Journal of Human Resources
ETOC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Human Resources 43(2):352-382 (2008);
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gundersen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kreider, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Articles

Food Stamps and Food Insecurity

What Can Be Learned in the Presence of Nonclassical Measurement Error?

Craig Gundersen and Brent Kreider

Policymakers have been puzzled to observe that food stamp households appear more likely to be food insecure than observationally similar eligible nonparticipating households. We reexamine this issue allowing for nonclassical reporting errors in food stamp participation and food insecurity. Extending the literature on partially identified parameters, we introduce a nonparametric framework that makes transparent what can be known about conditional probabilities when a binary outcome and conditioning variable are both subject to nonclassical measurement error. We find that the food insecurity paradox hinges on assumptions about the data that are not supported by the previous food stamp participation literature.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
B. Lavelle, M. D. Larsen, and C. Gundersen
Strategies for Surveys of American Indians
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2009; 73(2): 385 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. Gundersen, S. Garasky, and B. J. Lohman
Food Insecurity Is Not Associated with Childhood Obesity as Assessed Using Multiple Measures of Obesity
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1173 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2008 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System