Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

High-Stakes Grades and Student Behavior

Ulrik Hvidman and Hans Henrik Sievertsen
Journal of Human Resources, July 2021, 56 (3) 821-849; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.56.3.0718-9620R2
Ulrik Hvidman
Ulrik Hvidman is Head of Research for Governance and Management at VIVE—The Danish Center for Social Science Research
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Henrik Sievertsen
Hans Henrik Sievertsen is a lecturer at the Department of Economics, University of Bristol.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: h.h.sievertsen{at}bristol.ac.ukforassistance
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Angrist, Joshua ,
    2. Daniel Lang , and
    3. Philip Oreopoulos
    . 2009. “Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(1):136–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Angrist, Joshua , and
    2. Victor Lavy
    . 2009. “The Effects of High Stakes High School Achievement Awards: Evidence from a Randomized Trial.” American Economic Review 99(4):1384–414.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Apperson, J. ,
    2. C. Bueno , and
    3. T.R. Sass
    . 2016. “Do the Cheated Ever Prosper? The Long-Run Effects of Test-Score Manipulation by Teachers on Student Outcomes.” Unpublished.
  4. ↵
    1. Avery, Christopher ,
    2. Oded Gurantz ,
    3. Michael Hurwitz , and
    4. Jonathan Smith
    . 2018. “Shifting College Majors in Response to Advanced Placement Exam Scores.” Journal of Human Resources 53(4):918–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Azmat, Ghazala ,
    2. Manuel Bagues ,
    3. Antonio Cabrales , and
    4. Nagore Iriberri
    . 2019. “What You Don’t Know... Can’t Hurt You? A Natural Field Experiment on Relative Performance Feedback in Higher Education.” Management Science 65(8):3714–36.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Bandiera, Oriana ,
    2. Valentino Larcinese , and
    3. Imran Rasul
    . 2015. “Blissful Ignorance? A Natural Experiment on the Effect of Feedback on Students’ Performance.” Labour Economics 34:13–25.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Bettinger, Eric P
    . 2012. “Paying to Learn: The Effect of Financial Incentives on Elementary School Test Scores.” Review of Economics and Statistics 94(3):686–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Burgess, Simon ,
    2. Robert Metcalfe , and
    3. Sally Sadoff
    . 2016. “Understanding the Response to Financial and Non-Financial Incentives in Education: Field Experimental Evidence Using High-Stakes Assessments.” IZA DP 10284. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
  9. ↵
    1. Dee, Thomas S. ,
    2. Will Dobbie ,
    3. Brian A. Jacob , and
    4. Jonah Rockoff
    . 2019. “The Causes and Consequences of Test Score Manipulation: Evidence from the New York Regents Examinations.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 11(3):382–423.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Dee, Thomas S. , and
    2. Brian A. Jacob
    . 2006. “Do High School Exit Exams Influence Educational Attainment or Labor Market Performance?” NBER Working Paper 12199. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  11. ↵
    1. Dee, Thomas S.
    2011. “The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Student Achievement.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30(3):418–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Dee, Thomas S. , and
    2. James Wyckoff
    . 2015. “Incentives, Selection, and Teacher Performance: Evidence from Impact.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34(2):267–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Deming, David J. ,
    2. Sarah Cohodes ,
    3. Jennifer Jennings , and
    4. Christopher Jencks
    . 2016. “School Accountability, Postsecondary Attainment, and Earnings.” Review of Economics and Statistics 98(5):848–62.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Diamond, Rebecca , and
    2. Petra Persson
    . 2016. “The Long-Term Consequences of Teacher Discretion in Grading of High-Stakes Tests.” NBER Working Paper 22207. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  15. ↵
    1. Ebenstein, A. ,
    2. V. Lavy , and
    3. S. Roth
    . 2016. “The Long-Run Economic Consequences of High-Stakes Examinations: Evidence from Transitory Variation in Pollution.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8(4):36–65.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Elsner, Benjamin , and
    2. Ingo Isphording
    . 2017. “A Big Fish in a Small Pond: Ability Rank and Human Capital Investment.” Journal of Labor Economics 35(3):787–828.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Fryer, Roland G
    . 2011. “Financial Incentives and Student Achievement: Evidence from Randomized Trials.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4):1755–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Fryer, Roland G
    . 2013. “Teacher Incentives and Student Achievement: Evidence from New York City Public Schools.” Journal of Labor Economics 31(2):373–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Humlum, M.K. ,
    2. J.H.G. Kristoffersen , and
    3. R.M. Vejlin
    . 2014. “Timing of College Enrollment and Family Formation Decisions.” IZA Discussion Paper 7905. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
  20. ↵
    1. Imberman, Scott A. , and
    2. Michael F. Lovenheim
    . 2015. “Incentive Strength and Teacher Productivity: Evidence from a Group-Based Teacher Incentive Pay System.” Review of Economics and Statistics 97(2):364–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Jackson, C. Kirabo
    . 2010. “A Little Now for a Lot Later: A Look at a Texas Advanced Placement Incentive Program.” Journal of Human Resources 45(3):591–639.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Jacob, Brian A
    . 2002. “Where the Boys Aren’t: Non-Cognitive Skills, Returns to School and the Gender Gap in Higher Education.” Economics of Education Review 21(6):589–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Jacob, Brian A
    . 2005. “Accountability, Incentives and Behavior: The Impact of High-Stakes Testing in the Chicago Public Schools.” Journal of Public Economics 89(5):761–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Jacob, Brian A. , and
    2. Steven D. Levitt
    . 2003. “Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(3):843–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Lavy, Victor
    . 2009. “Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity, and Grading Ethics.” American Economic Review 99(5):1979–2021.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Lavy, Victor
    . 2015. “Teachers’ Pay for Performance in the Long-Run: Effects on Students’ Educational and Labor Market Outcomes in Adulthood.” NBER Working Paper 20983. Cambridge, MA: NBER. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20983
  27. ↵
    1. Levitt, Steven D. ,
    2. John A. List ,
    3. Susanne Neckermann , and
    4. Sally Sadoff
    . 2016. “The Behavioralist Goes to School: Leveraging Behavioral Economics to Improve Educational Performance.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 8(4):183–219.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Murphy, Richard , and
    2. Felix Weinhardt
    . 2014. “Top of the Class: The Importance of Ordinal Rank.” CESifo Working Paper Series 4815. Munich, Germany: CESifo.
  29. ↵
    1. Neal, Derek
    . 2013. “The Consequences of Using One Assessment System to Pursue Two Objectives.” Journal of Economic Education 44(4):339–52.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Oreopoulos, Philip , and
    2. Kjell G. Salvanes
    . 2011. “Priceless: The Nonpecuniary Benefits of Schooling.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(1):159–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Papay, John P. ,
    2. Richard J. Murnane , and
    3. John B. Willett
    . 2016. “The Impact of Test Score Labels on Human-Capital Investment Decisions.” Journal of Human Resources 51(2):357–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Reardon, Sean F. ,
    2. Nicole Arshan ,
    3. Allison Atteberry , and
    4. Michal Kurlaender
    . 2010. “Effects of Failing a High School Exit Exam on Course Taking, Achievement, Persistence, and Graduation.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 32(4):498–520.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Reback, Randall
    . 2008. “Teaching to the Rating: School Accountability and the Distribution of Student Achievement.” Journal of Public Economics 92(5–6):1394–415.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Smith, Jonathan ,
    2. Michael Hurwitz , and
    3. Christopher Avery
    . 2017. “Giving College Credit Where It Is Due: Advanced Placement Exam Scores and College Outcomes.” Journal of Labor Economics 35(1):67–147.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Stinebrickner, Ralph , and
    2. Todd Stinebrickner
    . 2014. “Academic Performance and College Dropout: Using Longitudinal Expectations Data to Estimate a Learning Model.” Journal of Labor Economics 32(3):601–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Stinebrickner, Todd , and
    2. Ralph Stinebrickner
    . 2012. “Learning about Academic Ability and the College Dropout Decision.” Journal of Labor Economics 30(4):707–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Zafar, Basit
    . 2011. “How Do College Students Form Expectations?” Journal of Labor Economics 29(2):301–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 56 (3)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 56, Issue 3
1 Jul 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High-Stakes Grades and Student Behavior
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
High-Stakes Grades and Student Behavior
Ulrik Hvidman, Hans Henrik Sievertsen
Journal of Human Resources Jul 2021, 56 (3) 821-849; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.56.3.0718-9620R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
High-Stakes Grades and Student Behavior
Ulrik Hvidman, Hans Henrik Sievertsen
Journal of Human Resources Jul 2021, 56 (3) 821-849; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.56.3.0718-9620R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Grades and Student Behavior: Incentives and Learning
    • III. Background
    • IV. Data
    • V. Identification and Estimation
    • VI. Results
    • VII. Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cash Welfare and Health Spending
  • Smartphone Bans, Student Outcomes and Mental Health
  • Teacher Perceptions, Test Scores, and Racial Disparities in the Classroom
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • I20
  • I21
  • I23
  • J24
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire