Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticle

Keeping the Production Line Running

Internal Substitution and Employee Absence

Lena Hensvik and Olof Rosenqvist
Journal of Human Resources, January 2019, 54 (1) 200-224; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.54.1.0516.7914R1
Lena Hensvik
Lena Hensvik is an associate professor of economics at the Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU) in Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Olof Rosenqvist
Olof Rosenqvist is a post-doc researcher at the Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy (IFAU) in Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We postulate that the production losses from absence depend on firms’ ability to internally substitute for absent workers, incentivizing firms to keep absence low in jobs with few substitutes. Using Swedish employer–employee data we show that absence is substantially lower in such positions conditional on establishment and occupation fixed effects. The result is driven by employee adjustments of absence to substitutability, and sorting of low (high) absence workers into (out of) positions with few substitutes. These findings highlight that internal substitution insures firms against production disruptions and that absence costs are important aspects of firms’ hiring and separation decisions.

JEL Classification
  • J23
  • L23
  • M51
  • Received May 2016.
  • Accepted June 2017.
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 54 (1)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 54, Issue 1
1 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Keeping the Production Line Running
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Keeping the Production Line Running
Lena Hensvik, Olof Rosenqvist
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2019, 54 (1) 200-224; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.54.1.0516.7914R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Keeping the Production Line Running
Lena Hensvik, Olof Rosenqvist
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2019, 54 (1) 200-224; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.54.1.0516.7914R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. The Institutional Setting
    • III. Firms’ Responses to Employee Absence
    • IV. Context and Data
    • V. Empirical Strategy and Findings
    • VI. Conclusions
    • Appendix
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • War-Driven Permanent Emigration, Sex Ratios, and Female Labor Force Participation
  • The Response of Firms to Maternity Leave and Sickness Absence
  • Workplace Presenteeism, Job Substitutability and Gender Inequality
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Do Higher Salaries Yield Better Teachers and Better Student Outcomes?
  • The Consequences of Performance Standards in Need-Based Aid
  • In-State College Enrollment and Later Life Location Decisions
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • J23
  • L23
  • M51
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire