Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

How Do Peers Impact Learning? An Experimental Investigation of Peer-to-Peer Teaching and Ability Tracking

View ORCID ProfileErik O. Kimbrough, View ORCID ProfileAndrew D. McGee and View ORCID ProfileHitoshi Shigeoka
Journal of Human Resources, January 2022, 57 (1) 304-339; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.57.1.0918-9770R2
Erik O. Kimbrough
Erik O. Kimbrough is at Smith Institute for Political Economy and Philosophy, Argyros School of Business and Economics, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA 92866 ()
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erik O. Kimbrough
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Andrew D. McGee
Andrew D. McGee is at Department of Economics, University of Alberta, 8-14 Tory Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H4, Canada, and IZA ()
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew D. McGee
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Hitoshi Shigeoka
Hitoshi Shigeoka is at Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada, and NBER ()
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hitoshi Shigeoka
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ammermueller, Andreas, and
    2. Jorn-Steffen Pischke
    . 2009. “Peer Effects in European Primary Schools: Evidence from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(3):315–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Angrist, Joshua D., and
    2. Kevin Lang
    . 2004. “Does School Integration Generate Peer Effects? Evidence from Boston’s Metco Program.” American Economic Review 94(5):1613–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Barankay, Iwan
    . 2012. “Rank Incentives Evidence from a Randomized Workplace Experiment.” Unpublished.
  4. ↵
    1. Bargh, John A., and
    2. Yaacov Schul
    . 1980. “On the Cognitive Benefits of Teaching.” Journal of Educational Psychology 72:593–604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Berthelon, Matias,
    2. Eric Bettinger,
    3. Diana Kruger, and
    4. Alejandro Montecinos-Pearce
    . 2019. “The Structure of Peers: The Impact of Peer Networks on Academic Achievement.” Research in Higher Education 60:931–59.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Bettinger, Eric P.,
    2. Lindsay Fox,
    3. Susanna Loeb, and
    4. Eric S. Taylor
    . 2017. “Virtual Classrooms: How Online College Courses Affect Student Success.” American Economic Review 107(9):2855–75.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Bettinger, Eric,
    2. Jing Liu, and
    3. Susanna Loeb
    . 2016. “Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 35(4):932–54.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Betts, Julian R.
    2011. “The Economics of Tracking in Education.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Volume 3, ed. by E. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessmann, 341–81. New York: Elsevier.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Betts, Julian R., and
    2. Jamie L. Shkolnik
    . 2000. “Key Difficulties in Identifying the Effects of Ability Grouping on Student Achievement.” Economics of Education Review 19(1):21–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Betts, Julian R., and
    2. Jamie L. Shkolnik
    . 2010. “The Effects of Ability Grouping on Student Achievement and Resource Allocation in Secondary Schools.” Economics of Education Review 19:1–15.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Blanes i Vidal, Jordi, and
    2. Mareike Nossol
    . 2011. “Tournaments without Prizes: Evidence from Personnel Records.” Management Science 57(10):1721–36.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Booij, Adam S.,
    2. Edwin Leuven, and
    3. Hessel Oosterbeek
    . 2017. “Ability Peer Effects in University: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Review of Economic Studies 84(2):547–78.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Brady, Ryan,
    2. Michael Insler, and
    3. Ahmed Rahman
    . 2017. “Bad Company: Understanding Negative Peer Effects in College Achievement.” European Economic Review 98:144–68.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Burke, Mary A., and
    2. Tim R. Sass
    . 2013. “Classroom Peer Effects and Student Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 31(1):51–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Calsamiglia, Caterina,
    2. Jorg Franke, and
    3. Pedro Rey-Biel
    . 2013. “The Incentive Effects of Affirmative Action in a Real-Effort Tournament.” Journal of Public Economics 98(C):15–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Richard L. Fullerton, and
    3. James E. West
    . 2009. “Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 27:439–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Bruce I. Sacerdote, and
    3. James E. West
    . 2013. “From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? The Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation.” Econometrica 81(3):855–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Charness, Gary,
    2. David Cooper, and
    3. Zachary Grossman
    . 2015. “Silence is Golden: Communication Costs and Team Problem Solving.” Unpublished.
  19. ↵
    1. Deming, David,
    2. Claudia Goldin,
    3. Lawrence Katz, and
    4. Noah Yuchtman
    . 2015. “Can Online Learning Bend the Higher Education Cost Curve?” American Economic Review 105(5):496–501.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Duflo, Esther,
    2. Pascaline Dupas, and
    3. Michael Kremer
    . 2011. “Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya.” American Economic Review 101(5):1739–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Eisenkopf, Gerald
    . 2010. “Peer Effects, Motivation, and Learning.” Economics of Education Review 29(3):364–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Epple, Dennis,
    2. Elizabeth Newlon, and
    3. Richard Romano
    . 2002. “Ability Tracking, School Competition, and the Distribution of Educational Benefits.” Journal of Public Economics 83(1):1–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Epple, Dennis, and
    2. Richard Romano
    . 2011. “Peer Effects in Education: A Survey of the Theory and Evidence.” In Handbook of Social Economics, Volume 1B, ed. Jess Benhabib, Alberto Bisin, and Matthew Jackson, 1053–163. Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Fafchamps, Marcel, and
    2. Di Mo
    . 2018. “Peer Effects in Computer Assisted Learning: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Experimental Economics 21:355–382.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Feld, Jan, and
    2. Ulf Zolitz
    . 2017. “Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects.” Journal of Labor Economics 35(2):387–428.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Figlio, David N., and
    2. Marianne E. Page
    . 2002. “School Choice and the Distributional Effects of Ability Tracking: Does Separation Increase Inequality?” Journal of Urban Economics 51(3):497–514.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Gamoran, Adam, and
    2. Martin Nystrand
    . 1994. “Tracking, Instruction and Achievement.” International Journal of Educational Research 21(2):217–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Garlick, Robert
    . 2018. “Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies: Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10(3):345–69.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gill, David,
    2. Zdenka Kissova,
    3. Jaesun Lee, and
    4. Victoria Prowse
    . 2016. “First-Place Loving and Last-Place Loathing: How Rank in the Distribution of Performance Affects Effort Provision.” Unpublished.
  29. ↵
    1. Griffith, Amanda, and
    2. Joyce Main
    . 2019. “First Impressions in the Classroom: How Do Class Characteristics Affect Student Grades and Majors?” Economics of Education Review 69:125–37.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Griffith, Amanda, and
    2. Kevin Rask
    . 2014. “Peer Effects in Higher Education: A Look at Heterogeneous Impacts.” Economics of Education Review 39:65–77.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Holt, Charles A., and
    2. Susan K. Laury
    . 2002. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects.” American Economic Review 92(5):1644–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Hong, Sok Chul, and
    2. Jungmin Lee
    . 2017. “Who Is Sitting Next to You? Peer Effects inside the Classroom.” Quantitative Economics 8:239–75.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Hoxby, Caroline
    . 2000. “Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation.” NBER Working Paper 7867. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  34. ↵
    1. Hoxby, Caroline, and
    2. Gretchen Weingarth
    . 2005. “Taking Race out of the Equation: School Reassignment and the Structure of Peer Effects.” Unpublished.
  35. ↵
    1. Imberman, Scott A.,
    2. Adriana D. Kugler, and
    3. Bruce I. Sacerdote
    . 2012. “Katrina’s Children: Evidence on the Structure of Peer Effects from Hurricane Evacuees.” American Economic Review 102(5):2048–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Jain, Tarun, and
    2. Mudit Kapoor
    . 2015. “The Impact of Study Groups and Roommates on Academic Performance.” Review of Economics and Statistics 97(1):44–54.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Johnson, David, and
    2. Roger Johnson
    . 1975. Learning Together and Alone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  38. ↵
    1. Koellinger, Philipp, and
    2. Joern Block
    . 2016. “How Does the Gender and Attractiveness of the Supervisor Influence the Performance of Supervisees? Implications for Hiring Processes in New Ventures.” International Review of Entrepreneurship 14(4):395–421.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Lavy, Victor,
    2. M. Daniele Paserman, and
    3. Analia Schlosser
    . 2012. “Inside the Black Box of Ability Peer Effects: Evidence from Variation in the Proportion of Low Achievers in the Classroom.” Economic Journal 122(559):208–237.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Lavy, Victor,
    2. Olmo Silva, and
    3. Felix Weinhardt
    . 2012. “The Good, the Bad and the Average: Evidence on the Scale and Nature of Ability Peer Effects in Schools.” Journal of Labor Economics 30(2):367–414.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Li, Tao,
    2. Li Han,
    3. Linxiu Zhang, and
    4. Scott Rozelle
    . 2014. “Encouraging Classroom Peer Interactions: Evidence from Chinese Migrant Schools.” Journal of Public Economics 111:29–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Ludwig, Jens,
    2. Jeff Kling, and
    3. Sendil Mullainathan
    . 2011. “Mechanism Experiments and Policy Evaluations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(25):17–38.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Lyle, David
    . 2007. “Estimating and Interpreting Peer and Role Model Effects from Randomly Assigned Social Groups at West Point.” Review of Economics and Statistics 89(2):289–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  44. ↵
    1. Lyle, David
    . 2009. “The Effects of Peer Group Heterogeneity on the Production of Human Capital at West Point.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1:69–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Manski, Charles F.
    1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60(3):531–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Ost, Ben
    . 2010. “The Role of Peers and Grades in Determining Major Persistence in the Sciences.” Economics of Education Review 29(6):923–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. Rohrbeck, Cynthia,
    2. Marika Ginsburg-Block,
    3. John Fantuzzo, and
    4. Traci Miller
    . 2003. “Peer-Assisted Learning Interventions with Elementary School Students: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95(2):240–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Sacerdote, Bruce
    . 2011. “Peer Effects in Education: How Might They Work, How Big Are They and How Much Do We Know Thus Far?” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, ed. E. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessmann, 249–77. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
  49. ↵
    1. Schunk, Dale
    . 1991. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. New York: Merrill.
  50. ↵
    1. Slavin, Robert
    . 1983. Cooperative Learning. New York: Longman.
  51. ↵
    1. Slavin, Robert
    . 1990. “Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 60(3):471–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Webb, Noreen
    . 1989. “Peer Interaction and Learning in Small Groups.” International Journal of Educational Research 13:21–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Zimmer, Ron
    . 2003. “A New Twist in the Education Tracking Debate.” Economics of Education Review 22(3):307–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 57 (1)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 57, Issue 1
1 Jan 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Do Peers Impact Learning? An Experimental Investigation of Peer-to-Peer Teaching and Ability Tracking
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
How Do Peers Impact Learning? An Experimental Investigation of Peer-to-Peer Teaching and Ability Tracking
Erik O. Kimbrough, Andrew D. McGee, Hitoshi Shigeoka
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2022, 57 (1) 304-339; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.57.1.0918-9770R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
How Do Peers Impact Learning? An Experimental Investigation of Peer-to-Peer Teaching and Ability Tracking
Erik O. Kimbrough, Andrew D. McGee, Hitoshi Shigeoka
Journal of Human Resources Jan 2022, 57 (1) 304-339; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.57.1.0918-9770R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Experimental Design
    • III. Data
    • IV. Main Results
    • V. Replication Exercise Using a Different Game: Nonograms
    • VI. Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Heterogeneous Returns to Active Labour Market Programs for Indigenous Populations
  • Leadership & Gender Composition in Managerial Positions
  • The Impact of Paid Family Leave on Families with Health Shocks
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • I24
  • C91
  • I28
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire