Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Feedback
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Research Highlights
  • Alerts
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Feedback
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Research Highlights
  • Alerts
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
Research ArticleArticle
Open Access

Cash Transfers and Fertility: How the Introduction and Cancellation of a Child Benefit Affected Births and Abortions

Libertad González and Sofia Karina Trommlerová
Published online before print February 15, 2021, 0220-10725R2; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.59.1.0220-10725R2
Libertad González
1Libertad González is an associate professor of economics at Universitat Pompeu Fabra and the Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sofia Karina Trommlerová
2Sofia Karina Trommlerová is a postdoctoral researcher in economics at Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, Spain.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We study the impact of a universal child benefit on fertility, identifying separately the effects driven by conceptions and those by abortions, and analyzing the potentially asymmetric impact of the benefit’s introduction and its later cancellation. We focus on a generous lump-sum maternity allowance that was introduced in Spain in 2007 and then eliminated in 2010. Using administrative, population-level data, we create a panel data set of the 50 Spanish provinces, with monthly data on birth rates and weekly data on abortion rates between 2000 and 2017. Our identification is based on the timing of the introduction and cancellation of the policy (both announcement and implementation), from which we infer when the changes in births and abortions can be expected. We find that the introduction of the policy led to a 3% increase in birth rates, due to both a decrease in abortions and an increase in conceptions. The announcement of the cancellation led to a transitory increase in birth rates just before the benefit termination was implemented, driven by a short-term decrease in abortions. The actual cancellation then led to a 6% decline in birth rates. A heterogeneity analysis suggests that the positive fertility effect of the benefit’s introduction was driven by high-skilled parents, while the negative impact of the cancellation was larger among low-skilled and out-of-labor-force parents, and in poorer regions and areas that were more affected by the 2008 recession. We also find suggestive evidence that the child benefit had both a timing (“tempo”) effect, such that some women had children earlier, and a level (“quantum”) effect, where some women had more children than they would have had otherwise.

JEL Codes:
  • J13
  • J18
  • fertility
  • abortion
  • birth rate
  • policy evaluation
  • child benefit

This open access article is distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) and is freely available online at: http://jhr.uwpress.org

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 58 (3)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 58, Issue 3
1 May 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cash Transfers and Fertility: How the Introduction and Cancellation of a Child Benefit Affected Births and Abortions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Cash Transfers and Fertility: How the Introduction and Cancellation of a Child Benefit Affected Births and Abortions
Libertad González, Sofia Karina Trommlerová
Journal of Human Resources Feb 2021, 0220-10725R2; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.59.1.0220-10725R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cash Transfers and Fertility: How the Introduction and Cancellation of a Child Benefit Affected Births and Abortions
Libertad González, Sofia Karina Trommlerová
Journal of Human Resources Feb 2021, 0220-10725R2; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.59.1.0220-10725R2
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Careers and Mismatch for College Graduates
  • The Impact of Prior Learning Assessments on College Completion and Financial Outcomes
  • How Far Is Too Far? New Evidence on Abortion Clinic Closures, Access, and Abortions
Show more Article

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • J13
  • J18
  • fertility
  • abortion
  • birth rate
  • policy evaluation
  • child benefit
UWP

© 2023 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire