Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
    • Free Issue
    • Special Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Alerts
  • Announcements
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
    • Free Issue
    • Special Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Alerts
  • Announcements
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

Gainfully Employed?

Assessing the Employment and Earnings of For-Profit College Students Using Administrative Data

Stephanie Riegg Cellini and Nicholas Turner
Journal of Human Resources, March 2019, 54 (2) 342-370; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.54.2.1016.8302R1
Stephanie Riegg Cellini
Associate professor of public policy and economics at George Washington University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: scellini{at}gwu.edu
Nicholas Turner
Senior economist at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nick.turner{at}frb.gov
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ashenfelter Orley,
    2. Harmon Colm,
    3. Oosterbeek Hessel
    . 1999. “A Review of Estimates of the Schooling/Earnings Relationship, with Tests for Publication Bias.” Labour Economics 6(4):453–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Card David
    . 1999. “The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3A, Part A, ed. Ashenfelter Orley, Card David, 1801–63. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Card David
    . 2001. “Estimating the Return to Schooling: Progress on Some Persistent Econometric Problems.” Econometrica 69(5):1127–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Cellini Stephanie Riegg,
    2. Chaudhary Latika
    . 2014. “The Labor Market Returns to a For-Profit College Education.” Economics of Education Review 43:125–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Cellini Stephanie Riegg,
    2. Darolia Rajeev
    . 2015. “College Costs and Financial Constraints: Student Borrowing at For-Profit Institutions.” In Student Loans and the Dynamics of Debt, ed. Hersbein B.J., Hollenbeck K., 137–74. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute Press.
  6. ↵
    1. Cellini Stephanie Riegg,
    2. Darolia Rajeev,
    3. Turner Lesley J.
    2016. “Where Do Students Go When For-Profit Colleges Lose Federal Aid?” NBER Working Paper 22967. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  7. ↵
    1. Cellini Stephanie Riegg,
    2. Goldin Claudia
    . 2014. “Does Federal Student Aid Raise Tuition? New Evidence on For-Profit Colleges.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6(4):1–33.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Chung Anna S.
    2008. “Effects of For-Profit Training on Earnings.” Unpublished. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
  9. ↵
    1. Darolia Rajeev
    . 2013. “Integrity versus Access? The Effect of Federal Financial Aid Availability on Postsecondary Enrollment.” Journal of Public Economics 106(October):101–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Darolia Rajeev,
    2. Koedel Corey,
    3. Martorell Paco,
    4. Wilson Katie,
    5. Perez-Arce Francisco
    . 2015. “Do Employers Prefer Workers Who Attend For-Profit Colleges? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34(4):881–903.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Deming David J.,
    2. Goldin Claudia,
    3. Katz Lawrence F.
    2012. “The For-Profit Postsecondary School Sector: Nimble Critters or Agile Predators?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(1):139–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Deming David J.,
    2. Goldin Claudia,
    3. Katz Lawrence F.,
    4. Yuchtman Noam
    . 2015. “Can Online Learning Bend the Higher Education Cost Curve?” American Economic Review 105(5): 496–501.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Deming David J.,
    2. Yuchtman Noam,
    3. Abulafi Amira,
    4. Goldin Claudia,
    5. Katz Lawrence F.
    2016. “The Value of Postsecondary Credentials in the Labor Market: An Experimental Study.” American Economic Review 106(3):778–806.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Federal Register
    . 2010. “Program Integrity: Gainful Employment”.” July 26, 2010 http://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2010/07/26/2010-17845/program-integrity-gainful-employment#p-67 (accessed September 6, 2010).
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Federal Register
    . 2014. “Program Integrity: Gainful Employment Final Rule”.” October 31, 2014 https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/10/31/2014-25594/program-integrity-gainful-employment (accessed May 10, 2016).
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Federal Student Aid
    . 2011. “Gainful Employment Operations Manual.” http://ifap.ed.gov/GainfulEmploymentOperationsManual/attachments/GainfulEmploymentOperationsManualMasterFile.pdf (accessed March 20, 2017).
  17. ↵
    1. Federal Student Aid
    . 2015. “Frequently Asked Questions about Corinthian Colleges.” U.S. Department of Education. https://studentaid.ed.gov/sa/about/announcements/corinthian/faq (accessed February 23, 2015).
  18. ↵
    1. Gilpin Gregory A.,
    2. Saunders Joseph,
    3. Stoddard Christina
    . 2015. “Why Has For-Profit Colleges’ Share of Higher Education Expanded so Rapidly? Estimating the Responsiveness to Labor Market Changes.” Economics of Education Review 45:53–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Goldin Claudia,
    2. Katz Lawrence F.
    2008. The Race between Education and Technology. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  20. ↵
    1. Goodman P.S.
    2010. “In Hard Times, Lured into Trade Schools and Debt.” New York Times. March 13, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/business/14schools.html (accessed August 6, 2010).
  21. ↵
    1. Grubb W.
    Norton. 1993a. “The Long-Run Effects of Proprietary Schools on Wages and Earnings: Implications for Federal Policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15(1):17–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Grubb W. Norton
    . 1993b. “The Varied Economic Returns to Postsecondary Education: New Evidence from the Class of 1972.” Journal of Human Resources 28(2):365–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Hoxby Caroline
    . 2015. “Computing the Value Added of American Postsecondary Institutions.” U.S. Treasury Report. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/15rpcompvalueaddpostsecondary.pdf (accessed September 5, 2018).
  24. ↵
    1. Jacobson Louis,
    2. LaLonde Robert,
    3. Sullivan Daniel G.
    2005. “Estimating the Returns to Community College Schooling for Displaced Workers.” Journal of Econometrics 125: 271–304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Jepsen Christopher,
    2. Mueser Peter
    . 2015. “The Benefits of Alternatives to Conventional College: Labor-Market Returns to Proprietary Schooling.” Unpublished. Dublin, Ireland: University College Dublin.
  26. ↵
    1. Jepsen Christopher,
    2. Troske Kenneth,
    3. Coomes Paul
    . 2014. “The Labor-Market Returns to Community College Degrees, Diplomas, and Certificates.” Journal of Labor Economics 32(1):95–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Kane Thomas J.,
    2. Rouse Cecilia Elena
    . 1995a. “The Labor Market Returns to Two- and Four-Year College.” American Economic Review 85(3):600–614.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Kane Thomas J.,
    2. Rouse Cecilia Elena
    . 1995b. “Comment on W. Norton Grubb: “The Varied Economic Returns to Post-secondary Education: New Evidence from the Class of 1972.” Journal of Human Resources 30(1):205–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Kane Thomas J.,
    2. Rouse Cecilia Elena
    . 1999. “The Community College: Educating Students at the Margin between College and Work.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 13(1):63–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Lang Kevin,
    2. Weinstein Russell
    . 2013. “The Wage Effects of Not-for-Profit and For-Profit Certifications: Better Data, Somewhat Different Results.” NBER Working Paper 19135. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  31. ↵
    1. Lewin Tamar
    . 2010. “For-Profit Colleges Mislead Students, Report Finds.” New York Times, A13. August 3, 2010 http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/education/04education.html?hp (accessed August 4, 2010).
  32. ↵
    1. Looney Adam,
    2. Yannelis Constantine
    . 2015. “A Crisis in Student Loans? How Changes in the Characteristics of Borrowers and the Institutions They Attended Contributed to Rising Loan Defaults.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Conference Draft, September 10–11.
  33. ↵
    1. Marcotte Dave E.,
    2. Bailey Thomas,
    3. Borkoski Carey,
    4. Kienzl Greg S.
    2005. “The Returns of a Community College Education: Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Survey.” Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 27(2):157–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
    . 2017. Digest of Education Statistics 2016. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2016menu_tables.asp (accessed July 14, 2017).
  35. ↵
    1. Oreopoulos Philip,
    2. Petronijevic Uros
    . 2013. “Making College Worth It: A Review of Research on the Returns to Higher Education.” NBER Working Paper 19053. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  36. ↵
    1. Rosenbaum James E.,
    2. Deil-Amen Regina,
    3. Person Ann E.
    2006. After Admission: from College Access to College Success. Russell Sage Foundation: New York.
  37. ↵
    1. Stevens Ann Huff,
    2. Kurlaender Michal,
    3. Grosz Michel
    . 2015. “Career Technical Education and Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from California Community Colleges.” NBER Working Paper 21137. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  38. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Education
    . 2014. “Fact Sheet on Final Gainful Employment Regulations.” https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2012/gainful-employment-fact-sheet-10302014.pdf (accessed March 22, 2016).
  39. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Education
    . 2016. “Proprietary School 90–10 Revenue Percentages 2013–2014.” Office of Federal Student Aid. https://studentaid.ed.gov/sa/about/data-center/school/proprietary (accessed on March 21, 2016).
  40. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Education
    . 2017. “Education Department Releases Final Debt-to-Earnings Rates for Gainful Employment Programs.” https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/education-department-releases-final-debt-earnings-rates-gainful-employment-programs (accessed June 16, 2017).
  41. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Labor
    . 2016. “Comparison of State Unemployment Laws.” http://www.unemploymentinsurance.doleta.gov/unemploy/comparison2016.asp (accessed on July 19, 2016).
  42. ↵
    1. U.S. Government Accountability Office
    . 2010. “For-Profit Colleges: Undercover Testing Finds Colleges Encouraged Fraud and Engaged in Deceptive and Questionable Marketing Practices.” Washington, DC: GAO. http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-948T (accessed August 5, 2010).
  43. ↵
    1. U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
    . 2012. “For Profit Education: The Failure to Safeguard the Federal Investment and Ensure Student Success.” S. Print 112-37. July 30, 2012 112th Congress, Second Session.
  44. ↵
    1. Whitman David
    . 2017. “Truman, Eisenhower, and the First GI Bill Scandal.” The Century Foundation. https://tcf.org/content/report/truman-eisenhower-first-gi-bill-scandal/ (accessed September 5, 2018).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 54 (2)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 54, Issue 2
31 Mar 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gainfully Employed?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Gainfully Employed?
Stephanie Riegg Cellini, Nicholas Turner
Journal of Human Resources Mar 2019, 54 (2) 342-370; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.54.2.1016.8302R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Gainfully Employed?
Stephanie Riegg Cellini, Nicholas Turner
Journal of Human Resources Mar 2019, 54 (2) 342-370; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.54.2.1016.8302R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Background
    • III. Data
    • IV. Estimation
    • V. Summary Statistics and Tests of Identifying Assumptions
    • VI. Results
    • VII. Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Benefits of Alternatives to Conventional College: Comparing the Labor-Market Returns to For-Profit Schools and Community Colleges
  • Where versus What: College Value-Added and Returns to Field of Study in Further Education
  • Stacking the Deck for Employment Success: Labor Market Returns to Stackable Credentials
  • Where versus What: College Value-Added and Returns to Field of Study in Further Education
  • Impacts of State Aid for Nontraditional Students on Educational and Labor Market Outcomes
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Teacher Testing Standards and the New Teacher Pipeline
  • Can Academic Redshirting Shrink the Education Gender Gap?
  • Working From Home and Wage Dynamics
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • I2
  • I20
  • I26
  • J24
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire