Abstract
When estimating population descriptive statistics, weighting is called for if needed to make the analysis sample representative of the target population. With regard to research directed instead at estimating causal effects, we discuss three distinct weighting motives: (1) to achieve precise estimates by correcting for heteroskedasticity; (2) to achieve consistent estimates by correcting for endogenous sampling; and (3) to identify average partial effects in the presence of unmodeled heterogeneity of effects. In each case, we find that the motive sometimes does not apply in situations where practitioners often assume it does.
- Received February 2013.
- Accepted September 2013.
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Log in using your username and password
Purchase access
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Safeguarding Consumers Through Minimum Quality Standards: Milk Inspections and Urban Mortality in the United States, 1880-1910
- COVID-19 Restrictions Reduced Abortion Clinic Visits, Even in Blue States
- Childhood Confidence, Schooling, and the Labor Market: Evidence from the PSID
- Examining the relationship between incidence and mortality for commonly diagnosed cancers in the USA: an observational study using population-based SEER database
- Effect of e-cigarette taxes on e-cigarette and cigarette retail prices and sales, USA, 2014-2019
- Who Benefits from a Smaller Honors Track?
- The Human Capital Peace Dividend
- Potential Supply of Midwest Cropland for Conversion to In-Field Prairie Strips
- The impact of COVID-19 employment shocks on suicide and safety net use: An early-stage investigation
- COVID-19 Vaccine Rollouts and the Reproduction of Urban Spatial Inequality: Disparities Within Large U.S. Cities in March and April 2021 by Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Composition
- Is Recycling Effective? Evidence from California between 2004 and 2017
- Quantifying social contact patterns in Minnesota during Stay-at-Home social distancing order
- Did Smog Rules Influence Who Loses? Manufacturing Job Losses and the Great Recession
- State minimum wage, paid sick leave, and food insufficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Is Recycling Effective? Evidence from California between 2004 and 2017
- Unemployment insurance and food insecurity among people who lost employment in the wake of COVID-19
- Are we #stayinghome to Flatten the Curve?*
- The association between age, COVID-19 symptoms, and social distancing behavior in the United States
- Maternal Mortality and Womens Political Participation
- What drives voluntary adoption of farming practices that can abate nutrient pollution?
- Following the Market? Hedonic Farmland Valuation Using Sales Prices versus Self-reported Values
- Does Access to Family Planning Increase Childrens Opportunities?: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X
- Mass evacuation and increases in long-term care benefits: lessons from the Fukushima nuclear disaster
- Does Governmental Assistance Affect Private Decisions to Insure? An Empirical Analysis of Flood Insurance Purchases
- Africas Skill Tragedy: Does Teachers Lack of Knowledge Lead to Low Student Performance?
- Cash for carbon: A randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation
- The Effect of Income on Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from the 2008 Economic Stimulus Tax Rebates
- Financial Literacy and Long- and Short-Term Financial Behavior in Different Age Groups