HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Friedberg, L. Articles by Webb, A. Search for Related Content

Retirement and the Evolution of Pension Structure

Defined benefit pension plans have become considerably less common since the early 1980s, while defined contribution plans have spread. Previous research showed that defined benefit plans, with sharp incentives encouraging retirement after a certain point, contributed to the striking decline in American retirement ages. In this paper we find that the absence of age-related incentives in defined contribution plans leads workers to retire almost two years later on average, compared to workers with defined benefit plans. Thus, the evolution of pension structure can help explain recent increases in the typical retirement age, after decades of decline.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. W. Johnson Employment Opportunities at Older Ages: Introduction to the Special Issue Research on Aging, January 1, 2009; 31(1): 3 - 16. [PDF]

				G. B. T. Mermin, R. W. Johnson, and D. P. Murphy Why Do Boomers Plan to Work Longer? J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., September 1, 2007; 62(5): S286 - S294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Poterba, S. Venti, and D. A. Wise Economics of Health and Mortality Special Feature: The shift from defined benefit pensions to 401(k) plans and the pension assets of the baby boom cohort PNAS, August 14, 2007; 104(33): 13238 - 13243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]