The Impacts of Performance Pay on Teacher Effectiveness and Retention

References

1. ↵
   1. Aaronson Daniel,
   2. Barrow Lisa,
   3. Sander William

   . 2007. “Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools.” Journal of Labor Economics 25(1):95–135.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Atkinson Adele,
   2. Burgess Simon,
   3. Croxson Bronwyn,
   4. Gregg Paul,
   5. Propper Carol,
   6. Slater Helen,
   7. Wilson Deborah

   . 2009. “Evaluating the Impact of Performance-Related Pay for Teachers in England.” Labour Economics 16(3):251–61.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bandiera Oriana,
   2. Barankay Iwan,
   3. Rasul Imran

   . 2007. “Incentives for Managers and Inequality among Workers: Evidence from a Firm-Level Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(2):729–73.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Benabou Roland,
   2. Tirole Jean

   . 2003. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation.” The Review of Economic Studies 70(3):489–520.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Booth Alison L.,
   2. Frank Jeff

   . 1999. “Earnings, Productivity, and Performance-Related Pay.” Journal of Labor Economics 17(3):447–63.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Chetty Raj,
   2. Friedman John N.,
   3. Rockoff Jonah E.

   2016. “Using Lagged Outcomes to Evaluate Bias in Value-Added Models.” NBER Working Paper 21951. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
7. ↵
   1. Deci Edward L.,
   2. Koestner Richard,
   3. Ryan Richard M.

   1999. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 125(6):627.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Dee Thomas S.,
   2. Wyckoff James

   . 2015. “Incentives, Selection, and Teacher Performance: Evidence from IMPACT.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34(2):267–97.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. DeLeire Thomas,
   2. Levy Helen

   . 2004. “Worker Sorting and the Risk of Death on the Job.” Journal of Labor Economics 22(4):925–53.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. 1. Delfgaauw Josse,
    2. Dur Robert

    . 2007. “Signaling and Screening of Workers’ Motivation.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 62(4):605–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Dohmen Thomas,
    2. Falk Armin

    . 2011. “Performance Pay and Multidimensional Sorting: Productivity, Preferences, and Gender.” American Economic Review 101(2):556–90.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Eberts Randall,
    2. Hollenbeck Kevin,
    3. Stone Joe

    . 2002. “Teacher Performance Incentives and Student Outcomes.” Journal of Human Resources 37(4):913–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Figlio David N.,
    2. Kenny Lawrence W.

    2007. “Individual Teacher Incentives and Student Performance.” Journal of Public Economics 91(5):901–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Fryer Roland G.

    2013. “Teacher Incentives and Student Achievement: Evidence from New York City Public Schools.” Journal of Labor Economics 31(2):373–407.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Glewwe Paul,
    2. Ilias Nauman,
    3. Kremer Michael

    . 2010. “Teacher Incentives.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(3):205–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Gneezy Uri,
    2. Niederle Muriel,
    3. Rustichini Aldo

    . 2003. “Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(3):1049–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Gneezy Uri,
    2. Rustichini Aldo

    . 2000. “Pay Enough or Don’t Pay at All.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3):791–810.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Goldhaber Dan

    . 2007. “Everyone’s Doing It, but What Does Teacher Testing Tell Us about Teacher Effectiveness?” Journal of Human Resources 42(4):765–94.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Goldhaber Dan,
    2. Chaplin Duncan Dunbar

    . 2015. “Assessing the “Rothstein Falsification Test”: Does It Really Show Teacher Value-Added Models Are Biased?” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 8(1):8–34.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Goodman Sarena F.,
    2. Turner Lesley J.

    2013. “The Design of Teacher Incentive Pay and Educational Outcomes: Evidence from the New York City Bonus Program.” Journal of Labor Economics 31(2):409–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Harris Douglas N.,
    2. Anderson Andrew

    . 2013. “Bias of Public Sector Worker Performance Monitoring: Theory and Empirical Evidence from Middle School Teachers.” Working Paper. New Orleans, LA: Tulane University.
22. ↵
    1. Hill Andrew J.

    2014. “The Costs of Failure: Negative Externalities in High School Course Repetition.” Economics of Education Review 43:91–105.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Imberman Scott A.

    2015. “How Effective Are Financial Incentives for Teachers?” IZA World of Labor 158. doi:10.15185/izawol.158

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Imberman Scott A.,
    2. Lovenheim Michael F.

    2015. “Incentive Strength and Teacher Productivity: Evidence from a Group-Based Teacher Incentive Pay System.” Review of Economics and Statistics 97(2):364–86.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. Jackson C. Kirabo

    . 2014. “Teacher Quality at the High School Level: The Importance of Accounting for Tracks.” Journal of Labor Economics 32(4):645–84.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Jackson C. Kirabo,
    2. Bruegmann Elias

    . 2009. “Teaching Students and Teaching Each Other: The Importance of Peer Learning for Teachers.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(4):85–108.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Jacob Brian A.,
    2. Lefgren Lars

    . 2008. “Can Principals Identify Effective Teachers? Evidence on Subjective Performance Evaluation in Education.” Journal of Labor Economics 26(1):101–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Jungert Tomas,
    2. Alm Fredrik,
    3. Thornberg Robert

    . 2014. “Motives for Becoming a Teacher and Their Relations to Academic Engagement and Dropout among Student Teachers.” Journal of Education for Teaching 40(2):173–85.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Kane Thomas J.,
    2. Rockoff Jonah E.,
    3. Staiger Douglas O.

    2008. “What Does Certification Tell Us about Teacher Effectiveness? Evidence from New York City.” Economics of Education Review 27(6):615–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Lavy Victor

    . 2002. “Evaluating the Effect of Teachers’ Group Performance Incentives on Pupil Achievement.” Journal of Political Economy 110(6):1286–317.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Lavy Victor

    . 2009. “Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity, and Grading Ethics.” American Economic Review 99(5):1979–2011.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Lavy Victor

    . 2013. “Gender Differences in Market Competitiveness in a Real Workplace: Evidence from Performance-Based Pay Tournaments among Teachers.” Economic Journal 123(569): 540–73.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Lazear Edward P.

    2000. “Performance Pay and Productivity”.” American Economic Review 90(5):1346–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Lincove J.A.

    2012. “Can Teacher Incentive Pay Improve Student Performance? Evidence from a Diverse Implementation.” PEEQ Working Paper. Project on Educator Effectiveness and Quality. Austin: University of Texas.
35. ↵
    1. Manning Alan,
    2. Saidi Farzad

    . 2010. “Understanding the Gender Pay Gap: What’s Competition Got to Do with It?” Industrial & Labor Relations Review 63(4):681–98.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. ↵
    1. Mansfield Richard K.

    2015. “Teacher Quality and Student Inequality.” Journal of Labor Economics 33(3):751–88.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Masclet David,
    2. Peterle Emmanuel,
    3. Larribeau Sophie

    . 2015. “Gender Differences in Tournament and Flat-Wage Schemes: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Economic Psychology 47:103–115.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Mellström Carl,
    2. Johannesson Magnus

    . 2008. “Crowding out in Blood Donation: Was Titmuss Right?” Journal of the European Economic Association 6(4):845–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Morin Louis-Philippe

    . 2015. “Do Men and Women Respond Differently to Competition? Evidence from a Major Education Reform.” Journal of Labor Economics 33(2):443–91.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Muralidharan Karthik,
    2. Sundararaman Venkatesh

    . 2011. “Teacher Opinions on Performance Pay: Evidence from India.” Economics of Education Review 30(3):394–403.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. ↵
    1. Neal Derek

    . 2011. “The Design of Performance Pay in Education.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Volume 4, ed. Hanushek Eric A., Machin Stephen, Woessmann Ludger, 495–550. New York: Elsevier.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Niederle Muriel,
    2. Vesterlund Lise

    . 2007. “Do Women Shy Away from Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much?” Quarterly Journal of Economics(2007):1067–101.
43. ↵
    1. Niederle Muriel,
    2. Vesterlund Lise

    . 2008. “Gender Differences in Competition.” Negotiation Journal 24(4):447–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Paarsch Harry J.,
    2. Shearer Bruce

    . 2000. “Piece Rates, Fixed Wages, and Incentive Effects: Statistical Evidence from Payroll Records.” International Economic Review 41(1):59–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. ↵
    1. Paarsch Harry J.,
    2. Shearer Bruce S.

    2007. “Do Women React Differently to Incentives? Evidence from Experimental Data and Payroll Records.” European Economic Review 51(7): 1682–1707.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
46. ↵
    1. Pham Lam,
    2. Nguyen Tuan,
    3. Springer Matthew

    . 2017. “Teacher Merit Pay and Student Test Scores: A Meta-Analysis.” Working Paper.
47. ↵
    1. Podgursky Michael J.,
    2. Springer Matthew G.

    2007. “Teacher Performance Pay: A Review.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26(4):909–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. ↵
    1. Rothstein Jesse

    . 2010. “Teacher Quality in Educational Production: Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(1):175–214.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. ↵
    1. Ryan Richard M.,
    2. Deci Edward L.

    2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25(1):54–67.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. ↵
    1. Shearer Bruce

    . 2004. “Piece Rates, Fixed Wages and Incentives: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Review of Economic Studies 71(2):513–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Sojourner Aaron J.,
    2. Mykerezi Elton,
    3. West Kristine L.

    2014. “Teacher Pay Reform and Productivity: Panel Data Evidence from Adoptions of Q-Comp in Minnesota.” Journal of Human Resources 49(4):945–81.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
52. ↵
    1. Springer Matthew G.,
    2. Ballou Dale,
    3. Hamilton Laura,
    4. Le Vi-Nhuan,
    5. Lockwood J.R.,
    6. McCaffrey Daniel F.,
    7. Pepper Matthew,
    8. Stecher Brian M.

    2011. “Teacher Pay for Performance: Experimental Evidence from the Project on Incentives in Teaching (POINT).” Washington, DC: Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.
53. ↵
    1. Thomson Margareta Maria,
    2. Turner Jeannine E.,
    3. Nietfeld John L.

    2012. “A Typological Approach to Investigate the Teaching Career Decision: Motivations and Beliefs about Teaching of Prospective Teacher Candidates.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28(3):324–35.

    OpenUrl