Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles
Open Access

Labor Market Concentration

José Azar, Ioana Marinescu and Marshall Steinbaum
Journal of Human Resources, April 2022, 57 (S) S167-S199; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.monopsony.1218-9914R1
José Azar
José Azar is Assistant Professor at the University of Navarra’s Business and Economics Department and a Visiting Assistant Professor and Research Associate at University of Navarra’s IESE Business School IESE Business School, Av. Pearson, 21, 08034 Barcelona, Spain and CEPR Associate ().
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jazar{at}iese.edu
Ioana Marinescu
Ioana Marinescu is Assistant Professor at University of Pennsylvania School of Social Policy & Practice, 3701 Locust Walk, Philadelphia PA, 19104-6214 and NBER Faculty Research Fellow ().
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ioma{at}upenn.edu
Marshall Steinbaum
Marshall Steinbaum is Assistant Professor at University of Utah Economics Department, 260 Central Campus Dr. 4100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Log Real Wages across Markets in CareerBuilder and BLS

    Notes: This figure shows a kernel density plot of the log real wage for labor markets for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4 on CareerBuilder.com. The real wage is defined as the average wage across wage-posting vacancies in a given market and year–quarter, divided by the consumer price index for that year–quarter. The BLS plot corresponds to the log average wages from the Occupational Employment Statistics.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Average HHI by Commuting Zone, Based on Vacancy Shares

    Notes: This figure shows the average of the Herfindahl–Hirschman index by six-digit SOC occupation code for labor markets for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4. The categories we use for HHI concentration levels are: “Low”: HHI 0–1,500; “Moderate”: HHI 1,500–2,500; “High”: HHI 2,500–5,000; “Very High”: HHI 5,000–10,000. These categories correspond to the DOJ–FTC guidelines, except that we add the additional distinction between high and very high concentration levels around the 5,000 HHI threshold. Market shares are defined as the sum of vacancies posted in CareerBuilder.com by a given firm in a given market and year–quarter divided by total vacancies posted in the website in that market and year–quarter.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Histogram ofHHIs Based on Application Shares and Vacancy Shares

    Notes: This figure shows a histogram of the Herfindahl–Hirschman index for labor markets for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4. Market shares are defined as either the sum of vacancies posted in CareerBuilder.com by a given firm in a given market and year–quarter divided by total vacancies posted in the website in that market and year–quarter, or as the sum of applications (EOI) through the website to a given firm in a given market and year–quarter divided by the total number of applications to all firms in that market and year–quarter.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Average HHI by Occupation, Based Vacancy Shares

    Notes: This figure shows the average of the Herfindahl–Hirschman index by six-digit SOC occupation code for labor markets for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4. Market shares are defined as the sum of vacancies posted in CareerBuilder.com by a given firm in a given market and year–quarter divided by total vacancies posted in the website in that market and year–quarter.

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Binned Scatter of Log HHI Based on Vacancies and Log Real Wage

    Notes: This figure shows a binned scatter plot of log HHI based on vacancy shares and log real wage in the same market, using 18 quantiles.

  • Figure 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6

    Binned Scatter of Log HHI Based on Applications and Log Real Wage

    Notes: This figure shows a binned scatter plot of log HHI based on application shares and log real wage in the same market, using 18 quantiles.

  • Figure 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7

    Binned Scatter of Residualized Log HHI Based on Vacancies and Residualized Log Real Wage

    Notes: This figure shows a binned scatter plot of the residuals of a regression of log HHI (based on vacancy shares) on log tightness, CZ-by-SOC fixed effects, and CZ-by-year–quarter fixed effects and the residuals of a regression of log real wage in the same market, also on log tightness, CZ-by-SOC fixed effects, and CZ-by-year–quarter fixed effects.

  • Figure 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8

    Effect of Log HHI (Vacancies) on Log Real Wage by Commuting Zone Population Percentile

    Notes: Estimated effect from a panel IV regression of log real wage on a fifth-order polynomial in log HHI (in terms of vacancies), instrumented with a fifth-order polynomial in average log 1/N in other commuting zones for the same occupation, controlling for log tightness, CZ-by-six-digit SOC fixed effects and time fixed effects. Data are for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4. We cluster standard errors at the market level.

  • Figure 9
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9

    Binned Scatter of Residualized Log HHI Based on Vacancies and Residualized Log Real Wage, Cross-Sectional Variation

    Notes: Panels A and B show binned scatter plots of the residuals of a regression of log HHI (based on vacancy shares) on log tightness, CZ fixed effects and SOC fixed effects, and the residuals of a regression of log real wage in the same market, also on log tightness, CZ fixed effects, and SOC fixed effects. The wages in Panel A are from CareerBuilder and in Panel B from the BLS Occupational Employment Statistics. Panels C and D show binned scatter plots of the residuals of a regression of the predicted first-stage log HHI (based on vacancy shares) on log tightness, CZ fixed effects, and SOC fixed effects, and the residuals of a regression of log real wage in the same market, also on log tightness, CZ fixed effects, and SOC fixed effects. The predicted first-stage log HHI refers to the predicted values from a first-stage IV regression of log HHI on the average log(1/N) for the same occupation in other markets, controlling for log tightness, CZ fixed effects, and SOC fixed effects. The wages in Panel C are from CareerBuilder and in Panel D from the BLS Occupational Employment Statistics.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    List of Occupations

    SOC CodeOccupation Description
    11-3011Administrative services managers
    13-2011Accountants and auditors
    13-2051Financial analysts
    13-2052Personal financial advisers
    13-2053Insurance underwriters
    13-2061Financial examiners
    15-1041Computer support specialists
    17-2111Health and safety engineers, except mining safety engineers and inspectors
    17-2112Industrial engineers
    29-1111Registered nurses
    41-4011Sales representatives, wholesale & manufacturing, technical & scientific products
    41-9041Telemarketers
    43-3031Bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing clerks
    43-4051Customer service representatives
    43-6011Executive secretaries and administrative assistants
    43-6012Legal secretaries
    43-6013Medical secretaries
    43-6014Secretaries and administrative assistants, except legal, medical, and executive
    47-1011First-line supervisors of construction trades and extraction workers
    49-3041Farm equipment mechanics
    49-3042Mobile heavy equipment mechanics, except engines
    49-3043Rail car repairers
    51-1011First-line supervisors/managers of production and operating workers
    53-3031Driver/sales workers
    53-3032Truck drivers, heavy and tractor-trailer
    53-3033Light truck or delivery services drivers
    • Notes: This table shows the six-digit SOC occupations present in our sample.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Summary Statistics

    MeanSDMin.Max.Obs.
    Real wage 41,547.36  36,216.76 4.71 5,504,38561,017
    Vacancies    82.95    224.39 1   17,92861,017
    Applications   3,612.96  14,416.02 0  528,28961,017
    Searches441,156.091,385,720.05 07,880,860161,017
    Log tightness   -2.9     1.36 -7.64  4.4860,200
    Number of firms    20.03    35.78 1     57161,017
    HHI (vacancies, CZ quarterly)—baseline   3,157.02   2,923.9266.04  10,00061,017
    HHI (applications, CZ quarterly)   3,480.17   3,061.03 0  10,00061,017
    HHI (vacancies, CZ monthly)   3,251.69   3,004.474.23  10,000132,461
    HHI (vacancies, CZ semesterly)   3,090.29   2,872.8658.57  10,00038,503
    HHI (vacancies, CZ yearly)   2,970.47   2,780.1151.91  10,00024,060
    HHI (vacancies, CZ whole period)   2,541.6   2,498.5154.76  10,0008,979
    HHI (applications, CZ monthly)   3,790.37   31,32.18 0  10,000132,461
    HHI (applications, CZ semesterly)   3,315.38   3,017.08 0  10,00038,503
    HHI (applications, CZ yearly)   3,120   2,900.47 0  10,00024,060
    HHI (applications, CZ whole period)   2,722.97   2,653.19 0  10,0008,979
    HHI (vacancies, CZ quarterly, population-weighted)   1,690.74   1,942.0966.04  10,00061,013
    HHI (applications, CZ quarterly, population-weighted)   1,848.51   2,127.09 0  10,00061,013
    HHI (vacancies, county quarterly)   4,222.52   3,331.3676.09  10,000111,109
    HHI (applications, county quarterly)   4,563.85   3,369.67 0  10,000111,109
    HHI (vacancies, state quarterly)   1,358.48   1,634.5864.01  10,00015,124
    HHI (applications, state quarterly)   1,458.09   1,781.24 0  10,00015,124
    • Notes: This table shows summary statistics for our sample consisting of commuting zone–occupational code (six-digit SOC) labor markets over the period 2010Q1–2013Q4.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Effect of Market Concentration on Real Wages: Panel Regressions (First Stage)

    Dependent Variable: Log HHI (Vacancies)
    (1)(2)(3)
    Panel A: Market-Level Regressions
    Average log (1/N) in other markets1.005***1.046***1.074***
    (0.0344)(0.0323)(0.0340)
    Log tightness0.171***0.198***
    (0.00471)(0.00558)
    Market (CZ × six-digit SOC) FE✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE✓✓
    year–quarter FE × CZ FE✓
    Observations59,48558,64256,679
    R-squared0.8460.8520.865
    Dependent Variable: Log HHI (Vacancies)
    (1)(2)(3)(4)
    Panel B: Vacancy-Level Regressions
    Average log (1/N) in other markets0.871***0.926***0.889***0.931***
    (0.129)(0.124)(0.116)(0.0760)
    Log tightness0.341***
    0.451***0.252***
    (0.0162)(0.0186)(0.0146)
    CZ × six-digit SOC FE✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE × CZ FE✓
    CZ × Job-title FE✓
    Observations1,023,2951,021,1851,020,510955,641
    R-squared0.9020.9130.9280.948
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Effect of Market Concentration on Real Wages: Panel Regressions

    Dependent Variable: Log(Real Wage)
    OLSIV
    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
    Panel A: Market-Level Regressions
    Log HHI (vacancies)-0.103***-0.0347***-0.0399***-0.0378***-0.0300***-0.141***-0.143***-0.127***
    (0.00456)(0.00377)(0.00392)(0.00406)(0.00422)(0.0191)(0.0181)(0.0176)
    Log tightness0.0113***0.0132***0.00686*0.0283***0.0305***
    (0.00320)(0.00357)(0.00360)(0.00427)(0.00479)
    year–quarter FE✓✓✓✓✓
    Market (CZ × six-digit SOC) FE✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE × CZ FE✓✓✓
    Year–Quarter FE × six-digit SOC FE✓
    Observations61,01759,48558,64256,67956,67759,48558,64256,679
    R-squared0.0420.6740.6720.7150.738-0.018-0.015-0.012
    Kleibergen–Paap F-stat854.31051996.7
    Panel B: Vacancy-Level Regressions
    Log HHI (vacancies)-0.0327***-0.0331***-0.0314***-0.0154***-0.200***-0.192***-0.188***-0.116***
    (0.00453)(0.00476)(0.00500)(0.00377)(0.0398)(0.0361)(0.0370)(0.0184)
    Log tightness0.0006650.004290.00818***0.0540***0.0737***0.0315***
    (0.00342)(0.00462)(0.00297)(0.0133)(0.0180)(0.00601)
    CZ × six-digit SOC FE✓✓✓✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE✓✓✓✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE × CZ FE✓✓
    CZ × job-title FE✓✓
    Observations1,023,2951,021,1851,020,510955,6411,023,2951,021,1851,020,510955,641
    R-squared0.5330.5330.5410.8490.5220.5240.5340.847
    Kleibergen–Paap F-stat45.6256.1858.72150.1
    • Notes: Data are for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4. We cluster standard errors at the market level.

    • ↵* p < 0.1,

    • ** p < 0.05,

    • ↵*** p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Plausibly Exogenous Instrument Regressions (Market-Level Data)

    Dependent Variable: Log(Real Wage)
    (1)(2)(3)
    Embedded Image-0.141***-0.149***-0.137***
    (0.0186)(0.0184)(0.0184)
    Log tightness0.003870.00526
    (0.00310)(0.00344)
    Market (CZ × six-digit SOC) FE✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE✓
    year–quarter FE × CZ FE✓
    Observations59,48558,64256,679
    R-squared0.6740.6710.715
    β (lower bound)-0.178-0.177-0.157
    β (upper bound)0.03620.03570.0349
    γmax-0.105-0.112-0.100
    • Notes: Data are for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4. We consider the following model in which the instrument is not fully exogenous and therefore can enter in the second stage: log(wm,t) = β·logHHIm,t + γ·z + θ·Xm,t + αt + δm + εm,t, where z is our instrumental variable. We implement the plausibly exogenous instrument regression methodology as follows. We start by running reduced form OLS regressions analogous to our IV specifications, but including the instrument directly in the second stage instead of log HHI. The value of γ in the table refers to the coefficient of the instrument in this regression. We take Embedded Image as the lower bound for the range of γ and zero as the upper bound, and then compute bounds for the coefficient on log HHI (β) using the plausibly exogenous regression methodology of Conley, Hansen, and Rossi (2010). We implement the methodology by (i) within-transforming all the variables (including the dependent variable, the regressors, and the instruments) by running regressions with each variable on the left-hand side and the corresponding set of fixed effects on the right-hand side, and taking the residuals as the transformed variables, and (ii) running the plausibly exogenous instrument regressions on the within-transformed variables using the plausexog command in Stata developed by Clarke (2017). We cluster standard errors at the market level. We also calculate the value of the lower bound for γ that would make the interval for β be fully to the left of zero. We call this value γmax.

    • * p < 0.1,

    • ** p < 0.05,

    • ↵*** p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Effect of Market Concentration on Real Wages: Robustness Checks 1

    Dependent Variable: Log( Real Wage)
    Control for VacanciesExcluding HHI = 1SOC-2Job Titles
    OLS
    (1)
    IV
    (2)
    OLS
    (3)
    IV
    (4)
    OLS
    (5)
    IV
    (6)
    OLS
    (7)
    IV
    (8)
    Log HHI (vacancies)-0.0373***-0.150***-0.0377***-0.131***-0.0491***-0.303***-0.00644***0.0337
    (0.00405)(0.0217)(0.00425)(0.0185)(0.00522)(0.0296)(0.00247)(0.0350)
    Log tightness0.0127***0.0378***0.0135***0.0359***0.0181***0.0683***-0.00673***-0.0102***
    (0.00374)(0.00604)(0.00424)(0.00582)(0.00504)(0.00765)(0.000772)(0.00237)
    Log vacancies0.00208-0.0143***0.00467
    (0.00331)(0.00459)(0.00363)
    CZ FE × six-digit SOC FE✓✓✓✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE × CZ FE✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
    CZ × Job-title FE✓✓
    Observations56,67956,67951,60751,60736,02336,023231,072182,354
    R-squared0.7150.7090.7090.7050.675-0.1010.879-0.002
    Kleibergen–Paap F-stat565.6907.1667.3462.8
    • Notes: Data are for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4. We cluster standard errors at the market level. In IV specifications, we use as instrument the average of log(l/2V) for the same six-digit SOC occupation in other commuting zones. Robust standard errors in parentheses.

    • * p < 0.1,

    • ** p < 0.05,

    • ↵*** p < 0.01.

    • View popup
    Table 7

    Effect of Market Concentration on Real Wages: Robustness Checks 2 (Panel IV)

    Dependent Variable: Log(Real Wage)
    1/N
    (1)
    HHI (EOI)
    (2)
    County
    (3)
    Cross-Section
    (4)
    Cross-Section (BLS Wages)
    (5)
    Fraction Posting Wage
    (6)
    Search Tightness
    (7)
    Log (1/N)-0.0882***
    (0.0123)
    Log HHI (EOI)-0.102***
    (0.0142)
    Log HHI (vacancies)-0.142***-0.0927***-0.0352***-0.157***-0.125***
    (0.0153)(0.0156)(0.00555)(0.0231)(0.0185)
    Log tightness0.00898***0.003010.0248***0.0300***0.003080.0325***
    (0.00345)(0.00350)(0.00337)(0.00997)(0.00349)(0.00510)
    Fraction posting wage0.147***
    (0.0305)
    Log (vacancies/searches)0.0252***
    (0.0447)
    CZ FE × six-digit SOC FE✓✓✓✓
    year–quarter FE × CZ FE✓✓✓✓
    County FE × six-digit SOC FE✓
    year–quarter FE × county FE✓
    CZ FE✓✓
    Six-digit SOC FE✓✓
    Observations56,67956,67994,7148,8956,22856,67957,383
    R-squared0.7140.7110.7220.6060.9370.7090.712
    Kleibergen–Paap F-stat  2008  1973  1473  1546  1494  643  800.8
    • Notes: Data are for the period 2010Q1–2013Q4. We cluster standard errors at the market level. In all cases, we report results from a panel IV specification using the average of log(l/2V) for the same six-digit SOC occupation in other commuting zones.

    • * p < 0.1,

    • ** p < 0.05,

    • ↵*** p < 0.01.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 57 (S)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 57, Issue S
1 Apr 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Labor Market Concentration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Labor Market Concentration
José Azar, Ioana Marinescu, Marshall Steinbaum
Journal of Human Resources Apr 2022, 57 (S) S167-S199; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.monopsony.1218-9914R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Labor Market Concentration
José Azar, Ioana Marinescu, Marshall Steinbaum
Journal of Human Resources Apr 2022, 57 (S) S167-S199; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.monopsony.1218-9914R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Measuring Labor Market Concentration
    • III. Concentration and Wages
    • IV. Robustness Checks
    • V. Discussion and Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Labor Market Concentration, Wages and Job Security in Europe
  • Strong Employers and Weak Employees: How Does Employer Concentration Affect Wages?
  • Labor Market Concentration, Earnings, and Inequality
  • Monopsony in the Labor Market: New Empirical Results and New Public Policies
  • Monopsony in Movers: The Elasticity of Labor Supply to Firm Wage Policies
  • Labor Monopsony and the Limits of the Law
  • Labor Market Competition and Employment Adjustment over the Business Cycle
  • Labor Market Polarization, Job Tasks, and Monopsony Power
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Effects of Exposure to a Large-Scale Recession on Higher Education and Early Labor Market Outcomes
  • Intergenerational Mobility Trends and the Changing Role of Female Labor
  • World War II Blues
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • J23
  • J31
  • J42
  • J63
  • L41
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire