STEM Graduates and Secondary School Curriculum: Does Early Exposure to Science Matter?

References

1. 1. Altonji, J.,
   2. P. Arcidiacono, and
   3. A. Maurel

   (2016). Cthe analysis of field choice in college and graduate school: Determinants and wage effects. Volume 5 of Handbook of the Economics of Education, pp. 305–396. Elsevier.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Altonji, J. G.

   (1995). The Effects of High School Curriculum on Education and Labor Market Outcomes. Journal of Human Resources 30 (3): 409–438.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Altonji, J. G.,
   2. E. Blom,
   3. C. Meghir, et al

   . (2012). Heterogeneity in Human Capital Investments: High School Curriculum, College Major, and Careers. Annual Review of Economics 4 (1): 185–223.

   OpenUrlWeb of Science
4. 1. Anelli, M., and
   2. Peri, G.

   . (2019). The Effects of High School Peers’ Gender on College Major, College Performance and Income. Economic Journal 129 (618): 553–602.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Angrist, J., and
   2. Pischke, J.-S.

   . (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press.
6. 1. Arcidiacono, P.,
   2. E. Aucejo, and
   3. V.J. Hotz

   . (2016). University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California. American Economic Review 106 (3): 525–562.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Arrow, K.

   . (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pp. 609–626. National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. 1. Autor, D. H.

   (2003). Outsourcing at Will: The Contribution of Unjust Dismissal Doctrine to the Growth of Employment Outsourcing. Journal of Labor Economics 21 (1): 1–42.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. 1. Betts, J. R. and
   2. H.Rose

   (2004). The Effect of High School Courses on Earnings. Review of Economic Studies 86 (2): 497–513.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Breda, T.,
    2. J. Grenet,
    3. M. Monnet, and
    4. C. van Effenterre

    . (2018). Can Female Role Models Reduce the Gender Gap in Science? Evidence from Classroom Interventions in French High Schools. PSE Working Papers, HAL.
11. 1. Broecke, S.

    (2013). Does Offering More Science at School Increase the Supply of Scientists? Education Economics 21 (4): 325–342.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Burgess, S.,
    2. E. Greaves,
    3. A. Vignoles, and
    4. D. Wilson

    (2015). What parents want: School preferences and school choice. Economic Journal 125 (587): 1262–1289.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Buser, M. Niederle, and
    2. H.Oosterbeek

    . (2014). Gender, Competitiveness, and Career Choices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (3): 1409–1447.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Card, D., and
    2. Payne A.

    (2020). High School Choices and the Gender Gap in STEM. Economic Inquiry 59 (1): 9–28.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Carrell, S. E.,
    2. M. E. Page, and
    3. J. E. West

    . (2010). Sex and Science: How Professor Gender Perpetuates the Gender Gap. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (3): 1101–1144.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Ceci, S.,
    2. D. Ginther,
    3. S. Kahn, and
    4. W. Williams

    (2014). Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape. Education Economics 15 (3): 75–141.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Cortes, K.,
    2. J. Goodman, and
    3. T. Nomi

    (2015). Intensive Math Instruction and Educational Attainment: Long-Run Impacts of Double-Dose Algebra. Journal of Human Resources 50 (1): 108–158.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 1. Deming, D.,
    2. J. S. Hastings,
    3. T. Kane, and
    4. D. O. Staiger

    (2014). School Choice, School Quality and Postsecondary Attainment. American Economic Review 104 (3): 991–1013.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. 1. Eccles, J. S., and
    2. Wang, M.-T.

    . (2016). What motivates females and males to pursue careers in mathematics and science? International Journal of Behavioral Development 40 (2): 100–106.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. 1. Ellison, G., and
    2. Swanson, A.

    (2016). Do Schools Matter for High Math Achievement? Evidence from the American Mathematics Competitions. American Economic Review 109 (6): 1244–1277.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Gemici, A. and
    2. M. Wiswall

    (2014). Evolution Of Gender Differences In Post Secondary Human Capital Investments: College Majors. International Economic Review 55 (1): 23–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. 1. Gneezy, U.,
    2. M. Niederle, and
    3. A. Rustichini

    (2003). Performance in competitive environments:Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (3): 1049–1074.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
23. 1. Goldin, C.

    (2013). Notes on Women and the Undergraduate Economics Major. CSWEP Newsletter (15), 4–6.
24. 1. Goldin, C.

    (2014). A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter. American Economic Review 104 (4): 1091–1119.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Goodman, J.

    (2019). The Labor of Division: Returns to Compulsory High School Math Coursework. Journal of Labor Economics 37 (4): 1141–1182.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Gorlitz, K., and
    2. C. Gravert

    (2018). The Effects of a High School Curriculum Reform on University Enrollment and the Choice of College Major. Education Economics 26 (3): 321–336.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Iaria, A.,
    2. C. Schwarz, and
    3. F. Waldinger

    (2018). Frontier Knowledge and Scientific Production: Evidence from the Collapse of International Science. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (2): 927–991.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Joensen, J. S., and
    2. H. S. Nielsen

    (2009). Is there a Causal Effect of High School Math on Labor Market Outcomes? Journal of Human Resources 44 (1): 171–198.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
29. 1. Joensen, J. S., and
    2. H. S. Nielsen

    (2016). Mathematics and Gender: Heterogeneity in Causes and Consequences. Economic Journal 126 (593): 1129–1163.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Kahn, S., and
    2. D. Ginther

    (2018). Women and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). In L. M. A. Susan L. Averett and S. D. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy.
31. 1. Kugler, A.,
    2. C. Tinsley, and
    3. O. Ukhaneva

    (2021). Choice of Majors: Are Women Really Different from Men? Economics of Education Review 81, 102079.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Levine, P. B., and
    2. Zimmerman D. J.

    (1995). The Benefit of Additional High-School Math and Science Classes for Young Men and Women. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13 (2): 137–49.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Mokyr, J.

    (2002). The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton University Press.
34. 1. Morando, G.

    (2020). The Effect of Studying Mathematics on Degree Choices. mimeo.
35. 1. Moser, P.,
    2. A. Voena, and
    3. F. Waldinger

    (2014). German jewish _Emigr_s and us invention. American Economic Review 104 (10): 3222–3255.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
36. 1. Niederle, M., and
    2. L. Vesterlund

    . (2007). Do Women Shy Away From Competition? Do Men Compete Too Much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (3): 1067–1101.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. 1. Niederle, M., and
    2. A. H. Yestrumskas

    (2008). Gender Differences in Seeking Challenges: The Role of Institutions. Working Paper 13922, National Bureau of Economic Research.
38. 1. Park, H.,
    2. J. R. Behrman, and
    3. J. Choi

    (2018). Do Single-sex Schools enhance Students' STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Outcomes? Economics of Education Review 62 (C), 35–47.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Porter, C., and
    2. D. Serra

    (2020). Gender Differences in the Choice of Major: The Importance of Female Role Models. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12 (3): 226–254.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Reuben, E.,
    2. M. Wiswall, and
    3. B. Zafar

    (2015). Preferences and Biases in Educational Choices and Labour Market Expectations: Shrinking the Black Box of Gender. The Economic Journal 127 (604): 2153–2186.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Riegle-Crumb, C.,
    2. B. King,
    3. E. Grodsky, and
    4. C. Muller

    (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry to STEM college majors over time. American Education Research Journal 49 (6), 1048.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. 1. Stinebrickner, R., and
    2. T. R. Stinebrickner

    (2014). A Major in Science? Initial Beliefs and Final Outcomes for College Major and Dropout. Review of Economic Studies 81 (1): 426–472.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. UK Government

    . (2004). Science & Innovation Investment Framework 2004–2014. Technical report, Department of Education, HM treasury, Department of Health, Department of Trade and Industry.
44. 1. UK Government

    (2006). Science & Innovation Investment Framework 2004–2014: next steps. Technical report, Department of Education, HM treasury, Department of Health, Department of Trade and Industry.
45. 1. Waldinger, F.

    (2016). Bombs, Brains, and Science: The Role of Human and Physical Capital for the Creation of Scientific Knowledge. The Review of Economics and Statistics 98 (5): 811–831.

    OpenUrl
46. 1. Wiswall, M., and
    2. B. Zafar

    (2017). Preference for the Workplace, Investment in Human Capital, and Gender. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (1): 457–507.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Zafar, B.

    (2013). College Major Choice and the Gender Gap. Journal of Human Resources 48 (3): 545–595.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text