Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles
Open Access

Labor Market Frictions and Moving Costs of the Employed and Unemployed

Tyler Ransom
Journal of Human Resources, April 2022, 57 (S) S137-S166; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.monopsony.0219-10013R2
Tyler Ransom
Tyler Ransom is an assistant professor of economics at the University of Oklahoma and a research affiliate at IZA ().
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Annual Migration Rates by Lagged Employment Status and Migration Distance

    Source: 2004 and 2008 panels of the public-use Survey of Income and Program Participation. Figures include all non-college graduates aged 18–55 who have completed their schooling. Employment is defined as full-time employment.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Counterfactual Changes in Migration by Origin City, Prior Employment Status, and Unobserved Worker Type

    Notes: Each panel corresponds to a different origin city and unobserved type. Bar heights refer to the change in the out-migration rate from the specified location in response to the listed counterfactual. All figures are for 25-year-olds who were not born in the origin location. “High” refers to a location in the 75th percentile of the given distribution; “low” refers to the 25th percentile. All characteristics not set to “high” or “low” are set to the median. The earnings shock (↓ w) corressponds to the 70th percentile of the crosslocation distribution in earnings AR(1) shock deviations. The unemployment shock corresponds to the jump from 2008 to 2009 for the average location in the data. To focus the results, each candidate location has median AR(1) parameters for both earnings and employment. Birth location is held fixed in all counterfactuals. Individual characteristics are set to the average for all 25-year-olds, conditional on employment status.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Descriptive Statistics of the Estimation Subsample of the SIPP, 2004–2013

    VariableMeanSD
    Log monthly earnings (2000 dollars)a7.960.52
    Work experience (years)22.609.49
    Age (years)42.299.76
    Lives in location in birth state0.740.44
    Lives in location in birth census division0.750.43
    Number of persons16,648
    Number of observations50,415
    • Notes: For complete sample selection rules, see Online Appendix Table A1.

    • ↵a. Conditional on being employed full-time with monthly earnings between $400 and $22,000. This variable has 29,238 person-year observations. The earnings variable is spatially deflated to account for differences in cost of living according to the procedure outlined in Online Appendix A.7.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Migration in the SIPP, 2004–2013

    Number of persons (age 18–55)16,648
    Movers568
    Movers (%)3.41
    Moves653
    Moves per mover1.15
    Repeat moves (% of all moves)13.38
    Return moves (% of all moves)8.98
    • Notes: Moves are defined as changing locations as specified in the model.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Linear Probability Models of Employment, by Lagged Employment Status

    Prev. EmployedPrev. Nonemployed
    VariableCoeff.SECoeff.SE
    Constant0.7243***0.00710.1976***0.0059
    Experience0.0123***0.00050.0077***0.0004
    Experience2/100-0.0200***0.0012-0.0142***0.0011
    Lagged state unempl. rate-0.0038***0.0006-0.0060***0.0006
    Mover dummy-0.1219***0.00800.0468***0.0076
    Race × gender dummies✓✓
    Observations83,32478,057
    • Notes: Dependent variable is an indicator for being employed full-time in the current period. Sample includes all non-college graduates aged 18–55 in the 2004 and 2008 panels of the public-use SIPP who have completed their schooling.

    • * p < 0.10,

    • ** p < 0.05,

    • ↵*** p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Structural Employment Probability Equation Estimates

    1 Type2 Types
    Prev. EmployedPrev. NonemployedPrev. EmployedPrev. Nonemployed
    VariableCoeff.SECoeff.SECoeff.SECoeff.SE
    Constant1.3056***0.22200.25660.22370.9812***0.22410.5035***0.2264
    Experience0.0858***0.00910.0359***0.00860.0847***0.00920.0366***0.0087
    Experience2/100-0.1228***0.0208-0.02850.0219-0.1224***0.0211-0.03100.0221
    Lagged local unempl. rate-0.0314***0.0104-0.0922***0.0110-0.0342***0.0105-0.0937***0.0111
    Mover dummy-0.9257***0.12800.19290.1557-1.0483***0.13000.23590.1572
    Unobserved type 10.7958***0.0400-0.5751***0.0429
    Location fixed effects✓✓✓✓
    Observations30,8989,94930,8989,949
    Persons12,0136,08712,0136,087
    • Notes: Reported numbers are coefficients from logit regressions conditional on previous employment status.

    • * p < 0.10,

    • ** p < 0.05,

    • ↵*** p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Structural Earnings Equation Estimates

    1 Type2 Types
    ParameterCoeff.SECoeff.SE
    Constant7.5708***0.06737.2074***0.0470
    Experience0.0432***0.00150.0411***0.0010
    Experience2/100-0.0595***0.0033-0.0575***0.0023
    Unobserved type 10.6773***0.0039
    Location-time fixed effects✓✓
    Persons11,40411,404
    Observations29,23829,238
    • Notes: Reported numbers are coefficients from an OLS log earnings regression conditional on full-time employment and observing earnings. See footnote (a) of Table 1 for complete details on this subsample.

    • * p < 0.10,

    • ** p < 0.05,

    • ↵*** p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Structural Choice Equation Estimates

    1 Type2 Types
    ParameterSymbolCoeff.SECoeff.SE
    Job & location preferences
     Expected log earnings(γ0)0.916**0.3971.001**0.412
     Home production benefit(γ1)-0.9023.47711.333***3.453
     Search cost(γ2)-1.195***0.069-1.008***0.070
     Birth state bonus(γ3)0.207***0.0720.210***0.072
     Birth division bonus(γ4)-0.0020.073-0.0030.073
    Switching costs
     Fixed cost(θ12 – θ8)0.335**0.1270.910***0.126
     Age(θ13 – θ9)-0.095***0.006-0.106***0.006
     Age2/100(θ14 – θ10)0.109***0.0080.121***0.008
     Unobserved type 1(θ15 – θ11)-0.746***0.019
    Moving costs
     Fixed cost(θ0)-3.148***0.361-3.165***0.362
     Distance (1,000 miles)(θ1)-2.063***0.078-2.066***0.078
     Distance2(θ2)0.369***0.0250.369***0.025
     Age(θ3)-0.094***0.018-0.101***0.018
     Age2/100(θ4)0.056**0.0230.063***0.023
     Employedt–1(θ5)0.197*0.1100.252**0.110
     Unemployedt–1(θ6)-0.230*0.128-0.239*0.129
     Unobserved type 1(θ7)0.256***0.045
     Pr(type = 1)(πr)N/A0.4926
     Observations50,41550,415
     Persons16,64816,648
     Discount factor(β)0.90.9
    • Notes: Reported numbers are flow utility parameter estimates from the dynamic choice model detailed in Online Appendix Section A.1. Estimates of location-specific amenities (the αβs) are not reported due to Census Bureau rules regarding disclosure risk.

    • ↵* p < 0.10,

    • ↵** p < 0.05,

    • ↵*** p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 7

    Sample Moving Costs and Amenity Values in Net Present Value and Percentage of Flow Earnings

    Monetary Value
    Type 1Type 2
    Utility ComponentEmployedUnemployedEmployedUnemployed
    Panel A: Net Present Value (US$)
    Moving costs
     Fixed cost of moving-105,095-127,749-116,777-140,023
     Average mover, 500-mile move-394,446-436,458-416,095-459,270
     Average mover, New York to Los Angeles-570,671-622,158-597,202-650,115
     Young mover, New York to Los Angeles-312,595-342,163-327,841-358,186
    Amenities
     SD of local amenities23,356
     Range of local amenities91,603
     Birth state bonus57,328
    Panel B: Percentage of Flow Earnings
    Moving costs
     Fixed cost of moving-30.6-37.3-34.1-40.8
     Average mover, 500-mile move-101.9-112.8-107.5-118.7
     Average mover, New York to Los Angeles-147.5-160.8-154.4-168.0
     Young mover, New York to Los Angeles-116.9-128.0-122.6-134.0
    Amenities
     SD of local amenities7.7
     Range of local amenities30.2
     Birth state bonus18.9
    • Notes: Panel A expresses the monetary values in terms of net present value, while Panel B expresses monetary values in terms of the percentage of flow earnings. All results are derived from the parameter estimates in Table 6. The average mover is age 39, and a young mover is age 25. The great-circle distance from New York to Los Angeles is 2,446 miles. For complete details on how these values are calculated, see Online Appendix Section A.4.

    • View popup
    Table 8

    Model Fit: Observed vs. Predicted Migration Probabilities

    2004–20082009–2013All
    t–1 Employment StatusDataModelDataModelDataModel
    Panel A: Migration Probabilities by Calendar Time and t–1 Employment Status
    Employed1.30%1.33%1.28%1.24%1.29%1.29%
    Unemployed1.21%1.25%1.15%1.10%1.19%1.19%
    Out of labor force1.88%1.73%1.52%1.66%1.69%1.70%
    Overall1.14%1.27%1.38%1.22%1.25%1.25%
    EmployedUnemployedOut of LFAll
    Age RangeDataModelDataModelDataModelDataModel
    Panel B: Migration Probabilities by Age and t–1 Employment Status
    18–252.31%2.11%2.54%3.62%3.37%3.31%2.52%2.84%
    26–351.90%1.65%2.31%2.32%1.97%2.13%2.00%1.86%
    36–451.00%1.20%1.57%1.42%1.23%1.30%1.13%1.25%
    46–550.80%0.82%1.09%0.85%0.88%0.84%0.86%0.83%
    EmployedUnemployedOut of LFAll
    Distance (Miles)DataModelDataModelDataModelDataModel
    Panel C: Migration Probabilities by Distance and t–1 Employment Status
    0–5000.72%0.70%0.68%0.65%0.92%0.94%0.72%0.70%
    501–1,0000.31%0.35%0.29%0.33%0.41%0.45%0.31%0.35%
    1,001–1,5000.13%0.13%0.10%0.12%0.20%0.17%0.13%0.13%
    1,501–2,0000.07%0.05%0.06%0.05%0.11%0.07%0.07%0.05%
    2,001+0.06%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.05%
    • Notes: All numbers in this table correspond to migration probabilities (multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages). Data probabilities consist of conditional means of an indicator for migration. Model probabilities consist of conditional means of the predicted probability of leaving the current location.

    • View popup
    Table 9

    Model Fit: Employment Transitions by Migration Status

    Period t
    DataModel
    Period t–1EUNEUN
    Panel A: Employment Transitions Conditional on Migrating
    Employed (E)70.98%22.69%6.33%71.99%22.26%5.75%
    Unemployed (U)41.40%46.50%12.10%45.06%44.77%10.17%
    Out of labor force (N)16.52%17.39%66.09%13.88%12.58%73.54%
    Panel B: Employment Transitions Conditional On Staying
    Employed (E)86.92%9.86%3.23%86.45%9.83%3.71%
    Unemployed (U)36.33%49.75%13.93%38.09%49.60%12.31%
    Out of labor force (N)10.81%10.41%78.78%10.56%12.22%77.21%
    • Notes: All numbers in this table correspond to employment transition probabilities (multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages). Data probabilities consist of conditional means of employment transition by migration status. Model probabilities consist of conditional means (by employment status) of the predicted conditional probability of making an employment transition (conditional on leaving or staying).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Free alternate access to The Journal of Human Resources supplementary materials is available at https://uwpress.wisc.edu/journals/journals/jhr-supplementary.html

    • 0219-10013R2_supp.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 57 (S)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 57, Issue S
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Labor Market Frictions and Moving Costs of the Employed and Unemployed
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Labor Market Frictions and Moving Costs of the Employed and Unemployed
Tyler Ransom
Journal of Human Resources Apr 2022, 57 (S) S137-S166; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.monopsony.0219-10013R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Labor Market Frictions and Moving Costs of the Employed and Unemployed
Tyler Ransom
Journal of Human Resources Apr 2022, 57 (S) S137-S166; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.monopsony.0219-10013R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Data and Stylized Facts about Migration and Unemployment
    • III. A Model of Search Frictions, Labor Supply, and Migration
    • IV. Identification and Estimation
    • V. Empirical Results
    • VI. Model Fit and Counterfactual Simulations
    • VII. Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Monopsony in the Labor Market: New Empirical Results and New Public Policies
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Licensure Tests and Teacher Supply
  • Closing the Gap Between Vocational and General Education?
  • The Effects of High School Remediation on Long-Run Educational Attainment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • C35
  • E32
  • J22
  • J61
  • J64
  • R23
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire