An Experimental Evaluation of Culturally Enriching Field Trips

References

1. 1. Anderson, Kaitlin. P.,
   2. Gary. W. Ritter, and
   3. Gema Zamarro

   . 2019. Understanding a vicious cycle: The relationship between student discipline and student academic outcomes. Educational Researcher, 48(5): 251–262.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Bourdieu, Pierre

   . 1986. The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J.G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood press.
3. 1. Bowen, Danie. H.,
   2. Jay. P. Greene, and
   3. Brian Kisida

   . 2014. Learning to think critically: A visual art experiment. Educational Researcher, 43(1): 37–44.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Bowen, Danie. H., and
   2. Brian Kisida

   . 2019. Investigating Causal Effects of Arts education Experiences: Experimental Evidence from Houston’s Arts Access Initiative. Rice Kinder Institute for Urban Research. Retrieved from https://kinder.rice.edu/research/investigating-causal-effects-arts-education-experiences-experimental-evidence-houstons-arts.
5. 1. Cullen, Juli. B., and
   2. Randal Reback

   . 2006. “Tinkering toward accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system.” In Timothy J. Gronberg and Dennis W. Jansen, eds. Improving School Accountability: Check-Ups or Choice, Advances in Applied Microeconomics. Vol. 14:1–34, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Davis, Mar. H.

   1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
7. 1. Eccles, Jacquelynn. S., and
   2. Jennifer Appleton

   (Eds.). 2002. Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
8. 1. Figlio, Davi. N., and
   2. Lawrence S. Getzler

   . 2006. “Accountability, ability, and disability: Gaming the system?” In Timothy J. Gronberg and Dennis W. Jansen, eds. Improving School Accountability: Check-Ups or Choice, Advances in Applied Microeconomics. Vol. 14:35–49, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Figlio, Davi. N., and
   2. Joshua Winicki

   . 2005. Food for thought: the effects of school accountability plans on school nutrition. Journal of public Economics, 89(2–3), 381–394.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Fredricks, Jennife. A.

    , 2011. Extracurricular participation and academic outcomes: Testing the overscheduling hypothesis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 295–307. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9704-0

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Fredricks, Jennife. A., and
    2. Eccles, Jacquelynne S.

    (2008). Participation in extracurricular activities in the middle school years: Are there developmental benefits for African American and European American youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(9), 1029–2043. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9309-4

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Gadsden, Vivia. L.

    2008. The arts and education: Knowledge generation, pedagogy, and the discourse of learning. Review of Research in Education, 32(1): 29–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
13. 1. Gara, Taylo. V.,
    2. Liane Brouillette, and
    3. George Farkas

    . 2018. Did the frequency of early elementary classroom arts instruction decrease during the no child left behind era? If so, for whom? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 45: 263–276.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Gehlbach, Hunter

    . 2004. A new perspective on perspective taking: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing an aptitude. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3): 207–235.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Gehlbach, Hunter,
    2. Scott W. Brown,
    3. Andri Loannou,
    4. Mark A. Boyer,
    5. Natalie Hudson,
    6. Anat NivSolomon,
    7. Donalyn Maneggia, and
    8. Laura Janik

    . 2008. Increasing interest in social studies: Social perspective taking and self-efficacy in stimulating simulations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4): 894–914.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. 1. Gehlbach, Hunter,
    2. Maureen E. Brinkworth, and
    3. Ming-te Wang

    . 2012. The social perspective taking process: What motivates individuals to take another’s perspective? Teachers College Record, 114 (1): 1–29.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
17. 1. Gilman, Rich

    . 2001. The relationship between life satisfaction, social interest, and frequency of extracurricular activities among adolescent students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 30, 749–767 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012285729701

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Goldstein, Thalia and
    2. Ellen Winner

    . 2012. Enhancing empathy and theory of mind. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(1): 19–37.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Goodman, Joshua

    2014. Flaking out: Student absences and snow days as disruptions of instructional time. Working Paper, NBER. Cambridge, Mass. Retrieve from https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w20221/w20221
20. 1. Gottfried, Michae. A.

    2010. Evaluating the relationship between student attendance and achievement in urban elementary and middle schools: An instrumental variables approach. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2): 434–465.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
21. 1. Gottfried, Michae. A.

    2014. Chronic absenteeism and its effects on students’ academic and socioemotional outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 19(2): 53–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Government Accountability Office

    . 2009. Access to arts education: Inclusion of additional questions in education’s planned research would help explain why instruction time has decreased for some students. Report to Congressional Requesters. (February, GAO-09-286). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09286
23. 1. Greene, Jay P.,
    2. Heidi. H. Erickson,
    3. Angela R. Watson, and
    4. Molly I. Beck

    . 2018. The play’s the thing: Experimentally examining the social and cognitive effects of school field trips to live theater performances. Educational Researcher, 47(4): 246–254.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Greene, Jay,
    2. Collin Hitt,
    3. Anne Kraybill, and
    4. Cari A. Bogulski

    . 2015. Learning from live theater: Students realize gains in knowledge, tolerance, and more. Education Next, 15(1): 54–61.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Greene, Jay P.,
    2. Brian Kisida, and
    3. Daniel H. Bowen

    . 2014. The educational value of field trips. Education Next, 14(1): 78–86.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Gutman, Leslie Morrison,
    2. Arnold Sameroff, and
    3. Jacquelynne S. Eccles

    . 2002. The academic achievement of African American students during early adolescence: An examination of multiple risks, promotive, and protective factors. American Journal of Community Psycjology, 30:367–399. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015389103911

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Hout, Michael, and
    2. Stuart W. Elliot

    . 2011. Incentives and test-based accountability in education. National Research Council of National Academies, Washington DC.
28. 1. Hitt, Collin

    . 2015. Just filling in the bubbles: Using careless answer patterns on surveys as a proxy measure of noncognitive skills. EDRE Working Paper 2015–06. Fayetteville, AR: Department of Education Reform, University of Arkansas. Retrieved from http://www.uaedreform.org/downloads/2015/07/edre-working-paper-2015-06.
29. 1. Hitt, Collin,
    2. Julie Trivitt, and
    3. Albert Cheng

    . 2016. When you say nothing at all: The predictive power of student effort on surveys. Economics of Education Review, 52: 105–119.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Jacob, Bria. A., and
    2. Steven D. Levitt

    . 2003. Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3): 843–877.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
31. 1. Jaegar, Mads Meier, and
    2. Stine Møllegarrd

    . 2017. Cultural capital, teacher bias, and educational success: New evidence form monozygotic twins. Social Science Research, 65: 130–144.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Keiper, Shelley,
    2. Brent A. Sandene,
    3. Hilary R. Persky, and
    4. Ming Kuang

    . 2009. The nation’s report card: Arts 2008 --music and visual arts. National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grade 8. NCES 2009–488. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2008/2009488.asp
33. 1. Kisida, Brian,
    2. Laura Goodwin, and
    3. Daniel H Bowen

    . 2020. Teaching history through theater: The effect of arts integration on students’ knowledge and attitudes. AERA Open, 6(1).
34. 1. Kisida, Brian,
    2. Jay P. Greene, and
    3. Daniel H. Bowen

    . 2014. Creating cultural consumers: The dynamics of cultural capital acquisition. Sociology of Education, 87(4): 281–295.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Kornrich, Sabino

    . 2016. Inequalities in parental spending on young children: 1972 to 2010. AERA Open, 2(2): 1–12. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/2332858416644180

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
36. 1. Lee, Bridget Kiger,
    2. Erika A. Patall,
    3. Stephanie W. Cawthon, and
    4. Rebecca R. Steingut

    . 2015. The effect of drama-based pedagogy on preK-16 outcomes: A meta-analysis of research from 1985–2012. Review of Educational Research, 85(1): 3–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 1. Lipscomb, Stephen

    . 2007. Secondary school extracurricular involvement and academic achievement: A fixed effects approach. Economics of Education Review, 26(4), 463–472. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.02.006

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Ludwig, Meredith.
    2. Andrea Boyle, and
    3. Jim Lindsay

    . 2017. Review of evidence: Arts integration research through the lens of Every Students Succeeds Act. American Institutes for Research. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/resource/review-evidence-arts-integration-research-through-lens-every-student-succeeds-act
39. 1. McCord, Rober. S., and
    2. Noelle M. Ellerson

    , 2009. Looking Back, Looking Forward: How the Economic Downturn Continues to Impact School Districts. American Association of School Administrators Arlington, VA. Retrieved from http://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/Resources/files/LookingBackLookingForward.
40. 1. Mosteller, Frederick, and
    2. Robert Boruch

    , eds. 2002. Evidence matters: Randomized trials in education research. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
41. 1. Noltemeyer, Amit. L.,
    2. Rose Marie Ward, and
    3. Caven Mcloughlin

    . 2015. Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44(2): 224–240.

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Painter, Gary,
    2. Johanna Lacoe, and
    3. Danielle Williams

    . 2015. Evaluating the academic and behavioral impacts of “School in the Park.” Social Innovation Policy Brief. Sol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California. Retrieved from https://socialinnovation.usc.edu/files/2013/01/SITP.
43. 1. Peterson, Pau. E.,
    2. David. E. Campbell, and
    3. Martin R. West

    . 2001. An evaluation of the basic fund scholarship program in the San Francisco Bay area, California. Working Paper 01–01. Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University. Retrieved from https://www.innovations.harvard.edu/evaluation-basic-fund-scholarship-program-san-francisco-bay-area-california
44. 1. Pirog, Mauree. A.,
    2. Anne. L. Buffardi,
    3. Colleen K. Chrisinger,
    4. Pradeep Singh, and
    5. John Briney

    . 2009. Are alternatives to randomized assignment nearly as good? Statistical corrections to nonrandomized evaluations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(1): 169–172.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. 1. RK & Associates

    . 2018. Impact study: The effects of facilitated single-visit art museum programs on students grades 4-6. Prepared for the National Art Education Association and Association of Art Museum Directors. Retrieved from https://www.arteducators.org/research/articles/377-naea-aamd-research-study-impact-of-art-museum-programs-on-k-12-students
46. 1. Rabkin, Nick, and
    2. E.C. Hedberg

    2011. Arts education in America: What the declines mean for arts participation. National Endowment for the Arts, Research Report #52. Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/publications/arts-education-america-what-declines-mean-arts-participation
47. 1. Rossi, Pete. H.,
    2. Mark. W. Lipsey, and
    3. Howard E. Freeman

    . 2004. Evaluation: A systematic approach. Seventh edition. California: Sage
48. 1. Ruppert, Sandra S.

    2006. Critical evidence: How the ARTS benefit student achievement. National Assembly of State Arts Agencies. Retrieved from https://nasaa-arts.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/05/critical-evidence
49. 1. Steinberg, Laurence

    . 2005. Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(2):69–74.
50. 1. Stecher, Bria. M.

    2002. Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practices. In Laura A. Hamilton, Brian M. Stecher, and Stephen P. Klein, eds. Making sense of test-based accountability in education: 80–100, Arlington, VA: RAND.
51. 1. Student Youth & Travel Association

    2016. Student youth and travel digest: A comprehensive survey of the student travel market. Mclean, VA. Retrieved from https://syta.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/SYTD-Social-Impact-8.11
52. 1. Swanson, Elise,
    2. Heidi H. Erickson, and
    3. Gary W. Ritter

    , 2017. Examining the Impacts of Middle School Disciplinary Policies on Ninth-Grade Retention. Educational Policy, (May).
53. 1. West, Marti. R.

    2007. “Testing, learning, and teaching: The effects of test–based accountability on student achievement and instructional time in core academic subjects.” In Chester E. Finn and Diane Ravitch, eds. Beyond basics: Achieving a liberal education for all children (pp. 46–62), Washington DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
54. 1. Zamarro, Gema
    2. Albert Cheng,
    3. M. Danish Shakeel, and
    4. Collin Hitt

    . 2016. Comparing and validating measures of non-cognitive traits: Performance task measures and self-reports from a nationally representative internet panel. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 72: 51–60.

    OpenUrl