Subjective Performance Evaluation in the Public Sector

References

1. 1. Abdulkadiroğlu Atila,
   2. Angrist Joshua D.,
   3. Dynarski Susan M.,
   4. Kane Thomas J.,
   5. Pathak Parag A.

   2011. “Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston’s Charters and Pilots.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(2):699–748.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 1. Allen Rebecca,
   2. Burgess Simon

   . 2012. “How Should We Treat Under-Performing Schools? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis of School Inspections in England.” CMPO Working Paper Number 12/287, Bristol University.
3. 1. Ashenfelter Orley

   . 1978. “Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings.” Review of Economics and Statistics 60(1):47–57.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. 1. Baker George P.

   1992. “Incentive Contracts and Performance Measurement.” Journal of Political Economy 100(3):598–614.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Bandiera Oriana,
   2. Barankay Iwan,
   3. Rasul Imran

   . 2007. “Incentives for Managers and Inequality Among Workers: Evidence from a Firm-Level Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(2):729–73.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Chakrabarti Rajashri

   . 2007. “Vouchers, Public School Response and the Role of Incentives: Evidence from Florida.” Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) of New York Working Paper 306.
7. 1. Chiang Hanley

   . 2009. “How Accountability Pressure on Failing Schools Affects Student Achievement.” Journal of Public Economics 93(9–10):1045–57.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Clark Damon

   . 2009. “The Performance and Competitive Effects of School Autonomy.” Journal of Political Economy 117(4):745–83.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Courty Pascal,
   2. Marschke Gerald

   . 2011. “Measuring Government Performance: An Overview of Dysfunctional Responses.” In The Performance of Performance Standards, ed. Heckman James J., Heinrich Carolyn J., Courty Pascal, Marschke Gerald, Smith Jeffrey, 203–29. Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
10. 1. Currie Janet,
    2. Thomas Duncan

    . 1995. “Does Head Start Make a Difference?” American Economic Review 85(3):341–64.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Cullen Julie Berry,
    2. Levitt Steven D.,
    3. Robertson Erin,
    4. Sadoff Sally

    . 2013. “What Can Be Done to Improve Struggling High Schools?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27(2):133–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. 1. Dixit Avinash

    . 2002. “Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector: An Interpretative Review.” Journal of Human Resources 37:696–727.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Dustmann Christian,
    2. Machin Stephen,
    3. Schönberg Uta

    . 2010. “Ethnicity and Educational Achievement in Compulsory Schooling.” The Economic Journal 120:F272–F297.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Faubert Violaine

    . 2009. “School Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries.” OECD Education Working Papers Number 42.
15. 1. Figlio David

    . “Testing, Crime and Punishment.” Journal of Public Economics 90(4–5):837–51.
16. 1. Figlio David,
    2. Loeb Susanna

    . 2010. “School Accountability.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Volume 3, ed. Eric Hanushek, Machin Stephen, Woessmann Ludger, 383–421. Amsterdam: North Holland.
17. 1. Figlio David,
    2. Elena Rouse Cecilia

    . 2006. “Do Accountability and Voucher Threats Improve Low-Performing Schools?” Journal of Public Economics 90(1–2):239–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Hanushek Eric A.,
    2. Raymond Margaret E.

    2005. “Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(2):297–327.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Hastings Justine S.,
    2. Weinstein Jeffrey M.

    2008. “Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(4):1373–414.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 1. Hastings Justine S.,
    2. Kane Thomas J.,
    3. Staiger Douglas O.

    2009. “Heterogeneous Preferences and the Efficacy of Public School Choice.” Unpublished.
21. 1. Heckman James

    . 2000. “Policies to Foster Human Capital.” Research in Economics 54(1):3–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Heckman James J.,
    2. Smith Jeffrey A.,
    3. Taber Christopher

    . 1996. “What Do Bureaucrats Do? The Effects of Performance Standards and Bureaucratic Preferences on Acceptance into the JTPA Program.” In Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Growth, Volume 7, ed. Libecap G., 191–217. Greenwich: JAI Press.
23. 1. Heckman James J.,
    2. Heinrich Carolyn J.,
    3. Courty Pascal,
    4. Marschke Gerald,
    5. Smith Jeffrey

    , eds. 2011. The Performance of Performance Standards. Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
24. 1. Holmstrom Bengt,
    2. Milgrom Paul

    . 1991. “Multitask Principal-Agent Analysis: Incentive Contracts Asset Ownership, and Job Design.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7(Special Issue):24–52.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
25. 1. Hussain Iftikhar

    . 2009. “Essays in Household Economics and Economics of Education.” PhD Thesis, University College London.
26. 1. Hussain Iftikhar

    . 2012. “Subjective Performance Evaluation in the Public Sector: Evidence from School Inspections.” CEE Discussion Paper 135, London School of Economics.
27. 1. Hussain Iftikhar

    . 2013. “Not Just Test Scores: Parents’ Demand Response to School Quality Information.” Paper presented at IZA Seminar, Bonn.
28. 1. Jacob Brian A.

    2005. “Accountability, Incentives and Behavior: Evidence from School Reform in Chicago.” Journal of Public Economics 89(5–6):761–96.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Jacob Brian A.,
    2. Lefgren Lars

    . 2005. “Principals as Agents: Subjective Performance Measurement in Education.” NBER Working Paper 11463.
30. 1. Jacob Brian A.,
    2. Levitt Steven D.

    2003. “Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(3):843–77.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 1. Johnson Paul

    . 2004. “Education Policy in England.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20(2):173–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract
32. 1. Kane Thomas J.,
    2. Taylor Eric S.,
    3. Tyler John H.,
    4. Wooten Amy L.

    2010. “Identifying Effective Classroom Practices Using Student Achievement Data.” NBER Working Paper 15803.
33. 1. Koretz Daniel

    . 2002. “Limitations in the Use of Achievement Tests as Measures of Educators’ Productivity.” Journal of Human Resources 37(4):752–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Lazear Edward P.

    2001.”Educational Production”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(3):777–803.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. 1. Lazear Edward P.,
    2. Oyer Paul

    . 2012. “Personnel Economics.” In Handbook of Organizational Economics, ed. Robert Gibbons, Roberts John, 479–519. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36. 1. Luginbuhl Rob,
    2. Webbink Dinand,
    3. Wolf Inge De

    . 2009. “Do Inspections Improve Primary School Performance?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31(3):221–37.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. 1. Machin Stephen,
    2. Vignoles Anna

    . 2005. What’s the Good of Education? The Economics of Education in the UK. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38. 1. Matthews Peter,
    2. Roger Holmes J.,
    3. Vickers Paul,
    4. Corporaal Bep

    . 1998. “Aspects of the Reliability and Validity of School Inspection Judgements of Teaching Quality.” Educational Research and Evaluation 4(2):167–88.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Matthews Peter,
    2. Sammons Pam

    . 2004. Improvement Through Inspection: An Evaluation of the Impact of Ofsted’s Work. London: Ofsted/Institute of Education.
40. 1. Milgrom Paul,
    2. Roberts John

    . 1988. “An Economic Approach to Influence Activities in Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 94:S154–S179.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. 1. Neal Derek,
    2. Whitmore Schanzenbach Diane

    . 2010. “Left Behind by Design: Proficiency Counts and Test-Based Accountability.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92(2):263–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. 1. OECD.

    2013. Synergies for Better Learning: An International Perspective on Evaluation and Assessment. Paris: OECD.
43. 1. Ofsted

    . 2011a. “The Framework for School Inspection, September.” Document reference number 090019, London.
44. 1. Ofsted

    . 2011b. “Conducting School Inspections: Guidance for Inspecting Schools.” Document reference number 090097, London.
45. 1. Prendergast Canice

    . 1999. “The Provision of Incentives in Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature 37(1):7–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Prendergast Canice,
    2. Topel Robert H.

    1996. “Favoritism in Organizations.” Journal of Political Economy 104(5):958–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Propper Carol,
    2. Sutton Matt,
    3. Whitnall Carolyn,
    4. Windmeijer Frank

    . 2010. “Incentives and Targets in Hospital Care: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Public Economics 94:318–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. 1. Reback Randall

    . 2008. “Teaching to the Rating: School Accountability and the Distribution of Student Achievement.” Journal of Public Economics 92(5–6):1394–415.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Reback Randall,
    2. Rockoff Jonah,
    3. Schwartz Heather

    . 2011. “Under Pressure: Job Security, Resource Allocation, and Productivity in Schools under NCLB.” NBER Working Paper 16745.
50. 1. Rockoff Jonah E.,
    2. Speroni Cecilia

    . 2010. “Subjective and Objective Evaluations of Teacher Effectiveness.” American Economic Review 100(2):261–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
51. 1. Rockoff Jonah,
    2. Turner Lesley

    . 2010. “Short-Run Impacts of Accountability on School Quality.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2(4):119–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Rosenthal Leslie

    . 2004. “Do School Inspections Improve School Quality? Ofsted Inspections and School Examination Results in the UK.” Economics of Education Review 23(2):143–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Rouse Cecilia Elena,
    2. Hannaway Jane,
    3. Goldhaber Dan,
    4. Figlio David

    . 2013. “Feeling the Florida Heat? How Low-Performing Schools Respond to Voucher and Accountability Pressure.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(2):251–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
54. 1. Taylor Eric S.,
    2. Tyler John H.

    2011. “The Effect of Evaluation on Performance: Evidence from Longitudinal Student Achievement Data of Mid-Career Teachers.” NBER Working Paper 16877.