Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleSymposium on Empirical Methods

Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples

Guido W. Imbens
Journal of Human Resources, March 2015, 50 (2) 373-419; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.373
Guido W. Imbens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abadie A.,
    2. Athey S.,
    3. Imbens G.,
    4. Wooldridge J.
    2014. “Finite Population Standard Errors.” Unpublished. http://econ.as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/32414/finite_14feb25.pdf
  2. ↵
    1. Abadie A.,
    2. Imbens G.
    2006. “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 74(1):235–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Abadie A.,
    2. Imbens G.
    2008. “On the Failure of the Bootstrap for Matching Estimators.” Econometrica 76(6):1537–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Abadie A.,
    2. Drukker D.,
    3. Herr H.,
    4. Imbens G.
    2003. “Implementing Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects in STATA.” The Stata Journal 4(3):290–311.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Angrist J.D.,
    2. Krueger A.B.
    2000. “Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3, ed. Ashenfelter A., Card D., 1277–1366. New York: Elsevier Science.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Angrist J.,
    2. Pischke S.
    2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricists’ Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  7. ↵
    1. Ashenfelter O.,
    2. Card D.
    1985. “Using the Longitudinal Structure of Earnings to Estimate the Effect of Training Programs.” Review of Economics and Statistics 67:648–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Becker S.,
    2. Ichino A.
    2002. “Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores.” The Stata Journal 2(4):358–77.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Belloni A.,
    2. Chernozhukov V.,
    3. Hansen C.
    2012. “Inference on Treatment Effects after Selection Amongst High-Dimensional Controls.” CEMMAP Working Paper Number CWP26/13.
  10. ↵
    1. Busso M.,
    2. DiNardo J.,
    3. McCrary J.
    2008. “Finite Sample Properties of Semiparametric Estimators of Average Treatment Effects.” Unpublished. Department of Economics, University of Michigan
  11. ↵
    1. Caliendo M.
    2006. Microeconometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
  12. ↵
    1. Caliendo M.,
    2. Kopeinig S.
    2011. “Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 22(1):31–72.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Card D.,
    2. Sullivan D.
    1988. “Measuring the Effect of Subsidized Training Programs on Movements In and Out of Employment.” Econometrica 56(3):497–530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Chen X.,
    2. Hong H.,
    3. Tarozzi A.
    2008. “Semiparametric Efficiency in GMM Models with Auxiliary Data.” Annals of Statistics 36(2):808–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Cochran W
    1968. “The Effectiveness of Adjustment by Subclassification in Removing Bias in Observational Studies.” Biometrics 24:295–314.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Crump R.,
    2. Hotz V.J.,
    3. Imbens G.,
    4. Mitnik O.
    2008. “Nonparametric Tests for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3):389–405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Crump R.,
    2. Hotz V.J.,
    3. Imbens G.,
    4. Mitnik O.
    2009. “Dealing with Limited Overlap in Estimation of Average Treatment Effects.” Biometrika 96(1):187–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Dawid P
    1979. “Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 41(1):1–31.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Dehejia R.,
    2. Wahba S.
    1999. “Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 94:1053–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Fisher R.A
    1925. The Design of Experiments, 1st Edition. London: Oliver and Boyd.
  20. ↵
    1. Frölich M
    . 2000. “Treatment Evaluation: Matching Versus Local Polynomial Regression.” Discussion Paper 2000–17, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
  21. ↵
    1. Frölich M
    2002. “A Note on the Role of the Propensity Score for Estimating Average Treatment Effects.” Econometric Reviews 23(2):167–74.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Frölich M
    2004. “Finite Sample Properties of Propensity-Score Matching and Weighting Estimators.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1):77–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Guo S.,
    2. Fraser M.
    2010. Propensity Score Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  24. ↵
    1. Hahn J.
    1998. “On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 66(2):315–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hahn J.,
    2. Ridder G.
    2013. “Asymptotic Variance of Semiparametric Estimators with Generated Regressors.” Econometrica 81(1):315–40.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Hainmueller J.
    2012. “Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies.” Political Analysis 20(1):25–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Hanson S.G.,
    2. Sunderam A.
    2012. “The Variance of Non-Parametric Treatment Effect Estimators in the Presence of Clustering.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 94(4):1197–201.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Heckman J.,
    2. Hotz J.
    1989. “Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Training Programs.” (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 84(804):862–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Heckman J.,
    2. Hotz J.
    1989. “Choosing Among Alternative Nonexperimental Methods for Estimating the Impact of Social Programs: The Case of Manpower Training.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 84(408):862–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Heckman J.,
    2. Vytlacil E.
    2007. “Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part I: Causal Models, Structural Models and Econometric Policy Evaluation.” In Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 6B, ed. Heckman J., Leamer E., 4779–874. New York: Elsevier Science.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Hirano K.,
    2. Imbens G.,
    3. Ridder G.
    2003. “Efficient Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Using the Estimated Propensity Score.” Econometrica 71(4):1161–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Imbens G
    2004. “Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86(1):1–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Imbens G.,
    2. Rubin D.
    (2015). Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Imbens G.,
    2. Rubin D.,
    3. Sacerdote B.
    2000. “Estimating the Effect of Unearned Income.” American Economic Review.
  32. ↵
    1. Imbens G,
    2. Rubin D,
    3. Sacerdote B
    . Estimating the Effect of Unearned Income on Labor Supply, Earnings, Savings and Consumption: Evidence from a Survey of Lottery Players. The American Economic Review. 2001;91:(4)778–794.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Imbens G.,
    2. Wooldridge J.
    2009. “Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(1):5–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Lalonde R.J
    1986. “Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data.” American Economic Review 76:604–20.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Lee M.J
    2005. Micro-Econometrics for Policy, Program, and Treatment Effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  36. ↵
    1. Millimet D.,
    2. Tchernis R.
    2009. “On the Specification of Propensity Scores, With Applications to the Analysis of Trade Policies” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 397–415.
  37. ↵
    1. Morgan S.,
    2. Winship C.
    2007. Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. ↵
    1. Murnane R.,
    2. Willett J.
    2010. Methods Matter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. ↵
    1. Neyman J
    1923. “On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.” translated in Statistical Science (with discussion) 5(4):465–80. From 1990 Statistical Science. On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9. Jerzy Splawa-Neyman Translated and edited by D. M. Dabrowska and T. P. Speed from the Polish original, which appeared in Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych Tom X (1923) 1–51 (Annals of Agricultural Sciences)
  40. ↵
    1. Quade D
    1982. “Nonparametric Analysis of Covariance by Matching.” Biometrics 38:597–611.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum P
    1989. “Optimal Matching in Observational Studies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 84:1024–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum P
    . 1995. Observational Studies. New York: Springer Verlag.
  43. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum P
    . 2010. Design of Observational Studies. New York: Springer Verlag.
  44. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum P.,
    2. Rubin D.
    1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70:41–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum P
    1984. “Reducing the Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:516–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Rubin D
    1973a. “Matching to Remove Bias in Observational Studies.” Biometrics 29:159–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Rubin D
    1973b. “The Use of Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustments to Remove Bias in Observational Studies.” Biometrics 29:185–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Rubin D
    1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66:688–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Rubin D
    1979. “Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:318–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Rubin D
    1990. “Formal Modes of Statistical Inference for Causal Effects.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 25:279–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Rubin D.,
    2. Thomas N.
    1992a. “Affinely Invariant Matching Methods with Ellipsoidal Distributions.” Annals of Statistics 20(2):1079–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Rubin D
    1992b. “Characterizing the Effect of Matching Using Linear Propensity Score Methods with Normal Distributions.” Biometrika 79:797–809.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Sekhon J
    2009. “Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference.” Annual Review of Political Science 12:487–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Tibshirani R
    1996. “Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 58(1):267–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Wooldridge J
    . 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 50 (2)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 50, Issue 2
31 Mar 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples
Guido W. Imbens
Journal of Human Resources Mar 2015, 50 (2) 373-419; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.50.2.373

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Matching Methods in Practice: Three Examples
Guido W. Imbens
Journal of Human Resources Mar 2015, 50 (2) 373-419; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.50.2.373
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Setup and Notation
    • III. Least Squares Estimation: When and Why Does It Not Work?
    • IV. The Strategy
    • V. Tools
    • VI. Three Applications
    • VII. Conclusion
    • Appendix A Estimating the Propensity Score
    • Appendix B Weights for Various Estimators
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Heterogeneous Returns to Active Labour Market Programs for Indigenous Populations
  • Urbanizing Agriculture, Additionality, and the Adoption of Agricultural Conservation Practices
  • Carbon emissions reductions from Indonesias moratorium on forest concessions are cost-effective yet contribute little to Paris pledges
  • Health, Human Capital, and Domestic Violence
  • Why Do We Inflate Grades?: The Effect of Adjunct Faculty Employment on Instructor Grading Standards
  • Agricultural Water Trading Restrictions and Drought Resilience
  • Spillover effects of childrens political status on elderly parents health in China
  • Has Forest Certification Reduced Forest Degradation in Sweden?
  • Missing Work Is a Pain: The Effect of Cox-2 Inhibitors on Sickness Absence and Disability Pension Receipt
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What Are We Weighting For?
  • Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics
Show more Symposium on Empirical Methods

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire