The Impact of Advisor Gender on Female Students’ STEM Enrollment and Persistence

References

1. ↵
   1. Angrist, Joshua,
   2. Daniel Lang, and
   3. Philip Oreopoulos

   . 2009. “Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(1):136–63.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Barr, Andrew, and
   2. Benjamin Castleman

   . 2018. “An Engine of Economic Opportunity: Intensive Advising, College Success, and Social Mobility.” Unpublished.
3. ↵
   1. Barr, Andrew, and
   2. Benjamin Castleman

   . 2019. “Exploring Variation in College Counselor Effectiveness.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 109:227–31.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bettinger, Eric P., and
   2. Rachel B. Baker

   . 2014. “The Effects of Student Coaching: An Evaluation of a Randomized Experiment in Student Advising.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 36(1):3–19.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Bettinger, Eric P., and
   2. Bridget Terry Long

   . 2005. “Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students.” American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 95(2):152–57.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Blau, Francine D.,
   2. Janet M. Currie,
   3. Rachel T.A. Croson, and
   4. Donna K. Ginther

   . 2010. “Can Mentoring Help Female Assistant Professors? Interim Results from a Randomized Trial.” American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 100(2):348–52.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Bostwick, Valerie K., and
   2. Bruce A. Weinberg

   . 2018. “Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs.” NBER Working Paper 25028. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
8. ↵
   1. Breda, Thomas,
   2. Julien Grenet,
   3. Marion Monnet, and
   4. Clémentine Van Effenterre

   . 2020. “Do Female Role Models Reduce the Gender Gap in Science? Evidence from French High Schools.” IZA Discussion Paper 13163. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
9. ↵
   1. Buckles, Kasey

   . 2019. “Fixing the Leaky Pipeline: Strategies for Making Economics Work for Women at Every Stage.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33(1):43–60.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Canaan, Serena,
    2. Antoine Deeb, and
    3. Pierre Mouganie

    . 2022. “Adviser Value Added and Student Outcomes: Evidence from Randomly Assigned College Advisers.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 14(4):151–91.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Canaan, Serena, and
    2. Pierre Mouganie

    . 2018. “Returns to Education Quality for Low-Skilled Students: Evidence from a Discontinuity.” Journal of Labor Economics 36(2):395–436.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Marianne E. Page, and
    3. James E. West

    . 2010. “Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(3):1101–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E., and
    2. Bruce I. Sacerdote

    . 2017. “Why Do College-Going Interventions Work?” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(3):124–51.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Bruce I. Sacerdote, and
    3. James E. West

    . 2013. “From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? The Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation.” Econometrica 81(3):855–82.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E., and
    2. James E. West

    . 2010. “Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors.” Journal of Political Economy 118(3):409–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. College Board

    . 2011. “How Four-Year Colleges and Universities Organize Themselves to Promote Student Persistence: The Emerging National Picture” New York: College Board Advocacy & Policy Center.
17. ↵
    1. College Board

    . 2012. “SAT Percentile Ranks.” http://media.collegeboard.com/digitalServices/pdf/research/SAT-Percentile-Ranks-2012.pdf (accessed August 8, 2022).
18. ↵
    1. Dee, Thomas S.

    2007. “Teachers and the Gender Gaps in Student Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 42(3):528–54.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Ellis, Jimmy R., and
    2. Seth Gershenson

    . 2020. “Gender, Peer Advising, and College Success.” Labour Economics 62:101775.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Gaule, Patrick, and
    2. Mario Piacentini

    . 2018. “An Advisor like Me? Advisor Gender and Post-Graduate Careers in Science.” Research Policy 47(4):805–13.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. ↵
    1. Gong, Jie,
    2. Yi Lu, and
    3. Hong Song

    . 2018. “The Effect of Teacher Gender on Students’ Academic and Noncognitive Outcomes.” Journal of Labor Economics 36(3):743–78.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Good, Phillip I.

    2006. Resampling Methods: A Practical Guide to Data Analysis. Third edition. Boston: Birkhäuser.
23. ↵
    1. Griffith, Amanda L.

    2010. “Persistence of Women and Minorities in STEM Field Majors: Is it the School that Matters?” Economics of Education Review 29(6):911–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Gurantz, Oded,
    2. Matea Pender,
    3. Zachary Mabel,
    4. Cassandra Larson, and
    5. Eric Bettinger

    . 2020. “Virtual Advising for High-Achieving High School Students.” Economics of Education Review 75:101974.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Hastings, Justine S.,
    2. Christopher A. Neilson, and
    3. Seth D. Zimmerman

    . 2013. “Are Some Degrees Worth More Than Others? Evidence from College Admission Cutoffs in Chile.” NBER Working Paper 19241. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
26. ↵
    1. Heß, Simon

    . 2017. “Randomization Inference with Stata: A Guide and Software.” Stata Journal 17(3):630–51.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Hilmer, Christiana, and
    2. Michael Hilmer

    . 2007. “Women Helping Women, Men Helping Women? Same-Gender Mentoring, Initial Job Placements, and Early Career Publishing Success for Economics PhDs.” American Economic Review Papers & Proceedings 97(2):422–26.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Hoffmann, Florian, and
    2. Philip Oreopoulos

    . 2009. “A Professor like Me: The Influence of Instructor Gender on College Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 44(2):479–94.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    1. Kato, Takao, and
    2. Yang Song

    . 2018. “An Advisor Like Me: Does Gender Matter?” IZA Discussion Paper 11575. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
30. ↵
    1. Kirkebøen, Lars J.,
    2. Edwin Leuven, and
    3. Magne Mogstad

    . 2016. “Field of Study, Earnings, and Self-Selection.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(3):1057–111.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Kofoed, Micheal S., and
    2. Elizabeth mcGovney

    . 2019. “The Effect of Same-Gender or Same-Race Role Models on Occupation Choice: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Mentors at West Point.” Journal of Human Resources 54(2):430–67.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    1. Kot, Felly Chiteng

    . 2014. “The Impact of Centralized Advising on First-Year Academic Performance and Second-Year Enrollment Behavior.” Research in Higher Education 55(6):527–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Lavecchia, Adam M.,
    2. Heidi Liu, and
    3. Philip Oreopoulos

    . 2016. “Behavioral Economics of Education: Progress and Possibilities.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Volume 5, ed. Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin, and Ludger Woessmann, 1–74. New York: Elsevier.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Lehman, Eric L., and
    2. Joseph P. Romano

    . 2005. Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Third edition. Springer Texts in Statistics. New York: Springer.
35. ↵
    1. Lim, Jaegeum, and
    2. Jonathan Meer

    . 2017. “The Impact of Teacher–Student Gender Matches: Random Assignment Evidence from South Korea.” Journal of Human Resources 52(4):979–97.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
36. ↵
    1. Lim, Jaegeum, and
    2. Jonathan Meer

    . 2020. “Persistent Effects of Teacher–Student Gender Matches.” Journal of Human Resources 55(3):809–35.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
37. ↵
    1. Lusher, Lester,
    2. Doug Campbell, and
    3. Scott Carrell

    . 2018. “TAs Like Me: Racial Interactions between Graduate Teaching Assistants and Undergraduates.” Journal of Public Economics 159:203–24.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Mansour, Hani,
    2. Daniel I. Rees,
    3. Bryson M. Rintala, and
    4. Nathan N. Wozny

    . 2022. “The Effects of Professor Gender on the Post-Graduation Outcomes of Female Students.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 75(3:693–715.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Mouganie, Pierre, and
    2. Yaojing Wang

    . 2020. “High-Performing Peers and Female STEM Choices in School.” Journal of Labor Economics 38(3):805–41.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. NACADA

    . 2011. 2011 “National Survey of Academic Advising.” https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Clearinghouse/View-Articles/2011-NACADA-National-Survey.aspx (accessed August 4, 2022).
41. ↵
    1. Neumark, David, and
    2. Rosella Gardecki

    . 1998. “Women Helping Women? Role Model and Mentoring Effects on Female Ph.D. Students in Economics.” Journal of Human Resources 33(1):220–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Oreopoulos, Philip, and
    2. Uros Petronijevic

    . 2019. “The Remarkable Unresponsiveness of College Students to Nudging and What We Can Learn From It.” NBER Working Paper 26059. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
43. ↵
    1. Pezzoni, Michele,
    2. Jacques Mairesse,
    3. Paula Stephan, and
    4. Julia Lane

    . 2016. “Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study.” PloS One 11(1):e0145146.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
44. ↵
    1. Porter, Catherine, and
    2. Danila Serra

    . 2020. “Gender Differences in the Choice of Major: The Importance of Female Role Models.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12(3):226–54.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Thompson, Shane

    . 2017. “College Advising and Gender.” Economic Inquiry 55(2):1007–16.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation

    . 2015. “Reaching the Full Potential of STEM for Women and the U.S. Economy.” Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation.
47. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics

    . 2018. “The Condition of Education 2018.” NCES 2018-144. Washington, DC: NCES.
48. ↵
    1. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy

    . 2011. “Women and Girls in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM).” Technical Report.