Persistent Effects of Teacher–Student Gender Matches

References

1. ↵
   1. Antecol Heather,
   2. Eren Ozkan,
   3. Ozbeklik Serkan

   . 2015. “The Effect of Teacher Gender on Student Achievement in Primary School.” Journal of Labor Economics 33(1):63–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Berenbaum Sheri A.,
   2. Martin Carol Lynn,
   3. Ruble Diane N.

   2008. “Gender Development.” In Child and Adolescent Development: An Advanced Course, ed. Damon William, Lerner Richard M., 647–95. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3. ↵
   1. Byun Sooyong,
   2. Kim Kyungkeun

   . 2010. “Educational Inequality in South Korea: The Widening Socioeconomic Gap in Student Achievement.” Research in Sociology of Education 17:155–82.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Carlsson Magnus,
   2. Dahl Gordon B.,
   3. Öckert Björn,
   4. Rooth Dan-Olof

   . 2015. “The Effect of Schooling on Cognitive Skills.” Review of Economics and Statistics 97(3):533–47.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Carrell Scott E.,
   2. Page Marianne E.,
   3. West James E.

   2010. “Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(3):1101–44.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Carrell Scott E.,
   2. West James E.

   2010. “Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors.” Journal of Political Economy 118(3):409–32.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Cho Insook

   . 2012. “The Effect of Teacher Student Gender Matching: Evidence from OECD Countries.” Economics of Education Review 31(3):54–67.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Dee Thomas S.

   2007. “Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 42(3):528–54.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Eble Alex,
   2. Hu Feng

   . 2017. “Stereotypes, Role Models, and the Formation of Beliefs.” Unpublished.
10. ↵
    1. Gershenson Seth,
    2. Hart Cassandra,
    3. Hyman Joshua,
    4. Lindsay Constance,
    5. Papageorge Nicholas W.

    2018. “The Long-Run Impacts of Same-Race Teachers.” NBER Working Paper 25254. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
11. ↵
    1. Gershenson Seth,
    2. Holt Stephen B.,
    3. Papageorge Nicholas W.

    2016. “Who Believes in Me? The Effect of Student–Teacher Demographic Match on Teacher Expectations.” Economics of Education Review 52:209–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. Good Phillip I.

    2006. Resampling Methods: A Practical Guide to Data Analysis, 3rd ed. Boston: Birkhäuser.
13. ↵
    1. Holmlund Helena,
    2. Sund Krister

    . 2008. “Is the Gender Gap in School Performance Affected by the Sex of the Teacher?” Labour Economics 15(1):37–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Jackson C. Kirabo

    . 2012. “Single-Sex Schools, Student Achievement, and Course Selection: Evidence from Rule-Based Student Assignments in Trinidad and Tobago.” Journal of Public Economics 96(1):173–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Jackson C. Kirabo

    . 2014. “Teacher Quality at the High School Level: The Importance of Accounting for Tracks.” Journal of Labor Economics 32(4):645–84.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Jackson C. Kirabo

    . 2018. “What Do Test Scores Miss? The Importance of Teacher Effects on Non–Test Score Outcomes.” Journal of Political Economy 126(5):2072–107.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Jacob Brian A.,
    2. Lefgren Lars,
    3. Sims David P.

    2010. “The Persistence of Teacher-Induced Learning Gains.” Journal of Human Resources 45(4):915–43.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Jones Damon,
    2. Molitor David,
    3. Reif Julian

    . 2018. “What Do Workplace Wellness Programs Do? Evidence from the Illinois Workplace Wellness Study.” NBER Working Paper 24229. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
19. ↵
    1. Kang Changhui

    . 2007. “Classroom Peer Effects and Academic Achievement: Quasi-Randomization Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Urban Economics 61(3):458–95.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Kofoed Michael S.,
    2. mcGovney Elizabeth

    . 2017. “The Effect of Same-Gender and Same-Race Role Models on Occupation Choice: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Mentors at West Point.” Journal of Human Resources 54(2):430–67.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Korea Legislation Research Institute

    . 2011. “Enforcement Decree of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Article 68 (Methods for Entering Middle Schools).” Presidential Decree 22712. Yeongigun, South Korea: Korea Legislation Research Institute.
22. ↵
    1. Lavy Victor,
    2. Sand Edith

    . 2015. “On the Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers Stereotypical Biases.” NBER Working Paper 20909. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
23. ↵
    1. Lee Soohyung,
    2. Niederle Muriel,
    3. Kang Namwook

    . 2014. “Do Single-Sex Schools Make Girls More Competitive?” Economics Letters 124(3):474–77.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Lehmann Erich L.,
    2. Romano Joseph P.

    April 2005. Testing Statistical Hypotheses. 3rd ed. Springer Texts in Statistics. New York: Springer.
25. ↵
    1. Leslie Sarah-Jane,
    2. Cimpian Andrei,
    3. Meyer Meredith,
    4. Freeland Edward

    . 2015. “Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions across Academic Disciplines.” Science 347(6219):262–65.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    1. Lim Jaegeum,
    2. Meer Jonathan

    . 2017. “The Impact of Teacher–Student Gender Matches: Random Assignment Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Human Resources 52(4):979–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
27. ↵
    1. Muralidharan Karthik,
    2. Sheth Ketki

    . 2016. “Bridging Education Gender Gaps in Developing Countries: The Role of Female Teachers.” Journal of Human Resources 51(2):269–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. Park Hyunjoon,
    2. Behrman Jere R.,
    3. Choi Jaesung

    . 2013. “Causal Effects of Single-Sex Schools on College Entrance Exams and College Attendance: Random Assignment in Seoul High Schools.” Demography 50(2):447–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
29. ↵
    1. Park Hyunjoon,
    2. Behrman Jere R.,
    3. Choi Jaesung

    . 2018. “Do Single-Sex Schools Enhance Students’ STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Outcomes?” Economics of Education Review 62:35–47.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Porter Catherine,
    2. Serra Danila

    . 2017. “Gender Differences in the Choice of Major: The Importance of Female Role Models.” Department of Economics Departmental Working Papers 1705. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University.
31. ↵
    1. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education

    . 2012. “Announcement on High School Admissions Plan for 2013 School Year.” SMOE Announcement 2012-51.
32. ↵
    1. Spencer Steven J.,
    2. Steele Claude M.,
    3. Quinn Diane M.

    1999. “Stereotype Threat and Women’s Math Performance.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 35(1):4–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science