Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Feedback
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Research Highlights
  • Alerts
  • Special Issue
  • Other Publications
    • UWP

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of Human Resources
  • Other Publications
    • UWP
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Journal of Human Resources

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current
    • Ahead of print
    • Archive
    • Supplementary Material
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Institutions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Feedback
    • Request JHR at your library
    • Research Highlights
  • Alerts
  • Special Issue
  • Follow uwp on Twitter
Research ArticleArticles

Nudging Demand for Academic Support Services: Experimental and Structural Evidence from Higher Education

Todd Pugatch and Nicholas Wilson
Published online before print March 09, 2022, 0221-11474R2; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0221-11474R2
Todd Pugatch
* School of Public Policy, Oregon State University,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Nicholas Wilson
Department of Economics, Reed College, .
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

    1. Abadie, Alberto
    . 2003. “Semiparametric Instrumental Variable Estimation of Treatment Response Models.” Journal of Econometrics 113 (2): 231-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00201-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Allcott, Hunt, and
    2. Nathan Wozny
    . 2014. “Gasoline Prices, Fuel Economy, and the Energy Paradox.” Review of Economics and Statistics 96 (5): 779-95.
    OpenUrl
    1. Altonji, Joseph G.,
    2. Erica Blom, and
    3. Costas Meghir
    . 2012. “Heterogeneity in Human Capital Investments: High School Curriculum, College Major, and Careers.” Annu. Rev. Econ. 4 (1): 185-223.
    OpenUrl
    1. Angrist, Joshua D., and
    2. Ivan Fernandez-Val
    . 2013. “ExtrapoLATE-Ing: External Validity And.” In Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Volume 3, Econometrics: Tenth World Congress, 51:401. Cambridge University Press.
    OpenUrl
    1. Angrist, Joshua,
    2. Daniel Lang, and
    3. Philip Oreopoulos
    . 2009. “Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 136-63.
    1. Arcidiacono, Peter
    . 2004. “Ability Sorting and the Returns to College Major.” Journal of Econometrics 121 (1): 343-75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Arum, Richard, and
    2. Josipa Roksa
    . 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. University of Chicago Press.
    1. Ashworth, Jared, and
    2. Tyler Ransom
    . 2019. “Has the College Wage Premium Continued to Rise? Evidence from Multiple U.S. Surveys.” Economics of Education Review 69 (April): 149-54. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.econedurev.2019.02.003.
    OpenUrl
    1. Auferoth, Florian
    . 2020. “Who Benefits from Nudges for Exam Preparation? An Experiment.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3424583. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3424583.
    1. Avery, Christopher, and
    2. Sarah Turner
    . 2012. “Student Loans: Do College Students Borrow Too Much-Or Not Enough?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (1): 165-92.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Balaban, Rita, and
    2. Patrick Conway
    . 2020. “A Test of Enhancing Learning in Economics through Nudges.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 110 (May): 289-93. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201050.
    OpenUrl
    1. Barrow, Lisa,
    2. Cecilia E. Rouse, and
    3. Amanda McFarland
    . 2020. “Who Has the Time? Community College Students’ Time-Use Response to Financial Incentives.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3584755. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3584755.
    1. Benjamini, Yoav,
    2. Abba M. Krieger, and
    3. Daniel Yekutieli
    . 2006. “Adaptive Linear Step-up Procedures That Control the False Discovery Rate.” Biometrika 93 (3): 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/93.3.491.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Bettinger, Eric P., and
    2. Rachel B. Baker
    . 2013. “The Effects of Student Coaching An Evaluation of a Randomized Experiment in Student Advising.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 0162373713500523.
    1. Bettinger, Eric P.,
    2. Benjamin L. Castleman, and
    3. Zachary Mabel
    . 2019. “Finishing the Last Lap: Experimental Evidence on Strategies to Increase College Completion for Students At Risk of Late Departure.”
    1. Bleemer, Zachary, and
    2. Aashish Mehta
    . 2021. “College Major Restrictions and Student Stratification.” EdWorkingPapers.Com. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai21-502.
    1. Bound, John,
    2. Michael F. Lovenheim, and
    3. Sarah Turner
    . 2010. “Why Have College Completion Rates Declined? An Analysis of Changing Student Preparation and Collegiate Resources.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2 (3): 129-57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bound, John,
    2. Michael F. Lovenheim, and
    3. Sarah Turner
    . 2012. “Increasing Time to Baccalaureate Degree in the United States.” Education Finance and Policy 7 (4): 375-424.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Butcher, Kristin F., and
    2. Mary G. Visher
    . 2013. “The Impact of a Classroom-Based Guidance Program on Student Performance in Community College Math Classes:” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, September. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713485813.
    1. Carrell, Scott E, and
    2. Michal Kurlaender
    . 2020a. “My Professor Cares: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Faculty Engagement.” Working Paper 27312. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27312.
    1. Carrell, Scott E, and
    2. Michal Kurlaender
    . 2020b. “My Professor Cares: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Faculty Engagement.” Working Paper 27312. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27312.
    1. Castleman, Benjamin L., and
    2. Lindsay C. Page
    . 2015. “Summer Nudging: Can Personalized Text Messages and Peer Mentor Outreach Increase College Going among Low-Income High School Graduates?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 115: 144-60.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Castleman, Benjamin L., and
    2. Lindsay C. Page
    . 2016. “Freshman Year Financial Aid Nudges: An Experiment to Increase FAFSA Renewal and College Persistence.” Journal of Human Resources 51 (2): 389-415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chetty, Raj,
    2. Adam Looney, and
    3. Kory Kroft
    . 2009. “Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence.” The American Economic Review 99 (4): 1145-77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Clark, Damon,
    2. David Gill,
    3. Victoria Prowse, and
    4. Mark Rush
    . 2017. “Using Goals to Motivate College Students: Theory and Evidence from Field Experiments.” Working Paper 23638. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23638.
    1. Cortes, Kalena E,
    2. Hans D.U. Fricke,
    3. Susanna Loeb,
    4. David S Song, and
    5. Benjamin N York
    . 2019a. “When Behavioral Barriers Are Too High or Low – How Timing Matters for Parenting Interventions.” Working Paper 25964. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w25964.
    1. Cortes, Kalena E.,
    2. Hans Fricke,
    3. Susanna Loeb,
    4. David S. Song, and
    5. Benjamin N. York
    . 2019b. “Too Little or Too Much? Actionable Advice in an Early-Childhood Text Messaging Experiment.” Education Finance and Policy, December, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00304.
    1. Courtin, Emilie,
    2. Peter Muennig,
    3. Nandita Verma,
    4. James A. Riccio,
    5. Mylene Lagarde,
    6. Paolo Vineis,
    7. Ichiro Kawachi, and
    8. Mauricio Avendano
    . 2018. “Conditional Cash Transfers and Health of Low-Income Families in the US: Evaluating the Family Rewards Experiment.” Health Affairs 37 (3): 438-46.
    OpenUrl
    1. Damgaard, Mette Trier, and
    2. Helena Skyt Nielsen
    . 2018. “Nudging in Education.” Economics of Education Review, March. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008.
    1. DellaVigna, Stefano, and
    2. Joshua M. Pollet
    . 2009. “Investor Inattention and Friday Earnings Announcements.” The Journal of Finance 64 (2): 709-49.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Dobronyi, Christopher R.,
    2. Philip Oreopoulos, and
    3. Uros Petronijevic
    . 2019. “Goal Setting, Academic Reminders, and College Success: A Large-Scale Field Experiment.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 12 (1): 38-66.
    OpenUrl
    1. Ericson, Keith Marzilli
    . 2017. “On the Interaction of Memory and Procrastination: Implications for Reminders, Deadlines, and Empirical Estimation.” Journal of the European Economic Association 15 (3): 692-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/%28ISSN%291542-4774/issues.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gabaix, Xavier
    . 2019. “Behavioral Inattention.” In Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1, 2:261-343. Elsevier.
    OpenUrl
    1. Gemus, Jonathan
    . 2010. “College Achievement and Earnings.” Working Paper.
    1. Gordanier, John,
    2. William Hauk, and
    3. Chandini Sankaran
    . 2019. “Early Intervention in College Classes and Improved Student Outcomes.” Economics of Education Review 72 (C): 23-29.
    OpenUrl
    1. Himmler, Oliver,
    2. Robert Jäckle, and
    3. Philipp Weinschenk
    . 2019. “Soft Commitments, Reminders, and Academic Performance.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 11 (2): 114-42. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170288.
    OpenUrl
    1. Hossain, Tanjim, and
    2. John Morgan
    . 2006. … “... Plus Shipping and Handling: Revenue (Non) Equivalence in Field Experiments on Ebay.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 6 (2).
    1. ideas42
    . 2015. “Increasing Use of On-Campus Tutoring: Helping Students Achieve Academic Success.” http://www.ideas42.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/WK-Brief.pdf.
    1. Imbens, Guido W., and
    2. Joshua D. Angrist
    . 1994. “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 62 (2): 467-75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Kowalski, Amanda Ellen
    . 2016. “Doing More When You’re Running Late: Applying Marginal Treatment Effect Methods to Examine Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Experiments.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2800873. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2800873.
    1. Lacetera, Nicola,
    2. Devin G. Pope, and
    3. Justin R. Sydnor
    . 2012. “Heuristic Thinking and Limited Attention in the Car Market.” American Economic Review 102 (5): 2206-36.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Laibson, David
    . 1997. “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 443-78. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Lindo, Jason M.,
    2. Isaac D. Swensen, and
    3. Glen R. Waddell
    . 2012. “Are Big-Time Sports a Threat to Student Achievement?” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4 (4): 254-74.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. List, John A.,
    2. Jeffrey A. Livingston, and
    3. Susanne Neckermann
    . 2018. “Do Financial Incentives Crowd out Intrinsic Motivation to Perform on Standardized Tests?” Economics of Education Review 66 (October): 125-36. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.econedurev.2018.08.002.
    OpenUrl
    1. Miller, Cynthia,
    2. Rhiannon Miller,
    3. Nandita Verma,
    4. Nadine Dechausay,
    5. Edith Yang,
    6. Timothy Rudd,
    7. Jonathan Rodriguez, and
    8. Sylvie Honig
    . 2016. “Effects of a Modified Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Two American Cities: Findings from Family Rewards 2.0.” New York: MDRC, September.
    1. National Center for Education Statistics
    . 2016. “Digest of Education Statistics.” 2016. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_326.10.asp.
    1. O’Donoghue, Ted, and
    2. Matthew Rabin
    . 1999. “Doing It Now or Later.” American Economic Review 89 (1): 103-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
    1. Oreopoulos, Philip, and
    2. Uros Petronijevic
    . 2018. “Student Coaching: How Far Can Technology Go?” Journal of Human Resources 53 (2): 299-329. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.53.2.1216-8439R.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Oreopoulos, Philip, and
    2. Uros Petronijevic
    . 2019. “The Remarkable Unresponsiveness of College Students to Nudging And What We Can Learn from It.” Working Paper 26059. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26059.
    1. Page, Lindsay C.,
    2. Benjamin L. Castleman, and
    3. Katharine Meyer
    . 2020. “Customized Nudging to Improve FAFSA Completion and Income Verification.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 42 (1): 3-21.
    OpenUrl
    1. Page, Lindsay C.,
    2. Jeonghyun Lee, and
    3. Hunter Gehlbach
    . 2020. “Conditions under Which College Students Can Be Responsive to Nudging.” EdWorkingPapers.Com. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/ai20-242.
    1. Paloyo, Alfredo R.,
    2. Sally Rogan, and
    3. Peter Siminski
    . 2016. “The Effect of Supplemental Instruction on Academic Performance: An Encouragement Design Experiment.” Economics of Education Review 55 (Supplement C): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.econedurev.2016.08.005.
    OpenUrl
    1. Patnaik, Arpita,
    2. Matthew J Wiswall, and
    3. Basit Zafar
    . 2020. “College Majors.” Working Paper 27645. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27645.
    1. Pop-Eleches, Cristian,
    2. Harsha Thirumurthy,
    3. James P. Habyarimana,
    4. Joshua G. Zivin,
    5. Markus P. Goldstein,
    6. Damien De Walque,
    7. Leslie Mackeen,
    8. Jessica Haberer,
    9. Sylvester Kimaiyo, and
    10. John Sidle
    . 2011. “Mobile Phone Technologies Improve Adherence to Antiretroviral Treatment in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Text Message Reminders.” AIDS (London, England) 25 (6): 825.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Pugatch, Todd, and
    2. Elizabeth Schroeder
    . 2021a. “Promoting Female Interest in Economics: Limits to Nudges.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 111 (May): 123-27. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211024.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pugatch, Todd, and
    2. Elizabeth Schroeder
    . 2021b. “A Simple Nudge Increases Socioeconomic Diversity in Undergraduate Economics.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3860599. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3860599.
    1. Pugatch, Todd, and
    2. Nicholas Wilson
    . 2018a. “Addressing Barriers to Student Success in Higher Education.” American Economic Association. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.2744-2.0.
    1. Pugatch, Todd, and
    2. Nicholas Wilson
    . 2018b. “Nudging Study Habits: A Field Experiment on Peer Tutoring in Higher Education.” Economics of Education Review 62 (Supplement C): 151-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.11.003.
    OpenUrl
    1. Riccio, James
    . 2010. “Sharing Lessons from the First Conditional Cash Transfer Program in the United States.” Ann Arbor, MI: National Poverty Center.
    1. Rury, Derek, and
    2. Scott Carrell
    . 2020. “Knowing What It Takes: The Effect of Information About Returns to Studying on Study Effort and Achievement,” July. http://conference.iza.org/conference_files/edu_2020/rury_d29540.pdf.
    1. Shambaugh, Jay,
    2. Ryan Nunn,
    3. Patrick Liu, and
    4. Greg Nantz
    . 2017. “Thirteen Facts about Wage Growth.” The Hamilton Project 1.
    1. Stinebrickner, Ralph, and
    2. Todd R. Stinebrickner
    . 2008. “The Causal Effect of Studying on Academic Performance.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 8 (1). http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bejeap.2008.8.1/bejeap.2008.8.1.1868/bejeap.2008.8.1.1868.xml.
    1. Taubinsky, Dmitry, and
    2. Alex Rees-Jones
    . 2018. “Attention Variation and Welfare: Theory and Evidence from a Tax Salience Experiment.” The Review of Economic Studies 85 (4): 2462-96.
    OpenUrl
    1. Train, Kenneth E.
    2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
    1. U.S. Department of Education
    . 2019. “The Condition of Education 2019.” NCES 2019-144. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cue.asp.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of Human Resources: 58 (5)
Journal of Human Resources
Vol. 58, Issue 5
1 Sep 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Journal of Human Resources.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nudging Demand for Academic Support Services: Experimental and Structural Evidence from Higher Education
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Journal of Human Resources
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Journal of Human Resources web site.
Citation Tools
Nudging Demand for Academic Support Services: Experimental and Structural Evidence from Higher Education
Todd Pugatch, Nicholas Wilson
Journal of Human Resources Mar 2022, 0221-11474R2; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.0221-11474R2

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nudging Demand for Academic Support Services: Experimental and Structural Evidence from Higher Education
Todd Pugatch, Nicholas Wilson
Journal of Human Resources Mar 2022, 0221-11474R2; DOI: 10.3368/jhr.0221-11474R2
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Taken by Storm
  • Selection into Identification in Fixed Effects Models, with Application to Head Start
  • Dynamics of the Gender Gap in High Math Achievement
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • email
  • Higher education
  • incentives
  • nudges
  • text
  • randomized control trial
  • A22
  • D91
  • I23
  • M31
UWP

© 2023 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

Powered by HighWire