Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

College Major Choice and the Gender Gap

Basit Zafar
Journal of Human Resources, July 2013, 48 (3) 545-595; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.3.545
Basit Zafar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Altonji Joseph
    . 1993. “The Demand for and Return to Education when Education Outcomes are Uncertain.” Journal of Labor Economics 11(1):48–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Altonji Joseph,
    2. Blank Rebecca
    . 1999. “Race and Gender in the Labor Market.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3c, ed. Ashenfelter Orley, Card David, 3144–3259. Elsevier Science.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Arcidiacono Peter
    . 2004. “Ability Sorting and the Returns to College Major.” Journal of Econometrics 121(1–2):343–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Arcidiacono Peter,
    2. Hotz Joseph,
    3. Kang Songman
    . 2012. “Modeling College Major Choices using Elicited Measures of Expectations and Counterfactuals.” Journal of Econometrics 166(1):3–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Bagwell Laurie,
    2. Bernheim B. Douglas
    . 1996. “Veblen Effects in a Theory of Conspicuous Consumption.” American Economic Review 86(3):349–73.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Bamberger Gustavo
    . 1986. “Occupation Choice: The Role of Undergraduate Education.” Dissertation, University of Chicago.
  7. ↵
    1. Baron-Cohen Simon
    . 2003. The Essential Difference: Men, Women, and the Extreme Male Brain. London: Allen Lane.
  8. ↵
    1. Barres Ben
    . 2006. “Does Gender Matter?” Nature 442:133–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Becker Gary,
    2. Stigler George
    . 1977. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.” American Economic Review 67(2):76–90.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Beffy Magali,
    2. Fougere Denis,
    3. Maurel Arnaud
    . 2012. “Choosing the Field of Study in Post-Secondary Education: Do Expected Earnings Matter?” Review of Economics and Statistics 94(1):334–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Benitez-Silva Hugo,
    2. Buchinsky Moshe,
    3. Chan Hiu Man,
    4. Cheidvasser Sofia,
    5. Rust John
    . 2004. “How Large is the Bias in Self-Reported Disability?” Journal of Applied Econometrics 19(6):649–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Bertrand Marianne,
    2. Mullainathan Sendhil
    . 2001. “Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data.” American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 91(2):67–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Bertrand Marianne,
    2. Goldin Claudia,
    3. Katz Lawrence
    . 2010. “Dynamics of the Gender Gap for Young Professionals in the Financial and Corporate Sectors.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(3):228–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Bound John,
    2. Brown Charles,
    3. Mathiowetz Nancy
    . 2001. “Measurement Error in Survey Data.” In Handbook of Econometrics V. 5, ed. Leamer Edward, Heckman James, 3705–3843. Elsevier Science.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Breen Richard,
    2. Garcia-Penalosa Cecilia
    . 2002. “Bayesian Learning and Gender Segregation.” Journal of Labor Economics 20(4):899–922.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Brown Charles,
    2. Corcoran Mary
    . 1997. “Sex Based Differences in School Content and the Male-Female Wage Gap.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99:31–44.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Carrell Scott,
    2. Page Marianne,
    3. West James
    . 2010. “Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(3):1101–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Cejka Mary,
    2. Eagly Alice
    . 1999. “Gender-Stereotypic Images of Occupations Correspond to the Sex Segregation of Employment.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25(4):413–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Chemers Martin,
    2. Hu Li-tze,
    3. Garcia Ben
    . 2001. “Academic Self-Efficacy and First-Year College Student Performance and Adjustment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93(1):55–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Croson Rachel,
    2. Gneezy Uri
    . 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(2):448–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Daymont Thomas,
    2. Andrisani Paul
    . 1984. “Job Preferences, College Major, and the Gender Gap in Earnings.” Journal of Human Resources 19(3): 408–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Delavande Adeline
    . 2008. “Pill, Patch or Shot? Subjective Expectations and Birth Control Choice.” International Economic Review 49(3):999–1042.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Dey Judy,
    2. Hill Catherine
    . 2007. “Behind the Pay Gap.” American Association of University Women Educational Foundation Research Report.
  24. ↵
    1. Dominitz Jeff,
    2. Manski Charles
    . 1996. “Eliciting Student Expectations of the Returns to Schooling.” Journal of Human Resources 31(1):1–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Easterlin Richard
    . 1995. “Preferences and Prices in Choice of Career: The Switch to Business, 1972–87.” Journal of Economics Behavior and Organization 27(1):1–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Eckel Catherine,
    2. Grossman Philip
    . 2008. “Differences in the Economic Decisions of Men and Women: Experimental Evidence.” In Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, ed. Plott Charles, Smith Vernon, 509–19. New York: Elsevier.
  27. ↵
    1. Euwals Rob,
    2. Melenberg Bertrand,
    3. van Soest Arthur
    . 1998. “Testing the Predictive Value of Subjective Labor Supply Data.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 13(5):567–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Fairlie Robert
    . 2005. “An Extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition Technique to Logit and Probit Models.” Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 30(4):305–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Festinger Leon
    . 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  30. ↵
    1. Fiorito Jack,
    2. Dauffenbach Robert
    . 1982. “Market and Nonmarket Influences in Curriculum Choice by College Students.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36(1):88–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Freeman Richard
    . 1971. The Market for College-Trained Manpower: Study in the Economics of Career Choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  32. ↵
    1. Garman David,
    2. Loury Linda
    . 1995. “College Selectivity and Earnings.” Journal of Labor Economics 13:289–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Goldin Claudia,
    2. Katz Lawrence,
    3. Kuziemko Ilyana
    . 2006. “The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20(4):133–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Hoffmann Florian,
    2. Oreopoulos Philip
    . 2009. “A Professor Like Me: The Influence of Instructor Gender on College Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 44(2):479–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Hurd Michael,
    2. Smith James,
    3. Zissimopoulos Julie
    . 2004. “The Effects of Subjective Survival on Retirement and Social Security Claiming.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 19(6):761–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Jacob Brian,
    2. Wilder Tamara
    . 2011. “Educational Expectations and Attainment.” In Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality and the Uncertain Life Chances of Low-Income Children, ed. Duncan Greg, Murnane Richard, 133–64. New York, NY: Russell Sage Press.
    1. Juster Thomas
    . 1964. Anticipations and Purchases: An Analysis of Consumer Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  37. ↵
    1. Kapteyn Arie,
    2. van Soest Arthur,
    3. Zissimopoulos Julie
    . 2007. “Using Stated Preferences Data to Analyze Preferences for Full and Partial Retirement.” IZA Discussion Paper 2785.
  38. ↵
    1. Kimura Doreen
    .1999. Sex and Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  39. ↵
    1. Lewin Tamar
    . 2002. “For Students Seeking Edge, One Major Just Isn't Enough.” New York Times, November 17, page 1.
  40. ↵
    1. Long Vonda
    . 1986. “Relationship of Masculinity to Self-Esteem and Self-Acceptance in Female Professionals, College Students, Clients, and Victims of Domestic Violence.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 54:323–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Lubinski David,
    2. Benbow Camilla
    . 1992. “Gender Differences in Abilities and Preferences Among the Gifted: Implications for the Math/Science Pipeline.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 1: 61–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Luce Duncan,
    2. Suppes Patrick
    . 1965. “Preferences, Utility and Subjective Probability.” In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, ed. Luce Duncan, Bush Robert, Galanter Eugene, 249–410. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  43. ↵
    1. Malamud Ofer
    . 2010. “Breadth vs. Depth: The Effect of Academic Specialization on Labor Market Outcomes.” Labour 24(4):359–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Manski Charles
    . 1993. “Adolescent Econometricians: How Do Youth Infer the Returns to Schooling?” In Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education, ed. Clotfelter Charles, Rothschild Michael, 43–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  45. ↵
    1. Manski Charles
    . 2002. “Identification of Decision Rules in Experiments on Simple Games of Proposal and Response.” European Economic Review 46(4–5):880–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    1. Manski Charles
    . 2004. “Measuring Expectations.” Econometrica 72(5):1329–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Niederle Muriel,
    2. Vesterlund Lise
    . 2007. “Do Women Shy away from Competition? Do Men Compete too Much?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3):1067–1101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Oaxaca Ronald
    . 1973. “Male-Female Wage Differential in the Urban Labor Markets.” International Economic Review 14(3):693–709.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. ↵
    1. Paglin Morton,
    2. Rufolo Anthony
    . 1990. “Heterogeneous Human Capital, Occupational Choice, and Male-Female Earnings Differences.” Journal of Labor Economics 8(1):123–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Polachek Solomon
    . 1981. “Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in Occupational Structure.” Review of Economics and Statistics 63(1):60–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Revelt David,
    2. Train Kenneth
    . 1998. “Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80(4):647–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Spencer Steven,
    2. Steele Claude,
    3. Quinn Diane
    . 1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35:4–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Stinebrickner Todd,
    2. Stinebrickner Ralph
    . 2008a. “Learning about Academic Ability and the College Drop-out Decision.” University of Western Ontario Working Paper 20086.
  54. ↵
    1. Stinebrickner Todd,
    2. Stinebrickner Ralph
    . 2008b. “The Causal Effect of Studying on Academic Performance.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 8(1) (Frontiers), Article 14:1–53.
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. Stinebrickner Todd,
    2. Stinebrickner Ralph
    . 2011. “Math or Science? Using Longitudinal Expectations Data to Examine the Process of Choosing a College Major.” Working Paper.
  56. ↵
    1. Traweek Sharon
    . 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  57. ↵
    1. Turner Sarah,
    2. Bowen William
    . 1999. “Choice of Major: The Changing (Unchanging) Gender Gap.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52(2):289–313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Valian Virginia
    . 1998. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  59. ↵
    1. van der Klaauw Wilbert
    . 2012. “On the Use of Expectations Data in Estimating Structural Dynamic Models: An Analysis of Career Choices” Journal of Labor Economics 30(3):521–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  60. ↵
    1. Van der Klaauw Wilbert,
    2. Wolpin Kenneth
    . 2008. “Social Security and Savings and Retirement Behavior of Low Income Households.” Journal of Econometrics 145(1–2):21–42
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Weinberger Catherine
    . 2004. “Just Ask! Why Surveyed Women Did Not Pursue Information Technology Courses or Careers?” IEEE Technology and Society 23(2):28–35.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wiswall Matthew,
    2. Zafar Basit
    . 2011. “Determinants of College Major Choice: Identification Using an Information Experiment.” Staff Report No. 500. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  62. ↵
    1. Xie Yu,
    2. Shauman Kimberlee
    . 2003. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  63. ↵
    1. Zafar Basit
    . 2009. “College Major Choice and the Gender Gap.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Report no. 364.
  64. ↵
    1. Zafar Basit
    . 2011a. “Can Subjective Expectations Data be Used in Choice Models? Evidence on Cognitive Biases.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 26(3):520–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. ↵
    1. Zafar Basit
    . 2011b. “How do College Students Form Expectations?” Journal of Labor Economics 29(2):301–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Zafar Basit
    . 2012. “Double Majors: One for Me, One for Mom and Dad?” Economic Inquiry 50(2):287–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 48 (3)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 48, Issue 3
1 Jul 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
College Major Choice and the Gender Gap
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
College Major Choice and the Gender Gap
Basit Zafar
Journal of Human Resources Jul 2013, 48 (3) 545-595; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.48.3.545

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
College Major Choice and the Gender Gap
Basit Zafar
Journal of Human Resources Jul 2013, 48 (3) 545-595; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.48.3.545
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Choice Model
    • III. Data
    • IV. Econometric Model
    • IV. Choice Model Estimation
    • VI. Understanding Gender Differences
    • VII. Discussion and Conclusion
    • Appendix A1 Survey Questionnaire
    • Appendix A2 Decomposition Algorithm
    • Appendix A3 Beliefs about Enjoying Coursework and Work
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • STEM Graduates and Secondary School Curriculum: Does Early Exposure to Science Matter?
  • For Better or Worse? Subjective Expectations and Cost-Benefit Trade-Offs in Health Behavior
  • Parental Beliefs about Returns to Different Types of Investments in School Children
  • Why Do We Inflate Grades?: The Effect of Adjunct Faculty Employment on Instructor Grading Standards
  • Major Malfunction: A Field Experiment Correcting Undergraduates Beliefs about Salaries
  • Timing Matters: Evidence from College Major Decisions
  • Competitive Schools and the Gender Gap in the Choice of Field of Study
  • The Effect of Same-Gender or Same-Race Role Models on Occupation Choice: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Mentors at West Point
  • The Impact of Test Score Labels on Human-Capital Investment Decisions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Effects of Exposure to a Large-Scale Recession on Higher Education and Early Labor Market Outcomes
  • Intergenerational Mobility Trends and the Changing Role of Female Labor
  • World War II Blues
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire