Can Transfers and Complementary Nutrition Programming Reduce Intimate Partner Violence Four Years Post-Program?

Notes: p-values are reported from Wald tests on the equality of means of control and each treatment for each variable. Standard errors are clustered at the village level. Variables with missing values imputed at the treatment group mean: Doing work [. . .], Controls money [. . .], Household’s consumption expenditure. Standardized variables: Doing work [. . .], Woman’s monthly labor income, Woman currently owns any savings, Controls money [. . .], Household’s consumption expenditure.

Notes: Marginal effects of probit models reported. N = 2,416. Control variables include all baseline characteristics of the woman and her household shown in Table 2. 6mPP denotes six months post-program, 4yPP denotes four years post-program. Standard errors clustered at the village level. ^*p < 0.1, ^**p < 0.05, ^***p < 0.01.

Notes: OLS coefficients reported with standard errors in parentheses (clustered at the village level). N = 2416 (North = 1181; South = 1235) for all indexes except private costs and emotional well-being of men [both N = 1989 (North = 1012; South = 977)]. Channels are constructed following Kling et al. (2007) and standardized to the control group. As described in Section II.B, social and community support of women can also be conceptualized as cost of men; however, they were estimated separately here to allow for mutually exclusive channels. For the household poverty channel, higher values indicate lower poverty. Control variables include all baseline characteristics of the woman and her household shown in Table 2. ^*p < 0.1, ^**p < 0.05, ^***p < 0.01.