Incorporating Employee Heterogeneity into Default Rules for Retirement Plan Selection

References

1. 1. Arano Kathleen,
   2. Parker Carl,
   3. Terry Rory L.

   2010. “Gender-Based Risk Aversion and Retirement Asset Allocation.” Economic Inquiry 48(1):147–55.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Barsky Robert B.,
   2. Juster F. Thomas,
   3. Kimball Miles S.,
   4. Shapiro Matthew D.

   1997. “Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2):537–79.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 1. Bernheim B. Douglas,
   2. Fradkin Andrey,
   3. Popov Igor

   . 2011. “The Welfare Economics of Default Options: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of 401(k) Plans.” NBER Working Paper 17587, National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. 1. Beshears John,
   2. Choi James J.,
   3. Laibson David,
   4. Madrian Brigitte C.

   2008. “The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Savings Outcomes: Evidence from the United States.” In Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas, ed. Kay Stephen J., Sinha Tapen, 59–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. 1. Bodie Zvi,
   2. Marcus Alan J.,
   3. Merton Robert C.

   1998. “Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution Pension Plans. What Are the Real Trade-offs?” In Pensions in the U.S. Economy, ed. Bodie Zvi, Shoven John, Wise David. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
6. 1. Brown Jeffrey R.,
   2. Weisbenner Scott J.

   2007. “Who Chooses Defined Contribution Plans?” NBER Working Paper 12842, National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. 1. Carroll Gabriel D.,
   2. Choi James J.,
   3. Laibson David,
   4. Madrian Brigitte C.,
   5. Mertrick Andrew

   . 2009. “Optimal Defaults and Active Decisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4):1639–74.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
8. 1. Chetty Raj

   . 2006. “A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion.” In American Economic Review 96(5):1821–34.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Choi James J.,
   2. Laibson David,
   3. Madrian Brigitte C.

   2005. “Are Empowerment and Education Enough? Underdiversification in 401(k) Plans.” In Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2):151–98.
10. 1. Choi James J.,
    2. Laibson David,
    3. Madrian Brigitte C.,
    4. Metrick Andrew

    . 2004. “For Better or For Worse: Default Effect and 401(k) Savings Behavior.” In Perspectives in the Economics of Aging, ed. Wise David A. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
11. 1. Clark Robert L.,
    2. Pitts M. Melinda

    . 1999. “Faculty Choice of Pension Plan: Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution.” Industrial Relations 38(1):18–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Clark Robert L.,
    2. Ghent Linda S.,
    3. McDermed Ann A.

    2006. “Pension Plan Choice among University Faculty.” Southern Economic Journal 72(3):560–77.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. DellaVigna Stefano

    . 2009. “Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(2):315–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. GAO. 2008. “Defined Benefit Pensions: Plan Freeze Affect Millions of Participants and May Post Retirement Income Challenges.” Report Number: GAO–08–817, General Accounting Office. Washington D.C.: GPO.
15. 1. Goldstein Daniel,
    2. Johnson Eric J.,
    3. Sharpe William F.

    2008. “Choosing Outcomes versus Choosing Products: Consumer-Focused Retirement Investment Advice.” Journal of Consumer Research 35:440–56.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 1. Handel Benjamin

    . 2009. “Adverse Selection and Switching Costs in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.” Chicago, Ill.: Northwestern University. Unpublished.
17. Ibbotson. 2008. Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation 2008 Yearbook. Chicago, Ill: Ibbotson Associates.
18. 1. Imbens Guido,
    2. Lemieux Thomas

    . 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):615–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Johnson Eric J.,
    2. Goldstein Daniel

    . 2003. “Do Defaults Save Lives?” Science 302: 1338–39.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. Kimball Miles S.,
    2. Sahm Claudia R.,
    3. Shapiro Matthew D.

    2009. “Risk Preferences in the PSID: Individual Imputations and Family Covariation.” American Economic Review 99(2):363–68.

    OpenUrlPubMed
21. 1. Kocherlakota Narayana R.

    1996. “The Equity Premium: It's Still a Puzzle.” Journal of Economic Literature 34(1):42–71.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
22. 1. Kruse Douglas L.

    1995. “Pension Substitution in the 1980s: Why the Shift toward Defined Contribution?” Industrial Relations 34(2):218–41.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Lachance Marie-Eve,
    2. Mitchell Olivia S.,
    3. Smetters Kent

    . 2003. “Guaranteeing Defined Contribution Pensions: The Option to Buy Back a Defined Benefit Promise.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 70(1):1–16.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Lee David S.,
    2. Lemieux Thomas

    . 2009. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” NBER Working Paper 14723, National Bureau of Economic Research.
25. 1. Madrian Brigitte C.,
    2. Shea Dennis F.

    2001. “The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4):1149–1525.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. 1. Manchester Colleen F.

    “The Effect of Pension Plan Type on Retirement Age: Distinguishing Plan Incentives from Preferences.” Southern Economic Journal 77(1):104–25.
27. 1. Mehra Rajnish,
    2. Prescott Edward C.

    1985. “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle.” Journal of Monetary Economics 15:145–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Milevsky Moshe A.,
    2. Promislow S. David

    . 2004. “Florida's Pension Election: From DB to DC and Back.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 71(3):381–404.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Mitchell Olivia S.,
    2. Mottola Gary R.,
    3. Utkus Stephen P.,
    4. Yamaguchi Takeshi

    . 2009. “Default, Framing, and Spillover Effects: The Case of Lifecycle Funds in 401(K) Plans.” NBER Working Paper 15108, National Bureau of Economic Research.
30. 1. Papke Leslie

    . 1999. “Are 401(k) Plans Replacing Other Employer-Provided Pensions? Evidence from Panel Data.” Journal of Human Resources 34(2):346–69.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Papke Leslie

    . 2004. “Pension Plan Choice in the Public Sector: The Case of Michigan State Employees.” National Tax Journal 57(2):329–39.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Shoven John B.,
    2. Sialm Clemens

    . 1998. “Long Run Asset Allocation for Retirement Savings.” Journal of Private Portfolio Management, pp. 13–26.
33. 1. Shoven John B.,
    2. Sialm Clemens

    . 2003. “Asset Location in Tax-Deferred and Conventional Savings Accounts.” Journal of Public Economics 88:23–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Thaler Richard H.,
    2. Sunstein Cass R.

    2003. “Libertarian Paternalism.” In American Economic Review 93(2):175–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. Towers-Perrin. 2003. “Back to the Future: Redefining Retirement in the 21st Century.” http://www.towersperrin.com/tp/getwebcachedoc?country=global&webc=HRS/USA/2004/200401/2003_redefining_ret.pdf
36. Vanguard. 2009. “How Americans Save 2009.” Available at: https://institutional.vanguard.com/iam/pdf/HAS09.pdf
37. 1. Yang Tongxuan

    . 2005. “Understanding the Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution Choice.” Pension Research Council Working Paper Series 2005–04. Philadelphia: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.