Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

Peer Effects in Disadvantaged Primary Schools

Evidence from a Randomized Experiment

Heather Antecol, Ozkan Eren and Serkan Ozbeklik
Journal of Human Resources, January 2016, 51 (1) 95-132; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.51.1.95
Heather Antecol
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ozkan Eren
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Serkan Ozbeklik
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Arcidiacono Peter,
    2. Nicholson Sean
    2005. “Peer Effects in Medical School.” Journal of Public Economics 89(2–3):327–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Bandiera Oriana,
    2. Barankay Iwan,
    3. Rasul Imran
    2005. “Social Preferences and the Response to Incentives: Evidence from Personnel Data.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(3):917–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Bertrand Marianne
    2010. “New Perspectives in Gender.” In Handbook of Labor Economics Volume 4B, ed. Ashenfelter Orley, Card David, 1545–92. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  4. ↵
    1. Betts Julian R.,
    2. Zau Andrew
    2004. “Peer Groups and Academic Achievement: Panel Evidence from Administrative Data.” Paper presented at the Third IZA / SOLE Transatlantic Meeting of Labor Economists, Buch am Ammersee, Germany, June 2004.
  5. ↵
    1. Boozer Michael A.,
    2. Cacciola Stephen E.
    2001. “Inside the Black Box of Project Star: Estimation of Peer Effects.” Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper Number 832. New Haven: Yale University.
  6. ↵
    1. Brown Jennifer
    2011. “Quitters Never Win: The (Adverse) Incentive Effects of Competing with Superstars.” Journal of Political Economy 119(5):982–1013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Bui Sa A.,
    2. Craig Steven G.,
    3. Imberman Scott A.
    2014. “Is Gifted Education a Bright Idea? Assessing the Impact of Gifted and Talented Programs on Students.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6(3):30–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Burke Mary A.,
    2. Sass Tim R.
    2013. “Classroom Peer Effects and Student Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 31(1):51–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Carrell Scott E.,
    2. Hoekstra Mark L.
    2010. “Externalities in the Classroom: How Children Exposed to Domestic Violence Affect Everyone’s Kids.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(1):211–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Carrell Scott E.,
    2. Fullerton Richard L.,
    3. West James E.
    2009. “Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(3):439–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Carman Katherine G.,
    2. Zhang Lei
    2012. “Classroom Peer Effects and Academic Achievement: Evidence from a Chinese Middle School.” Chinese Economic Review 23(2):223–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Case Anne,
    2. Katz Larry F.
    1991. “The Company You Keep: The Effects of Family and Neighborhood on Disadvantaged Youths.” NBER Working Paper 3705.
  13. ↵
    1. Clotfelter Charles T.,
    2. Ladd Helen F.,
    3. Vigdor Jacob L.
    2006. “Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness.” Journal of Human Resources 41(4):778–820.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Coleman James S
    1966. “Equality of Educational Opportunity: The Coleman Report.” Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office [summary report].
  15. ↵
    1. Constantine Jill,
    2. Player Daniel,
    3. Silva Tim,
    4. Hallgren Kristin,
    5. Grider Mary,
    6. Deke John
    2009. “An Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification: Final Report.” NCEE 2009-4043. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  16. ↵
    1. Croson Rachel,
    2. Gneezy Uri
    2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(2):1–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Curto Vilsa E.,
    2. Fryer Roland G. Jr.
    2014. “The Potential of Urban Boarding Schools for the Poor: Evidence from SEED.” Journal of Labor Economics 32(1):65–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Duflo Esther,
    2. Dupas Pascaline,
    3. Kremer Michael
    2011. “Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya.” American Economic Review 101(5):1739–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Epple Dennis,
    2. Romano Richard E.
    2011. “Peer Effects in Education: A Survey of the Theory and Evidence.” In Handbook of Social Economics Volume 1, ed. Benhabib Jess, Bisin Alberto, Jackson Matthew O., 1053–163. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  20. ↵
    1. Falk Armin,
    2. Ichino Andrea
    2006. “Clear Evidence on Peer Effects.” Journal of Labor Economics 24(1):39–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Fleischman Howard L.,
    2. Hopstock Paul J.,
    3. Pelczar Marisa P.,
    4. Shelley Brooke E.
    2010. “Highlights from PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context.” NCES 2011-004. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  22. ↵
    1. Foster Gigi
    2006. “It’s Not Your Peers, and It’s Not Your friends: Some Progress Toward Understanding the Educational Peer Effect Mechanism.” Journal of Public Economics 90(10–11):1455–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Frölich Markus,
    2. Melly Blaise
    2013. “Unconditional Quartile Treatment Effects Under Endogeneity.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 31(3):346–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Gaviria Alejandro,
    2. Raphael Steven
    2001. “School-Based Peer Effects and Juvenile Behavior.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2):257–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Graham Bryan S.
    2008. “Identifying Social Interactions Through Conditional Variance Restrictions.” Econometrica 76(3):643–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Guryan Jonathan,
    2. Kroft Kory,
    3. Notowidigdo Matthew J.
    2009. “Peer Effects in the Workplace: Evidence from Random Groupings in Professional Golf Tournaments.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(4):34–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Hanushek Eric A
    2006. “School Resources.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education Volume 2, ed. Hanushek Eric A., Welch Finis, 865–908. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  28. ↵
    1. Hanushek Eric A.,
    2. Raymond Margaret E.
    2005. “Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(2):297–327.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hanushek Eric A.,
    2. Rivkin Steven G.
    2006. “Teacher Quality.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education Volume 2, ed. Hanushek Eric A., Welch Finis, 1051–162. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  29. ↵
    1. Hanushek Eric A.,
    2. Kain John F.,
    3. Markman Jacob M.,
    4. Rivkin Steven G.
    2003. “Does Peer Ability Affect Student Achievement.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 18(5):527–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Hoxby Caroline M
    2000. “Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation.” NBER Working Paper 7867.
  31. ↵
    1. Hoxby Caroline M.,
    2. Weingarth Gretchen
    2006. “Taking Race Out of the Equation: School Reassignment and the Structure of Peer Effects.” Paper presented at the Allied Social Science Associations Conference, Boston, January 2006.
  32. ↵
    1. Imberman Scott A.,
    2. Kugler Adriana D.,
    3. Sacerdote Bruce I.
    2012. “Katrina’s Children: Evidence on the Structure of Peer Effects from Hurricane Evacuees.” American Economic Review 102(5):2048–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Jackson Kirabo C.
    2013. “Can Higher Achieving Peers Explain the Benefits to Attending Selective Schools? Evidence from Trinidad Tobago.” Journal of Public Economics 108(6):63–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Kane Thomas J.,
    2. Taylor Eric S.,
    3. Tyler John H.,
    4. Wooten Amy L.
    2011. “Identifying Effective Classroom Practices Using Student Achievement Data.” Journal of Human Resources 46(3):587–613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Kling Jeffrey R.,
    2. Ludwig Jens,
    3. Katz Larry F.
    2005. “Neighborhood Effects on Crime for Female and Male Youth: Evidence from a Randomized Housing Voucher Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(1):87–130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Krueger Alan B.,
    2. Whitmore Diane M.
    2001. “The Effect of Attending a Small Class in the Early Grades on College-Test Taking and Middle School Results: Evidence from Project STAR.” Economic Journal 111(468):1–28.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Lavy Victor,
    2. Paserman Daniele,
    3. Schlosser Analia
    2012. “Inside the Black Box of Ability Peer Effects: Evidence from Variation in the Proportion of Low Achievers in the Classroom.” Economic Journal 122(559):208–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lavy Victor,
    2. Silva Olma,
    3. Weinhardt Felix
    2012. “The Good, the Bad, and the Average: Evidence on Ability Peer Effects in Schools.” Journal of Labor Economics 30(2):367–414.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Lu Fangwen,
    2. Anderson Michael L.
    2015. “Peer Effects in Microenvironments: The Benefits of Homogeneous Classroom Groups.” Journal of Labor Economics 33(1):91–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Ludwig Jens,
    2. Duncan Greg J.,
    3. Hirschfield Paul
    2001. “Urban Poverty and Juvenile Crime: Evidence from a Randomized Housing-Mobility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2):655–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Lyle David S.
    2007. “Estimating and Interpreting Peer and Role Model Effects from Randomly Assigned Social Groups at West Point.” Review of Economics and Statistics 89(2):289–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Manski Charles F.
    1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60(3):531–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Marsh Herbert W.
    1987. “The Big Fish Little Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept.” Journal of Educational Psychology 79(3):280–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Marsh Herbert W.,
    2. Hau Kit-Tai
    2003. “Big Fish Little Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Cross Cultural (26-Country) Test of the Negative Effects of Academic Selective Schools.” American Psychologist 58(5):364–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Marsh Herbert W.,
    2. Parker John W.
    1984. “Determinants of Student Self-Concept: Is it Better To Be a Relatively Large Fish in a Small Pond Even If You Don’t Learn to Swim as Well?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(1):213–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Mass Alexandre,
    2. Moretti Enrico
    2009. “Peers at Work.” American Economic Review 99(1): 112–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Moffitt Robert A.
    2001. “Policy Interventions, Low-Level Equilibria, and Social Interactions.” In Social Dynamics, ed. Durlauf Steven N., Peyton Young H., 45–82. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  47. ↵
    1. Pop-Eleches Christian,
    2. Urquiola Miguel
    2013. “Going to a Better School: Effects and Behavioral Responses.” American Economic Review 103(4):1289–324.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. ↵
    1. Sacerdote Bruce I
    2001. “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2):681–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Sacerdote Bruce I.
    2011. “Peer Effects in Education: How Might They Work, How Big Are They and How Much Do We Know Thus Far?” In Handbook of the Economics of Education Volume 3, ed. Hanushek Erik, Machin Stephen, Woessmann Ludger, 249–77. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  50. ↵
    1. Sass Tim R.,
    2. Hannaway Jane,
    3. Xu Zeyu,
    4. Figlio David N.,
    5. Feng Li
    2012. “Value Added of Teachers in High-Poverty Schools and Lower Poverty Schools.” Journal of Urban Economics 72(2–3):104–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Sojourner Aaron
    2013. “Identification of Peer Effects with Missing Peer Data: Evidence from Project STAR.” Economic Journal 123(569):574–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  52. ↵
    1. Stinebrickner Ralph,
    2. Stinebrickner Todd R.
    2006. “What Can Be Learned About Peer Effects Using College Roommates? Evidence from New Survey Data and Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds.” Journal of Public Economics 90(8–9):1435–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. U.S. Department of Education
    . 2009. Race to the Top Executive Summary. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/.
  53. ↵
    1. Vigdor Jacob L.,
    2. Nechyba Thomas
    2007. “Peer Effects in North Carolina Public Schools.” In Schools and the Equal Opportunity Problem, ed. Woessmann Ludger, Peterson Paul E., 73–102. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  54. ↵
    1. Whitmore Diane
    2005. “‘Resource and Peer Impacts on Girls’ Academic Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 95(2):199–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    1. Zhang Hongliang
    2014. “Beyond Attenuation: The Role of Testing Noise in the Estimation of Achievement-Based Peer Effects.” Working paper.
  56. ↵
    1. Zimmerman David J
    2003. “Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85(1):9–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 51 (1)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 51, Issue 1
1 Jan 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Peer Effects in Disadvantaged Primary Schools
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Peer Effects in Disadvantaged Primary Schools
Heather Antecol, Ozkan Eren, Serkan Ozbeklik
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2016, 51 (1) 95-132; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.51.1.95

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Peer Effects in Disadvantaged Primary Schools
Heather Antecol, Ozkan Eren, Serkan Ozbeklik
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2016, 51 (1) 95-132; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.51.1.95
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Data and Tests for Random Assignment
    • III. Empirical Methodology and Results
    • IV. Conclusion
    • Appendix
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Effects of Exposure to a Large-Scale Recession on Higher Education and Early Labor Market Outcomes
  • Intergenerational Mobility Trends and the Changing Role of Female Labor
  • World War II Blues
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire