Teacher Pay Reform and Productivity

References

1. ↵
   1. Bandiera Oriana,
   2. Barankay Iwan,
   3. Rasul Imran

   . 2007. “Incentives for Managers and Inequality Among Workers.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(2):729–73.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Barlevy Gadi,
   2. Neal Derek

   . 2012. “Pay for Percentile.” American Economic Review 102(5):1805–31.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Bloom Nicholas,
   2. Reenen John Van

   2011. “Human Resource Management and Productivity.” In Handbook of Labor Economics Volume 4B ed. Ashenfelter Orley, Card David, 1697–763. Amsterdam: North Holland.
4. ↵
   1. Cappelli Peter,
   2. Neumark David

   . 2001. “Do “High-Performance” Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54(4):737–882.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Chetty Raj,
   2. Friedman John N.,
   3. Hilger Nate,
   4. Saez Emmanuel,
   5. Schanzenbach Diane Whitmore,
   6. Yagan Danny

   . 2011. “How Does Your Kindergarten Classroom Affect Your Earnings?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4):1593–660.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Danielson Charlotte,
   2. McGreal Thomas L

   . 2000. “Teacher Evaluation to Enhance Professional Practice.” Technical Report for the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7. ↵
   1. Darling-Hammond Linda,
   2. Wei Ruth Chung,
   3. Andree Alethea,
   4. Richardson Nikole,
   5. Orphanos Stelios

   . 2009. “Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad.” Technical Report for the National Staff Development Council of Stanford University.
8. ↵
   1. deFiebre Conrad,
   2. Patricia Lopez,
   3. Hopfensperger Jean

   . 2005. “Legislature 2005 Wrapping Up.” Star Tribune, July 14.
9. ↵
   1. Dillon Sam

   . 2007. “Long Reviled, Merit Pay Gains Among Teachers.” The New York Times, June 18.
10. ↵
    1. Figlio David N.,
    2. Kenny Lawrence W.

    2007. “Individual Teacher Incentives and Student Performance.” Journal of Public Economics 91(5):901–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Fryer Roland G

    . 2011. “Financial Incentives and Student Achievement: Evidence from Randomized Trials.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4):1755–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Glazerman Steven,
    2. Seifullah Allison

    2010. “An Evaluation of the Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) in Chicago: Year Two Impact Report.” Washington, D.C.: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
13. ↵
    1. Glewwe Paul,
    2. Ilias Nauman,
    3. Kremer Michael

    . 2010. “Teacher Incentives.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(3):205–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Graham Bryan S

    . 2008. “Identifying Social Interactions Through Conditional Variance Restrictions.” Econometrica 76(3):643–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Hanushek Eric A

    . 2011. “The Economic Value of Higher Teacher Quality.” Economics of Education Review 30(3):466–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Hanushek Eric A.,
    2. Wöessmann Ludger

    . 2011. “Overview of the Symposium on Performance Pay for Teachers.” Economics of Education Review 30(3):391–93.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Hauser Carl,
    2. Gage Kingsbury G.

    2008. “RIT Scale Norms: For Use with Measures of Academic Progress.” Technical Report to the Northwest Evaluation Association.
18. ↵
    1. Herweg Fabian,
    2. Müller Daniel,
    3. Weinschenk Philipp

    . 2010. “Binary Payment Schemes.” American Economic Review 100(5):2451–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Hezel Associates

    . 2009. “Quality Compensation for Teachers Summative Evaluation.” Technical Report prepared for the Minnesota Department of Education.
20. ↵
    1. Holmstrom Bengt,
    2. Milgrom Paul

    . 1991. “Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership and Job Design.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 7(Special Issue):24–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Hord Shirley M.,
    2. Hirsch Stephanie A

    . 2008. “Making the Promise a Reality.” In Sustaining Professional Learning Communities, ed. Blankenstein Alan M., Houston Paul D., Cole Robert W., 23–40. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
22. ↵
    1. Hoxby Caroline M

    . 2000. “Peer Effects in the Classroom.” NBER Working Paper 7867. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
23. ↵
    1. Ichniowski Casey,
    2. Shaw Kathryn,
    3. Prennushi Giovanna

    . 1997. “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines.” The American Economic Review 87(3):291–313.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Kirabo Jackson C.,
    2. Bruegmann Elias

    . 2009. “Teaching Students and Teaching Each Other: The Importance of Peer Learning for Teachers.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(4):85–108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Jacob Brian A.,
    2. Lefgren Lars

    . 2008. “Can Principals Identify Effective Teachers? Evidence on Subjective Performance Evaluation in Education.” Journal of Labor Economics 26(1):101.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Koretz Daniel M

    . 2002. “Limitations in the Use of Achievement Tests as Measures of Educators’ Productivity.” Journal of Human Resources 37(4):752–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Koretz Daniel M.,
    2. Barron Sheila,
    3. Mitchell Karen J,
    4. Stecher Brian M.

    1996. The Perceived Effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
28. ↵
    1. Krueger Alan B

    . 2003. “Economic Considerations and Class Size.” Economic Journal 113(485):F34–F63.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Ladd Helen F

    . 1999. “The Dallas School Accountability and Incentive Program: An Evaluation of Its Impacts on Student Outcomes.” Economics of Education Review 18(1):1–16.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Lavy Victor

    . 2002. “Evaluating the Effect of Teachers’ Performance Incentives on Pupils’ Achievements.” Journal of Political Economy 110(6):1286–317.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Lavy Victor

    . 2009. “Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity, and Grading Ethics,” American Economic Review 99(5):1979–2011.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Lazear Edward P

    . 2000. “Performance Pay and Productivity.” American Economic Review 90(5):1346–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Lovenheim Michael F

    . 2009. “The Effect of Teachers’ Unions on Education Production: Evidence from Union Election Certification in Three Midwestern States.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(4)525–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Marsden David

    . 2010. “The Paradox of Performance-Related Pay Systems.” In Paradoxes of Modernization: Unintended Consequences of Public Policy Reform, ed. Margetts Helen, Hood Christopher, 185–203. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. ↵
    1. Marsden David,
    2. Belfield Richard

    . 2007. “Pay for Performance Where Output Is Hard to Measure: The Case of Performance Pay for School Teachers.” Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations 15:1–34.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Milgrom Paul,
    2. Roberts John

    . 1990. “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing.” American Economic Review 80(3):511–28.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Muralidharan Karthik,
    2. Sundararaman Venkatesh

    . 2011. “Teacher Performance Pay: Experimental Evidence from India,” Journal of Political Economy 119(1):39–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Nadler Carl,
    2. Wiswall Matthew

    . 2011. “Risk Aversion and Support for Merit Pay: Theory and Evidence from Minnesota’s Q Comp Program.” Education Finance & Policy 6(1):1–31.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Neal Derek

    . 2011. “The Design of Performance Pay in Education,” NBER Working Paper 16710.
40. ↵
    1. Nobels James

    . 2009. “Evaluation Report: Q Comp Quality Compensation.” Technical Report for the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor.
41. ↵
    1. Podgursky Michael J.,
    2. Springer Matthew G.

    2007. “Teacher Performance Pay: A Review.” Journal of Policy Analysis & Management 26(4):909–50.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Prendergast Canice

    . 2002. “The Tenuous Trade-off Between Risk and Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy 110(5):1071–102.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. ↵
    1. Prentice Graham,
    2. Burgess Simon,
    3. Propper Carol

    2007. “Performance Pay in the Public Sector.” Technical Report, Office of Manpower Economics. Coventry: University of Warwick.
44. ↵
    1. Rockoff Jonah E.,
    2. Jacob Brian A.,
    3. Kane Thomas J.,
    4. Staiger Douglas O.

    2011. “Can You Recognize an Effective Teacher When You Recruit One?” Education Finance & Policy 6(1):43–74.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Rockoff Jonah E.,
    2. Staiger Douglas O.,
    3. Kane Thomas J.,
    4. Taylor Eric S.

    2012. “Information and Employee Evaluation: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention in Public Schools.” American Economic Review 102(7):3184–213.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Schwartz Nathaniel

    . 2012. “Aligning Teacher Improvement Strategies: A Mixed Method Study of Teaching Reform in Minnesota.” PhD dissertation. University of Michigan. http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96100/1/nschwart_1.pdf.
47. ↵
    1. Sojourner Aaron J

    . 2013. “Identification of Peer Effects with Missing Data.” Economic Journal 123(569):574–605.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Springer Matthew G.,
    2. Dale Ballou,
    3. Peng Art (Xiao)

    . 2008. “Impact of the Teacher Advancement Program on Student Test Score Gains: Findings from an Independent Appraisal.” Technical Report, National Center on Performance Incentives. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.
49. ↵
    1. Springer Matthew G.,
    2. Hamilton Laura,
    3. McCaffrey Daniel F,
    4. Ballou Dale,
    5. Le Vi-Nhuan,
    6. Pepper Matthew,
    7. Lockwood J.R.,
    8. Stecher Brian M.

    2010. “Teacher Pay for Performance: Experimental Evidence from the Project on Incentives in Teaching.” Technical Report, National Center on Performance Incentives. Nashville: Vanderbilt University.
50. ↵
    1. Taylor Eric S.,
    2. Tyler John H.

    2012. “The Effect of Evaluation on Teacher Performance.” American Economic Review 102(7):3628–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
51. ↵
    1. Tyler John H.,
    2. Taylor Eric S.,
    3. Kane Thomas J.,
    4. Wooten Amy L.

    2010. “Using Student Performance Data to Identify Effective Classroom Practices.” American Economic Review 100(2):256–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
52. ↵
    1. Victory New Hampshire

    . 2012. “The 60 Second Update with Governor Tim Pawlenty.” http://60secondupdates.com/pawlenty/pawlenty-2.
53. ↵
    1. Vigdor Jacob L

    . 2009. “Teacher Salary Bonuses in North Carolina.” In Performance Incentives: Their Growing Impact on American K–12 Education, ed. Springer Matthew G., 227–50. Harrisonburg: The Brookings Institution.
54. ↵
    1. Wahlstrom Kyla,
    2. Sheldon Tim,
    3. Peterson Kristin

    2006. “Implementation of the Quality Compensation Program (Q Comp): A Formative Evaluation.” Technical Report, University of Minnesota’s Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
55. ↵
    1. West Kristine L

    . 2012. “Teachers Unions, Compensation, and Tenure.” University of Minnesota Technical Report.
56. ↵
    1. Whitmore Diane

    . 2005. “Resource and Peer Impacts on Girls’ Academic Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” American Economic Review 95(2):199–203.

    OpenUrlCrossRef