Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

Discrimination Begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments

Prashant Bharadwaj and Leah K. Lakdawala
Journal of Human Resources, January 2013, 48 (1) 71-113; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.1.71
Prashant Bharadwaj
Prashant Bharadwaj is an assistant professor in the Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego. Leah K. Lakdawala is an assistant professor in the Department of Economics at Michigan State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leah K. Lakdawala
Prashant Bharadwaj is an assistant professor in the Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego. Leah K. Lakdawala is an assistant professor in the Department of Economics at Michigan State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aizer Anna,
    2. Cunha Flavio
    . 2010. “Child Endowments, Parental Investments and the Development of Human Capital.” Brown University Working Paper.
  2. ↵
    1. Almond Douglas,
    2. Chay Kenneth Y.,
    3. Lee David S.
    2002. “Does Low Birth Weight Matter? Evidence from the U.S. Population of Twin Births.” University of California, Berkeley, Center for Labor Economics Working Paper 53.
  3. ↵
    1. Almond Douglas,
    2. Mazumder Bhashkar
    . 2005. “The 1918 Influenza Pandemic and Subsequent Health Outcomes: An Analysis of SIPP Data.” American Economic Review 95(2):58–262.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Arnold Fred,
    2. Kishor Sunita,
    3. Roy T.K.
    2002. “Sex-Selective Abortions in India.” Population and Development Review 28(4):759–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Ashenfelter Orley,
    2. Rouse Cecilia
    . 1998. “Income, Schooling, and Ability: Evidence from a New Sample of Identical Twins.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(1):253–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Barcellos Silvia Helena,
    2. Carvalho Leandra,
    3. Lleras-Muney Adriana
    . 2010. “Child Gender and Parental Investments in India: Are Boys and Girls Treated Differently?” UCLA. Unpublished.
  7. ↵
    1. Behrman Jere R.,
    2. Rosenzweig Mark R.
    2004. “Returns to Birthweight.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86(2):586–601.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Behrman Jere R.,
    2. Rosenzweig Mark R.,
    3. Taubman Paul
    . 1994. “Endowments and the Allocation of Schooling in the Family and in the Marriage Market: The Twins Experiment.” Journal of Political Economy 102(6):1131–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Bhalotra Sonia,
    2. Cochrane Tom
    . 2010. “Where Have all the Young Girls Gone? On the Rising Trend in Sex Selection in India.” University of Bristol Working Paper.
  10. ↵
    1. Bharadwaj Prashant,
    2. Eberhard Juan
    . 2010. “Atmospheric Air Pollution and Birth Weight.” Working Paper.
  11. ↵
    1. Black Sandra E.,
    2. Devereux Paul J.,
    3. Salvanes Kjell
    . 2007. “From the Cradle to the Labor Market? The Effect of Birth Weight on Adult Outcomes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(1):409–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Blencowe Paul,
    2. Vandelaur Jos,
    3. Roper Martha,
    4. Cousens Simon
    . 2010. “Tetanus Toxoid Immunization to Reduce Mortality from Neonatal Tetanus.” International Journal of Epidemiology 39(suppl 1): i102–i109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Dahl Gordon,
    2. Moretti Enrico
    . 2008. “The Demand for Sons: Evidence from Divorce, Fertility, and Shotgun Marriage.” Review of Economic Studies 75(4):1085–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Drèze Jean,
    2. Sen Amartya Kumar
    . 1992. Hunger and Public Action. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
    1. Dugger Celia W.
    2001. “Abortion in India Is Tipping Scales Sharply Against Girls.” New York Times. April 22.
  14. The Economist. 2010. “The Worldwide War on Baby Girls.” March 4.
  15. ↵
    1. Garg Ashish,
    2. Mordoch Jonathan
    . 1998. “Sibling Rivalry and the Gender Gap: Evidence from Child Health Outcomes in Ghana.” Journal of Population Economics 11(4):471–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Gechter Michael
    . 2010. “Examining the Sex Ratio in Pakistan.” Unpublished.
  17. ↵
    1. Gortmaker Steven L.
    1979. “The Effects of Prenatal Care upon the Health of the Newborn.” American Journal of Public Health 69(7):653–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Gupta Monica Das
    . 1987. “Selective Discrimination Against Female Children in Rural Punjab, India.” Population and Development Review 13(1):77–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Gupta Monica Das,
    2. Zhenghua Jiang,
    3. Bohua Li,
    4. Zhenming Xie,
    5. Chung Woojin,
    6. Hwa-Ok Bae
    . 2003. “Why Is Son Preference So Persistent in East and South Asia? A Cross-Country Study of China, India and the Republic of Korea.” Journal of Development Studies 40(2):153–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Gupta Shiv D.,
    2. Keyl Penelope M.
    1998. “Effectiveness of Prenatal Tetanus Toxoid Immunization Against Neonatal Tetanus in a Rural Area in India.” Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 17(4):316–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Hu Luojia,
    2. Schlosser Analia
    . 2011. “Prenatal Sex Selection and Girls' Well-Being: Evidence from India.” IZA Working Paper 5562.
  22. ↵
    1. Hua Cai
    . 2001. “A Society Without Fathers or Husbands: The Na of China.” Cambridge: MIT Press.
  23. ↵
    1. Jayachandran Seema,
    2. Kuziemko Ilyana
    . 2011. “Why Do Mothers Breastfeed Girls Less Than Boys? Evidence and Implications for Child Health in India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 26(3):1485–538.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Jha Prabhat,
    2. Kumar Rajesh,
    3. Vasa Priya,
    4. Dhingra Neeraj,
    5. Thiruchelvam Deva,
    6. Moineddin Rahim
    . 2006. “Low Male-to-Female Sex Ratio of Children Born in India: National Survey of 1.1 Million Households.” The Lancet 367(9506):211–18.
    OpenUrl
    1. Katz Neil S.
    2003. “Abortion in India: Selecting by Gender.” The Washington Post. May 20.
  25. ↵
    1. Kling Jeffrey R.,
    2. Liebman Jeffrey B.,
    3. Katz Lawrence F.
    2007. “Supplement to ‘Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects’.” Econometrica 75(1):83–119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Lhila Aparna,
    2. Simon Kosali I.
    2008. “Prenatal Health Investment Decisions: Does the Child's Sex Matter?” Demography 45(4):885–905.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Loughran David S.,
    2. Datar Ashlesha,
    3. Kilburn M. Rebecca
    . 2004. “The Interactive Effect of Birth Weight and Parental Investment on Child Test Scores.” RAND Labor and Population Working Paper WR-168.
  28. ↵
    1. Meng Lingsheng
    . 2010. “Prenatal Sex Selection and Missing Girls in China: Evidence from the Diffusion of Diagnostic Ultrasound.” Working Paper.
  29. ↵
    1. Miller Barbara D.
    2001. “Female-Selective Abortion in Asia: Patterns, Policies, and Debates.” American Anthropologist 103(4):1083–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Osmani Siddiq,
    2. Sen Amartya
    . 2003. “The Hidden Penalties of Gender Inequality: Fetal Origins of Ill-health.” Economics & Human Biology 1(1):105–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Oster Emily
    . 2009. “Proximate Causes of Population Gender Imbalance in India.” Demography 46(2):325–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Pitt Mark M.,
    2. Rosenzweig Mark R.
    1990. “Estimating the Intrahousehold Incidence of Illness: Child Health and Gender-Inequality in the Allocation of Time.” International Economic Review 31(4):969–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Pörtner Claus C.
    2010. “Sex-selective Abortions, Fertility and Birth Spacing.” Working Paper.
  33. ↵
    1. Prachuabmoh Visid,
    2. Knodel John,
    3. Alers Oscar J.
    1974. “Preference for Sons, Desire for Additional Children, and Family Planning in Thailand.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 36(3):601–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Qian Nancy
    . 2008. “Missing Women and the Price of Tea in China: The Effect of Sex-specific Earnings on Sex Imbalance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(3):1251–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Rahman Makhlisur,
    2. Chen Lincoln C.,
    3. Chakraborty J.,
    4. Yunus M.D.,
    5. Chowdhury A.I.,
    6. Sarder A.M.,
    7. Bhatia Shushum,
    8. Curlin George T.
    1982. “Use of Tetanus Toxoid for the Prevention of Neonatal Tetanus. 1. Reduction of Neonatal Mortality by Immunization of Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women in Rural Bangladesh.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 60(2):261–67.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Rosenzweig Mark R.,
    2. Zhang Junsen
    . 2009. “Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birth Weight and China's ‘One-Child’ Policy.” Review of Economic Studies 76(3):1149–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Ulizzi L.,
    2. Zonta L.
    2002. “Sex Differential Patterns in Perinatal Deaths in Italy.” Human Biology 74(6):879–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Zubair F.,
    2. Dahl E.,
    3. Sher Shah S.,
    4. Ahmed M.,
    5. Brosig B.
    2006. “Gender Preferences and Demand for Preconception Sex Selection: A Survey Among Pregnant Women in Pakistan.” Human Reproduction 22(2):605–609.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Zupan J.,
    2. Aahman E.
    2005. “Perinatal Mortality for the Year 2000: Estimates Developed by WHO.” Geneva: World Health Organization.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 48 (1)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 48, Issue 1
1 Jan 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Discrimination Begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Discrimination Begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments
Prashant Bharadwaj, Leah K. Lakdawala
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2013, 48 (1) 71-113; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.48.1.71

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Discrimination Begins in the Womb: Evidence of Sex-Selective Prenatal Investments
Prashant Bharadwaj, Leah K. Lakdawala
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2013, 48 (1) 71-113; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.48.1.71
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Methodology and Estimation Issues
    • III. Data
    • IV. Results
    • V. Conclusion
    • Appendix 1 Calculating the contribution of differential tetanus immunizations to excess female mortality
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Can Abortion Mitigate Transitory Shocks?: Demographic Consequences Under Son Preference
  • Can Rights-Based Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Childrens Nutrition at scale? Evidence from Indias Maternity Benefit Program
  • The Intergenerational Effects of Marital Transfers: Evidence from India
  • Where There Is a Will: Fertility Behavior and Sex Bias in Large Families
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • War-Driven Permanent Emigration, Sex Ratios, and Female Labor Force Participation
  • The Impact of High School Financial Education on Financial Knowledge and Saving Choices
  • Who Benefits from a Smaller Honors Track?
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire