The Effect of Social Benefits on Youth Employment

References

1. ↵
   1. Angrist Joshua,
   2. Pischke Jörn-Steffen

   . 2010. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(2):3–30.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Angrist Joshua,
   2. Rokkanen Mikka

   . 2015. “Wanna Get Away? RD Identification Away from the Cutoff”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 110(512):1331–44.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Attanasio Orazio,
   2. Meghir Costas,
   3. Santiago Ana

   . 2011. “Education Choices in Mexico: Using a Structural Model and a Randomized Experiment to Evaluate PROGRESA”. Review of Economic Studies 79 (2012):37–66.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bargain Olivier

   . 2009. “Flexible Labour Supply Models”. Economics Letters 105(1):103–5.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bargain Olivier,
   2. Doorley Karing

   . 2011. “Caught in the Trap? Welfare’s Disincentive and the Labor Supply of Single Men”. Journal of Public Economics 95(9–10):1096–110.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Bargain Olivier,
   2. Vicard Augustin

   . 2014. “Le RMI puis le RSA découragent-ils certains jeunes de travailler? Une analyse sur les jeunes autour de 25 ans.” Economie et Statistiques Forthcoming.
7. ↵
   1. Bargain Olivier,
   2. Decoster André,
   3. Dolls Mathias,
   4. Neumann Dirk,
   5. Peichl Andreas,
   6. Siegloch Sebastian

   . 2013. “Welfare, Labor Supply and Heterogeneous Preferences: Evidence for Europe and the United States”. Social Choice and Welfare 41(4):789–817.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Beffy Magali,
   2. Buchinsky Mosche,
   3. Fougere Denis,
   4. Kamionka Thierry,
   5. Kramarz Francis

   . 2006. “The Returns to Seniority in France (And Why Are They Lower than in the United States?).” Discussion Paper Series No. 5486.
9. ↵
   1. Blundell Richard

   . 2006. “Earned Income Tax Credit Policies: Impact and Optimality: The Adam Smith Lecture, 2005”. Labour Economics 13(4):423–43.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Blundell Richard

    . 2012. “Tax Policy Reform: The Role of Empirical Evidence”. Journal of the European Economic Association 10(1):43–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Blundell Richard,
    2. MaCurdy Thomas

    . 1999. “Labor Supply: A Review of Alternative Approaches.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, ed. Ashenfelter Orley, Card David, Vol. 3, Part A, 1559–695. New York: Elsevier.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Blundell Richard,
    2. Duncan Alan,
    3. Meghir Costas

    . 1998. “Estimating Labour Supply Responses Using Tax Reforms”. Econometrica 66(4):827–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Bourguignon François,
    2. Magnac Thierry

    . 1990. “Labour Supply and Taxation in France”. Journal of Human Resources 25(3):358–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Cai Lixin,
    2. Kalb Guyonne,
    3. Tseng Yi-Ping,
    4. Vu Ha

    . 2008. “The Effect of Financial Incentives on Labour Supply: Evidence for Lone Parents from Microsimulation and Quasi-Experimental Evaluation”. Fiscal Studies 29(2):285–325.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Card David,
    2. Hyslop Dean

    . 2005. “Estimating the Effects of a Time-Limited Earnings Subsidy for Welfare-Leavers”. Econometrica 73(6):1723–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Chemin Matthieu,
    2. Wasmer Etienne

    . 2012. “Ex-ante and Ex-post Evaluation of the 1989 French Welfare Reform Using a Natural Experiment: The 1908 Social Laws in Alsace-Moselle.” LIEPP Working Paper, 2012/3. Paris: Sciences-Po.
17. ↵
    1. Choi Eleanor Jawon

    . 2011. “Evaluating a Structural Model of Labor Supply and Welfare Participation: Evidence from State Welfare Reform Experiments.” Unpublished.
18. ↵
    1. Deaton Angus

    . 2009. “Instruments of Development: Randomization in the Tropics and the Search for the Elusive Keys to Economic Development”. Proceedings of the British Academy, 2008 Lectures 162:123–60.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Decoster André,
    2. Haan Peter

    . 2015. “Empirical Welfare Analysis with Preference Heterogeneity”. International Tax and Public Finance 22(2):224–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Devereux Paul

    . 2003. “Changes in Male Labor Supply and Wages”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56(3):409–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Devereux Paul

    . 2004. “Changes in Relative Wages and Family Labor Supply”. Journal of Human Resources 39(3):696–722.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Dong Yingying,
    2. Lewbel Arthur

    . 2015. “Identifying the Effect of Changing the Policy Threshold in Regression Discontinuity Models”. Review of Economics and Statistics 97(5):1081–92.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Eissa Nada,
    2. Liebman Jeffrey

    . 1996. “Labor Supply Response to the Earned Income Tax Credit”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(2):605–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Eissa Nada Henrik Jacobsen Kleven,
    2. Kreiner Claus Thustrup

    . 2008. “Evaluation of Four Tax Reforms in the United States: Labor Supply and Welfare Effects for Single Mothers”. Journal of Public Economics 92(3):795–816.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Francesconi Marco,
    2. Klaauw Wilbert Van der

    . 2007. “The Socioeconomic Consequences of ‘In-Work’ Benefit Reform for British Lone Mothers”. Journal of Human Resources 42(1):1–31.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    1. Geyer Johannes,
    2. Haan Peter,
    3. Wrohlich Katharina

    . 2015. “The Effects of Family Policy on Maternal Labor Supply: Combining Evidence from a Structural Model and a Quasi-experimental Approach”. Labour Economics 36(C):84–98.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Gurgand Marc,
    2. Margolis David

    . 2008. “Does Work Pay in France? Monetary Incentives, Hours Constraints, and the Guaranteed Minimum Income”. Journal of Public Economics 92(7):1669–97.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Hansen Jörgen,
    2. Liu Xingfei

    . 2011. “Estimating Labor Supply Responses and Welfare Participation: Using a Natural Experiment to Validate a Structural Labor Supply Model.” IZA Discussion Papers 5718, Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
29. ↵
    1. Hausman Jerry

    . 1981. “Stochastic Problems in the Simulation of Labor Supply.” NBER Working Papers 0788, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
30. ↵
    1. Hausman Jerry,
    2. Wise David

    . 1979. “Attrition Bias in Experimental and Panel Data: The Gary Income Maintenance Experiment”. Econometrica 47(2):455–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Heckman James,
    2. Urzúa Sergio

    . 2010. “Comparing IV with Structural Models: What Simple IV Can and Cannot Identify”. Journal of Econometrics 156(1):27–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Hoynes Hilary

    . 1996. “Welfare Transfers in Two-parent Families: Labor Supply and Welfare Participation under AFDC-UP”. Econometrica 64(29):295–332.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido

    . 2010. “Better LATE than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)”. Journal of Economic Literature 48(2):399–423.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Imbens Guido,
    2. Rubin Donald,
    3. Sacerdote Bruce

    . 2001. “Estimating the Effect of Unearned Income on Labor Supply, Earnings, Savings and Consumption: Evidence from a Survey of Lottery Players”. American Economic Review 91(4):778–94.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Immervoll Herwig,
    2. Kleven Henrik Jacobsen,
    3. Kreiner Claus Thustrup,
    4. Saez Emmanuel

    . 2007. “Welfare Reform in European Countries: A Microsimulation Analysis”. Economic Journal 117(516):1–44.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Jonassen Anders

    . 2013. “Disincentive Effect of a Generous Social Assistance Scheme.” SFI working paper 01:2013, Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University.
37. ↵
    1. Keane Michael,
    2. Wolpin Kenneth

    . 2007. “Exploring the Usefulness of a Nonrandom Holdout Sample for Model Validation: Welfare Effects on Female Behavior”. International Economic Review 48(4):1351–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Lalonde Robert

    . 1986. “Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data”. American Economic Review 76(4):604–20.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Laroque Guy,
    2. Salanié Bernard

    . 2002. “Labour Market Institutions and Employment in France”. Journal of Applied Econometrics 17(1):25–48.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Lee David,
    2. Lemieux Thomas

    . 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics”. Journal of Economic Literature 48(2):281–355.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Lemieux Thomas,
    2. Milligan Kevin

    . 2008. “Incentive Effects of Social Assistance: a Regression Discontinuity Approach”. Journal of Econometrics 142(2):807–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Pencavel John

    . 2002. “Cohort Analysis of the Association between Work Hours and Wages among Men”. Journal of Human Resources 37(2):251–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
43. ↵
    1. Pronzato Chiara

    . 2012. “Comparing Quasi-experimental Design and Structural Models for Policy Evaluation: The Case of a Reform of Lone Parental Welfare.” IZA Discussion Papers 6803. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
44. ↵
    1. Thoresen Thor,
    2. Vattø Trine

    . 2015. “Validation of the Discrete Choice Labor Supply Model by Methods of the New Tax Responsiveness Literature”. Labour Economics 37(C):38–53.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Todd Petra,
    2. Wolpin Kenneth

    . 2003. “Using a Social Experiment to Validate a Dynamic Behavioral Model of Child Schooling and Fertility: Assessing the Impact of a School Subsidy Program in Mexico.” PIER Working Paper Archive 03-022. Pennsylvania: Penn Institute for Economic Research.
46. ↵
    1. van Soest Arthur

    . 1995. “Structural Models of Family Labor Supply: A Discrete Choice Approach”. Journal of Human Resources 30(1):63–88.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. ↵
    1. van Soest Arthur,
    2. Das Marcel,
    3. Gong Xiaodong

    . 2002. “A Structural Labor Supply Model with Non-parametric Preferences”. Journal of Econometrics 107(1–2):345–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science