Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticle
Open Access

The Impact of Family Composition on Educational Achievement

Stacey H. Chen, Yen-Chien Chen and Jin-Tan Liu
Journal of Human Resources, January 2019, 54 (1) 122-170; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.54.1.0915.7401R1
Stacey H. Chen
Stacy H. Chen is an associate professor of economics at National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yen-Chien Chen
Yen-Chien Chen is an associate professor of economics at National Chi-Nan University, Taiwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jin-Tan Liu
Jin-Tan Liu is a professor of economics at National Taiwan University and NBER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Almond Douglas,
    2. Chay Kenneth Y.,
    3. Lee David S.
    2005. “The Costs of Low Birth Weight.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(3):1031–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Ananat Elizabeth O.,
    2. Michaels Guy
    . 2008. “The Effect of Marital Breakup on the Income Distribution of Women with Children.” Journal of Human Resources 43(3):611–29.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Angrist Joshua D.,
    2. Evans William N.
    1998. “Children and Their Parents’ Labor Supply: Evidence from Exogenous Variations in Family Size.” American Economic Review 88(3): 450–77.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Angrist Joshua D.,
    2. Lavy Victor,
    3. Schlosser Analia
    . 2010. “Multiple Experiments for the Causal Link between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Labor Economics 28(4):773–823.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Angrist Joshua D.,
    2. Pischke Jorn-Steffen
    . 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  6. ↵
    1. Barcellos Silvia H.,
    2. Carvalho Leandro S.,
    3. Lleras-Muney Adriana
    . 2014. “Child Gender and Parental Investments in India: Are Boys and Girls Treated Differently?” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6(1):157–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Barclay George W.
    1954. A Report on Taiwan’s Population. Princeton, NJ: Office of Population Research, Princeton University.
  8. ↵
    1. Basu Alaka M.
    1989. “Is Discrimination in Food Really Necessary for Explaining Sex Differentials in Childhood Mortality?” Population Studies 43(2):193–210.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Bhalotra Sonia,
    2. Clarke Damian
    . 2016. “The Twin Instrument.” IZA Discussion Paper 10405. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
  10. ↵
    1. Black Sandra E.,
    2. Devereux Paul J.,
    3. Salvanes Kjell G.
    2005. “The More the Merrier? The Effect of Family Size and Birth Order on Children’s Education.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(2):669–700.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Black Sandra E.,
    2. Devereux Paul J.,
    3. Salvanes Kjell G.
    2010. “Small Family, Smart Family? Family Size and the IQ Scores of Young Men.” Journal of Human Resources 45(1):33–58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Borooah Vani K.
    2004. “Gender Bias among Children in India in Their Diet and Immunisation against Disease.” Social Science & Medicine 58(9):1719–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Butcher Kristin F.,
    2. Case Anne
    . 1994. “The Effect of Sibling Sex Composition on Women’s Education and Earnings.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(3):531–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Caceres-Delpiano Julio
    . 2006. “The Impacts of Family Size on Investment in Child Quality.” Journal of Human Resources 41(4):738–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Chahnazarian Anouch
    . 1988. “Determinants of the Sex Ratio at Birth: Review of Recent Literature.” Social Biology 35(3–4):214–35.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Chen Lincoln C.,
    2. Huq Emdadul,
    3. D’Souza Stan
    . 1981. “Sex Bias in the Family Allocation of Food and Health Care in Rural Bangladesh.” Population and Development Review 17(1): 55–70.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chen Stacey H.,
    2. Chen Yen-Chien,
    3. Liu Jin-Tan
    . 2014. “The Impact of Family Composition on Educational Achievement.” NBER Working Paper 20443. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  17. ↵
    1. Conley Dalton,
    2. Glauber Rebecca
    . 2006. “Parental Educational Investment and Children’s Academic Risk: Estimates of the Impact of Sibship Size and Birth Order from Exogenous Variation in Fertility.” Journal of Human Resources 41(4):722–37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Currie Janet
    . 2009. “Healthy, Wealthy, and Wise: Socioeconomic Status, Poor Health in Childhood, and Human Capital Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(1):87–122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Dahl Gordon,
    2. Moretti Enrico
    . 2008. “The Demand for Sons.” Review of Economic Studies 75(4):1085–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Deaton Angus
    . 1997. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  21. ↵
    1. Deaton Angus
    . 2003. “Health, Inequality, and Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Literature 41(1):113–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Duflo Esther
    . 2005. “Gender Equality in Development.” Bureau for Research in Economic Analysis of Development (BREAD) Policy Paper 011.
  23. ↵
    1. Filmer Deon,
    2. Friedman Jed,
    3. Schady Norbert
    . 2009. “Development, Modernization, and Childbearing: The Role of Family Sex Composition.” World Bank Economic Review 23(3):371–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Ganatra Bela R.,
    2. Hirve Siddhi S.
    1994. “Male Bias in Health Care Utilization for Under Fives in a Rural Community in Western India.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 72(1): 101–4.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Garg Ashish,
    2. Morduch Jonathan
    . 1998. “Sibling Rivalry and the Gender Gap: Evidence from Child Health Outcomes in Ghana.” Journal of Population Economics 11(4):471–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Goodkind Daniel
    . 1996. “On Substituting Sex Preference Strategies in East Asia: Does Prenatal Sex Selection Reduce Postnatal Discrimination?” Population and Development Review 22(1): 111–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Greenhalgh Susan
    . 1985. “Is Inequality Demographically Induced? The Family Cycle and the Distribution of Income in Taiwan.” American Anthropologist 87(3):571–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Huber Martin
    . 2015. “Testing the Validity of the Sibling Sex Ratio Instrument.” Labour 29(1): 1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Hull Terence H.
    1990. “Recent Trends in Sex Ratios at Birth in China.” Population and Development Review 16(1):63–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Jayachandran Seema,
    2. Kuziemko Ilyana
    . 2011. “Why Do Mothers Breastfeed Girls Less than Boys? Evidence and Implications for Child Health in India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(3):1485–538.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Jensen Robert
    . 2005. “Equal Treatment, Unequal Outcomes? Generating Sex Inequality through Fertility Behavior.” Unpublished.
  32. ↵
    1. Johansson Sten,
    2. Nygren Ola
    . 1991. “The Missing Girls of China: A New Demographic Account.” Population and Development Review 17(1):35–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Kaestner Robert
    . 1997. “Are Brothers Really Better? Sibling Gender Composition and Educational Achievement Revisited.” Journal of Human Resources 32(2):250–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Kishor Sunita,
    2. Gupta Kamla
    2009. “Gender Equality and Womens Empowerment in India. National Family Health Survey (NFHS–3), India, 2005–06”. Report. Mumbai, India Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences.
  35. ↵
    1. Lafortune Jeanne,
    2. Lee Soohyung
    . 2014. “All for One? Family Size and Children’s Educational Distribution under Credit Constraints.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 104(5):365–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Li Hongbin,
    2. Zhang Junsen,
    3. Zhu Yi
    . 2008. “The Quantity–Quality Tradeoff of Children in a Developing Country: Identification Using Chinese Twins.” Demography 45(1):223–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Lin Ming-Jen,
    2. Liu Jin-Tan,
    3. Qian Nancy
    . 2014. “More Missing Women, Fewer Dying Girls: The Impact of Sex Selective Abortion on Sex at Birth and Relative Female Mortality in Taiwan.” Journal of the European Economic Association 12(4):899–926.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Lundberg Shelly,
    2. Rose Elaina
    . 2002. “The Effects of Sons and Daughters on Men’s Labor Supply and Wages.” Review of Economics and Statistics 84(2):251–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Morduch Jonathan
    . 2000. “Sibling Rivalry in Africa.” American Economic Review 90(2):405–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Parish William,
    2. Willis Robert
    . 1993. “Daughters, Education, and Family Budgets: Taiwan Experiences.” Journal of Human Resources 28(4):863–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Ponczek Vladimir,
    2. Souza Andre Portela
    . 2012. “New Evidence of the Causal Effect of Family Size on Child Quality in a Developing Country.” Journal of Human Resources 47(1):64–106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Rose Elaina
    . 2000. “Gender Bias, Credit Constraints and Time Allocation in Rural India.” Economic Journal 110(465):738–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. ↵
    1. Rosenblum Daniel
    . 2013. “The Effect of Fertility Decisions on Excess Female Mortality in India.” Journal of Population Economics 26(1):147–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Rosenzweig Mark R.,
    2. Wolpin Kenneth I.
    1980. “Testing the Quantity–Quality Fertility Model: The Use of Twins as a Natural Experiment.” Econometrica 48(1):227–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Rosenzweig Mark R.,
    2. Wolpin Kenneth I.
    2000. “Natural ‘Natural Experiments’ in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 38(4):827–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Rosenzweig Mark R.,
    2. Zhang Junsen
    . 2009. “Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birth Weight and China’s ‘One–Child’ Policy.” Review of Economic Studies 76(3):1149–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Rudd Jeremy B.
    1993. “Boy–Girl Discrimination in Taiwan: Evidence from Expenditure Data.” Princeton, NJ: Research Program in Development Studies, Princeton University.
  48. ↵
    1. Sen Amartya
    . 1990. “More than 100 Million Women Are Missing.” New York Review of Books 37 (20), December 20.
  49. ↵
    1. Singh Ashish
    . 2012. “Gender Based Within–Household Inequality in Childhood Immunization in India: Changes over Time and across Regions.” PLOS One 7(4):e35045 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035045.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Steelman Lala Carr,
    2. Powell Brian,
    3. Werum Regina,
    4. Carter Scott
    . 2002. “Reconsidering the Effects of Sibling Configuration: Recent Advances and Challenges.” Annual Review of Sociology 28:243–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. VanderWeele Tyler J.
    2013. “A Three-Way Decomposition of a Total Effect into Direct, Indirect and Interactive Effects.” Epidemiology 24(2):224–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. VanderWeele Tyler J.
    2014. “A Unification of Mediation and Interaction: A 4–Way Decomposition.” Epidemiology 25(5):749–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Vogl Tom S.
    2013. “Marriage Institutions and Sibling Competition: Evidence from South Asia.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128(3):1017–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Waldron Ingrid
    . 1983. “Sex Differences in Human Mortality: The Role of Genetic Factors.” Social Science and Medicine 17(6):321–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    1. Wei Shang-Jin,
    2. Zhang Xiaobo
    . 2011. “The Competitive Saving Motive: Evidence from Rising Sex Ratios and Savings Rates in China.” Journal of Political Economy 119(3):511–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Yamaguchi Kazuo
    . 1989. “A Formal Theory for Male-Preferring Stopping Rules of Childbearing: Sex Differences in Birth Order and the Number of Siblings.” Demography 26(3):451–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 54 (1)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 54, Issue 1
1 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Impact of Family Composition on Educational Achievement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
The Impact of Family Composition on Educational Achievement
Stacey H. Chen, Yen-Chien Chen, Jin-Tan Liu
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2019, 54 (1) 122-170; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.54.1.0915.7401R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Impact of Family Composition on Educational Achievement
Stacey H. Chen, Yen-Chien Chen, Jin-Tan Liu
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2019, 54 (1) 122-170; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.54.1.0915.7401R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Data and Descriptive Analysis
    • III. Empirical Strategy
    • IV. Empirical Results
    • V. Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • In-State College Enrollment and Later Life Location Decisions
  • The Journal of Human Resources Referees Volume 55
  • The Economic Burden of Crime
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • J1
  • I25
  • O15
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire