More Harm than Good?

References

1. 1. Beffy Magali,
   2. Davezies Laurent

   . 2013. “Has the “Ambition Success” Educational Program Achieved Its Ambition?” Annals of Economics and Statistics 111/112:271–94.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Black Sandra E.

   1999. “Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(2):577–99.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Bénabou Roland,
   2. Kramarz Francis,
   3. Prost Corinne

   . 2004. “Zones d’éducation prioritaire: Quels moyens pour quels résultats? Une évaluation sur la période 1982–1992.” Économie et statistique 80:3–34.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Bénabou Roland,
   2. Kramarz Francis,
   3. Prost Corinne

   . 2009. “The French Zones d’Education Prioritaire: Much Ado about Nothing?” Economics of Education Review 28(3):345–56.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Borman Geoffrey D.,
   2. D’Agostino Jerome V.

   1996. “Title I and Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Federal Evaluation Results.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 18(4):309–26.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Burgess Simon,
   2. Greaves Ellen,
   3. Vignoles Anna,
   4. Wilson Deborah

   . 2015. “What Parents Want: School Preferences and School Choice.” The Economic Journal 125(587):1262–89.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Caille Jean-Paul,
   2. Davezies Laurent,
   3. Garrouste Manon

   . 2016. “Les résultats scolaires des collégiens bénéficientils des réseaux ambition réussite? Une analyse par régression sur discontinuité.” Revue économique 67(3):639–66.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Calonico Sebastian,
   2. Cattaneo Matias,
   3. Titiunik Rocío

   . 2014a. “Robust Data-Driven Inference in the Regression-Discontinuity Design.” The Stata Journal 14(4):909–46.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Calonico Sebastian,
   2. Cattaneo Matias,
   3. Titiunik Rocío

   . 2014b. “Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs.” Econometrica 82(6):2295–326.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Chay Kenneth Y.,
    2. McEwan Patrick J.,
    3. Urquiola Miguel

    . 2005. “The Central Role of Noise in Evaluating Interventions That Use Test Scores to Rank Schools.” American Economic Review 95(4):1237–58.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Davezies Laurent,
    2. Garrouste Manon

    . 2014. “More Harm than Good? Sorting Effects in a Compensatory Education Program.” Working Paper 2014-42. Palaiseau, France: Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
12. 1. Davezies Laurent,
    2. Barbanchon Thomas Le

    . 2017. “Regression Discontinuity Design with Continuous Measurement Error in the Running Variable.” Journal of Econometrics 200(2):260–81.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Dinerstein Michael,
    2. Smith Troy

    . 2015. “Quantifying the Supply Response of Private Schools to Public Policies.” Discussion Paper 15-019. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
14. 1. Dobbie Will,
    2. Fryer Roland G.

    2011. “Are High-Quality Schools Enough to Increase Achievement among the Poor? Evidence from the Harlem Children’s Zone.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3(3):158–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. 1. Epple Dennis,
    2. Romer Thomas,
    3. Sieg Holger

    . 2001. “Interjurisdictional Sorting and Majority Rule: An Empirical Analysis.” Econometrica 69(6):1437–65.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Fack Gabrielle,
    2. Grenet Julien

    . 2010. “When Do Better Schools Raise Housing Prices? Evidence from Paris Public and Private Schools.” Journal of Public Economics 94(1–2):59–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Fack Gabrielle,
    2. Grenet Julien

    . 2013. “Les effets de l’assouplissement de la carte scolaire dans l’éducation prioritaire.” Éducation & formations 83:25–37.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Ferreyra Maria Marta

    2007. “Estimating the Effects of Private School Vouchers in Multidistrict Economies.” American Economic Review 97(3):789–817.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Figlio David N.,
    2. Lucas Maurice E.

    2004. “What’s in a Grade? School Report Cards and the Housing Market.” American Economic Review 94(3):591–604.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Friesen Jane,
    2. Javdani Mohsen,
    3. Smith Justin,
    4. Woodcock Simon

    . 2012. “How Do School ‘Report Cards’ Affect School Choice Decisions?” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique 45(2):784–807.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Glaeser Edward L.

    2008. “The Economic Approach to Cities.” Working Paper rwp08-003. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
22. 1. Hahn Jinyong,
    2. Todd Petra,
    3. van der Klaauw Wilbert

    . 2001. “Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Econometrica 69(1):201–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Hanushek Eric A.,
    2. Kain John F.,
    3. Rivkin Steven G.

    2004. “Why Public Schools Lose Teachers.” The Journal of Human Resources 39(2):326–54.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 1. Hastings Justine,
    2. Kane Thomas,
    3. Staiger Douglas

    . 2009. “Heterogeneous Preferences and the Efficacy of Public School Choice.” Unpublished.
25. 1. Hastings Justine S.,
    2. Weinstein Jeffrey M.

    2008. “Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(4):1373–414.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Horowitz Joel L.,
    2. Manski Charles F.

    1995. “Identification and Robustness with Contaminated and Corrupted Data.” Econometrica 63(2):281–302.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Hsieh Chang-Tai,
    2. Urquiola Miguel

    . 2006. “The Effects of Generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratification: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program.” Journal of Public Economics 90(8–9):1477–503.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Imbens Guido W.,
    2. Angrist Joshua D.

    1994. “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 62(2):467–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Imbens Guido W.,
    2. Kalyanaraman Karthik

    . 2012. “Optimal Bandwidth Choice for the Regression Discontinuity Estimator.” The Review of Economic Studies 79(3):933–59.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Imbens Guido W.,
    2. Lemieux Thomas

    . 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):615–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Jepsen Christopher,
    2. Rivkin Steven

    . 2009. “Class Size Reduction and Student Achievement: The Potential Tradeoff between Teacher Quality and Class Size.” The Journal of Human Resources 44(1):223–50.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. 1. Lafourcade Miren,
    2. Mayneris Florian

    . 2017. “En finir avec les ghettos urbains? Retour sur 20 ans d’expérience des Zones Franches Urbaines.” Opuscule 44. Paris: Centre pour la recherche économique et ses applications.
33. 1. Leuven Edwin,
    2. Lindahl Mikael,
    3. Oosterbeek Hessel,
    4. Webbink Dinand

    . 2007. “The Effect of Extra Funding for Disadvantaged Pupils on Achievement.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 89(4):721–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Machin Stephen,
    2. McNally Sandra,
    3. Meghir Costas

    . 2004. “Improving Pupil Performance in English Secondary Schools: Excellence in Cities.” Journal of the European Economic Association 2(2–3):396–405.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Machin Stephen,
    2. McNally Sandra,
    3. Meghir Costas

    . 2010. “Resources and Standards in Urban Schools.” Journal of Human Capital 4(4): 365–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. 1. MacLeod W. Bentley,
    2. Urquiola Miguel

    . 2012. “Anti-Lemons: School Reputation, Relative Diversity, and Educational Quality.” IZA Discussion Paper 6805. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
37. 1. MacLeod W. Bentley,
    2. Urquiola Miguel

    . 2015. “Reputation and School Competition.” American Economic Review 105(11): 3471–88.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Maurin Éric

    . 2004. Le ghetto français. Enquête sur le séparatisme social. Paris: Le Seuil.
39. 1. McCrary Justin

    . 2008. “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):698–714.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. 1. Moretti Enrico

    . 2011. “Social Learning and Peer Effects in Consumption: Evidence from Movie Sales.” Review of Economic Studies 78(1):356–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. 1. Murat Fabrice,
    2. Thaurel-Richard Michèle

    . 2013. “Évolution des caractéristiques des collèges durant la mise en oeuvre de l’assouplissement de la carte scolaire de 2007.” Éducation & formations 83:11–20.

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Nechyba Thomas

    . 2003. “Public School Finance and Urban School Policy: General versus Partial Equilibrium Analysis.” Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs: 139–70.
43. 1. Neumark David,
    2. Simpson Helen

    . 2015. “Place-Based Policies.” In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 5, ed. Duranton Gilles, Henderson J. Vernon, Strange William C., 1197–287. New York: Elsevier.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
44. 1. Partridge D. Mark,
    2. Rickman S. Dan

    . 2006. The Geography of American Poverty: Is There a Need for Place-Based Policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
45. 1. Pei Zhuan,
    2. Shen Yi

    . 2017. “The Devil Is in the Tails: Regression Discontinuity Design with Measurement Error in the Assignment Variable.” In Regression Discontinuity Designs: Theory and Applications, Advances in Econometrics Volume 38, ed. Cattaneo Matias D., Escanciano Juan Carlos, 455–502. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
46. 1. Pop-Eleches Cristian,
    2. Urquiola Miguel

    . 2013. “Going to a Better School: Effects and Behavioral Responses.” American Economic Review 103(4):1289–324.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
47. 1. Prost Corinne

    . 2013. “Teacher Mobility: Can Financial Incentives Help Disadvantaged Schools to Retain Their Teachers?” Annals of Economics and Statistics 111/112:171–91.

    OpenUrl
48. 1. Reardon Sean F.,
    2. Robinson P. Joseph

    . 2012. “Regression Discontinuity Designs with Multiple Rating-Score Variables.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 5(1):83–104.

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Rothstein Jesse M.

    2006. “Good Principals or Good Peers? Parental Valuation of School Characteristics, Tiebout Equilibrium, and the Incentive Effects of Competition among Jurisdictions.” American Economic Review 96(4):1333–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Shapiro Joseph,
    2. Treviño Jorge Moreno

    . 2004. “Compensatory Education for Disadvantaged Mexican Students: An Impact Evaluation Using Propensity Score Matching.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3334. Washington, DC: World Bank.
51. 1. Tokman Andrea

    . 2002. “Evaluation of the P900 Program: A Targeted Education Program for Underperforming Schools.” Central Bank of Chile Working Paper 170. Santiago: Central Bank of Chile.
52. 1. Urquiola Miguel

    . 2005. “Does School Choice Lead to Sorting? Evidence from Tiebout Variation.” American Economic Review 95(4):1310–26.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Urquiola Miguel,
    2. Verhoogen Eric

    . 2009. “Class-Size Caps, Sorting, and the Regression-Discontinuity Design.” American Economic Review 99(1):179–215.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
54. 1. van der Klaauw Wilbert

    2008. “Breaking the Link between Poverty and Low Student Achievement: An Evaluation of Title I.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):731–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. 1. Wong Vivian C.,
    2. Steiner Peter M.,
    3. Cook Thomas D.

    2013. “Analyzing Regression-Discontinuity Designs with Multiple Assignment Variables: A Comparative Study of Four Estimation Methods.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 38(2):107–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Yu Ping

    . 2012. “Identification of Treatment Effects in Regression Discontinuity Designs with Measurement Error.” Unpublished.