Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

How Can Progressive Vouchers Help the Poor Benefit from School Choice? Evidence from the Chilean Voucher System

View ORCID ProfileJosefa Aguirre
Journal of Human Resources, May 2022, 57 (3) 956-997; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.57.3.0318-9386R2
Josefa Aguirre
Josefa Aguirre is a professor at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Escuela de Gobierno.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Josefa Aguirre
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Abadie, Alberto
    . 2002. “Bootstrap Tests for Distributional Treatment Effects in Instrumental Variable Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 97(457):284–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Abdulkadiroglu, Atile,
    2. Parag Pathak, and
    3. Christopher Walters
    . 2015. “Free to Choose: Can School Choice Reduce Student Achievement?” NBER Working Paper 21839. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
    1. Andrabi, Tahir,
    2. Jishnu Das, and
    3. Asim Ijaz Khwaja
    . 2017. “Report Cards: The Impact of Providing School and Child Test Scores on Educational Markets.” American Economic Review 107(6):1535–63.
    OpenUrl
    1. Angrist, Joshua,
    2. Eric Bettinger,
    3. Erik Bloom,
    4. Elizabeth King, and
    5. Michael Kremer
    . 2002. “Vouchers for Private Schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment.” American Economic Review 92(5):1535–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Angrist, Joshua,
    2. Eric Bettinger, and
    3. Michael Kremer
    . 2006. “Long-Term Educational Consequences of Secondary School Vouchers: Evidence from Administrative Records in Colombia.” American Economic Review 96(3):847–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Angrist, Joshua, and
    2. Miikka Rokkanen
    . 2015. “Wanna Get Away? Regression Discontinuity Estimation of Exam School Effects Away from the Cutoff.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 110(512):1331–44.
    OpenUrl
    1. Bayer, Patrick,
    2. Fernando Ferreira, and
    3. Robert McMillan
    . 2007. “A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods.” Journal of Political Economy 115(4):588–638.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bohlmark, Anders,
    2. Helena Holmlund, and
    3. Mikael Lindahl
    . 2015. “School Choice and Segregation: Evidence from Sweden.” Working paper. Uppsala, Sweden: IFAU-Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    1. Bohlmark, Anders, and
    2. Mikael Lindahl
    . 2007. “The Impact of School Choice on Pupil Achievement, Segregation and Costs: Swedish Evidence.” IZA Discussion Paper 2786. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
    1. Calonico, Sebastian,
    2. Matias Cattaneo, and
    3. Rocio Titiunik
    . 2014. “Robust Data-Driven Inference in the Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Stata Journal 14(4):909–46.
    OpenUrl
    1. Carrasco, Alejandro,
    2. Francisca Bogolasky,
    3. Carolina Flores,
    4. Gabriel Gutierrez, and
    5. Ernesto San-Martin
    . 2014. “Selección de Estudiantes y Desigualdad Educacional en Chile: ¿Que Tan Coactiva es la Regulación que la Prohibe?” Fonide report number 711286.
    1. Chakrabarti, Rajashri
    . 2008. “Can Increasing Private School Participation and Monetary Loss in a Voucher Program Affect Public School Performance? Evidence from Milwaukee.” Journal of Public Economics 92(5–6):1371–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Chakrabarti, Rajashri
    . 2009. “Do Vouchers Lead to Sorting under Random Private-School Selection? Evidence from the Milwaukee Voucher Program.” Staff Reports 379. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    1. Chingos, Matthew M., and
    2. Paul E. Peterson
    . 2015. “Experimentally Estimated Impacts of School Vouchers on College Enrollment and Degree attainment.” Journal of Public Economics 122:1–12.
    OpenUrl
    1. Chumacero, Romulo A.,
    2. Daniel Gómez, and
    3. Ricardo Paredes
    . 2011. “I Would Walk 500 miles (If It Paid).” Economics of Education Review 30(5):1103–14.
    OpenUrl
    1. Correa, Juan A.,
    2. Francisco Parro, and
    3. Loreto Reyes
    . 2014. “The Effects of Vouchers on School Results: Evidence from Chile’s Targeted Voucher Program.” Journal of Human Capital 8(4):351–98.
    OpenUrl
    1. Epple, Dennis, and
    2. Richard Romano
    . 1998. “Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects.” American Economic Review 88(1):33–62.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Epple, Dennis, and
    2. Richard Romano
    . 2008. “Educational Vouchers and Cream Skimming.” International Economic Review 49(4):1395–435.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Epple, Dennis,
    2. Richard Romano, and
    3. Miguel Urquiola
    . 2015. “School Vouchers: A Survey of the Economics Literature.” NBER Working Paper 21523. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
    1. Feigenberg, Benjamin,
    2. Steven Rivkin, and
    3. Rui Yan
    . 2019. “Illusory Gains from Chile’s Targeted School Voucher Experiment.” Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society 129(623):2805–32.
    OpenUrl
    1. Figlio, David, and
    2. Cassandra M.D. Hart
    . 2014. “Competitive Effects of Means-Tested School Vouchers.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6(1):133–56.
    OpenUrl
    1. Figlio, David, and
    2. Cecilia E. Rouse
    . 2006. “Do Accountability and Voucher Threats Improve Low-Performing Schools?” Journal of Public Economics 90(1–2):239–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Gallego, Francisco
    . 2013. “When Does Inter-School Competition Matter? Evidence from the Chilean Voucher System.” B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 13(2):525–62.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gallego, Francisco, and
    2. Andres Hernando
    . 2008. “On the Determinants and Implications of School Choice: Semi-Structural Stimulations for Chile.” Economia 9(1):197–244.
    OpenUrl
    1. Grau, Nicolas,
    2. Daniel Hojman, and
    3. Alejandra Mizala
    . 2018. “School Closure and Educational Attainment: Evidence from a Market-Based System.” Economics of Education Review 65:1–17.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hastings, Justine,
    2. Thomas J. Kane, and
    3. Douglas Staiger
    . 2009. “Heterogeneous Preferences and the Efficacy of Public School Choice.” NBER Working Paper 2145. Cambridge MA: NBER.
    1. Hastings, Justine, and
    2. Jeffrey Weinstein
    . 2008. “Information, School Choice, and Academic Achievement: Evidence from Two Experiments.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(4):1373–414.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Hoxby, Caroline
    . 2003. “School Choice and School Productivity: Could School Choice Be a Tide That Lifts All Boats?” In The Economics of School Choice, ed. Caroline Hoxby, 287–342. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Hoxby, Caroline, and
    2. Christopher Avery
    . 2013. “The Missing One-Offs: The Hidden Supply of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 46(1):1–65.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and
    2. Miguel Urquiola
    . 2003. “When Schools Compete, How Do They Compete? An Assessment of Chile’s Nationwide School Voucher Program.” NBER Working Paper 10008. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
    1. Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and
    2. Miguel Urquiola
    . 2006. “The Effects of Generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratification: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program.” Journal of Public Economics 90(8–9):1477–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kline, Patrick
    . 2011. “Oaxaca-Blinder as a Reweighting Estimator.” American Economic Review 101(3):532–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. MacLeod, W. Bentley, and
    2. Miguel Urquiola
    . 2012. “Anti-Lemons: School Reputation, Relative Diversity, and Educational Quality.” IZA Discussion Paper 6805. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
    1. MacLeod, W. Bentley, and
    2. M. Urquiola
    . 2015. “Reputation and School Competition.” American Economic Review 105(11):3471–88.
    OpenUrl
    1. Manski, Charles
    . 1992. “Educational Choice (Vouchers) and Social Mobility.” Economics of Education Review 11(4):351–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Mayer, Daniel P.,
    2. Paul E. Peterson,
    3. David E. Myers,
    4. Christina C. Tuttle, and
    5. William G. Howell
    . 2002. “School Choice in New York City after Three Years: An Evaluation of the School Choice Scholarships Program.” Research Paper PEPG02-01. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Program on Education Policy and Governance.
    1. McCrary, Justine
    . 2008. “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):698–714.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McEwan, Patrick. J.,
    2. Miguel Urquiola, and
    3. Emiliana Vegas
    . 2008. “School Choice, Stratification, and Information on School Performance: Lessons from Chile. Economia 8(2):1–42.
    OpenUrl
  1. MINEDUC. 2012. “Impacto de la Ley SEP en SIMCE: Una Mirada a 4 Años de su Implementación” Serie Evidencias 1(8).
    1. Mizala, Alejandra,
    2. Pilar Romaguera, and
    3. Miguel Urquiola
    . 2007. “Socioeconomic Status or Noise? Tradeoffs in the Generation of School Quality Information.” Journal of Development Economics 84(1):61–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Mizala, Alejandra, and
    2. Florencia Torche
    . 2013. “¿Logra la Subvención Escolar Preferencial Igualar los Resultados Educativos?” Documento de Referencia 9, Espacio Publico.
    1. Muralidharan, Karthik, and
    2. Venkatesch Sundararaman
    . 2015. “The Aggregate Effect of School Choice: Evidence from a Two-Stage Experiment in India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(3):1011–66.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Murnane, Richard J.,
    2. Marcus R. Waldman,
    3. John B. Willett,
    4. Maria Soledad Bos, and
    5. Emiliana Vegas
    . 2017. “The Consequences of Educational Voucher Reform in Chile.” NBER Working Paper 23550. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
    1. Navarro-Palau, Patricia
    . 2017. “Effects of Differentiated School Vouchers: Evidence from a Policy Change and Date of Birth Cutoffs.” Economics of Education Review 58:86–107.
    OpenUrl
    1. Nechyba, Thomas J.
    2000. “Mobility, Targeting, and Private-School Vouchers.” American Economic Review 90(1):130–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Nechyba, Thomas J.
    2003. “Introducing School Choice into Multidistrict Public School Systems.” In Economics of School Choice, ed. Caroline Hoxby, 145–94, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Neilson, Christopher
    . 2013. “Targeted Vouchers, Competition among Schools, and the Academic Achievement of Poor Students.” Unpublished.
    1. Pallais, Amanda
    . 2015. “Small Differences that Matter: Mistakes in Applying to College.” Journal of Labor Economics 33(2):493–520.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Peterson, Paul,
    2. William Howell,
    3. Patrick J. Wolf, and
    4. David Campbell
    . 2003. “School Vouchers. Results from Randomized Experiments.” In The Economics of School Choice, ed. Caroline Hoxby, 107–44. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
    1. Radford, Alexandria W.
    2013. Top Student, Top School? How Social Class Shapes Where Valedictorians Go To College. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Ross, Rebecca,
    2. Shannon White,
    3. Josh Wright, and
    4. Lori Knapp
    . 2013. “Using Behavioral Economics for Postsecondary Success.” Ideas 42. https://www.ideas42.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Using-Behavioral-Economics-for-Postsecondary-Success_ideas42_2013.pdf (accessed September 22, 2021).
    1. Rouse, Cecilia E.
    1998. “Private School Vouchers and Student Achievement: An Evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(2):553–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Rouse, Cecilia E.,
    2. Jane Hannaway, Dan Goldhaber, and
    3. David Figlio
    . 2013. “Feeling the Florida Heat? How Low-Performing Schools Respond to Voucher and Accountability Pressure.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(2):251–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Sandstrom, F. Mikael, and
    2. Fredrik Bergstrom
    . 2005. “School Vouchers in Practice: Competition Will Not Hurt You.” Journal of Public Economics 89(2–3):351–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Smith, Jonathan,
    2. Michael Hurwitz, and
    3. Jessica Howell
    . 2015. “Screening Mechanisms and Student Responses in the College Market.” Economics of Education Review 44:17–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Thaler, Richard H., and
    2. Sendhil Mullainathan
    . 2008. “How Behavioral Economics Differs from Traditional Economics.” In The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, Volume 2, ed. David R. Henderson, 34–37. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
    OpenUrl
    1. Urquiola, Miguel and
    2. Eric Verhoogen
    . 2009. “Class-Size Caps, Sorting, and the Regression-Discontinuity Design.” American Economic Review 99(1):179–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Valenzuela, Juan Pablo,
    2. Cristian Bellei, and
    3. Danae De los Ríos
    . 2010. “Segregación Escolar en Chile. In Cambios en la Gobernanza del Sistema Educativo Chileno, ed. Sergio Martinic and Gregory Elacqua, 257–84. Santiago de Chile: Unesco, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
    1. Villarroel, Gabriel
    . 2012. “Mejoramiento en Resultados Académicos de la Educación Básica en Chile Primeros Efectos de la Ley de Subvención Escolar Preferencial (SEP).” Tesis para optar al grado de magister en economía, Universidad de Chile.
    1. Witte, John F.,
    2. Deven Carlson,
    3. Joshua M. Cowen,
    4. David J. Fleming, and
    5. P.J. Wolf
    . 2012. “MPCP Longitudinal Educational Growth Study: Fifth Year Report.” SCDP Milwaukee Evaluation Report 29. School Choice Demonstration Project.
    1. Wolf, Patrick,
    2. Babette Gutmann,
    3. Michael Puma,
    4. Brian Kisida,
    5. Lou Rizzo,
    6. Nada Eissa, and
    7. Matthew Carr
    . 2010. “Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Final report.” NCEE 2010–4018. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 57 (3)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 57, Issue 3
1 May 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Can Progressive Vouchers Help the Poor Benefit from School Choice? Evidence from the Chilean Voucher System
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
How Can Progressive Vouchers Help the Poor Benefit from School Choice? Evidence from the Chilean Voucher System
Josefa Aguirre
Journal of Human Resources May 2022, 57 (3) 956-997; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.57.3.0318-9386R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
How Can Progressive Vouchers Help the Poor Benefit from School Choice? Evidence from the Chilean Voucher System
Josefa Aguirre
Journal of Human Resources May 2022, 57 (3) 956-997; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.57.3.0318-9386R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Effects of Exposure to a Large-Scale Recession on Higher Education and Early Labor Market Outcomes
  • Intergenerational Mobility Trends and the Changing Role of Female Labor
  • Can Schools Change Religious Attitudes?
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • I20
  • I22
  • I24
  • I28
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire