Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Connect
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Request JHR at your library
  • Alerts
  • Call for Editor
  • Free Issue
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
  • Follow JHR on Bluesky
Research ArticleArticles

Detecting and Preventing Cheating in Exams: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Tobias Cagala, Ulrich Glogowsky and Johannes Rincke
Published online before print October 13, 2021, 0620-10947R1; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0620-10947R1
Tobias Cagala
* Economist at Deutsche Bundesbank
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tobias.cagala{at}bundesbank.de
Ulrich Glogowsky
* Professor of economics at Johannes Kepler University Linz
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ulrich.glogowsky{at}jku.at
Johannes Rincke
* Professor of economics at University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: johannes.rincke{at}fau.de
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Becker, Gary
    . 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76(2):169–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Behavioural Insights Team
    . 2012. “Applying Behavioural Insights to Reduce Fraud, Error and Debt.” London: Cabinet Office.
    1. Bernheim, Douglas
    . 1994. “A Theory of Conformity.” Journal of Political Economy 102(5):841–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Blume, Lawrence,
    2. William Brock,
    3. Steven Durlauf, and
    4. Yannis Ioannides
    . 2011. “Identification of Social Interactions.” In Handbook of Social Economics, ed. Alberto Bisin, Jess Benhabib and Matthew Jackson, 1:853–964. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Bowers, William
    . 1964. Student Dishonesty and Its Control in Colleges. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
    1. Cagala, Tobias,
    2. Ulrich Glogowsky, and
    3. Johannes Rincke
    . 2019. “Does Commitment to a No-Cheating Rule Affect Academic Cheating?” Unpublished.
    1. Cameron, Colin,
    2. Jonah Gelbach, and
    3. Douglas Miller
    . 2008. “Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3):414–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Carrell, Scott,
    2. Frederick Malmstrom, and
    3. James West
    . 2008. “Peer Effects in Academic Cheating.” Journal of Human Resources 43(1):173–207.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chalfin, Aaron, and
    2. Justin McCrary
    . 2017. “Criminal Deterrence: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Economic Literature 55(1):5–48.
    OpenUrl
    1. Cheung, Jessica
    . 2012. “The Fading Honor Code.” The New York Times, April 13, 2014.
    1. Davis, Stephen,
    2. Cathy Grover,
    3. Angela Becker, and
    4. Loretta McGregor
    . 1992. “Academic Dishonesty: Prevalence, Determinants, Techniques, and Punishments.” Teaching of Psychology 19(1):16–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Davis, Stephen, and
    2. Wayne Ludvigson
    . 1995. “Additional Data on Academic Dishonesty and a Proposal for Remediation.” Teaching of Psychology 22(2):119–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Dee, Thomas, and
    2. Brian Jacob
    . 2012. “Rational Ignorance in Education: A Field Experiment in Student Plagiarism.” Journal of Human Resources 47(2):397–434.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Di Tella, Rafael, and
    2. Ernesto Schargrodsky
    . 2004. “Do Police Reduce Crime? Estimates Using the Allocation of Police Forces After a Terrorist Attack.” American Economic Review 94(1):115–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Drake, Charles
    . 1941. “Why Students Cheat.” The Journal of Higher Education 12(8):418–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Duflo, Esther,
    2. Rachel Glennerster, and
    3. Michael Kremer
    . 2008. “Using Randomization in Development Economics Research: A Toolkit.” In Handbook of Development Economics, ed. Paul Schultz and John Strauss, 4:3895–3962. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Falk, Armin, and
    2. Andrea Ichino
    . 2006. “Clean Evidence on Peer Effects.” Journal of Labor Economics 24(1):39–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Ferraz, Claudio, and
    2. Frederico Finan
    . 2011. “Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments.” American Economic Review 101:1274–1311.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Fisher, Ronald
    . 1922. “On the Interpretation of χ2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 85(1):87–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Genereux, Randy, and
    2. Beverly McLeod
    . 1995. “Circumstances Surrounding Cheating: A Questionnaire Study of College Students.” Research in Higher Education 36(6): 687–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Guryan, Jonathan,
    2. Kory Kroft, and
    3. Matthew Notowidigdo
    . 2009. “Peer Effects in the Workplace: Evidence from Random Groupings in Professional Golf Tournaments.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(4):34–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Herbst, Daniel, and
    2. Alexandre Mas
    . 2015. “Peer Effects on Worker Output in the Laboratory Generalize to the Field.” Science 350(6260):545–49.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Holland, Paul
    . 1996. “Assessing Unusual Agreement Between the Incorrect Answers of Two Examinees Using the K-index: Statistical Theory and Empirical Support.” ETS Research Report Series 1996(1):i–41.
    OpenUrl
    1. Jacob, Brian, and
    2. Steven Levitt
    . 2003. “Rotten Apples: An Investigation of the Prevalence and Predictors of Teacher Cheating.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(3):843–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Jacquemet, Nicolas,
    2. Stéphane Luchini,
    3. Julie Rosaz, and
    4. Jason Shogren
    . 2019. “Truth-Telling under Oath.” Management Science 65(1):426–38.
    OpenUrl
    1. Jones, Payton,
    2. Benjamin Bellet, and
    3. Richard McNally
    . 2020. “Helping or Harming? The Effect of Trigger Warnings on Individuals with Trauma Histories.” Clinical Psychological Science 8(5):905–17.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kleven, Henrik,
    2. Martin Knudsen,
    3. Claus Kreiner,
    4. Soren Pedersen, and
    5. Emmanuel Saez
    . 2011. “Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from a Tax Audit Experiment in Denmark.” Econometrica 79(3):651–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kremer, Michael, and
    2. Dan Levy
    . 2008. “Peer Effects and Alcohol Use Among College Students.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 22(3):189–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Kristal, Ariella,
    2. Ashley Whillans,
    3. Max Bazerman,
    4. Francesca Gino,
    5. Lisa Shu,
    6. Nina Mazar, and
    7. Dan Ariely
    . 2020. “Signing at the Beginning Versus at the End Does Not Decrease Dishonesty.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(13):7103–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lapinski, Maria, and
    2. Rajiv Rimal
    . 2005. “An Explication of Social Norms.” Communication Theory 15(2):127–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Levitt, Steven
    . 1997. “Using Electoral Cycles in Police Hiring to Estimate the Effect of Police on Crime.” American Economic Review 87(3):270–90.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
    1. Lin, Ming-Jen, and
    2. Steven Levitt
    . 2020. “Catching Cheating Students.” Economica 87(348):885–900.
    OpenUrl
    1. Linden, Wim van der, and
    2. Leonardo Sotaridona
    . 2006. “Detecting Answer Copying When the Regular Response Process Follows a Known Response Model.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 31(3):283–304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lucifora, Claudio, and
    2. Marco Tonello
    . 2015. “Cheating and Social Interactions. Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in a National Evaluation Program.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 115:45–66.
    OpenUrl
    1. MacKinnon, James, and
    2. Matthew Webb
    . 2017. “Wild Bootstrap Inference for Wildly Different Cluster Sizes.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 32(2):233–54.
    OpenUrl
    1. Manski, Charles
    . 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” Review of Economic Studies 60(3):531–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Manski, Charles
    . 2000. “Economic Analysis of Social Interactions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3):115–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Martinelli, César,
    2. Susan Parker,
    3. Ana Pérez-Gea, and
    4. Rodimiro Rodrigo
    . 2018. “Cheating and Incentives: Learning from a Policy Experiment.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 10(1):298–325.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mazar, Nina,
    2. On Amir, and
    3. Dan Ariely
    . 2008. “The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance.” Journal of Marketing Research 45:633–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McCabe, Donald
    . 2005. “Cheating Among College and University Students: A North American Perspective.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 1(1).
    1. McCabe, Donald, and
    2. Linda Trevino
    . 1993. “Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and Other Contextual Influences.” Journal of Higher Education 64:522–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. McCabe, Donald, and
    2. Linda Trevino
    . 1997. “Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation.” Research in Higher Education 38(3):379–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. McCabe, Donald,
    2. Linda Trevino, and
    3. Kenneth Butterfield
    . 2001. “Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research.” Ethics & Behavior 11(3):219–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Miron, Anca, and
    2. Jack Brehm
    . 2006. “Reactance Theory – 40 Years Later.” Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie 37(1):9–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Nelson, Leif,
    2. Joseph Simmons, and
    3. Uri Simonsohn
    . 2021. “Evidence of Fraud in an Influential Field Experiment About Dishonesty.” Unpublished.
    1. Olken, Benjamin
    . 2007. “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” Journal of Political Economy 115:200–249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Olken, Benjamin, and
    2. Rohini Pande
    . 2012. “Corruption in Developing Countries.” Annual Review of Economics 4(1):479–509.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Parnther, Ceceilia
    . 2020. “Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Comprehensive Review.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies 1(1):25–45.
    OpenUrl
    1. Parr, F. W.
    1936. “The Problem of Student Honesty.” The Journal of Higher Education 7(6):318–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Power, Lori
    . 2009. “University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism.” Journal of Higher Education 80:643–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Rains, Stephen A.
    2013. “The Nature of Psychological Reactance Revisited: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Human Communication Research 39(1):47–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Rosenbaum, Paul
    . 2002. “Covariance Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Observational Studies.” Statistical Science 17(3):286–327.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Sacerdote, Bruce
    . 2001. “Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2):681–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Schab, Fred
    . 1991. “Schooling Without Learning: Thirty Years of Cheating in High School.” Adolescence 26:839–47.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Shu, Lisa,
    2. Nina Mazar,
    3. Francesca Gino,
    4. Dan Ariely, and
    5. Max Bazerman
    . 2012. “Signing at the Beginning Makes Ethics Salient and Decreases Dishonest Self-Reports in Comparison to Signing at the End.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(38):15197–15200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Slemrod, Joel
    . 2019. “Tax Compliance and Enforcement.” Journal of Economic Literature 57(4):904–54.
    OpenUrl
    1. Slemrod, Joel,
    2. Marsha Blumenthal, and
    3. Charles Christian
    . 2001. “Taxpayer Response to an Increased Probability of Audit: Evidence from a Controlled Experiment in Minnesota.” Journal of Public Economics 79(3):455–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Sotaridona, Leonardo, and
    2. Rob Meijer
    . 2003. “Two New Statistics to Detect Answer Copying.” Journal of Educational Measurement 40(1):53–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Spence, Michael
    . 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3):355–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Steindl, Christina,
    2. Eva Jonas,
    3. Sandra Sittenthaler,
    4. Eva Traut-Mattausch, and
    5. Jeff Greenberg
    . 2015. “Understanding Psychological Reactance: New Developments and Findings.” Zeitschrift Für Psychologie 223:205–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Verschuere, Bruno,
    2. Ewout Meijer,
    3. Ariane Jim,
    4. Katherine Hoogesteyn,
    5. Robin Orthey,
    6. Randy McCarthy, and
    7. John Skowronski
    . 2018. “Registered Replication Report on Mazar, Amir, and Ariely (2008).” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1(3):299–317.
    OpenUrl
    1. Wesolowsky, George
    . 2000. “Detecting Excessive Similarity in Answers on Multiple Choice Exams.” Journal of Applied Statistics 27(7):909–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Wollack, James
    . 1997. “A Nominal Response Model Approach for Detecting Answer Copying.” Applied Psychological Measurement 21(4):307–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Wollack, James
    . 2003. “Comparison of Answer Copying Indices with Real Data.” Journal of Educational Measurement 40(3):189–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Wollack, James
    . 2006. “Simultaneous Use of Multiple Answer Copying Indexes to Improve Detection Rates.” Applied Measurement in Education 19(4):265–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
Next
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 61 (1)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 61, Issue 1
1 Jan 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detecting and Preventing Cheating in Exams: Evidence from a Field Experiment
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Detecting and Preventing Cheating in Exams: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Tobias Cagala, Ulrich Glogowsky, Johannes Rincke
Journal of Human Resources Oct 2021, 0620-10947R1; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.0620-10947R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Detecting and Preventing Cheating in Exams: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Tobias Cagala, Ulrich Glogowsky, Johannes Rincke
Journal of Human Resources Oct 2021, 0620-10947R1; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.0620-10947R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • First Impressions Matter
  • Can Abortion Mitigate Transitory Shocks? Demographic Consequences under Son Preference
  • “There She Is, Your Ideal”
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • academic cheating
  • close monitoring
  • honesty declaration
  • field experiment
  • randomization testing
  • I21
  • I23
  • D83
UW Press logo

© 2026 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire