Class Size Reduction and Student Achievement

References

1. 1. Angrist Joshua,
   2. Lavy Victor

   . 1999. “Using Maimonides’ Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Scholastic Achievement.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2): 533–76.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Ballou Dale,
   2. Podrusky Michael

   . 1997. Teacher Pay and Teacher Quality. Kalamazoo, MI: The Upjohn Institute.
3. 1. Bohrnstedt George,
   2. Stecher Brian

   , eds. 1999. Class Size Reduction in California: Early Evaluation Findings, 1996–1998. Palo Alto: American Institutes for Research.
4. 1. Boyd Don,
   2. Lankford Hamilton,
   3. Loeb Susanna,
   4. Wyckoff James

   . 2003. “Analyzing the Determinants of the Matching of Public School Teachers to Jobs.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Number 9878.
5. 1. Ehrenberg Ronald,
   2. Brewer Dominic,
   3. Gamoran Adam,
   4. Willms J. Douglas

   2001. “Class Size and Student Achievement.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2(1):1–30.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. 1. Hanushek Eric.

   1999. “Some Findings from an Independent Investigation of the Tennessee STAR Experiment and from Other Investigations of Class Size Effects.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21(2):143–64.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
7. 1. Hanushek Eric,
   2. Kain John,
   3. Rivkin Seven

   . 2004. “Disruption versus Tiebout Improvement: The Costs and Benefits of Switching Schools.” Journal of Public Economics 88(9–10): 1721–46.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Hoxby Caroline Minter

   . 2000. “The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Population Variation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4):1239–86.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. 1. Jepsen Christopher,
   2. Rivkin Steven

   . 2002. Class Size Reduction, Teacher Quality, and Academic Achievement in California Elementary Public Schools. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
10. 1. Krueger Alan

    . 1999. “Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2):497–532.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 1. Krueger Alan,
    2. Whitmore Diane

    . 2001. “The Effect of Attending a Small Class in the Early Grades on College Test-Taking and Middle School Test Results: Evidence from Project STAR.” The Economic Journal 111(1):1–28.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Rivkin Steven

    . 2006. “Cumulative Nature of Learning and Specification Bias in Education Research.” Unpublished.
13. 1. Rivkin Steven G.,
    2. Hanushek Eric A.,
    3. Kain John F.

    2005. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.” Econometrica 73(2):417–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Ross Randy

    . 1999. “How Class-Size Reduction Harms Kids in Poor Neighborhoods.” Education Week, May 26.
15. 1. Sims David

    . 2003. “How Flexible is Educational Production? Combination Classes and Class Size Reduction in California.” Unpublished.
16. 1. Stecher Brian,
    2. Bohrnstedt George

    , eds. 2000. Class Size Reduction in California: The 1998–1999 Evaluation Findings. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
17. 1. Stecher Brian,
    2. Bohrnstedt George

    , eds. 2002. What Have We Learned about Class Size Reduction in California? Sacramento: California Department of Education.
18. 1. Todd Petra,
    2. Wolpin Kenneth I.

    2003. “On the Specification and Estimation of the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement.” Economic Journal 113(485): F3–F33.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Unlu Fatih

    . 2005. “California Class Size Reduction Reform: New Findings from the NAEP.” Unpublished.