Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
    • Free Issue
    • Special Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Alerts
  • Announcements
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UW Press Journals
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
    • Free Issue
    • Special Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Alerts
  • Announcements
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles
Open Access

The Impact of Low-Ability Peers on Cognitive and Noncognitive Outcomes

Random Assignment Evidence on the Effects and Operating Channels

View ORCID ProfileDi Xu, View ORCID ProfileQing Zhang and View ORCID ProfileXuehan Zhou
Journal of Human Resources, March 2022, 57 (2) 555-596; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.57.2.0718-9637R2
Di Xu
Di Xu is an associate professor of Education Policy and Social Context at the School of Education, University of California Irvine .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Di Xu
  • For correspondence: dix3{at}uci.edu
Qing Zhang
Qing Zhang is a postdoctoral fellow at the Instituite for Policy Research at Northwestern University.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Qing Zhang
Xuehan Zhou
Xuehan Zhou is a doctoral student at the School of Education, University of California, Irvine.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Xuehan Zhou
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Aizer, Anna
    . 2008. “Peer Effects and Human Capital Accumulation: The Externalities of ADD.” NBER Working Paper 14354. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  2. ↵
    1. Allen, Chiharu S.,
    2. Qi Chen,
    3. Victor L. Willson, and
    4. Jan N. Hughes
    . 2009. “Quality of Design Moderates Effects of Grade Retention on Achievement: A Meta-analytic, Multilevel Analysis.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31(4):480–99.
  3. ↵
    1. Ammermueller, Andreas, and
    2. Jörn-Steffen Pischke
    . 2009. “Peer Effects in European Primary Schools: Evidence from The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(3):315–48.
  4. ↵
    1. Anderson, Michael L.
    2008. “Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(484):1481–95.
  5. ↵
    1. Angrist, Joshua D.
    2014. “The Perils of Peer Effects.” Labour Economics 30:98–108.
  6. ↵
    1. Bauminger, Nirit,
    2. Ricky Finzi-Dottan,
    3. Sagit Chason, and
    4. Dov Har-Even
    . 2008. “Intimacy in Adolescent Friendship: The Roles of Attachment, Coherence, and Self-Disclosure.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 25(3):409–28.
  7. ↵
    1. Bifulco, Robert,
    2. Jason M. Fletcher, and
    3. Stephen L. Ross
    . 2011. “The Effect of Classmate Characteristics on Post-Secondary Outcomes: Evidence From the Add Health.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(1):25–53.
  8. ↵
    1. Booij, Adam S.,
    2. Edwin Leuven, and
    3. Hessel Oosterbeek
    . 2017. “Ability Peer Effects in University: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment.” Review of Economic Studies 84(2):547–78.
  9. ↵
    1. Borghans, Lex,
    2. Angela. L. Duckworth,
    3. James. J. Heckman, and
    4. Bas Ter Weel
    . 2008. “The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits.” Journal of Human Resources 43:972–1059.
  10. ↵
    1. Burke, Mary A., and
    2. Tim R. Sass
    . 2013. “Classroom Peer Effects and Student Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 31(1):51–82.
  11. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Richard L. Fullerton, and
    3. James E. West
    . 2009. “Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(3):439–64.
  12. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E., and
    2. Mark Hoekstra
    . 2010. “Externalities in the Classroom: How Children Exposed to Domestic Violence Affect Everyone’s Kids.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(1):211–28.
  13. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Mark Hoekstra, and
    3. Elira Kuka
    . 2018. “The Long-Run Effects of Disruptive Peers.” American Economic Review 108(11):3377–415.
  14. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Bruce I. Sacerdote, and
    3. James E. West
    . 2013. “From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? The Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation.” Econometrica 81(3):855–82.
  15. ↵
    1. Chen, Huiying
    . 2013. “Yi Wu Jiao Yu Jie Duan Liu Ji Zhi Du Zhi Shen Si.” (“Examining China’s Grade Retention Policy in Compulsory Education.”) Educational Measurement and Evaluation 2013(1):23–7.
  16. ↵
    1. Chen, Xinxin,
    2. Chengfang Liu,
    3. Linxiu Zhang,
    4. Yaojiang Shi, and
    5. Scott Rozelle
    . 2009. “Does Taking One Step Back Get You Two Steps Forward? Grade Retention and School Performance in Poor Areas in Rural China.” International Journal of Educational Development 30(6):544–59.
  17. ↵
    1. Deming, David
    . 2009. “Early Childhood Intervention and Life-cycle Skill Development: Evidence from Head Start.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(3):111–34.
  18. ↵
    1. Duflo, Esther,
    2. Pascaline Dupas, and
    3. Michael Kremer
    . 2011. “Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya.” American Economic Review 101(5):1739–74.
  19. ↵
    1. Eccles, Jacquelynne S.,
    2. Mina N. Vida, and
    3. Bonnie. Barber
    . 2004. “The Relation of Early Adolescents’ College Plans and Both Academic Ability and Task-Value Beliefs to Subsequent College Enrollment.” Journal of Early Adolescence 24(1):63–77.
  20. ↵
    1. Feld, Jan, and
    2. Ulf Zölitz
    . 2017. “Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects.” Journal of Labor Economics 35(2):387–428.
    1. Figlio, David N.
    2007. “Boys Named Sue: Disruptive Children and Their Peers.” Education Finance and Policy 2(4):376–394.
    1. Fredericks, Jennifer. A.,
    2. Phyllis C. Blumenfeld, and
    3. Alison H. Paris
    . 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74:59–109.
  21. ↵
    1. Gong, Jie,
    2. Yi Lu, and
    3. Hong Song
    . 2018. “The Effect of Teacher Gender on Students’ Academic and Noncognitive Outcomes.” Journal of Labor Economics 36(3):743–78.
  22. ↵
    1. Gong, Jie,
    2. Yi Lu, and
    3. Hong Song
    . 2021. “Gender Peer Effects on Students’ Academic and Noncognitive Outcomes: Evidence and Mechanisms.” Journal of Human Resources 56(3):686–710.
  23. ↵
    1. Gould, Eric D.,
    2. Victor Lavy, and
    3. M. Daniele Paserman
    . 2009. “Does Immigration Affect the Long-Term Educational Outcomes of Natives? Quasi-Experimental Evidence.” Economic Journal 119(540):1243–69.
  24. ↵
    1. Gunuc, Selim
    . 2016. “Peer Influence in Internet and Digital Game Addicted Adolescents: Is Internet/Digital Game Addiction Contagious?” International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction 6(2):1–8.
  25. ↵
    1. Hao, Lingxin, and
    2. Xiao Yu
    . 2015. “Rural–Urban Migration and Children’s Access to Education: China in Comparative Perspective.” Paper Commissioned for the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2015, Education for All 2000–2015: Achievements and Challenges.
  26. ↵
    1. Hillman, Stephen B.,
    2. Shlomo S. Sawilowsky, and
    3. Marilyn J. Becker
    . 1993. “Effects of Maternal Employment Patterns on Adolescents’ Substance Use and Other Risk-Taking Behaviors.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 2(3):203–19.
  27. ↵
    1. Hoxby, Caroline M.
    2000. “Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation.” NBER Working Paper 7867. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  28. ↵
    1. Jimmerson, Shane
    . 2001. “Meta-analysis of Grade Retention Research: Implications for Practice in the 21st Century.” School Psychology Review 30(3):420–37.
  29. ↵
    1. Kling, Jeffrey R.,
    2. Jeffrey B. Liebman, and
    3. Lawrence F. Katz
    . 2007. “Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects.” Econometrica 75(1):83–119.
    1. Kaiser, Henry F.
    1974. “An Index of Factorial Simplicity.” Psychometrika 39(1):31–6.
  30. ↵
    1. Lavy, Victor,
    2. M. Daniele Paserman, and
    3. Analia Schlosser
    . 2012. “Inside the Black Box of Ability Peer Effects: Evidence from Variation in the Proportion of Low Achievers in the Classroom.” Economic Journal 122(559):208–37.
  31. ↵
    1. Lavy, Victor, and
    2. Analia Schlosser
    . 2011. “Mechanisms and Impacts of Gender Peer Effects at School.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3(2):1–33.
  32. ↵
    1. Lefgren, Lars
    . 2004. “Educational Peer Effects and the Chicago Public Schools.” Journal of Urban Economics 56(2):169–91.
  33. ↵
    1. Li, Li, and
    2. Haoming Liu
    . 2014. “Primary School Availability and Middle School Education in Rural China.” Labour Economics 28:24–40.
  34. ↵
    1. Li, Yajun,
    2. Xinghui Zhang,
    3. Furong Lu,
    4. Qin Zhang, and
    5. Yun Wang
    . 2014. “Internet Addiction among Elementary and Middle School Students in China: A Nationally Representative Sample Study.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17(2):111–16.
  35. ↵
    1. Liu, Jingqiu, and
    2. Ruth Barnhart
    . 1999. “Homeroom Teacher and Homeroom Class: The Key to Classroom Management in China’s Schools.” Educational Forum 63(4):380–84.
  36. ↵
    1. Löwe, Bernd,
    2. Kurt Kroenke, and
    3. Kerstin Gräfe
    . 2005. “Detecting and Monitoring Depression with a Two-Item Questionnaire (PHQ-2).” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 58(2):163–71.
  37. ↵
    1. Lyle, David S.
    2007. “Estimating and Interpreting Peer and Role Model Effects from Randomly Assigned Social Groups at West Point.” Review of Economics and Statistics 89(2):289–99.
  38. ↵
    1. Mahoney, Joseph L., and
    2. Håkan Stattin
    . 2000. “Leisure Activities and Adolescent Antisocial Behavior: The Role of Structure and Social Context.” Journal of Adolescence 23(2):113–27.
  39. ↵
    1. Mahoney, Joseph L.,
    2. Håkan Stattin, and
    3. Heather Lord
    . 2004. “Unstructured Youth Recreation Centre Participation and Antisocial Behavior Development: Selection Influences and the Moderating Role of Antisocial Peers.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 28(6):553–60.
  40. ↵
    1. Manski, Charles F.
    1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60(3):531–42.
  41. ↵
    1. McCord, Joan
    . 1991. “Family Relationships, Juvenile Delinquency, and Adult Criminality.” Criminology 29(3):397–417.
  42. ↵
    1. McGee, R.O.B.,
    2. Michael Feehan,
    3. Sheila Williams, and
    4. Jessie Anderson
    . 1992. “DSM-III Disorders from Age 11 to Age 15 Years.” Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 31(1):50–59.
  43. ↵
    1. McNelles, Laurie R., and
    2. Jennifer A. Connolly
    . 1999. “Intimacy between Adolescent Friends: Age and Gender Differences in Intimate Affect and Intimate Behaviors.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 9(2):143–59.
  44. ↵
    1. Menaghan, Elizabeth G., and
    2. Toby L. Parcel
    . 1991. “Determining Children’s Home Environments: The Impact of Maternal Characteristics and Current Occupational and Family Conditions.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53(2):417–31.
  45. ↵
    1. Mendez, Linda
    2. M. Raffaele, and
    3. Howard M. Knoff
    . 2003. “Who Gets Suspended from School and Why: A Demographic Analysis of Schools and Disciplinary Infractions in a Large School District.” Education and Treatment of Children 26(1):30–51.
  46. ↵
    1. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China
    . 2015a. “Number of Schools, Classes of Junior Secondary Education.” http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A03/moe_560/jytjsj_2014/2014_qg/201509/t20150906_205423.html (accessed September 2, 2021).
    1. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China
    . 2015b. “Number of Schools, External Teaching Sites, and Classes in Primary Schools.” http://www.moe.gov.cn/s78/A03/moe_560/jytjsj_2014/2014_qg/201509/t20150901_204658.html (accessed September 2, 2021).
  47. ↵
    1. Moffitt, Terrie E.,
    2. Louise Arseneault,
    3. Daniel Belsky,
    4. Nigel Dickson,
    5. Robert J. Hancox,
    6. HonaLee Harrington,
    7. Renate Houts,
    8. Richie Poulton,
    9. Brent W. Roberts,
    10. Stephen Ross,
    11. Malcolm R. Sears,
    12. W. Murray Thomson, and
    13. Avshalom Caspi
    . 2011. “A Gradient of Childhood Self-Control Predicts Health, Wealth, and Public Safety.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(7):2693–98.
  48. ↵
    1. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
    . 2016. “Education in China: A Snapshot.” "https://www.oecd.org/china/Education-in-China-a-snapshot. (accessed September 9, 2021).
  49. ↵
    1. Parcel, Toby L., and
    2. Elizabeth G. Menaghan
    . 1994. “Early Parental Work, Family Social Capital, and Early Childhood Outcomes.” American Journal of Sociology 99(4):972–1009.
  50. ↵
    1. Reuters
    . 2007. “Worried China Bans New Internet Cafes for a Year.” "https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-internet-ban/worried-china-bans-new-internet-cafes-for-a-year-idUSPEK24407720070307. (accessed September 9, 2021).
  51. ↵
    1. Romano, Joseph P., and
    2. Michael Wolf
    . 2016. “Efficient Computation of Adjusted P-values for Resampling-Based Stepdown Multiple Testing.” Statistics & Probability Letters 113:38–40.
  52. ↵
    1. Sacerdote, Bruce
    . 2001. “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2):681–704.
  53. ↵
    1. Wang, Xueli
    . 2013. “Why Students Choose STEM Majors: Motivation, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support.” American Educational Research Journal 50(5):1080–121.
  54. ↵
    1. Zhang, Chi
    . 2014. “Dui Wo Guo Yi Wu Jiao Yu Jie Duan Liu Ji Zhi Du De Si Kao.” (“China’s Grade Retention Policy in Compulsory Education.”) Journal of Educational Development 2014(1):25–7.
  55. ↵
    1. Zhao, Guochang,
    2. Jingjing Ye,
    3. Zhengyang Li, and
    4. Sen Xue
    . 2017. “How and Why Do Chinese Urban Students Outperform Their Rural Counterparts?” China Economic Review 45:103–23.
  56. ↵
    1. Zhao, Zhenzhou
    . 2014. “The Teacher–State Relationship in China: An Exploration of Homeroom Teachers’ Experiences.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 24(2):148–64.
  57. ↵
    1. Zhiyan Consulting Group
    . 2016. “Statistics and Prospects of Internet Café in China: 2016.” http://www.chyxx.com/research/201609/445408.html#catalogue (accessed September 9, 2021).
  58. ↵
    1. Zimmerman, David J.
    2003. “Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 85(1):9–23.
  59. ↵
    1. Zoccolillo, Mark
    . 1993. “Gender and the Development of Conduct Disorder.” Development and Psychopathology 5(1–2):65–78.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 57 (2)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 57, Issue 2
1 Mar 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Impact of Low-Ability Peers on Cognitive and Noncognitive Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
The Impact of Low-Ability Peers on Cognitive and Noncognitive Outcomes
Di Xu, Qing Zhang, Xuehan Zhou
Journal of Human Resources Mar 2022, 57 (2) 555-596; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.57.2.0718-9637R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Impact of Low-Ability Peers on Cognitive and Noncognitive Outcomes
Di Xu, Qing Zhang, Xuehan Zhou
Journal of Human Resources Mar 2022, 57 (2) 555-596; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.57.2.0718-9637R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Background
    • III. Data
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Monopsony, Efficiency, and the Regularization of Undocumented Immigrants
  • Migration, Segregation, and Interracial Marriage
  • Providers, Places, and Children’s Mental Health Care
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • I21
  • I28
  • D62
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire