Gender of Children, Bargaining Power, and Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in China

References

1. ↵
   1. Anderson Siwan

   . 2003. “Why Dowry Payments Declined with Modernization in Europe but Are Rising in India.” Journal of Political Economy 111(2):269–310.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Behrman Jere

   . 1997. “Intrahousehold Distribution and the Family.” In Handbook of Family and Population Economics, ed. Rosenzweig Mark, Stark Oded, 125–87. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.
3. ↵
   1. Bernhardt Kathryn

   . 1995. “The Inheritance Rights of Daughters: the Song Anomaly?” Modern China 21(3): 269–309.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Bray Francesca

   . 1997. Technology and Gender: Fabrics of Power in Late Imperial China. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
5. ↵
   1. Brown Philip

   . 2009. “Dowry and Intrahousehold Bargaining: Evidence from China.” Journal of Human Resources 44(1):25–46.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Chau Tai Wai,
   2. Li Hongbin,
   3. Liu Pak Wai,
   4. Zhang Junshen

   . 2007. “Testing the Collective Model of Household Labor Supply: Evidence from China.” China Economic Review 18(4):389–402.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Chen Joyce

   . 2006. “Migration and Imperfect Monitoring: Implications for Intra-Household Allocation.” American Economic Review, papers and proceedings 96(2):227–31.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Chiappori Pierre-Andre,
   2. Fortin Bernard,
   3. Lacroix Guy

   . 2002. “Marriage Market, Divorce Legislation, and Household Labor Supply.” Journal of Political Economy 110(1):37–72.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Das Gupta Monica,
   2. Jiang Zhenghua,
   3. Li Bohua,
   4. Xie Zhenming,
   5. Chung Woojin,
   6. Bae Hwa-Ok

   . 2003. “Why Is Son Preference So Persistent in East and South Asia? A Cross-Country Study of China, India and the Republic of Korea.” Journal of Development Studies 40(2):153–87.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Duflo Esther

    . 2003. “Grandmothers and Granddaughters: Old Age Pension and Intra-Household Allocation in South Africa.” World Bank Economic Review 17(1):1–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Ebenstein Avraham

    . 2009. “Estimating a Dynamic Model of Sex Selection in China.” Demography. Forthcoming.
12. ↵
    1. Ebenstein Avraham

    . 2010. “The “Missing Girls” of China and the Unintended Consequences of the One Child Policy.” Journal of Human Resources 45(1):87–115.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    1. Edlund Lena,
    2. Hongbin Li,
    3. Junjian Yi,
    4. Zhang Junshen

    . 2007. “Sex Ratios and Crime: Evidence from China’s One-Child Policy.” IZA Working Paper No. 3214.
14. ↵
    1. Folbre Nancy

    . 1984. “Market Opportunities, Genetic Endowments, and Intrafamily Resource Distribution: Comment.” American Economic Review 74(3): 518–20.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Garcia Marito

    . 1990. “Resource Allocation and Household Welfare: A Study of Personal Sources of Income on Food Consumption, Nutrition, and Health in the Philippines.” Hague: Institute of Social Science. Unpublished.
16. ↵
    1. Gustafsson Bojorn,
    2. Li Shi

    . 2000. “Economic Transformation and the Gender Earnings Gap in Urban China.” Journal of Population Economics 13(2):305–29.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Hoddinott John,
    2. Haddad Lawrence

    . 1995. “Does Female Income Share Influence Household Expenditures? Evidence from Cote D’Ivoire.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57(1):77–96.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Hoddinott John,
    2. Harold Alderman,
    3. Haddad Lawrence

    . 1997. “Testing Competing Models of Intrahousehold Allocation.” In Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Models, Methods, and Policy, ed. Haddad Lawrence, Hoddinott John, Alderman Harold, 129–41. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19. ↵
    1. Lee James,
    2. Wang Feng

    . 1999. One Quarter of Humanity: Malthusian Mythology and Chinese Realities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
20. ↵
    1. Lundberg Shelly,
    2. Pollak Robert A.,
    3. Wales Terence J.

    1997. “Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit.” Journal of Human Resources 32(3):463–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Mangyo Eiji

    . 2008. “Who Benefits More From Higher Household Consumption? The Intrahousehold Allocation of Nutrients in China.” Journal of Development Economics 86(2):296–312.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Manser Marilyn,
    2. Brown Murray

    . 1980. “Marriage and Household Decision-making: A Bargaining Analysis.” International Economic Review 21(2):31–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Maurer-Fazio Margaret,
    2. Hughes James

    . 2002. “The Effect of Market Liberalization on the Relative Earnings of Chinese Women.” Journal of Comparative Economics (30)4:709–31.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. McElroy Marjorie,
    2. Horney Mary Jean

    . 1981. “Nash-Bargained Household Decision: Toward a Generalization of the Theory of Demand.” International Economic Review 22(2):333–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Meng Lingsheng

    . 2009. “Prenatal Sex Selection and Missing Girls in China: Evidence from the Diffusion of Diagnostic Ultrasound.” College Park: University of Maryland. Unpublished
26. ↵
    1. Park Albert,
    2. Rukumnuaykit Pungpond

    . 2004. “Eat Drink Man Woman: Testing for Gender Bias in China Using Individual Nutrient Intake Data.” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Unpublished.
27. ↵
    1. Qian Nancy

    . 2008. “Missing Women and the Price of Tea in China: The Effect of Sex-Specific Income on Sex Imbalance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(3):1251–85.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Quisumbing Agnes,
    2. Maluccio John

    . 2003. “Resources at Marriage and Intrahousehold Allocation: Evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65(3):283–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Rao Vijayendra,
    2. Greene Margaret

    . 1991. “Marital Instability, Intrahousehold Bargaining, and their Implication for Fertility in Brazil.” Population Research Center Discussion Paper No. OSC-PRC91-3, NORC. Chicago: University of Chicago.
30. ↵
    1. Rozelle Scott,
    2. Dong Xiao-yuan,
    3. Zhang Linxiu,
    4. Mason Andrew

    . 2002. “Gender Wage Gaps in Post-Reform Rural China.” Pacific Economic Review 7(1):157–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Schultz Paul

    . 1990. “Testing the Neoclassical Model of Family Labor Supply and Fertility.” Journal of Human Resources 25(4):599–634.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Sen Amartya

    . 1990. “More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing.” New York Review of Books 3 (20):61–66.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Strauss John,
    2. Thomas Duncan

    . 2008. “Health over the Life Course.” In Handbooks of Development Economics, 4, ed. Schultz Paul, Strauss John, 3376–474. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Strauss John

    . 2009. “New Issues in Health and Development.” Los Angeles: University of Southern California. Unpublished.
35. ↵
    1. Thomas Duncan

    . 1990. “Intra-Household Resource Allocation: An Inferential Approach.” Journal of Human Resources 25(4):635–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Thomas Duncan

    . 1994. “Like Father, Like Son or Like Mother, Like Daughter: Parental Education and Child Health.” Journal of Human Resources 29(4):950–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Thomas Duncan,
    2. Dante Contreras,
    3. Frankenburg Elizabeth

    . 1997. “Distribution of Power Within the Household and Child Health.” Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
38. ↵
    1. Von Braun Joachim

    . 1988. “Effects of Technological Change in Agriculture on Food Consumption and Nutrition: Rice in a West African Setting.” World Development 16(9):1083–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Zhang Junshen,
    2. Chan William

    . 1999. “Dowry and Wife’s Welfare: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 107(4):786–808.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science