Do Mothers Decide? The Impact of Preferences in Healthcare

References

1. ↵
   1. Amu Olubusola,
   2. Rajendran Sasha,
   3. Bolaji Ibrahim I.

   1998. “Maternal Choice Alone Should Not Determine Method of Delivery.” British Medical Journal 317(7156):463–65.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Angrist Joshua D.

   2001. “Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models with Dummy Endogenous Regressors: Simple Strategies for Empirical Practice.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 19(1):2–28.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bergsjø Per,
   2. Schmidt Eberhardt,
   3. Pusch Detlev

   . 1983. “Differences in the Reported Frequencies of Some Obstetrical Interventions in Europe.” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 90(7):628–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Betrán Ana P.,
   2. Merialdi Mario,
   3. Lauer Jeremy A.,
   4. Bing-Shun Wang,
   5. Thomas Jane,
   6. Van Look Paul,
   7. Wagner Marsden

   . 2007. “Rates of Caesarean Section: Analysis of Global, Regional and National Estimates.” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 21(2):98–113.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Baicker Katherine,
   2. Buckles Kasey S.,
   3. Chandra Amitabh

   . 2006. “Geographic Variation in the Appropriate Use of Caesarean Delivery.” Health Affairs 25(5):w355–w367.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Blom Svein,
   2. Henriksen Kristin

   . 2008. “Levekår Blant Innvandrere i Norge 2005/2006.” Report 2008/5. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway, pp. 34–39.
7. ↵
   1. Daugstad Gunnlaug

   . 2007. “Fakta om Innvandrere og Deres Etterkommere.” Notat 2007/56. Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
8. ↵
   1. Gamble Jenny A.,
   2. Creedy Debra K.

   2000. “Women's Request for a Cesarean Section: a Critique of the Literature.” Birth 27(4):256–63.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Gortmaker Steven L.,
   2. Wise Paul H.

   1997. “The First Unjustice: Socioeconomic Disparities, Health Services Technology, and Infant Mortality.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:147–70.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Gregory Kimberly D.,
    2. Korst Lisa M.,
    3. Gornbein Jeffrey A.,
    4. Platt Lawrence D.

    2002. “Using Administrative Data to Identify Indications for Elective Primary Cesarean Delivery.” Health Services Research 37(5):1387–401.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Gruber Jon,
    2. Kim John,
    3. Mayzlin Dina

    . 1999. “Physician Fees and Procedure Intensity: the Case of Cesarean Delivery.” Journal of Health Economics 18(4):473–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Grytten Jostein,
    2. Monkerud Lars,
    3. Hagen Terje P.,
    4. Sørensen Rune,
    5. Eskild Anne,
    6. Skau Irene

    . 2011. “The Impact of Hospital Revenue on the Increase in Caesarean Sections in Norway. A Panel Data Analysis of Hospitals 1979–2005.” BMC Health Services Research 11(10):267.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Grytten Jostein,
    2. Monkerud Lars,
    3. Sørensen Rune

    . 2012. “Adoption of Diagnostic Technology and Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: a Test of the Practice Style Hypothesis in Norway.” Health Services Research 47(6):2169–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 1. Grytten Jostein,
    2. Skau Irene,
    3. Sørensen Rune

    . 2011. “Do Expert Patients Get Better Treatment than Others? Agency Discrimination and Statistical Discrimination in Obstetrics.” Journal of Health Economics 30(1):163–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Habiba Marwan,
    2. Kaminski Monique,
    3. Da Frè Monica,
    4. Marsal Karel,
    5. Bleker Otto,
    6. Librero Julian,
    7. Grandjean Héléne,
    8. Gratia Paul,
    9. Guaschino Secondo,
    10. Heyl Wolfgang,
    11. Taylor David,
    12. Cuttini Marina

    . 2006. “Caesarean Section on Request: a Comparison of Obstetricians' Attitudes in Eight European Countries.” BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113(6):647–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Hall Marion H.

    1987. “When a Woman Asks for a Caesarean Section.” British Medical Journal 294(6566):201.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
17. ↵
    1. Harris Lisa H

    . 2001. “Counseling Women about Choice.” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 15(1):93–107.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    1. Hemminki Elina

    . 1997. “Cesarean Sections: Women's Choice for Giving Birth?” Birth 24(2):124–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Holtz Sara A.,
    2. Stanton Cynthia K.

    2007. “Assessing the Quality of Cesarean Birth Data in the Demographic and Health Surveys.” Studies in Family Planning 38(1):47–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Inglehart Ronald,
    2. Welzel Christian

    . 2010. “Changing Mass Priorities: the Link between Modernization and Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 8(2):551–67.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Irgens Lorentz M

    . 2000. “The MFR of Norway. Epidemiological Research and Surveillance throughout 30 Years.” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 79(6):435–39.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Jurdi Rozzet,
    2. Khawaja Marwan

    . 2004. “Caesarean Section Rates in the Arab Region: a Cross-National Study.” Health Policy and Planning 19(2):101–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. ↵
    1. Keeler Emmet B.,
    2. Brodie Mollyann

    . 1993. “Economic Incentives in the Choice between Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section.” Milbank Quarterly 71(3):365–404.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Khawaja Marwan,
    2. Choueiry Nathalie,
    3. Jurdi Rozzet

    . 2009. “Hospital-Based Caesarean Section in the Arab Region: an Overview.”Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 15(2):458–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. ↵
    1. Kolås Toril,
    2. Hofoss Dag,
    3. Daltveit Anne K.,
    4. Nilsen Stein T.,
    5. Henriksen Tore,
    6. Häger Renate,
    7. Ingemarsson Ingemar,
    8. Øian Pål

    . 2003. “Indications for Cesarean Deliveries in Norway.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188(4):864–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Lavender Tina G.,
    2. Justus Hofmeyr,
    3. Neilson James P.,
    4. Kingdon Carol,
    5. Gyte Gillian M. L.

    2006. “Caesarean Section for NonMedical Reasons at Term (Review).” Cochrane Data base of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3. http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab004660.html (accessed July 11, 2011).
27. ↵
    1. MacKenzie Ian Z

    . 1999. “Should Women Who Elect to Have Caesarean Sections Pay for Them?” British Medical Journal 318(7190):1070.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. McCourt Chris,
    2. Weaver Jane,
    3. Statham Helen,
    4. Beake Sarah,
    5. Gamble Jenny,
    6. Creedy Debra

    . 2007. “Elective Cesarean Section and Decision Making: a Critical Review of the Literature.” Birth 34(1):65–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Measure DHS

    . 2011.“Demographic and Health Surveys.” http://measuredhs.com/ (accessed July 11, 2011).
30. ↵
    Ministry of Health. 2002. “Behovsbasert Finansiering av Spesialisthelsetjenesten.” Oslo: Ministry of Health.
31. ↵
    1. Moini Ashraf,
    2. Riazi Kiarash,
    3. Ebrahimi A.,
    4. Ostovan N.

    2007. “Caesarean Section Rates in Teaching Hospitals of Tehran: 1999–2003.” Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal 13(2):457–60.

    OpenUrlPubMed
32. ↵
    1. Notzon Francis C.,
    2. Placek Paul J.,
    3. Taffel Selma M.

    1987. “Comparisons of National Cesarean Section Rates.” The New England Journal of Medicine 316(7): 386–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    OECD, 2010. “OECD Health Data 2010—Selected Data. Healthcare activities.” http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=350 (accessed July 11, 2011).
34. ↵
    1. Paterson-Brown Sara

    . 1998. “Controversies in Management. Should Doctors Perform an Elective Caesarean Section on Request? Yes, as Long as the Woman Is Fully Informed.” British Medical Journal 317(7156):462–65.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
35. ↵
    1. Shah Archana,
    2. Faundes Anibal,
    3. Machoki M. Imunya,
    4. Bataglia Vincente,
    5. Amokrane Faouzi,
    6. Donner Allan,
    7. Mugerwa Kidza,
    8. Carroli Guillermo,
    9. Fawole Bukola,
    10. Langer Ana,
    11. Wolomby Jean José,
    12. Naravaez Alberto,
    13. Nafiou Idi,
    14. Kublickas Marius,
    15. Valladares Eliette,
    16. Velasco Alejandro,
    17. Zavaleta Nelly,
    18. Neves Isilda,
    19. Villar José

    . 2008. “Methodological Considerations in Implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 86(2):126–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Shearer Elizabeth Conner

    . 1983. “How Do Parents Really Feel after Cesarean Birth?” Birth 10(2):91–92.

    OpenUrlPubMed
37. ↵
    1. Stafford Randall S

    . 1990. “Cesarean Section Use and Source of Payment: an Analysis of California Hospital Discharge Abstracts.” American Journal of Public Health 80(3): 313–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Stanton Cynthia K.,
    2. Dubourg Dominique,
    3. Brouwere Vincent De,
    4. Pujades Mar,
    5. Ronsmans Carine

    . 2005. “Reliability of Data on Caesarean Sections in Developing Countries.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83(6):449–55.

    OpenUrlPubMed
39. ↵
    1. Stanton Cynthia K.,
    2. Holtz Sara A.

    , 2006. “Levels and Trends in Cesarean Birth in the Developing World.” Studies in Family Planning 37(1):41–48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
40. ↵
    Statistics Norway. 2000. “Norwegian Standard Classification of Education. Revised 2000.” Oslo/Kongsvinger: Statistics Norway.
41. ↵
    Statistics Norway. 2009. “StatBank Norway, 02 Population, Table 05184 Immigrants by Sex and Country Background.” http://statbank.ssb.no//statistikkbanken/default_fr.asp?PLanguage=1 (accessed July 11, 2011).
42. ↵
    1. Stephenson Patricia A,
    2. Bakoula Chryssa,
    3. Hemminki Elina,
    4. Knudsen Lars,
    5. Levasseur M.,
    6. Schenker Joseph G.,
    7. Stembera Zdenek,
    8. Tiba J.,
    9. Verbrugge Hans P.,
    10. Zupan J.,
    11. Wagner Marsden G.,
    12. Karagas Margaret,
    13. Pizacani B.,
    14. Pineault Raynald,
    15. Tuimala Risto,
    16. Houd Susanne,
    17. Lomas Jonathan

    . 1993. “Patterns of Use of Obstetrical Interventions in 12 Countries.” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 7(1):45–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
43. ↵
    1. Tranquilli Andrea Luigi,
    2. Garzetti Giuseppe Gioele

    . 1997. “A New Ethical and Clinical Dilemma in Obstetric Pratice: Cesarean Section ‘on Maternal Request’.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 177(1):245–46.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Wagner Marsden

    . 2000. “Choosing Caesarean Section.” Lancet 356(9242):1677–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. ↵
    1. Wax Joseph R.,
    2. Cartin Angelina,
    3. Pinette Michael G.,
    4. Blackstone Jacquelyn

    . 2004. “Patient Choice Cesarean: an Eevidence-Based Review.” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey 59(8):601–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Welzel Christian,
    2. Inglehart Ronald,
    3. Klingemann Hans-Dieter

    . 2003. “The Theory of Human Development: a Cross-Cultural Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 42(3):341–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    World Health Organization. 2011a. “European Health for All Data base (HFA-DB).” http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/data-and-evidence/databases/european-health-for-all-database-hfa-db2 (accessed July 11, 2011).
48. ↵
    World Health Organization. 2011b. “Making Pregnancy Safer. WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Observatory (GHO).” www.who.int/making_pregnancy_safer/health_systems/global_survey/en/index.html (accessed July 11, 2011).
49. ↵
    1. Young Diony

    . 2006. “Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request: Was the NIH Conference Based on a Faulty Premise?” Birth 33(3):171–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science