The Aftermath of Accelerating Algebra

References

1. ↵
   1. Allensworth Elaine,
   2. Nomi Takako,
   3. Montgomery Nicholas,
   4. Lee Valerie E.

   2009. “College Preparatory Curriculum for All: Academic Consequences of Requiring Algebra and English I for Ninth Graders in Chicago.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31(4):367–91.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Benjamin Daniel J.,
   2. Brown S.A.,
   3. Shapiro Jesse M.

   2013. “Who Is ‘Behavioral’? Cognitive Ability and Anomalous Preferences.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11(6):1231–55.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. 1. Betts Julian R.,
   2. Shkolnik Jamie L.

   1999. “The Behavioral Effects of Variations in Class Size: The Case of Math Teachers.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21(2):193–213.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Boyd Donald,
   2. Lankford Hamilton,
   3. Loeb Susanna,
   4. Rockoff Jonah,
   5. Wyckoff James

   . 2008. “The Narrowing Gap in New York City Teacher Qualifications and its Implications for Student Achievement in High-Poverty Schools.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 27(4):793–818.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Burris Carol C.,
   2. Heubert Jay P.,
   3. Levin Henry M.

   2006. “Accelerating Mathematics Achievement Using Heterogeneous Grouping.” American Educational Research Journal 43(1):103–34.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Chernozhukov Victor,
   2. Hansen Christian

   . 2005. “An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 73(1):245–61.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Clotfelter Charles T.,
   2. Ladd Helen F.,
   3. Vigdor Jacob L.

   2007. “Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement: Longitudinal Analysis with Student Fixed Effects.” Economics of Education Review 26(6):673–82.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Clotfelter Charles T.,
   2. Ladd Helen F.,
   3. Vigdor Jacob L.

   2010. “Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross-Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects.” Journal of Human Resources 45(3): 655–81.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Clotfelter Charles T.,
   2. Ladd Helen F.,
   3. Vigdor Jacob L.

   2012a. “The Aftermath of Accelerating Algebra: Evidence from a District Policy Initiative.” NBER Working Paper 18161.
10. ↵
    1. Clotfelter Charles T.,
    2. Ladd Helen F.,
    3. Vigdor Jacob L.

    2012b. “Algebra for 8th Graders: Evidence on Its Effects from 10 North Carolina Districts.” NBER Working Paper 18649.
11. ↵
    1. Deming David J.,
    2. Hastings Justine S.,
    3. Kane Thomas J.,
    4. Staiger Douglas O.

    2011. “School Choice, School Quality and Postsecondary Attainment.” NBER Working Paper 17438.
12. ↵
    1. Dossey J.A.,
    2. Mullis I.V.S,
    3. Lindquist M.M.,
    4. Chambers D.L.

    1988. The Mathematics Report Card. Are We Measuring Up? Trends and Achievement Based on the 1986 National Assessment. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
13. ↵
    1. Gamoran Adam

    . 1997. “Curriculum Change as a Reform Strategy: Lessons from the United States and Scotland.” Teachers College Record 98(4):608–28.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Gamoran Adam,
    2. Hannigan E.

    2000. “Algebra for Everyone? Benefits of College Preparatory Mathematics for Students with Diverse Abilities in Early Secondary School.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22(3):241–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Gamoran Adam,
    2. Porter A.C.,
    3. Smithson J.,
    4. White P.A.

    1997. “Upgrading High School Mathematics Instruction: Improving Learning Opportunities for Low-Achieving, Low-Income Youth.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19(4):325–38.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Goodman Joshua

    . 2012. “The Labor of Division: Returns to Compulsory Math Coursework.” HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP12–032.
17. ↵
    1. Hastings Justine S.,
    2. Kane Thomas J.,
    3. Staiger Douglas O.

    2005. “Parental Preferences and School Competition: Evidence from a Public School Choice Program.” NBER Working Paper 11805.
18. ↵
    1. Hastings Justine S.,
    2. Kane Thomas J.,
    3. Staiger Douglas O.

    2006a. “Gender and Performance: Evidence from School Assignment by Randomized Lottery.” American Economic Review 95(2):232–36.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Hastings Justine S.,
    2. Kane Thomas J.,
    3. Staiger Douglas O.

    2006b. “Preferences and Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in a Public School Choice Lottery.” NBER Working Paper 12145.
20. ↵
    1. Hastings J.S.,
    2. Kane T.J.,
    3. Staiger D.O.,
    4. Weinstein J.M.

    2007. “The Effects of Randomized School Admissions on Voter Participation.” Journal of Public Economics 91(5):915–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Inoue A.,
    2. Solon Gary

    . 2010. “Two-Sample Instrumental Variables Estimators.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92(3):557–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Kirabo Jackson C.

    2009. “Student Demographics, Teacher Sorting, and Teacher Quality: Evidence from the End of School Desegregation.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(2):213–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Jensen M.B.

    1930. “The Influence of Class Size Upon Pupil Accomplishment in High-School Algebra.” Journal of Educational Research 21(1):337–56.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Krueger Alan B.

    1999. “Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2):497–532.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Loveless Thomas

    . 2008. “The Misplaced Math Student: Lost in Eighth-Grade Algebra.” Brookings Institution Brown Center Report on American Education, September.
26. ↵
    1. Ma Xin

    . 2005a. “Early Acceleration of Students in Mathematics: Does It Promote Growth and Stability of Growth in Achievement Across Mathematical Areas?” Contemporary Educational Psychology 30(4):439–60.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Ma Xin

    . 2005b. “A Longitudinal Assessment of Early Acceleration of Students in Mathematics on Growth in Mathematics Achievement.” Developmental Review 25(1):104–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. Murphy Kevin M.,
    2. Topel Robert H.

    1985. “Estimation and Inference in Two-Step Econometric Models.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3(4):370–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Neal Derek,
    2. Johnson William

    . 1996. “The Role of Premarket Factors in Black-White Wage Differences.” Journal of Political Economy 104(5):869–95.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Nomi Takako

    . 2012. “The Unintended Consequences of an Algebra-for-All Policy on High-Skill Students: Effects on Instructional Organization and Students’ Academic Outcomes.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34(4):489–505.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Perie Marianne,
    2. Moran Rebecca,
    3. Lutkus Anthony D.

    2005. “NAEP 2004 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance in Reading and Mathematics.” National Center for Education Statistics Publication 2005–464.
32. 1. Rivkin Steven G.,
    2. Hanushek Eric A.,
    3. Kain John F.

    2005. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.” Econometrica 73(2):417–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Rockoff Jonah E.

    2004. “The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data.” American Economic Review 94(2):247–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Rose Heather,
    2. Betts Julian

    . 2004. “The Effect of High School Courses on Earnings.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86(2):497–513.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Schoenfeld Alan

    . 1995. “Report of Working Group 1.” In The Algebra Initiative Colloquium: Papers Presented at a Conference on Reform in Algebra, ed. Lacampagne Carole, Blair William, Kaput Jim. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
36. ↵
    1. Smith Julia

    . 1996. “Does an Extra Year Make Any Difference? The Impact of Early Access to Algebra on Long-Term Gains in Mathematics Attainment.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 18(2):141–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Usiskin Zalman

    . 1987. “Why Elementary Algebra Can, Should and Must Be an Eighth-Grade Course for Average Students.” Mathematics Teacher 80(6):428–38.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Vigdor Jacob L.

    2011. “School Desegregation and the Black-White Test Score Gap.” In Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances, ed. Duncan G.J., Murnane R.J., 443–464. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
39. ↵
    1. Walston Jill,
    2. McCarroll Jill C.

    2010. “Eighth Grade Algebra: Findings from the Eighth-Grade Round of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998–99 (ECLS-K).” National Center for Education Statistics Publication 2010–016.
40. ↵
    1. White Paula A.

    1995. Math Innovations and Classroom Practice: Upgrading of the Math Curriculum at the High School Level. Madison: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
41. ↵
    1. White Paula A.,
    2. Gamoran Adam,
    3. Smithson John,
    4. Porter Andrew C.

    1996. “Upgrading the High School Mathematics Curriculum: Math Course-Taking Patterns in Seven High Schools in California and New York.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 18(4):285–307.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science