Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

Adapting the Supply of Education to the Needs of Girls: Evidence from a Policy Experiment in Rural India

Marian Meller and Stephan Litschig
Journal of Human Resources, August 2016, 51 (3) 760-802; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.51.3.0612-5000R
Marian Meller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephan Litschig
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Angrist Joshua,
    2. Bettinger Eric,
    3. Bloom Erik,
    4. King Elizabeth,
    5. Kremer Michael
    . 2002. “Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment.” American Economic Review 92(5):1535–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Banerjee Abhijit,
    2. Banerji Rukmini,
    3. Duflo Esther,
    4. Glennerster Rachel,
    5. Khemani Stuti
    . 2010. “Pitfalls from Participatory Programs: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Education in India.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2(1):1–30.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Banerjee Abhijit,
    2. Jacob Suraj,
    3. Kremer Michael,
    4. Lanjouw Jenny,
    5. Lanjouw Peter
    . 2004. “How Much Would Universal Primary Education Cost?” Available at URL http://www.cid.harvard.edu/events/papers/Sept04/Abhijit.Banerjee.pdf.
  4. ↵
    1. Barrera-Osorio Felipe,
    2. Linden Leigh L,
    3. Urquiola Miguel
    . 2007. “The Effects of User Fee Reductions on Enrollment: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment.” Available at URL http://www.columbia.edu/~msu2101/BarreraLindenUrquiola(2007).pdf
    1. Barrera-Osorio Felipe,
    2. David S,
    3. Blakeslee Matthew,
    4. Hoover Leigh,
    5. Linden L.,
    6. Raju Dhushyanth
    . 2013. “Expanding Educational Opportunities in Remote Parts of the World: Evidence from a RCT of a Public-Private Partnership in Pakistan.” Available at URL http://www.columbia.edu/~dsb2108/davidsblakeslee_pprs_pakistan_working_paper.pdf.
  5. ↵
    1. Behrman Jere R
    . 1988. “Intrahousehold Allocation of Nutrients in Rural India: Are Boys Favored? Do Parents Exhibit Inequality Aversion?” Oxford Economic Papers 40(1):32–54.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Burde Dana,
    2. Linden Leigh L.
    2013. “Bringing Education to Afghan Girls: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Village-Based Schools.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(3):27–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Cahuc Pierre,
    2. Zylberberg Andre
    . 2004. Labor Economics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  8. ↵
    1. Chin Aimee
    . 2005. “Can Redistributing Teachers Across Schools Raise Educational Attainment? Evidence from Operation Blackboard in India.” Journal of Development Economics 78(2):384–405.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Das Gupta Monica
    . 1987. “Selective Discrimination Against Female Children in Rural Punjab, India.” Population and Development Review 13(1):77–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Davies James B.,
    2. Zhang Junsen
    . 1995. “Gender Bias, Investments in Children, and Bequests.” International Economic Review 36(3):795–818.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Dhaliwal Iqbal,
    2. Duflo Esther,
    3. Glennerster Rachel,
    4. Tulloch Caitlin
    . 2014. “Comparative Cost-Effectiveness Analysis to Inform Policy in Developing Countries: A General Framework with Applications to Education.” In Education Policy in Developing Countries, ed. Glewwe P., 285–338. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  11. ↵
    1. Field Erica,
    2. Ambrus Attila
    . 2008. “Early Marriage, Age of Menarche, and Female Schooling Attainment in Bangladesh.” Journal of Political Economy 116(5):881–930.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Filmer Deon,
    2. Schady Norbert
    . 2008. “Getting Girls into School: Evidence from a Scholarship Program in Cambodia.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 56(3):581–617.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Foster Andrew D.,
    2. Rosenzweig Mark R
    . 2001. “Missing Women, the Marriage Market and Economic Growth.” University of Pennsylvania. Unpublished.
  14. ↵
    1. Glick Peter
    . 2008. “What Policies Will Reduce Gender Schooling Gaps in Developing Countries: Evidence and Interpretation World Development 36(9):1623–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Hahn Jinyong,
    2. Todd Petra,
    3. van der Klaauw Wilbert
    . 2001. “Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Econometrica 69(1):201–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Heath Rachel,
    2. Mobarak Mushfiq
    . 2012. “Does Demand or Supply Constrain Investments in Education: Evidence from Garment Sector Jobs in Bangladesh.” Available at URL http://faculty.washington.edu/rmheath/Garments%20Paper%20Heath%20Mobarak.pdf.
  16. ↵
    1. Herz Barbara,
    2. Sperling Gene B
    . 2004. What Works in Girls’ Education: Evidence and Policies from the Developing World. New York: Council of Foreign Relations Press.
  17. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido W.,
    2. Angrist Joshua D.
    1994. “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 62(2):467–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido W.,
    2. Kalyanaraman K.
    2012. “Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity Estimator.” Review of Economic Studies 79(3):933–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido W.,
    2. Lemieux Thomas
    . 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):615–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Jensen Robert
    . 2012. “Do Labor Market Opportunities Affect Young Women’s Work and Family Decisions? Experimental Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(2):753–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Kazianga Harounan,
    2. Levy Dan,
    3. Linden Leigh L.,
    4. Sloan Matt
    . 2013. “The Effects of ‘Girl-Friendly’ Schools: Evidence from the BRIGHT School Construction Program in Burkina Faso.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5(3):41–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Kim Jooseop,
    2. Alderman Harold,
    3. Orazem Peter F.
    1999. “Can Private School Subsidies Increase Enrollment for the Poor? The Quetta Urban Fellowship Program.” World Bank Economic Review 13(3):443–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Kingdon Geeta Gandhi
    . 2002. “The Gender Gap in Educational Attainment in India: How Much Can Be Explained?” Journal of Development Studies 39(2):25–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Kremer Michael,
    2. Miguel Edward,
    3. Thornton Rebecca
    . 2009. “Incentives to Learn.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 91(3):437–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Lee David S.,
    2. Lemieux Thomas
    . 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 48(2):281–355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Lloyd Cynthia,
    2. Mete Cem,
    3. Grant Monica
    . 2007. “Rural Girls in Pakistan: Constraints of Policy and Culture.” In Exclusion, Gender and Education: Case Studies from the Developing World, ed. Lewis Maureen, Lockheed Marlaine, 99–118. Washington D.C.: Center for Global Development.
  27. ↵
    1. Lokshin Michael M.,
    2. Glinskaya Elena,
    3. Garcia Marito
    . 2004. “The Effect of Early Childhood Development Programmes on Women’s Labour Force Participation and Older Children’s Schooling in Kenya.” Journal of African Economies 13(2):240–76.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. McCrary Justin
    . 2008. “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):698–714.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Mehta Arun C
    . 2010. Elementary Education in India: Progress Towards UEE—Analytical Report and Analytical Tables: 2007–08. New Delhi: National University of Educational Planning and Administration.
  30. ↵
    1. Mensch Barbara S.,
    2. Lloyd Cynthia B.
    1998. “Gender Differences in the Schooling Experiences of Adolescents in Low-Income Countries: The Case of Kenya.” Studies in Family Planning 29(2):167–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Meyersson Erik
    . 2014. “Islamic Rule and the Empowerment of the Poor and Pious.” Econometrica 82(1):229–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Ministry of Home Affairs
    . 2007. Census of India—Map Profile 2001, India States and Union Territories. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs of India, Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner.
  33. ↵
    1. MHRD
    . 2005. Annual Report 2004–05. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource of Development.
  34. ↵
    1. MHRD
    . 2007. Analysis of Budgeted Expenditure on Education, 2004–05 to 2006–07. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource of Development.
  35. ↵
    1. MHRD
    . 2008a. Revised Guidelines for Implementation of the National Program for Education of Girls at Elementary Level (NPEGEL) as a Component of the Scheme of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA). New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource of Development of India. Unpublished.
  36. ↵
    1. MHRD
    . 2008b. Revised Guidelines for Implementation of Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalayas (KGBV). New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource of Development of India. Unpublished.
  37. ↵
    1. MHRD
    . 2008c. National and State Evaluation Reports, NPEGEL and KGBV. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource of Development of India. Unpublished.
  38. ↵
    1. MHRD
    . 2008d. Analysis of Budgeted Expenditure on Education, 2005–06 to 2007–08. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource of Development.
  39. ↵
    1. MHRD
    . 2008e. SSA/NPEGEL/KGBV Physical Progress Reports, Financial Status, and Component-Wise Budgets. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource of Development of India. Data tables.
  40. ↵
    1. MHRD
    . 2010. “Tables of Statistics of School Education 2007–08.” Available at URL http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/SES-School-2007-08.pdf.
    1. Press Information Bureau of the Government of India\
    . 2007. Unspent Amount Under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan. Available at URL http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=33297.
  41. ↵
    1. The PROBE team
    . 1999. Public Report on Basic Education in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  42. ↵
    1. Reinikka Ritva,
    2. Svensson Jakob
    . 2004. “Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(2):678–704.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Rosen Sherwin
    . 1986. “The Theory of Equalizing Differences.” In Handbook of Labor Economics Volume 1, ed. Ashenfelter O., Layard R., 641–92. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  44. ↵
    1. Rugh Andrea
    . 2000. Starting Now—Strategies for Girls Helping Complete Primary. Washington D.C.: Academy for Educational Development.
  45. ↵
    1. Schultz T. Paul
    . 2002. “Why Governments Should Invest More to Educate Girls.” World Development 30(2):207–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Schultz T. Paul
    . 2004. “School Subsidies for the Poor: Evaluating the Mexican Progresa Poverty Program.” Journal of Development Economics 74(1):199–250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Srinivasan K.,
    2. Shastri V.D.
    2002. A Set of Population Projections of India and the Larger States Based on 2001 Census Results. Population Foundation of India, New Delhi. Unpublished.
  48. ↵
    1. Tembon Mercy,
    2. Lucia Fort
    , eds. 2008. Girls’ Education in the 21st Century. Gender Equality, Empowerment, and Economic Growth. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
  49. ↵
    1. United Nations
    . 2011. Millennium Development Goals Indicator Database. http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Data.aspx
  50. ↵
    1. Unterhalter Elaine,
    2. North Amy,
    3. Arnot Madeleine,
    4. Lloyd Cynthia,
    5. Moletsane Lebo,
    6. Murphy-Graham Erin,
    7. Parkes Jenny,
    8. Saito Mioko
    . 2014. Interventions to Enhance Girls’ Education and Gender Equality. Education Rigorous Literature Review. London: Department for International Development.
  51. ↵
    1. World Bank
    . 2011. International Comparison Program. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ICPEXT/Resources/ICP_2011.html
    1. World Health Organization
    . 2011. Life Tables for WHO Member States. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/mortality_life_tables/en/
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 51 (3)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 51, Issue 3
1 Aug 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Adapting the Supply of Education to the Needs of Girls: Evidence from a Policy Experiment in Rural India
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Adapting the Supply of Education to the Needs of Girls: Evidence from a Policy Experiment in Rural India
Marian Meller, Stephan Litschig
Journal of Human Resources Aug 2016, 51 (3) 760-802; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.51.3.0612-5000R

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Adapting the Supply of Education to the Needs of Girls: Evidence from a Policy Experiment in Rural India
Marian Meller, Stephan Litschig
Journal of Human Resources Aug 2016, 51 (3) 760-802; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.51.3.0612-5000R
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Elementary Education in India
    • III. Theoretical Framework
    • IV. Identification and Estimation
    • V. Data
    • VI. Internal Validity Tests
    • VII. Results
    • VIII. Cost-Effectiveness
    • IX. Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Access to Colleges, Human Capital, and Empowerment of Women
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Schools as Safety Nets
  • Tasks and Black-white Inequality over the Long Twentieth Century
  • What Can Trends in Emergency Department Visits Tell Us About Child Mental Health?
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire