Nonbinding Peer Review and Effort in Teams

References

1. 1. Allport Floyd H

   1920. “The Influence of the Group upon Association and Thought.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 3(3):159–82.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Allport Floyd H

   1924. Social Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
3. 1. Antonioni David

   1995. “Problems Associated with Implementation of an Effective Upward Appraisal Feedback Process: An Experimental Field Study.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 6(2):157–71.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Arcidiacono Peter,
   2. Foster Gigi,
   3. Goodpaster Natalie,
   4. Kinsler Josh

   2012. “Estimating Spillovers Using Panel Data, with an Application to the Classroom.” Quantitative Economics 3(3): 421–70.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Azoulay Pierre,
   2. Graff Zivin J.S.,
   3. Wang Jialan

   2010. “Superstar Extinction.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(2):549–89.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Bandiera Oriana,
   2. Barankay Iwan,
   3. Rasul Imran

   2013. “Team Incentives: Evidence from a Firm Level Experiment.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11(5):1079–114.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. 1. Benabou Roland,
   2. Tirole Jean

   2003. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation.” The Review of Economic Studies 70(3):489–520.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Booij Adam S.,
   2. Leuven Edwin,
   3. Oosterbeek Hessel

   2017. “Ability Peer Effects in University: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Review of Economic Studies 84(2):547–78.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Carrell Scott E.,
   2. Fullerton Richard L.,
   3. West James E.

   2009. “Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(3): 439–64.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Carrell Scott E.,
    2. Sacerdote Bruce I.,
    3. West James E.

    2013. “From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? The Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation.” Econometrica 81(3):855–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Chaudhuri Ananish

    2011. “Sustaining Cooperation in Laboratory Public Goods Experiments: A Selective Survey of the Literature.” Experimental Economics 14(1):47–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Chemin Matthieu

    2018. Data from: “Non-Binding Peer Review and Effort in Teams: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Version 1. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LIKUGT
13. 1. Corgnet Brice

    2012. “Peer Evaluations and Team Performance: When Friends Do Worse than Strangers.” Economic Inquiry 50(1):171–81.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. 1. Corgnet Brice,
    2. Hernan-Gonzales Roberto,
    3. Rassenti Stephen

    2015. “Peer Pressure and Moral Hazard in Teams: Experimental Evidence.” Review of Behavioral Economics 2(4):379–403.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Cottrell Nicholas B.,
    2. Wack Dennis L.,
    3. Sekerak Gary J.,
    4. Rittle Robert H.

    1968. “Social Facilitation of Dominant Responses by the Presence of an Audience and the Mere Presence of Others.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9(3):245–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 1. Falk Armin,
    2. Ichino Andrea

    2006. “Clean Evidence on Peer Effects.” Journal of Labor Economics 24(1):39–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Falk Armin,
    2. Kosfeld Michael

    2006. “The Hidden Costs of Control.” The American Economic Review 5(96):1611–630.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. Fischbacher Urs,
    2. Gächter Simon,
    3. Fehr Ernst

    2001. “Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment.” Economics Letters 71(3):397–404.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Fisher Anne

    2013. “Should Performance Reviews Be Crowdsourced?” Fortune, October 8. http://fortune.com/2013/10/08/should-performance-reviews-be-crowdsourced/ (accessed February 24, 2020).
20. 1. Foster Gigi

    2006. “It’s Not Your Peers, and It’s Not Your Friends: Some Progress toward Understanding the Educational Peer Effect Mechanism.” Journal of Public Economics 90(8):1455–475.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. 1. Greene William

    2010. “Testing Hypotheses about Interaction Terms in Nonlinear Models.” Economics Letters 107(2):291–97.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Gunnthorsdottir Anna,
    2. Houser Daniel,
    3. McCabe Kevin

    2007. “Disposition, History and Contributions in Public Goods Experiments.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 62(2):304–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Guryan Jonathan,
    2. Kroft Kory,
    3. Notowidigdo Matthew J.

    2009. “Peer Effects in the Workplace: Evidence from Random Groupings in Professional Golf Tournaments.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(4):34–68.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 1. Henchy Thomas,
    2. Glass David C.

    1968. “Evaluation Apprehension and the Social Facilitation of Dominant and Subordinate Responses.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10(4):446–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 1. Holmstrom Bengt,
    2. Milgrom Paul

    1991. “Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 7(2):24–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Homem de Mello Francisco

    2019. “Google’s Performance Management Practices.” https://qulture.rocks/en/blog/googles-performance-management-practices-part-1/ (accessed February 27, 2020).
27. 1. Jack B. Kelsey,
    2. Recalde Maria P.

    2015. “Leadership and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: Field Evidence from Bolivia.” Journal of Public Economics 122(C):80–93.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Kandel Eugene,
    2. Lazear Edward P.

    1992. “Peer Pressure and Partnerships.” Journal of Political Economy 100(4):801–17.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. 1. Kang Changhui

    2007. “Classroom Peer Effects and Academic Achievement: Quasi-Randomization Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Urban Economics 61(3):458–95.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Ledyard John

    1995. “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research.” In Handbook of Experimental Economics, ed. Kagel John H., Roth Alvin E., 111–94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. 1. Lyle David S

    2007. “Estimating and Interpreting Peer and Role Model Effects from Randomly Assigned Social Groups at West Point.” Review of Economics and Statistics 89(2):289–99.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Manski Charles F

    1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60(3):531–42.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Mas Alexandre,
    2. Moretti Enrico

    2009. “Peers at Work”. American Economic Review 99(1):112–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Page Talbot,
    2. Putterman Louis,
    3. Unel Bulent

    2005. “Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry and Efficiency.” Economic Journal 115(506):1032–53.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Sacerdote Bruce

    2001. “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2):681–704.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Smither James W.,
    2. London Manuel,
    3. Reilly Richard R.

    2005. “Does Performance Improve Following Multisource Feedback? A Theoretical Model, Meta-Analysis, and Review of Empirical Findings.” Personnel Psychology 58(1):33–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 1. Stinebrickner Ralph,
    2. Stinebrickner Todd R.

    2006. “What Can Be Learned about Peer Effects Using College Roommates? Evidence from New Survey Data and Students from Disadvantaged Backgrounds.” Journal of Public Economics 90(8):1435–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Waldinger Fabian

    2011. “Peer Effects in Science: Evidence from the Dismissal of Scientists in Nazi Germany.” Review of Economic Studies 79(2):838–61.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Zajonc Robert

    1965. “Social Facilitation.” Science 149(3681):269–74.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
40. 1. Zimmerman David J

    2003. “Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85(1):9–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science