Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

The Effect of Risk Assessment Scores on Judicial Behavior and Defendant Outcomes

View ORCID ProfileCarlyWill Sloan, View ORCID ProfileGeorge Naufal and View ORCID ProfileHeather Caspers
Journal of Human Resources, September 2025, 60 (5) 1778-1810; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0221-11470R3
CarlyWill Sloan
CarlyWill Sloan is at the United States Military Academy at West Point .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for CarlyWill Sloan
  • For correspondence: carlywill.sloan{at}westpoint.edu
George Naufal
George Naufal is at Texas A&M University and IZA .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for George Naufal
  • For correspondence: gnaufal{at}tamu.edu
Heather Caspers
Heather Caspers is at the Iowa Department of Human Rights .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Heather Caspers
  • For correspondence: heather.caspers{at}iowa.gov
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abadie, Alberto,
    2. Alexis Diamond, and
    3. Jens Hainmueller
    . 2010. “Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(490):493–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Almond, Louise,
    2. Michelle McManus,
    3. David Brian, and
    4. Daniel Peter Merrington
    . 2017. “Exploration of the Risk Factors Contained Within the UK’s Existing Domestic Abuse Risk Assessment Tool (DASH): Do These Risk Factors Have Individual Predictive Validity Regarding Recidivism?” Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research 9(1):58–68.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Anderson, Michael L.
    2008. “Multiple Inference and Gender Differences in the Effects of Early Intervention: A Reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry Preschool, and Early Training Projects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(484):1481–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Angwin, Julia,
    2. Jeff Larson,
    3. Lauren Kirchner, and
    4. Surya Mattu
    . 2016. “Machine Bias.” ProPublica, May 23. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (accessed March 27, 2025).
  5. ↵
    1. Calonico, Sebastian,
    2. Matias D. Cattaneo,
    3. Max H. Farrell, and
    4. Rocıo Titiunik
    . 2017. “Rdrobust: Software for Regression Discontinuity Designs.” Stata Journal 17(2):372–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Carmichael, Dottie,
    2. George Naufal,
    3. Steve Wood,
    4. Heather Caspers, and
    5. Miner Marchbanks
    . 2017. “Liberty and Justice: Pretrial Practices in Texas.” Public Policy Research Institute. College Station: Texas A&M University. https://ppri.tamu.edu/portfolio-items/liberty-and-justice/ (accessed March 27, 2025).
  7. ↵
    1. Chanenson, Steven L. and
    2. Jordan M. Hyatt
    . 2016. “The Use of Risk Assessment at Sentencing: Implications for Research and Policy.” Public Policy Research Paper. Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1201&context=wps (accessed March 27, 2025).
  8. ↵
    1. Craver, Jack.
    2017. “Travis County: No Place for Bondsmen.” Austin Monitor, March 30. https://www.austinmonitor.com/?s=Travis+County%3A+No+Place+for+Bondsmen (accessed March 27, 2025).
  9. ↵
    1. DeMichele, Matthew,
    2. Peter Baumgartner,
    3. Michael Wenger,
    4. Kelle Barrick,
    5. Megan Comfort, and
    6. Shilpi Misra
    . 2018. “The Public Safety Assessment: A Re-validation and Assessment of Predictive Utility and Differential Prediction by Race and Gender in Kentucky.”
  10. ↵
    1. Didwania, Stephanie Holmes.
    2022. “Gender Favoritism among Criminal Prosecutors.” Journal of Law and Economics 2022 65(1):77–104.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Dobbie, Will,
    2. Jacob Goldin, and
    3. Crystal S. Yang
    . 2018. “The Effects of Pretrial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges.” American Economic Review 108(2):201–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Doleac, Jennifer L., and
    2. Megan Stevenson
    . 2017. “Are Criminal Risk Assessment Scores Racist?” Brookings, August 22. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2016/08/22/are-criminal-risk-assessment-scores-racist/#7s8d6f87 (accessed March 27, 2025).
  13. ———. 2018. “Algorithmic Risk Assessment in the Hands of Humans.” IZA Discussion Paper 12853. Bonn, Germany: IZA.
  14. ↵
    1. Dressel, Julia, and
    2. Hany Farid
    . 2018. “The Accuracy, Fairness, and Limits of Predicting Recidivism.” Science Advances 4(1):eaao5580.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Flores, Anthony W.,
    2. Alexander M. Holsinger,
    3. Christopher T. Lowenkamp, and
    4. Thomas H. Cohen
    . 2017. “Time-Free Effects in Predicting Recidivism Using Both Fixed and Variable Follow-up Periods: Do Different Methods Produce Different Results.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 44(1):121–37.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Grove, William M.,
    2. David H. Zald,
    3. Boyd S. Lebow,
    4. Beth E. Snitz, and
    5. Chad Nelson
    . 2000. “Clinical Versus Mechanical Prediction: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Assessment 12(1):19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Gupta, Arpit,
    2. Christopher Hansman, and
    3. Ethan Frenchman
    . 2016. “The Heavy Costs of High Bail: Evidence from Judge Randomization.” Journal of Legal Studies 45(2):471–505.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Heaton, Paul,
    2. Sandra Mayson, and
    3. Megan Stevenson
    . 2017. “The Downstream Consequences of Misdemeanor Pretrial Detention.” Stanford Law Review 69(3):711.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Judicial Council of California. 2021. “Pretrial Risk Assessment Tool Validation.” https://courts.ca.gov/programs-initiatives/criminal-justice-services/california-pretrial-release-program/pretrial-release (accessed March 27, 2025).
  20. ↵
    1. Kleinberg, Jon,
    2. Himabindu Lakkaraju,
    3. Jure Leskovec,
    4. Jens Ludwig, and
    5. Sendhil Mullainathan
    . 2017. “Human Decisions and Machine Predictions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(1):237–93.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Latessa, Edward J.,
    2. Richard Lemke,
    3. Matthew Makarios, and
    4. Paula Smith
    . 2010. “The Creation and Validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS).” Federal Probation Journal 74:16.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Leslie, Emily and
    2. Nolan G. Pope
    . 2017. “The Unintended Impact of Pretrial Detention on Case Outcomes: Evidence from New York City Arraignments.” Journal of Law and Economics 60(3):529–57.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Meredith, Tammy,
    2. John C. Speir, and
    3. Sharon Johnson
    . 2007. “Developing and Implementing Automated Risk Assessments in Parole.” Justice Research and Policy 9(1):1–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    New Jersey Courts. 2018. “New Jersey Court Report to the Governor and the Legislature.” New Jersey Court Report.
    1. Reaves, Brian A.
    , and Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2013. “Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties 2009 Statistical Tables.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=4845 (accessed March 27, 2025).
  25. ↵
    1. Schmidt, Nicole,
    2. Emily Lien,
    3. MaryFaith Vaughan, and
    4. Matthew T. Huss
    . 2017. “An Examination of Individual Differences and Factor Structure on the LS/CMI: Does This Popular Risk Assessment Tool Measure Up?” Deviant Behavior 38(3):306–17.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Smith, Jordan.
    2012. “Keeping People in Jail Costs the County Money, But Is It in the Best Interest of Public Safety?” Austin Chronicle, 12 October.
  27. Stanford Pretrial Risk Assessment Tools Factsheet Project. 2021. “Risk Assessment Factsheet.”
  28. ↵
    1. Stevenson, Megan T.
    2018a. “Assessing Risk Assessment in Action.” Minnesota Law Review 103:303–384.
    OpenUrl
  29. ———. 2018b. “Distortion of Justice: How the Inability to Pay Bail Affects Case Outcomes.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 34(4):511–542.
    OpenUrl
  30. Travis County Criminal Courts. 2012. “Travis County Criminal Courts Fair Defense Act Program.” http://tidc.tamu.edu/DGReportDocuments/212-07-D08%20Final4.07Fair%20Defense%20Act.pdf (accessed March 27, 2025).
  31. ↵
    1. Turner, Susan,
    2. James Hess, and
    3. Jesse Jannetta
    . 2009. “Development of the California Static Risk Assessment Instrument (CSRA).” Center for Evidence-Based Corrections Working Paper. Irvine, CA: UC Irvine.
  32. ↵
    United States Census Bureau. 2017. “U.S. Census Bureau Quickfacts: Travis County.” https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045217 (accessed March 27, 2025).
  33. ———. 2018. “County Population Totals and Components of Change: 2010–2017.” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
    1. Zhang, Sheldon X.,
    2. Robert E.L. Roberts, and
    3. David Farabee
    . 2014. “An Analysis of Prisoner Reentry and Parole Risk using COMPAS and Traditional Criminal History Measures.” Crime & Delinquency 60(2):167–192.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 60 (5)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 60, Issue 5
1 Sep 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Risk Assessment Scores on Judicial Behavior and Defendant Outcomes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
The Effect of Risk Assessment Scores on Judicial Behavior and Defendant Outcomes
CarlyWill Sloan, George Naufal, Heather Caspers
Journal of Human Resources Sep 2025, 60 (5) 1778-1810; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.0221-11470R3

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Effect of Risk Assessment Scores on Judicial Behavior and Defendant Outcomes
CarlyWill Sloan, George Naufal, Heather Caspers
Journal of Human Resources Sep 2025, 60 (5) 1778-1810; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.0221-11470R3
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Overview of the Travis County System
    • III. Data
    • IV. Methods
    • V. Results
    • VI. Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Effects of Exposure to a Large-Scale Recession on Higher Education and Early Labor Market Outcomes
  • Intergenerational Mobility Trends and the Changing Role of Female Labor
  • Treatment for mental health and substance use
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • K4
  • J7
UW Press logo

© 2025 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire