There's Always Room for Improvement: The Persistent Benefits of a Large-scale Teacher Evaluation System

References

1. 1. Aaronson, D.,
   2. Barrow, L., &
   3. Sander, W.

   2007. “Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools”. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1):95–135.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. 1. Al-Ubaydli, O.,
   2. List, J. A.,
   3. LoRe, D., &
   4. Suskind, D.

   2017a. Scaling for economists: Lessons from the non-adherence problem in the medical literature”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4):125–44.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Al-Ubaydli, O.,
   2. List, J. A., &
   3. Suskind, D. L.

   2017b. What can we learn from experiments? Understanding the threats to the scalability of experimental results”. American Economic Review, 107(5):282–86.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Albanel, X.

   2012. “Le travail d'évaluation. L'inspection des professeurs de l'enseignement secondaire”. Spirale-Revue de recherches en éducation, 49(1):107–121.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Allen, J. P.,
   2. Pianta, R. C.,
   3. Gregory, A.,
   4. Mikami, A. Y., &
   5. Lun, J.

   2011. “An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement”. Science, 333(6045):1034–1037.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. 1. Angrist, J. D. &
   2. Lavy, V.

   2001. “Does teacher training affect pupil learning? Evidence from matched comparisons in Jerusalem public schools”. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2):343–369.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. 1. Banerjee, A.,
   2. Banerji, R.,
   3. Berry, J.,
   4. Duo, E.,
   5. Kannan, H.,
   6. Mukerji, S.,
   7. Shotland, M., &
   8. Walton, M.

   2017. “From proof of concept to scalable policies: Challenges and solutions, with an application”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4):73–102.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Black, P. &
   2. Wiliam, D.

   1998. “Assessment and classroom learning”. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 5(1):7–74.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Burgess, S.,
   2. Rawal, S., &
   3. Taylor, E. S.

   2019. “Teacher peer observation and student test scores: Evidence from a field experiment in English secondary schools.”. EdWorkingPaper: 19–139.
10. 1. Chetty, R.,
    2. Friedman, J. N., &
    3. Rockoff, J. E

    . 2014. “Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood”. American Economic Review, 104(9):2633–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. CNESCO. 2015. “La constitution des classes : pratiques et enjeux”. Conseil National d'Évaluation du Système Scolaire.
12. 1. Condette, J.-F

    . 2017. Les personnels d'inspection: contrôler, Évaluer, conseiller les enseignants: retour sur une histoire: France-Europe, XVIIe-XXe siècle. Presses universitaires de Rennes.
13. 1. Cullen, J. B.,
    2. Koedel, C., &
    3. Parsons, E.

    2016. “The compositional effect of rigorous teacher evaluation on workforce quality”. Education Finance and Policy, pages 1–85.
14. 1. Dee, T. S. &
    2. Wyckoff, J.

    2015. “Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2):267–297.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 1. Dee, T. S.,
    2. James, J., &
    3. Wyckoff, J.

    2019. “Is Effective Teacher Evaluation Sustainable? Evidence from DCPS”. Education Finance and Policy, pages 1–53.
16. 1. Dixit, A.

    2002. “Incentives and organizations in the public sector: An interpretative review”. Journal of Human Resources, pages 696–727.
17. 1. Feuillet, P.

    2020. “Le devenir des enseignants entre la rentrée 2017 et la rentrée 2018”. Note d'information n°20.16, Avril 2020, DEPP.
18. 1. Fryer, R. G.

    2013. “Teacher incentives and student achievement: Evidence from New York City public schools”. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(2):373–407.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Garet, M. S.,
    2. Wayne, A. J.,
    3. Brown, S.,
    4. Rickles, J.,
    5. Song, M., &
    6. Manzeske, D.

    2017. “The Impact of Providing Performance Feedback to Teachers and Principals. NCEE 2018-4001.”. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
20. 1. Glazerman, S.,
    2. Dolfin, S.,
    3. Bleeker, M.,
    4. Johnson, A.,
    5. Isenberg, E.,
    6. Lugo-Gil, J.,
    7. Grider, M.,
    8. Britton, E., &
    9. Ali, M.

    2008. “Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Results from the First Year of a Randomized Controlled Study. NCEE 2009–4034.” National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
21. 1. Glazerman, S.,
    2. Isenberg, E.,
    3. Dolfin, S.,
    4. Bleeker, M.,
    5. Johnson, A.,
    6. Grider, M., &
    7. Jacobus, M.

    2010. “Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Final Results from a Randomized Controlled Study. NCEE 2010-4027.”. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
22. 1. Goodman-Bacon, A

    . 2018. “Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing”. National Bureau of Economic Research.
23. 1. Hanushek, E. A. &
    2. Rivkin, S. G.

    2006. “Teacher quality”. Handbook of the Economics of Education 2: 1051–1078.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Hanushek, E. A. &
    2. Rivkin, S. G.

    2010. “Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality”. American Economic Review, 100(2):267–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Harris, D. N. &
    2. Sass, T. R.

    2011. “Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement”. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8):798–812.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. 1. Hopkins, K. D. &
    2. Bracht, G. H.

    1975. “Ten-year stability of verbal and nonverbal IQ scores”. American Educational Research Journal, 12(4):469–477.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 1. Hussain, I.

    2015. “Subjective performance evaluation in the public sector: evidence from school inspections”. Journal of Human Resources, 50(1):189–221.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. IGEN. 2011. “Mission sur le rôle et l'activité des inspecteurs pédagogiques du second degré Note à Monsieur le ministre de l'Education nationale, de la jeunesse et de la vie associative”. Note n° 2011-02).
29. IGEN/IGAENR. 2006. “La contribution de l'éducation prioritaire à l'égalité des chances des élèves”. Rapport n 2006-076).
30. IGEN/IGAENR. 2016. “Rôle et positionnement des inspecteurs du second degrée en académie”. Rapport n° 2016-070.
31. 1. Jackson, C. K.,
    2. Rockoff, J. E., &
    3. Staiger, D. O.

    2014. “Teacher effects and teacher-related policies”. Annu. Rev. Econ., 6(1):801–825.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Kraft, M. A.

    2020. “Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions”. Educational Researcher, 49(4): 241–253.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Lavy, V.

    2009. “Performance pay and teachers' effort, productivity, and grading ethics”. American Economic Review, 99(5):1979–2011.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. 1. Lavy, V.

    2020. “Teachers' Pay for Performance in the Long-Run: The Dynamic Pattern of Treatment Effects on Students' Educational and Labour Market Outcomes in Adulthood”. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(5):2322–2355.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Muijs, D. &
    2. Reynolds, D.

    2017. Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. Sage.
36. 1. Murphy, R.,
    2. Weinhardt, F., &
    3. Wyness, G.

    2018. “Who Teaches the Teachers? A RCT of Peer-to-Peer Observation and Feedback in 181 Schools”. CEP Discussion Paper No 1565.
37. 1. Neal, D.

    2011. “The design of performance pay in education”. In Handbook of the Economics of Education, volume 4, pages 495–550.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Palet, L.

    2019. “De la qualification à la compétence: la fausse piste du méerite?”. Administration Education, (3):129–137.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Papay, J. P.

    & Kraft, M. A. 2015. “Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement”. Journal of Public Economics, 130:105–119.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. 1. Papay, J. P.,
    2. Taylor, E. S.,
    3. Tyler, J. H., &
    4. Laski, M. E.

    2020. “Learning Job Skills from Colleagues at Work: Evidence from a Field Experiment Using Teacher Performance Data”. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(1):359–88.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Piketty, T. &
    2. Valdenaire, M.

    2006. L'impact de la taille des classes sur la réussite scolaire dans les écoles, colléges et lycées français: estimations à partir du panel primaire 1997 et du panel secondaire 1995. Direction de l'évaluation et de la prospective.
42. 1. Rivkin, S. G.,
    2. Hanushek, E. A., &
    3. Kain, J. F.

    2005. “Teachers, schools, and academic achievement”. Econometrica, 73(2):417–458.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. Rockoff, J. E.

    2004. “The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data”. American Economic Review, 94(2):247–252.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. 1. Rockoff, J. E.

    2008. “Does mentoring reduce turnover and improve skills of new employees? Evidence from teachers in New York City”. National Bureau of Economic Research.
45. 1. Sartain, L. &
    2. Steinberg, M. P.

    2016. Teachers' labor market responses to performance evaluation reform: Experimental evidence from Chicago public schools”. Journal of Human Resources, 51(3):615–655.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
46. 1. Springer, M. G.,
    2. Hamilton, L.,
    3. McCaffrey, D. F.,
    4. Ballou, D.,
    5. Le, V.-N.,
    6. Pepper, M.,
    7. Lockwood, J., &
    8. Stecher, B. M.

    2010. “Teacher pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the Project on Incentives in Teaching.”. National Center on Performance Incentives.
47. 1. Steinberg, M. P. &
    2. Sartain, L.

    2015. “Does teacher evaluation improve school performance? Experimental evidence from Chicago's Excellence in Teaching project”. Education Finance and Policy, 10(4):535–572.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. 1. Taylor, E. S. &
    2. Tyler, J. H.

    2012. “The effect of evaluation on teacher performance”. American Economic Review, 102(7):3628–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. 1. Terrier, C.

    2014. “Matching Practices for secondary public school teachers-France”. Matching in Practice.
50. 1. Weisberg, D.,
    2. Sexton, S.,
    3. Mulhern, J.,
    4. Keeling, D.,
    5. Schunck, J.,
    6. Palcisco, A., &
    7. Morgan, K.

    2009. The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. ERIC.
51. 1. Wiswall, M.

    2013. “The dynamics of teacher quality”. Journal of Public Economics, 100:61–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science