Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

Timing Matters

Evidence from College Major Decisions

Richard W. Patterson, View ORCID ProfileNolan G. Pope and Aaron Feudo
Journal of Human Resources, July 2023, 58 (4) 1347-1384; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.59.2.0820-11127R1
Richard W. Patterson
Richard W. Patterson is at the Brigham Young University, IZA, and CESifo (rich_patterson{at}byu.edu).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nolan G. Pope
Nolan G. Pope is at University of Maryland (npope{at}umd.edu).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nolan G. Pope
Aaron Feudo
Aaron Feudois at the United States Military Academy (aaron.feudo{at}usma.edu).
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Agarwal, Sumit,
    2. John C. Driscoll,
    3. Xavier Gabaix, and
    4. David Laibson
    . 2011. “Learning in the Credit Card Market.”
  2. ↵
    1. Altonji, Joseph G.,
    2. Erica Blom, and
    3. Costas Meghir
    . 2012. “Heterogeneity in Human Capital Investments: High School Curriculum, College Major, and Careers.” Annual Review of Economics 4(1):185–223.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Altonji, Joseph G.,
    2. Lisa B. Kahn, and
    3. Jamin D Speer
    . 2014. “Trends in Earnings Differentials across College Majors and the Changing Task Composition of Jobs.” American Economic Review 104(5):387–93.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Arcidiacono, Peter
    . 2004. “Ability Sorting and the Returns to College Major.” Journal of Econometrics 121(1–2):343–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Arcidiacono, Peter,
    2. Esteban Aucejo,
    3. Arnaud Maurel, and
    4. Tyler Ransom
    . 2016. “College Attrition and the Dynamics of Information Revelation.” NBER Working Paper 22325. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  6. ↵
    1. Avery, Christopher,
    2. Oded Gurantz,
    3. Michael Hurwitz, and
    4. Jonathan Smith
    . 2018. “Shifting College Majors in Response to Advanced Placement Exam Scores.” Journal of Human Resources 53(4):918–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Bettinger, Eric P., and
    2. Bridget Terry Long
    . 2005. “Do Faculty Serve as Role Models? The Impact of Instructor Gender on Female Students.” American Economic Review 95(2):152–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Betts, Julian R.
    1996. “What Do Students Know About Wages? Evidence from a Survey of Undergraduates.” Journal of Human Resources 31(1):27–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Bordalo, Pedro,
    2. Nicola Gennaioli, and
    3. Andrei Shleifer
    . 2017. “Memory, Attention, and Choice.” NBER Working Paper 23256. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  10. ↵
    1. Bordon, Paola, and
    2. Chao Fu
    . 2015. “College-Major Choice to College-Then-Major Choice.” Review of Economic Studies 82(4):1247–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Richard L. Fullerton, and
    3. James E. West
    . 2009. “Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement.” Journal of Labor Economics 27(3):439–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Carrell, Scott E.,
    2. Marianne E. Page, and
    3. James E. West
    . 2010. “Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(3):1101–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Carter, Susan Payne,
    2. Kyle Greenberg, and
    3. Michael S. Walker
    . 2017. “The Impact of Computer Usage on Academic Performance: Evidence from a Randomized Trial at the United States Military Academy.” Economics of Education Review 56:118–32.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Castleman, Benjamin L.,
    2. Bridget Terry Long, and
    3. Zachary Mabel
    . 2018. “Can Financial Aid Help to Address the Growing Need for STEM Education? The Effects of Need-Based Grants on the Completion of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Courses and Degrees.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 37(1):136–66.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Chevalier, Arnaud
    . 2011. “Subject Choice and Earnings of UK Graduates.” Economics of Education Review 30(6):1187–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Dawes, Philip L., and
    2. Jennifer Brown
    . 2002. “Determinants of Awareness, Consideration, and Choice Set Size in University Choice.” Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 12(1): 49–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Denning, Jeffrey T., and
    2. Patrick Turley
    . 2017. “Was that SMART? Institutional Financial Incentives and Field of Study.” Journal of Human Resources 52(1):152–86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Eide, Eric, and
    2. Geetha Waehrer
    . 1998. “The Role of the Option Value of College Attendance in College Major Choice.” Economics of Education Review 17(1):73–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Eliaz, Kfir, and
    2. Ran Spiegler
    . 2011. “Consideration Sets and Competitive Marketing.” Review of Economic Studies 78(1):235–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Ellsberg, Daniel
    . 1961. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75(4):643–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Fairlie, Robert W.,
    2. Florian Hoffmann, and
    3. Philip Oreopoulos
    . 2014. “A Community College Instructor Like Me: Race and Ethnicity Interactions in the Classroom.” American Economic Review 104(8):2567–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Fox, Craig R., and
    2. Amos Tversky
    . 1995. “Ambiguity Aversion and Comparative Ignorance.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3):585–603.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Fricke, Hans,
    2. Jeffrey Grogger, and
    3. Andreas Steinmayr
    . 2015. “Does Exposure to Economics Bring New Majors to the Field? Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” NBER Working Paper 21130. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  24. ↵
    1. Gennaioli, Nicola, and
    2. Andrei Shleifer
    . 2010. “What Comes to Mind.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(4):1399–433.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Haggag, Kareem,
    2. Richard Patterson,
    3. Nolan G. Pope, and
    4. Aaron Feudo
    . 2018. “Attribution Bias in Major Decisions: Evidence from the United States Military Academy.” CESifo Working Paper Series 7081. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3214405
  26. ↵
    1. Handel, Benjamin R.
    2013. “Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts.” American Economic Review 103(7):2643–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Hastings, Justine S.,
    2. Christopher A. Neilson, and
    3. Seth D. Zimmerman
    . 2013. “Are Some Degrees Worth More Than Others? Evidence from College Admission Cutoffs in Chile.” NBER Working Paper 19241. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  28. ↵
    1. Hoffmann, Florian, and
    2. Philip Oreopoulos
    . 2009. “A Professor like Me: The Influence of Instructor Gender on College Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 44(2):479–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Joensen, Juanna Schrøter, and
    2. Helena Skyt Nielsen
    . 2016. “Mathematics and Gender: Heterogeneity in Causes and Consequences.” Economic Journal 126(593):1129–63.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Kahneman, Daniel,
    2. Jack L. Knetsch, and
    3. Richard H. Thaler
    . 1991. “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1):193–206.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Keys, Benjamin,
    2. Devin Pope, and
    3. Jaren Pope
    . 2016. “Failure to Refinance.” Journal of Financial Economics 122(3):482–99.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Kirkeboen, Lars J.,
    2. Edwin Leuven, and
    3. Magne Mogstad
    . 2016. “Field of Study, Earnings, and Self-Selection.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(3):1057–111.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Knight, Frank H.
    1921. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston MA: Hart, Schaffner, and Marx; Houghton Mifflin.
  34. ↵
    1. Laibson, David
    . 1997. “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2):443–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Loewenstein, George,
    2. Ted O’Donoghue, and
    3. Matthew Rabin
    . 2003. “Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4):1209–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Madrian, Brigitte C., and
    2. Dennis F. Shea
    . 2001. “The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4):1149–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Malamud, Ofer
    . 2010. “Breadth versus Depth: The Timing of Specialization in Higher Education.” Labour 24(4):359–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Malamud, Ofer
    . 2011. “Discovering One’s Talent: Learning from Academic Specialization.” ILR Review 64(2):375–405.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Malgwi, Charles A.,
    2. Martha A. Howe, and
    3. Priscilla A. Burnaby
    . 2005. “Influences on Students’ Choice of College Major.” Journal of Education for Business 80(5):275–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Manzini, Paola, and
    2. Marco Mariotti
    . 2014. “Stochastic Choice and Consideration Sets.” Econometrica 82(3):1153–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Menon, Geeta, and
    2. Priya Raghubir
    . 2003. “Ease-of-Retrieval as an Automatic Input in Judgments: A Mere-Accessibility Framework?” Journal of Consumer Research 30(2):230–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. ↵
    1. Mullainathan, Sendhil
    . 2002. “A Memory-Based Model of Bounded Rationality.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(3):735–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Nedungadi, Prakash
    . 1990. “Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice without Altering Brand Evaluations.” Journal of Consumer Research 17(3):263–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. O’Donoghue, Ted, and
    2. Matthew Rabin
    . 1999. “Doing It Now or Later.” American Economic Review 89(1):103–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Patnaik, Arpita,
    2. Joanna Venator,
    3. Matthew Wiswall, and
    4. Basit Zafar
    . 2020. “The Role of Heterogeneous Risk Preferences, Discount Rates, and Earnings Expectations in College Major Choice.” NBER Working Paper 26785. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
  46. ↵
    1. Pope, Nolan G.
    2016. “How the Time of Day Affects Productivity: Evidence from School Schedules.” Review of Economics and Statistics 98(1):1–11.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Sacerdote, Bruce
    . 2001. “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2):681–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Schwarz, Norbert,
    2. Herbert Bless,
    3. Fritz Strack,
    4. Gisela Klumpp,
    5. Helga Rittenauer-Schatka, and
    6. Annette Simons
    . 1991. “Ease of Retrieval as Information: Another Look at the Availability Heuristic.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61(2):195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Stange, Kevin M.
    2012. “An Empirical Investigation of the Option Value of College Enrollment.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4(1):49–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Stange, Kevin M.
    2015. “Differential Pricing in Undergraduate Education: Effects on Degree Production by Field.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34(1):107–35.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Stinebrickner, Ralph, and
    2. Todd R. Stinebrickner
    . 2013. “A Major in Science? Initial Beliefs and Final Outcomes for College Major and Dropout.” Review of Economic Studies 81(1):426–72.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Tversky, Amos, and
    2. Daniel Kahneman
    . 1973. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability.” Cognitive Psychology 5(2):207–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  53. ↵
    1. Tybout, Alice M.,
    2. Brian Sternthal,
    3. Prashant Malaviya,
    4. Georgios A Bakamitsos, and
    5. Se-Bum Park
    . 2005. “Information Accessibility as a Moderator of Judgments: The Role of Content Versus Retrieval Ease.” Journal of Consumer Research 32(1):76–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Venit, Ed
    . 2016. “How Late Is Too Late? Myths and Facts about the Consequences of Switching College Majors.” Washington, DC: EAB Student Success Collaborative.
  55. ↵
    1. Webber, Douglas A.
    2014. “The Lifetime Earnings Premia of Different Majors: Correcting for Selection Based on Cognitive, Noncognitive, and Unobserved Factors.” Labour Economics 28:14–23.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Wiswall, Matthew, and
    2. Basit Zafar
    . 2014. “Determinants of College Major Choice: Identification Using an Information Experiment.” Review of Economic Studies 82(2):791–824.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Zafar, Basit
    . 2011. “How Do College Students Form Expectations?” Journal of Labor Economics 29(2):301–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Zafar, Basit
    . 2013. “College Major Choice and the Gender Gap.” Journal of Human Resources 48(3):545–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 58 (4)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 58, Issue 4
1 Jul 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Timing Matters
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Timing Matters
Richard W. Patterson, Nolan G. Pope, Aaron Feudo
Journal of Human Resources Jul 2023, 58 (4) 1347-1384; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.59.2.0820-11127R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Timing Matters
Richard W. Patterson, Nolan G. Pope, Aaron Feudo
Journal of Human Resources Jul 2023, 58 (4) 1347-1384; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.59.2.0820-11127R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Study Environment and Data
    • III. Methods and Results
    • IV. Mechanisms for Results
    • V. Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First Impressions Matter
  • Can Abortion Mitigate Transitory Shocks? Demographic Consequences under Son Preference
  • “There She Is, Your Ideal”
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • D91
  • I23
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire