Abstract
As baby boomers reach retirement age, demographic pressures on public programs may cause policy makers to cut benefits and encourage employment at later ages. But how much demand exists for older workers? This paper reports on a field experiment to determine hiring conditions for older women in entry-level jobs in two cities. A younger worker is more than 40 percent more likely to be offered an interview than is an older worker. No evidence is found to support taste-based discrimination as a reason for this differential, and some suggestive evidence is found to support statistical discrimination.
- Received September 2006.
- Accepted March 2007.
This open access article is distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) and is freely available online at: http://jhr.uwpress.org
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Older Workers and Retirement Security: A Review
- Age Discrimination in Hiring: Evidence from Age-Blind versus Non-Age-Blind Hiring Procedures
- Do Low-Wage Employers Discriminate against Applicants with Long Commutes?: Evidence from a Correspondence Experiment
- The Age Twist in Employers Gender Requests: Evidence from Four Job Boards
- Factors Determining Callbacks to Job Applications by the Unemployed: An Audit Study
- Employment Trends by Age in the United States: Why Are Older Workers Different?
- Detecting Discrimination in Audit and Correspondence Studies
- Obesity, Attractiveness, and Differential Treatment in Hiring: A Field Experiment