Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Feedback
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Research Highlights
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Feedback
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Research Highlights
  • Alerts
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
Research ArticleArticles

Slipping Anchor?

Testing the Vignettes Approach to Identification and Correction of Reporting Heterogeneity

Teresa Bago d’Uva, Maarten Lindeboom, Owen O’Donnell and Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal of Human Resources, October 2011, 46 (4) 875-906; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.46.4.875
Teresa Bago d’Uva
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maarten Lindeboom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Owen O’Donnell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eddy van Doorslaer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We propose tests of the two assumptions under which anchoring vignettes identify heterogeneity in reporting of categorical evaluations. Systematic variation in the perceived difference between any two vignette states is sufficient to reject vignette equivalence. Response consistency—the respondent uses the same response scale to evaluate the vignette and herself—is testable given sufficiently comprehensive objective indicators that independently identify response scales. Both assumptions are rejected for reporting of cognitive and physical functioning in a sample of older English individuals, although a weaker test resting on less stringent assumptions does not reject response consistency for cognition.

  • Received October 2009.
  • Accepted November 2010.

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 46, Issue 4
2 Oct 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Ed Board (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Slipping Anchor?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Slipping Anchor?
Teresa Bago d’Uva, Maarten Lindeboom, Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal of Human Resources Oct 2011, 46 (4) 875-906; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.46.4.875

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Slipping Anchor?
Teresa Bago d’Uva, Maarten Lindeboom, Owen O’Donnell, Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal of Human Resources Oct 2011, 46 (4) 875-906; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.46.4.875
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Where versus What: College Value-Added and Returns to Field of Study in Further Education
  • Female Executives and the Motherhood Penalty
  • The Effect of Fraternity Moratoriums on Alcohol Offenses and Sexual Assaults
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UWP

© 2023 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire