Incorporating Employee Heterogeneity into Default Rules for Retirement Plan Selection

References

1. ↵
   1. Arano Kathleen,
   2. Parker Carl,
   3. Terry Rory L.

   2010. “Gender-Based Risk Aversion and Retirement Asset Allocation.” Economic Inquiry 48(1):147–55.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Barsky Robert B.,
   2. Juster F. Thomas,
   3. Kimball Miles S.,
   4. Shapiro Matthew D.

   1997. “Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2):537–79.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bernheim B. Douglas,
   2. Fradkin Andrey,
   3. Popov Igor

   . 2011. “The Welfare Economics of Default Options: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of 401(k) Plans.” NBER Working Paper 17587, National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. ↵
   1. Beshears John,
   2. Choi James J.,
   3. Laibson David,
   4. Madrian Brigitte C.

   2008. “The Importance of Default Options for Retirement Savings Outcomes: Evidence from the United States.” In Lessons from Pension Reform in the Americas, ed. Kay Stephen J., Sinha Tapen, 59–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. 1. Bodie Zvi,
   2. Marcus Alan J.,
   3. Merton Robert C.

   1998. “Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution Pension Plans. What Are the Real Trade-offs?” In Pensions in the U.S. Economy, ed. Bodie Zvi, Shoven John, Wise David. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
6. ↵
   1. Brown Jeffrey R.,
   2. Weisbenner Scott J.

   2007. “Who Chooses Defined Contribution Plans?” NBER Working Paper 12842, National Bureau of Economic Research.
7. ↵
   1. Carroll Gabriel D.,
   2. Choi James J.,
   3. Laibson David,
   4. Madrian Brigitte C.,
   5. Mertrick Andrew

   . 2009. “Optimal Defaults and Active Decisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4):1639–74.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Chetty Raj

   . 2006. “A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion.” In American Economic Review 96(5):1821–34.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Choi James J.,
   2. Laibson David,
   3. Madrian Brigitte C.

   2005. “Are Empowerment and Education Enough? Underdiversification in 401(k) Plans.” In Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2):151–98.
10. ↵
    1. Choi James J.,
    2. Laibson David,
    3. Madrian Brigitte C.,
    4. Metrick Andrew

    . 2004. “For Better or For Worse: Default Effect and 401(k) Savings Behavior.” In Perspectives in the Economics of Aging, ed. Wise David A. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press.
11. ↵
    1. Clark Robert L.,
    2. Pitts M. Melinda

    . 1999. “Faculty Choice of Pension Plan: Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution.” Industrial Relations 38(1):18–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Clark Robert L.,
    2. Ghent Linda S.,
    3. McDermed Ann A.

    2006. “Pension Plan Choice among University Faculty.” Southern Economic Journal 72(3):560–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. DellaVigna Stefano

    . 2009. “Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(2):315–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    GAO. 2008. “Defined Benefit Pensions: Plan Freeze Affect Millions of Participants and May Post Retirement Income Challenges.” Report Number: GAO–08–817, General Accounting Office. Washington D.C.: GPO.
15. ↵
    1. Goldstein Daniel,
    2. Johnson Eric J.,
    3. Sharpe William F.

    2008. “Choosing Outcomes versus Choosing Products: Consumer-Focused Retirement Investment Advice.” Journal of Consumer Research 35:440–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Handel Benjamin

    . 2009. “Adverse Selection and Switching Costs in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.” Chicago, Ill.: Northwestern University. Unpublished.
17. ↵
    Ibbotson. 2008. Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation 2008 Yearbook. Chicago, Ill: Ibbotson Associates.
18. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido,
    2. Lemieux Thomas

    . 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):615–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Johnson Eric J.,
    2. Goldstein Daniel

    . 2003. “Do Defaults Save Lives?” Science 302: 1338–39.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. Kimball Miles S.,
    2. Sahm Claudia R.,
    3. Shapiro Matthew D.

    2009. “Risk Preferences in the PSID: Individual Imputations and Family Covariation.” American Economic Review 99(2):363–68.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. ↵
    1. Kocherlakota Narayana R.

    1996. “The Equity Premium: It's Still a Puzzle.” Journal of Economic Literature 34(1):42–71.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Kruse Douglas L.

    1995. “Pension Substitution in the 1980s: Why the Shift toward Defined Contribution?” Industrial Relations 34(2):218–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Lachance Marie-Eve,
    2. Mitchell Olivia S.,
    3. Smetters Kent

    . 2003. “Guaranteeing Defined Contribution Pensions: The Option to Buy Back a Defined Benefit Promise.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 70(1):1–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Lee David S.,
    2. Lemieux Thomas

    . 2009. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” NBER Working Paper 14723, National Bureau of Economic Research.
25. ↵
    1. Madrian Brigitte C.,
    2. Shea Dennis F.

    2001. “The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4):1149–1525.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Manchester Colleen F.

    “The Effect of Pension Plan Type on Retirement Age: Distinguishing Plan Incentives from Preferences.” Southern Economic Journal 77(1):104–25.
27. ↵
    1. Mehra Rajnish,
    2. Prescott Edward C.

    1985. “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle.” Journal of Monetary Economics 15:145–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Milevsky Moshe A.,
    2. Promislow S. David

    . 2004. “Florida's Pension Election: From DB to DC and Back.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 71(3):381–404.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Mitchell Olivia S.,
    2. Mottola Gary R.,
    3. Utkus Stephen P.,
    4. Yamaguchi Takeshi

    . 2009. “Default, Framing, and Spillover Effects: The Case of Lifecycle Funds in 401(K) Plans.” NBER Working Paper 15108, National Bureau of Economic Research.
30. ↵
    1. Papke Leslie

    . 1999. “Are 401(k) Plans Replacing Other Employer-Provided Pensions? Evidence from Panel Data.” Journal of Human Resources 34(2):346–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Papke Leslie

    . 2004. “Pension Plan Choice in the Public Sector: The Case of Michigan State Employees.” National Tax Journal 57(2):329–39.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Shoven John B.,
    2. Sialm Clemens

    . 1998. “Long Run Asset Allocation for Retirement Savings.” Journal of Private Portfolio Management, pp. 13–26.
33. ↵
    1. Shoven John B.,
    2. Sialm Clemens

    . 2003. “Asset Location in Tax-Deferred and Conventional Savings Accounts.” Journal of Public Economics 88:23–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Thaler Richard H.,
    2. Sunstein Cass R.

    2003. “Libertarian Paternalism.” In American Economic Review 93(2):175–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    Towers-Perrin. 2003. “Back to the Future: Redefining Retirement in the 21st Century.” http://www.towersperrin.com/tp/getwebcachedoc?country=global&webc=HRS/USA/2004/200401/2003_redefining_ret.pdf
36. ↵
    Vanguard. 2009. “How Americans Save 2009.” Available at: https://institutional.vanguard.com/iam/pdf/HAS09.pdf
37. ↵
    1. Yang Tongxuan

    . 2005. “Understanding the Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution Choice.” Pension Research Council Working Paper Series 2005–04. Philadelphia: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.