More Than Just a Nudge

References

1. ↵
   1. Allcott Hunt

   . 2011. “Social Norms and Energy Conservation.” Journal of Public Economics 95(9–10):1082–95.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Avery Christopher,
   2. Kane Thomas J.

   2004. “Student Perceptions of College Opportunities. The Boston COACH Program.” In College Choices: The Economics of Where to Go, When to Go, and How to Pay For It, ed. Hoxby Caroline, 355–94. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
3. ↵
   1. Bergen John R.,
   2. Sladeczek Ingrid E.,
   3. Schwarz Richard D.

   1991. “Effects of a Measurement and Planning System on Kindergarteners’ Cognitive Development and Educational Programming.” American Educational Research Journal 28(3):683–714.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Bergman Peter

   . 2016. “Parent–Child Information Frictions and Human Capital Investment: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Working Paper. http://www.columbia.edu/~psb2101/BergmanSubmission.pdf (accessed April 8, 2016).
5. ↵
   1. Beshears John,
   2. Choi James J.,
   3. Laibson David,
   4. Madrian Brigitte C.,
   5. Milkman Katherine L.

   2015. “The Effect of Providing Peer Information on Retirement Savings Decisions.” The Journal of Finance 70(3):1161–201.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Black Paul,
   2. Wiliam Dylan

   . 1998a. “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment.” Phi Delta Kappan 80(2):139–48.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Black Paul,
   2. Wiliam Dylan

   . 1998b. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education 5(1):7–74.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Castleman Benjamin L.,
   2. Page Lindsay C.

   2015. “Summer Nudging: Can Personalized Text Messages and Peer Mentor Outreach Increase College Going among Low-Income High School Graduates?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 115:144–60.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Cortes Kalena,
   2. Fricke Hans,
   3. Loeb Susanna,
   4. Song David

   . 2017. “Actionable Advice to Foster Parental Engagement: Evidence from an Early-Childhood Text Messaging Experiment.” Unpublished. Stanford, CA: Stanford.
10. ↵
    1. DellaVigna Stefano

    . 2009. “Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field.” Journal of Economic Literature 47(2):315–72.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Dizon-Ross Rebecca

    . 2017. “Parents’ Perceptions and Children’s Education: Experimental Evidence from Malawi.” Working Paper. http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/rebecca.dizon-ross/research/papers/perceptions.pdf (accessed August 7, 2017).
12. ↵
    1. Escueta Maya,
    2. Quan Vincent,
    3. Nickow Andre Joshua,
    4. Oreopoulos Philip

    . 2017. “Education Technology: An Evidence-Based Review.” NBER Working Paper 23744. Cambridge, MA: NBER. www.nber.org/papers/w23744 (accessed November 2, 2017).
13. ↵
    1. Fountas and Pinnell

    . 2012. “Field Study of Reliability and Validity of the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment Systems 1 and 2.” http://www.heinemann.com/fountasandpinnell/research/BASFieldStudyFullReport.pdf (accessed July 8, 2015).
14. ↵
    1. Frey Bruno S.,
    2. Meier Stephan

    . 2004. “Social Comparisons and Pro-Social Behavior: Testing ‘Conditional Cooperation’ in a Field Experiment.” American Economic Review 94(5):1717–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Gerber Alan S.,
    2. Rogers Todd

    . 2009. “Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote: Everybody’s Voting and so Should You.” The Journal of Politics 71(1):178–91.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Grodsky Eric,
    2. Jones Melanie T.

    2007. “Real and Imagined Barriers to College Entry: Perceptions of Cost.” Social Science Research 36(2):745–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Hastings Justine S.,
    2. Weinstein Jeffrey M.

    2008. “Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(4): 1373–414.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Hoxby Caroline,
    2. Turner Sarah

    . 2013. “Expanding College Opportunities for High-Achieving, Low Income Students.” Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 12-014. Stanford, CA: Stanford.
19. ↵
    1. Karlan Dean,
    2. McConnell Margaret,
    3. Mullainathan Sendhil,
    4. Zinman Jonathan

    . 2016. “Getting to the Top of Mind: How Reminders Increase Saving.” Management Science 62(12): 3393–411.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Kast Felipe,
    2. Meier Stephan,
    3. Pomeranz Dina

    . 2012. “Under-Savers Anonymous: Evidence on Self-Help Groups and Peer Pressure as a Savings Commitment Device.” NBER Working Paper 18417. Cambridge, MA: NBER. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18417.pdf (accessed March 30, 2016).
21. ↵
    1. Kraft Matthew A.,
    2. Rogers Todd A.

    2015. “The Underutilized Potential of Teacher-to-Parent Communication: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Economics of Education Review 47:49–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Kulik Chen-Lin C.,
    2. Kulik James A.

    1984. “Effects of Ability Grouping on Elementary School Pupils: A Meta-Analysis.” Presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED255329.pdf (accessed October 17, 2018).
23. ↵
    1. Kulik Chen-Lin C.,
    2. Kulik James A.

    1992. “Meta-Analytic Findings on Grouping Programs.” Gifted Child Quarterly 36(2):73–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Lee David S.

    2009. “Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects.” Review of Economic Studies 76(3):1071–102.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Lou Yipling,
    2. Abrami Philip C.,
    3. Spence John C.,
    4. Poulsen Catherine,
    5. Chambers Bette,
    6. d’Apollinia Sylvia

    . 1996. “Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 66(4):423–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Mullainathan Sendhil,
    2. Thaler Richard H.

    2000. “Behavioral Economics.” NBER Working Paper w7948. Cambridge, MA: NBER. http://www.nber.org/papers/w7948 (accessed December 15, 2015).
27. ↵
    1. Pane John F.,
    2. Griffin Beth Ann,
    3. McCaffrey Daniel F.,
    4. Karam Rita

    . 2014. “Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at Scale.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 36(2):127–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Robinson Joseph P.

    2009. “Evidence of a Differential Effect of Ability-Grouping on the Reading Achievement Growth of Language-Minority Hispanics.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 30(2):141–80.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Samejima Fumiko

    . 1997. “Graded Response Model.” In Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, ed. van der Linden Wim J., Hambleton Ronald K., 85–100. New York: Springer.
30. ↵
    1. Valant Jon,
    2. Loeb Susanna

    . 2014. “Information, Choice, and Decision-Making: Field Experiments with Adult and Student School Choosers.” Working Paper.
31. ↵
    1. Van Klaveren Chris,
    2. Vonk Sebastiaan,
    3. Cornelisz Ilja

    . 2017. “The Effect of Adaptive Versus Static Practicing on student Learning—Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment.” Economics of Education Review 58:175–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Vygotsky Lev S.

    1978a. “Interaction between Learning and Development.” Readings on the Development of Children 23(3):34–41.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Vygotsky Lev S.

    1978b. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. ↵
    1. York Benjamin N.,
    2. Loeb Susanna,
    3. Doss Christopher

    . 2019. “One Step at a Time: The Effects of an Early Literacy Text-Messaging Program for Parents of Preschoolers.” Journal of Human Resources 54(3):533–62.

    OpenUrl