Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles
Open Access

Can Information Enhanced with Nudges Mitigate the Rise of Childhood Obesity in the Global South?

Pham Khanh Nam, View ORCID ProfileBrandon J. Restrepo, View ORCID ProfileMatthias Rieger and View ORCID ProfileNatascha Wagner
Journal of Human Resources, July 2025, 60 (4) 1323-1355; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0821-11827R2
Pham Khanh Nam
Pham Khanh Nam is Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brandon J. Restrepo
Brandon J. Restrepo is a Research Economist at the USDA, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brandon J. Restrepo
Matthias Rieger
Matthias Rieger is Professor of Global Health at Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management and The International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthias Rieger
  • For correspondence: rieger{at}eshpm.eur.nl
Natascha Wagner
Natascha Wagner is Professor of Development Economics and Director of the Global Data Lab at Radboud University in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Natascha Wagner
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Schematic of Key Intervention Activities

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Timeline of Data Collection and Intervention Activities

    Notes: Activities until November 2019 in the timeline were registered in the AEA trial registry. Planned dates of the study, intervention, and first follow-up survey deviated from actual dates due to unforeseen practical/logistical reasons. The trial registry status was changed to “completed” on September 27, 2020, after a first draft of the paper was completed. The italicized part or second follow-up survey was done after completion of the AEA-registered activities and analysis. We publicly registered this second follow-up and research hypothesis/questions on March 10, 2021 on aspredicted.org.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Baseline Balance

    Reg. EffectNOverallControlTreatmentp-Valueq-Value
    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)
    Panel A: Primary Outcomes, Families
    (1)BMI z-score–7272.3192.3192.3180.990.99
    Overweight or obese–7270.9450.9480.9420.740.99
    Obese–7270.6510.670.6310.270.99
    Waist (cm)–72572.86772.78172.9530.750.99
    Body fat (%)–72834.95434.93534.9740.940.99
    (2)Snack choice (cookie = 1, fruit = 0)–7260.6380.6320.6440.740.74
    (3)Children are born to be fat (strongly disagree or disagree = 1, otherwise = 0)+6790.6330.6280.6390.780.99
    Vegetables needed each day (in g, log)+4965.1625.135.1940.640.99
    Fruits needed each day (g, log)+4984.9784.9535.0040.670.99
    Calories needed each day (log)–3626.3216.326.3230.990.99
    (4)Past 30 days, number of:
     Meals in “western-style” fast-food or pizza place–6771.4981.5551.4380.460.69
     Ready to eat food meals from grocery store–6772.6412.4062.8860.180.54
     Frozen meals/pizzas–6740.8490.8580.8390.920.92
    Past 7 days, number of days (days at home plus days outside excl. school):
     Consumed soft drinks–6771.8351.7141.9610.120.54
     Consumed fruit+6773.9843.9713.9970.910.92
     Consumed green vegetables+6764.4174.3064.5330.340.68
    Panel B: Secondary Outcomes, Families
    (1)Perceived healthiness of child’s diet (excellent or very good = 1, otherwise = 0)∼6800.2960.2940.2970.920.92
    Perceived healthiness of child’s current weight (healthy = 1, no = 0)∼6800.7910.7610.8230.050.10
    (2)Past 30 days, spending on (log):
     Sweet snacks–5560.4820.4470.5190.070.21
     Salty snacks–5520.3520.3420.3620.590.84
     Soft drinks–5490.2840.2880.280.840.84
    (3)Past 7 days, number of:
     Hours TV, video games, other electronic devices–67814.49314.70314.2740.780.84
     Days physically active for a total of at least 20 minutes+6792.3892.2942.4880.240.72
     Days walking/biking for at least 10 minutes+6742.2232.2392.2050.840.84
    • Notes: Q-values by family of indicators as indicated by horizontal dividers. “Reg. Effect” means effect direction registered in AEA RCT Registry.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Anthropometrics and Snack Choice

    BMI z-ScoreOverweight or ObeseObeseWaist (cm)Body Fat (%)Average Effect (1–5)Snack Choice (Cookie = 1, Fruit = 0)
    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
    Panel A: Overall
    Control mean2.280.960.6475.4335.930.46
    Treatment–0.036–0.030**0.018–0.613*–0.832***–0.073**–0.049
    (0.027)(0.015)(0.025)(0.327)(0.278)(0.033)(0.036)
    Q-value0.220.100.470.100.02
    N675675675676678 677
    Panel B: Boys
    Control mean2.500.980.7477.0735.850.53
    Treatment0.031–0.0110.047–0.162–0.2000.003–0.045
    (0.039)(0.014)(0.032)(0.429)(0.401)(0.046)(0.048)
    q-value0.710.710.710.710.71
    N390390390392393 392
    Panel C: Girls
    Control mean1.950.920.5073.0136.040.37
    Treatment–0.126***–0.058*–0.034–1.065**–1.712***–0.185***–0.050
    (0.036)(0.030)(0.040)(0.530)(0.375)(0.052)(0.054)
    q-value0.000.070.410.070.00
    N285285285284285 285
    • Notes: *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01. OLS estimates. Robust standard errors in brackets below estimates. All covariates, reduced sample. Q-values are calculated over Columns 1–5 as preregistered.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Diet

    Past 30 DaysPast 7 Days
    Meals in “Western-Style” Fast-Food or Pizza PlaceReady to Eat Food Meals from Grocery StoreFrozen Meals/PizzasConsumed Soft DrinksConsumed FruitConsumed Green VegetablesAverage Effect (SD)
    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
    Panel A: Overall
    Control mean1.293.130.681.734.054.83
    Treatment–0.143–0.308–0.212*–0.343*0.2160.296–0.098**
    (0.140)(0.359)(0.128)(0.189)(0.281)(0.339)(0.040)
    q-value0.440.440.300.300.440.44
    N621612605394354338 
    Panel B: Boys
    Control mean1.293.200.631.743.994.89
    Treatment–0.260–0.424–0.021–0.2940.149–0.085–0.065
    (0.201)(0.458)(0.200)(0.267)(0.345)(0.462)(0.051)
    q-value0.710.710.920.710.920.92
    N356353349228205190 
    Panel C: Girls
    Control mean1.303.020.771.724.124.74
    Treatment–0.012–0.163–0.462***–0.4090.2180.571–0.124**
    (0.205)(0.591)(0.160)(0.276)(0.491)(0.514)(0.062)
    q-value0.950.940.020.420.940.54
    N265259256166149148 
    • Notes: Effects in Columns 5 and 6 enter negatively into the average effect calculation. *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01. OLS estimates. Robust standard errors in brackets below estimates. All covariates, reduced sample. Q-values are calculated over Columns 1–6 as preregistered.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Perceptions

    Perceived Healthiness of Child’s Diet (Excellent or Very Good = 1, Otherwise = 0)Perceived Healthiness of Child’s Current Weight (Healthy = 1, No = 0)Average Effect (SD)
    (1)(2)(3)
    Panel A: Overall
    Control mean0.340.74
    Treatment–0.083**–0.039–0.132**
    (0.036)(0.034)(0.054)
    q-value0.040.24
    N634637 
    Panel B: Boys
    Control mean0.340.75
    Treatment–0.090*–0.028–0.126*
    (0.047)(0.045)(0.072)
    q-value0.120.54
    N363366 
    Panel C: Girls
    Control mean0.350.74
    Treatment–0.056–0.059–0.125
    (0.057)(0.051)(0.084)
    q-value0.330.33
    N271271
    • Notes: *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01. OLS estimates. Robust standard errors in brackets below estimates. All covariates, reduced sample. Q-values are calculated over Columns 1–2 as preregistered.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Anthropometrics (Longer Term, Second Follow-Up)

    BMI z-ScoreOverweight or ObeseObeseWaist (cm)Body Fat (%)Average Effect (SD)
    (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)
    Panel A: Overall
    Control mean2.210.950.6379.6236.83
    Treatment0.0340.0040.044–0.217–0.1750.020
    (0.038)(0.018)(0.038)(0.495)(0.418)(0.047)
    q-value0.830.830.830.830.83
    N420420420419421 
    Panel B: Boys
    Control mean2.430.950.7781.5637.41
    Treatment0.099**0.0360.0320.2650.3900.095
    (0.049)(0.023)(0.041)(0.630)(0.557)(0.058)
    q-value0.230.300.610.680.61
    N240240240240241 
    Panel C: Girls
    Control mean1.870.960.4176.5335.91
    Treatment–0.105*–0.064**0.083–1.229–1.518**–0.158**
    (0.056)(0.028)(0.066)(0.812)(0.638)(0.073)
    q-value0.100.060.210.170.06
    N180180180179180 
    • Notes: *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01. OLS estimates. Robust standard errors in brackets below estimates. All covariates, reduced sample. q-values are calculated over Columns 1–5 as preregistered.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Free alternate access to The Journal of Human Resources supplementary materials is available at https://uwpress.wisc.edu/journals/journals/jhr-supplementary.html

    • 0821-11827R2_supp.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 60 (4)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 60, Issue 4
1 Jul 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Can Information Enhanced with Nudges Mitigate the Rise of Childhood Obesity in the Global South?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Can Information Enhanced with Nudges Mitigate the Rise of Childhood Obesity in the Global South?
Pham Khanh Nam, Brandon J. Restrepo, Matthias Rieger, Natascha Wagner
Journal of Human Resources Jul 2025, 60 (4) 1323-1355; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.0821-11827R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Can Information Enhanced with Nudges Mitigate the Rise of Childhood Obesity in the Global South?
Pham Khanh Nam, Brandon J. Restrepo, Matthias Rieger, Natascha Wagner
Journal of Human Resources Jul 2025, 60 (4) 1323-1355; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.0821-11827R2
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Experimental Design
    • III. Baseline Descriptive Statistics and Balance Checks
    • IV. Analysis and Results
    • V. Exploring Longer-Term Effects
    • VI. Discussion and Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Effects of Exposure to a Large-Scale Recession on Higher Education and Early Labor Market Outcomes
  • Intergenerational Mobility Trends and the Changing Role of Female Labor
  • World War II Blues
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • I12
  • I15
  • I18
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire