Detecting Discrimination in Audit and Correspondence Studies

References

1. ↵
   1. Aigner Dennis J.,
   2. Cain Glen

   . 1977. “Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 30(2):175–87.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Banerjee Abhijit,
   2. Bertrand Marianne,
   3. Datta Saugato,
   4. Mullainathan Sendhil

   . 2008. “Labor Market Discrimination in Delhi: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of Comparative Economics 38(1):14–27.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Becker Gary S.

   1971. The Economics of Discrimination, Second Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. ↵
   1. Bertrand Marianne,
   2. Mullainathan Sendhil

   . 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94(4):991–1013.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Bovenkerk F.,
   2. Gras M.,
   3. Ramsoedh D.

   . 1995. “Discrimination Against Migrant Workers and Ethnic Minorities in Access to Employment in the Netherlands.” International Migration Papers, No. 4. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
6. ↵
   1. Cornelißen Thomas

   . 2005. “Standard Errors of Marginal Effects in the Heteroskedastic Probit Model.” Institute of Quantitative Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 230. Hanover, Germany: University of Hanover.
7. ↵
   1. Dickinson David L.,
   2. Oaxaca Ronald L.

   . 2009. “Statistical Discrimination in Labor Markets: An Experimental Analysis.” Southern Economic Journal 71(1):16–31.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Fix Michael,
   2. Struyk Raymond

   . 1993. Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
9. ↵
   1. Gneezy Uri,
   2. List John A.

   . 2004. “Are the Disabled Discriminated Against in Product Markets? Evidence from Field Experiments.” Unpublished paper. Chicago: University of Chicago.
10. ↵
    1. Goldberg Pinelopi Koujianou

    . 1996. “Dealer Price Discrimination in New Car Purchases: Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Survey.” Journal of Political Economy 104(3):622–54.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Heckman James J.

    1998. “Detecting Discrimination.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(2):101–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Heckman James,
    2. Siegelman Peter

    . 1993. “The Urban Institute Audit Studies: Their Methods and Findings.” In Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America, ed. Fix, and Struyk, 187–258. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
13. ↵
    1. Johnson Norman L.,
    2. Kotz Samuel

    . 1970. Continuous Univariate Distributions—2. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. ↵
    1. Lahey Joanna N.

    2008. “Age, Women, and Hiring: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Human Resources 43(1):30–56.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. ↵
    1. Lahey Joanna N.,
    2. Beasley Ryan A.

    . 2009. “Computerizing Audit Studies.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70(3):508–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. ↵
    1. Lundberg Shelly J.,
    2. Startz Richard

    . 1983. “Private Discrimination and Social Intervention in Competitive Labor Markets.” American Economic Review 73(3):340–7.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Maddala G.S

    . 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
18. ↵
    1. Manski Charles F.

    1988. “Identification of Binary Response Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83(403):729–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Matzkin Rosa L.

    1992. “Nonparametric and Distribution-Free Estimation of the Binary Threshold Crossing and the Binary Choice Models.” Econometrica 60(2):239–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Mincy Ronald

    . 1993. “The Urban Institute Audit Studies: Their Research and Policy Context.” In Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America, ed. Fix, and Struyk, 165–86. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.
21. ↵
    1. Neumark David

    . 1996. “Sex Discrimination in Restaurant Hiring: An Audit Study.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(3):915–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Neumark David

    . 1999. “Wage Differentials by Race and Sex: The Roles of Taste Discrimination and Labor Market Information.” Industrial Relations 38(3):414–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Pager Devah

    . 2007. “The Use of Field Experiments for Studies of Employment Discrimination: Contributions, Critiques, and Directions for the Future.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 609(1):104–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Riach Peter A.,
    2. Rich Judith

    . 2002. “Field Experiments of Discrimination in the Market Place.” The Economic Journal 112(483):F480–518.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Riach Peter A.,
    2. Rich Judith

    . 2007. “An Experimental Investigation of Age Discrimination in the Spanish Labor Market.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 2654. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
26. ↵
    1. Rothschild Michael,
    2. Stiglitz Joseph E.

    . 1982. “A Model of Employment Outcomes Illustrating the Effect of the Structure of Information on the Level and Distribution of Income.” Economics Letters 10(3–4):231–6.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Smeeters B.,
    2. Nayer A.

    . 1998. “La Discrimination a l’Acces a l’Emploi en Raison de l’Origine Etrangere: le Cas de le Belgique.” International Migration Papers, No. 23. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
28. ↵
    1. Turner Margery,
    2. Fix Michael,
    3. Struyk Raymond

    . 1991. “Opportunities Denied, Opportunities Diminished: Racial Discrimination in Hiring.” UI Report 91-9. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
29. ↵
    1. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

    . 1996. Notice 915.002, May 22, http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/testers.html (viewed February 28. 2010).
30. 1. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

    , n.d. “Facts About Race/Color Discrimination,” http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/fs-race.pdf (viewed March 23, 2009).
31. ↵
    1. Williams Richard

    . 2009. “Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups.” South Bend, Indiana: Notre Dame University. Unpublished.