Testing

References

1. 1. Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila,
   2. Joshua D. Angrist,
   3. Susan M. Dynarski,
   4. Thomas J. Kane, and
   5. Parag A. Pathak

   . 2011. “Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston’s Charters and Pilots.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(2): 699–748.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Altonji, Joseph G.,
   2. Todd E. Elder, and
   3. Christopher R. Taber

   . 2005. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools.” Journal of Political Economy 113(1): 151-184.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Andrab, Tahir,
   2. Jishnu Das, and
   3. Asim Ijaz Khwaja

   . 2017. “Report Cards: The Impact of Providing School and Child Test Scores on Educational Markets.” American Economic Review 107(6): 1535-1563.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Andrews, Paul, and
   2. coauthors

   . 2014. “OECD and Pisa Tests Are Damaging Education Worldwide.” The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/06/oecd-pisa-tests-damaging-education-academics (accessed June 20, 2018).
5. 1. Angrist, Joshua, and
   2. Victor Lavy

   . 2009. “The Effects of High Stakes High School Achievement Awards: Evidence from a Randomized Trial.” American Economic Review 99(4): 1384-1414.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. 1. Balart, Pau,
   2. Matthijs Oosterveen, and
   3. Dinand Webbink

   . 2018. “Test Scores, Noncognitive Skills and Economic Growth.” Economics of Education Review 63: 134-153.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Baumert, Jürgen, and
   2. Anke Demmrich

   . 2001. “Test Motivation in the Assessment of Student Skills: The Effects of Incentives on Motivation and Performance.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 16(3): 441-462.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Bergbauer, Annika B.,
   2. Eric A. Hanushek, and
   3. Ludger Woessmann

   . 2018. “Testing.” NBER Working Paper 24836 Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
9. 1. Bergbauer, Annika B.,
   2. Eric A. Hanushek, and
   3. Ludger Woessmann

   . 2021. “Replication Data.” Harvard Dataverse.. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BUID9K.
10. 1. Bergman, Peter

    . 2021. “Parent-Child Information Frictions and Human Capital Investment: Evidence from a Field Experiment.” Journal of Political Economy 129(1): 286-322.

    OpenUrl
11. 1. Bergman, Peter, and
    2. Eric W. Chan

    . 2021. “Leveraging Parents through Low-Cost Technology: The Impact of High-Frequency Information on Student Achievement.” Journal of Human Resources 56(1): 125-158.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Bettinger, Eric P.

    . 2012. “Paying to Learn: The Effect of Financial Incentives on Elementary School Test Scores.” Review of Economics and Statistics 94(3): 686-698.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Bishop, John H.

    . 1997. “The Effect of National Standards and Curriculum-Based Exams on Achievement.” American Economic Review 87(2): 260-264.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
14. 1. Bishop, John H., and
    2. Ludger Woessmann

    . 2004. “Institutional Effects in a Simple Model of Educational Production.” Education Economics 12(1): 17-38.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Borghans, Lex, and
    2. Trudie Schils

    . 2012. The Leaning Tower of Pisa: Decomposing Achievement Test Scores into Cognitive and Noncognitive Components. Mimeo.
16. 1. Burgess, Simon,
    2. Deborah Wilson, and
    3. Jack Worth

    . 2013. “A Natural Experiment in School Accountability: The Impact of School Performance Information on Pupil Progress.” Journal of Public Economics. 106: 57-67.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Card, David

    . 1999. “The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings.” In Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3A ed. Orley, Ashenfelter and David, Card, 1801-1863. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
18. 1. De Fraja, Gianni,
    2. Tania Oliveira, and
    3. Luisa Zanchi

    . 2010. “Must Try Harder: Evaluating the Role of Effort in Educational Attainment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92(3): 577-597.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Dee, Thomas S., and
    2. Brian A. Jacob

    . 2011. “The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Student Achievement.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30(3): 418-446.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Deming, David J.,
    2. Sarah Cohodes,
    3. Jennifer Jennings, and
    4. Christopher Jencks

    . 2016. “School Accountability, Postsecondary Attainment, and Earnings.” Review of Economics and Statistics 98(5): 848–862.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Figlio, David, and
    2. Susanna, Loeb

    . 2011. “School Accountability.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 3 ed. Eric A., Hanushek, Stephen, Machin, and Ludger, Woessmann, 383-421. Amsterdam: North Holland.
22. 1. Figlio, David N., and
    2. Joshua Winicki

    . 2005. “Food for Thought: The Effects of School Accountability Plans on School Nutrition.” Journal of Public Economics 89(2–3): 381-394.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Fryer, Roland G.

    2011. “Financial Incentives and Student Achievement: Evidence from Randomized Trials.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(4): 1755-1798.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Glewwe, Paul,
    2. Nauman Ilias, and
    3. Michael Kremer

    . 2010. “Teacher Incentives.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(3): 205-227.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. 1. Gneezy, Uri,
    2. John A. List,
    3. Jeffrey A. Livingston,
    4. Xiangdong Qin,
    5. Sally Sadoff, and
    6. Yang Xu

    . 2019. “Measuring Success in Education: The Role of Effort on the Test Itself.” American Economic Review: Insights 1(3): 291–308.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Hanushek, Eric A.,
    2. Susanne Link, and
    3. Ludger Woessmann

    . 2013. “Does School Autonomy Make Sense Everywhere? Panel Estimates from PISA.” Journal of Development Economics 104: 212-232.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Hanushek, Eric A., and
    2. Margaret E. Raymond

    . 2005. “Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24(2): 297-327.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. 1. Hanushek, Eric A.,
    2. Guido Schwerdt,
    3. Simon Wiederhold, and
    4. Ludger Woessmann

    . 2015. “Returns to Skills around the World: Evidence from PIAAC.” European Economic Review 73: 103–130.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Hanushek, Eric A., and
    2. Ludger, Woessmann

    . 2011. “The Economics of International Differences in Educational Achievement.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 3 ed. Eric A., Hanushek, Stephen, Machin, and Ludger, Woessmann, 89-200. Amsterdam: North Holland.
30. 1. Hanushek, Eric A., and
    2. Ludger, Woessmann

    . 2015. The Knowledge Capital of Nations: Education and the Economics of Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. 1. Holmstrom, Bengt, and
    2. Paul Milgrom

    . 1991. “Multitask Principal-agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7: 24-52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. 1. Hout, Michael, and
    2. Stuart W., Elliott

    , eds. 2011. Incentives and Test-based Accountability in Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
33. 1. Jacob, Brian A.

    2005. “Accountability, Incentives and Behavior: The Impact of High-stakes Testing in the Chicago Public Schools.” Journal of Public Economics 89(5–6): 761-796.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. 1. Jacob, Brian A., and
    2. Steven D. Levitt

    . 2003. “Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(3): 843-877.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
35. 1. Jürges, Hendrik,
    2. Kerstin Schneider, and
    3. Felix Büchel

    . 2005. “The Effect of Central Exit Examinations on Student Achievement: Quasi-experimental Evidence from TIMSS Germany.” Journal of the European Economic Association 3(5): 1134-1155.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Koning, Pierre, and
    2. Karen van der Wiel

    . 2012. “School Responsiveness to Quality Rankings: An Empirical Analysis of Secondary Education in the Netherlands.” De Economist 160(4): 339-355.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Koretz, Daniel

    . 2017. The Testing Charade: Pretending to Make Schools Better. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. 1. Kremer, Michael,
    2. Edward Miguel, and
    3. Rebecca Thornton

    . 2009. “Incentives to Learn.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91(3): 437-456.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. 1. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and
    2. David, Martimort

    . 2002. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-agent Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. 1. Lavy, Victor

    . 2009. “Performance Pay and Teachers’ Effort, Productivity, and Grading Ethics.” American Economic Review 99(5): 1979-2011.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
41. 1. Lavy, Victor

    . 2015. “Do Differences in Schools' Instruction Time Explain International Achievement Gaps? Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries.” Economic Journal 125(588): F397-F424.

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Luedemann, Elke

    . 2011. “Intended and Unintended Short-run Effects of the Introduction of Central Exit Exams: Evidence from Germany.” In Elke Luedemann, Schooling and the Formation of Cognitive and Non-cognitive Outcomes. ifo Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung 39. Munich: ifo Institute.
43. 1. Muralidharan, Karthik, and
    2. Venkatesh Sundararaman

    . 2011. “Teacher Performance Pay: Experimental Evidence from India.” Journal of Political Economy 119(1): 39-77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Neal, Derek, and
    2. Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach

    . 2010. “Left Behind by Design: Proficiency Counts and Test-based Accountability.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92(2): 263-283.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. 1. Nunes, Luis C.,
    2. Ana Balcão Reis, and
    3. Carmo Seabra

    . 2015. “The Publication of School Rankings: A Step toward Increased Accountability?” Economics of Education Review 49: 15-23.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. OECD

    . 2016. PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
47. 1. Pritchett, Lant

    . 2015. ‘Creating Education Systems Coherent for Learning Outcomes: Making the Transition from Schooling to Learning.’. RISE Working Paper 15/005. Oxford: Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE).
48. 1. Ramirez, Francisco O.,
    2. Evan Schofer, and
    3. John W. Meyer

    . 2018. “International Tests, National Assessments, and Educational Development (1970–2012).” Comparative Education Review 62(3): 344-364.

    OpenUrl
49. 1. Reback, Randall

    . 2008. “Teaching to the Rating: School Accountability and the Distribution of Student Achievement.” Journal of Public Economics 92(5–6): 1394-1415.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Reback, Randall,
    2. Jonah Rockoff, and
    3. Heather L. Schwartz

    . 2014. “Under Pressure: Job Security, Resource Allocation, and Productivity in Schools under No Child Left Behind.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6(3): 207-241.

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Rockoff, Jonah, and
    2. Lesley J. Turner

    . 2010. “Short-run Impacts of Accountability on School Quality.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2(4): 119-147.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
52. 1. Rouse, Cecilia Elena,
    2. Jane Hannaway,
    3. Dan Goldhaber, and
    4. David Figlio

    . 2013. “Feeling the Florida Heat? How Low-performing Schools Respond to Voucher and Accountability Pressure.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5(2): 251–281.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Schwerdt, Guido, and
    2. Ludger Woessmann

    . 2017. “The Information Value of Central School Exams.” Economics of Education Review 56: 65-79.

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Shewbridge, Claire,
    2. Melanie Ehren,
    3. Paulo Santiago, and
    4. Claudia Tamassia

    . 2012. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Luxembourg. Paris: OECD.
55. 1. Shewbridge, Claire,
    2. Eunice Jang,
    3. Peter Matthews, and
    4. Paulo Santiago

    . 2011. OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Denmark. Paris: OECD.
56. 1. Todd, Petra E., and
    2. Kenneth I. Wolpin

    . 2003. “On the Specification and Estimation of the Production Function for Cognitive Achievement.” Economic Journal 113(485): F3-33.

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Woessmann, Ludger

    . 2003. “Schooling Resources, Educational Institutions, and Student Performance: The International Evidence.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 65(2): 117-170.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. 1. Woessmann, Ludger

    . 2016. “The Importance of School Systems: Evidence from International Differences in Student Achievement.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(3): 3-33.

    OpenUrl
59. 1. Woessmann, Ludger

    . 2018. “Central Exit Exams Improve Student Outcomes.” IZA World of Labor 2018: 419.

    OpenUrl
60. 1. Woessmann, Ludger,
    2. Elke Luedemann,
    3. Gabriela Schuetz, and
    4. Martin R. West

    . 2009. School Accountability, Autonomy, and Choice around the World. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
61. 1. World Bank

    . 2018. World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education's Promise. Washington, DC: World Bank.
62. 1. York, Benjamin N.,
    2. Susanna Loeb, and
    3. Christopher Doss

    . 2019. “One Step at a Time: The Effects of an Early Literacy Text-Messaging Program for Parents of Preschoolers.” Journal of Human Resources 54(3): 537-566.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
63. 1. Zamarro, Gema,
    2. Collin Hitt, and
    3. Ildefonso Mendez

    . 2019. “When Students Don’t Care: Reexamining International Differences in Achievement and Student Effort.” Journal of Human Capital 13(4): 519-552.

    OpenUrl