Do Workers Discriminate against Female Bosses?

References

1. 1. Abel, M.

   (2019). Analysis plan: Effect of manager gender on worker effort and attitudes. aea rct registry. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.3810-2.0.
2. 1. Abel, M.

   (2022). Replication data for: Do workers discriminate against female bosses?
3. 1. Abel, M. and
   2. D. Buchman

   (2020). The effect of manager gender and performance feedback: Experimental evidence from india.
4. 1. Abel, M.,
   2. R. Burger, and
   3. P. Piraino

   (2020). The value of reference letters: Experimental evidence from south africa. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12(3), 40–71.

   OpenUrl
5. 1. Abraham, K. G.,
   2. J. C. Haltiwanger,
   3. K. Sandusky, and
   4. J. R. Spletzer

   (2018). Measuring the gig economy: Current knowledge and open issues. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
6. 1. Adler-Bell, S. and
   2. M. Miller

   (2018). The datafication of employment. Report on surveillance and privacy, The Century Foundation.
7. 1. Alexander, D. M.

   (2006). How do 360 degree performance reviews affect employee attitudes, effectiveness and performance. Seminar Research Paper Series 8, Schmidt Labor Research Center.
8. 1. Arrow, K.

   The theory of discrimination. Technical report.
9. 1. Ashforth, B. E. and
   2. R. H. Humphrey

   (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations 48(2), 97–125.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 1. Ayalew, S.,
    2. S. Manian, and
    3. K. Sheth

    (2018). Discrimination from below: Experimental evidence on female leadership in ethiopia. WPS 079, Center for Effective Global Action.
11. 1. Azmat, G. and
    2. N. Iriberri

    (2010). The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. Journal of Public Economics 94(7–8), 435–452.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. 1. Banaji, M. R.

    (2013). The implicit association test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes 265.
13. 1. Bandiera, O.,
    2. V. Larcinese, and
    3. I. Rasul

    (2015). Blissful ignorance? a natural experiment on the effect of feedback on students’ performance. Labour Economics 34, 13–25.

    OpenUrl
14. 1. Barankay, I.

    (2012). Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, Wharton Business Economics and Public Policy Papers.
15. 1. Barber, B. M. and
    2. T. Odean

    (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1), 261–292.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Bartos, V.,
    2. M. Bauer,
    3. J. Chytilová, and
    4. F. Matějka

    (2016). Attention discrimination: Theory and field experiments with monitoring information acquisition. American Economic Review 106(6), 1437–1475.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Beaman, L.,
    2. R. Chattopadhyay,
    3. E. Duo,
    4. R. Pande, and
    5. P. Topalova

    (2009). Powerful women: does exposure reduce bias? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(4), 1497–1540.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 1. Bertrand, M.

    (2011). New perspectives on gender. In Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 4, pp. 1543–1590. Elsevier.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. 1. Bertrand, M. and
    2. S. Mullainathan

    (2004). Are emily and greg more employable than lakisha and jamal? a field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review 94(4), 991–1013.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Blanes i Vidal, J. and
    2. M. Nossol

    (2011). Tournaments without prizes: Evidence from personnel records. Management Science 57(10), 1721–1736.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Blau, F. D. and
    2. L. M. Kahn

    (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 55(3), 789–865.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Bloom, N.,
    2. J. Liang,
    3. J. Roberts, and
    4. Z. J. Ying

    (2014). Does working from home work? evidence from a chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(1), 165–218.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Bordalo, P.,
    2. K. Coffman,
    3. N. Gennaioli, and
    4. A. Shleifer

    (2016). Stereotypes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131(4), 1753–1794.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. 1. Bordalo, P.,
    2. K. Coffman,
    3. N. Gennaioli, and
    4. A. Shleifer

    (2019). Beliefs about gender. American Economic Review 109(3), 739–73.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Boring, A.

    (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics 145, 27–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
26. 1. Boring, A. and
    2. A. Philippe

    (2019). Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Technical report, mimeo.
27. 1. Botelho, T. L. and
    2. M. Abraham

    (2017). Pursuing quality: how search costs and uncertainty magnify gender-based double standards in a multistage evaluation process. Administrative Science Quarterly 62(4), 698–730.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Brandts, J.,
    2. V. Groenert, and
    3. C. Rott

    (2015). The impact of advice on women’s and men’s selection into competition. Management Science 61(5), 1018–1035.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Buser, T.,
    2. M. Niederle, and
    3. H. Oosterbeek

    (2014). Gender, competitiveness, and career choices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(3), 1409–1447.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Buser, W.,
    2. J. Hayter, and
    3. E. C. Marshall

    (2019). Gender bias and temporal effects in standard evaluations of teaching. AEA Papers and Proceedings 109, 261–265.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Calonico, S.,
    2. M. D. Cattaneo, and
    3. R. Titiunik

    (2014). Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs. Econometrica 82(6), 2295–2326.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. 1. Carli, L. L.

    (2001). Gender and social inuence. Journal of Social Issues 57(4), 725–741.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Carpenter, T.,
    2. R. Pogacar,
    3. C. Pullig,
    4. M. Kouril,
    5. S. J. Aguilar,
    6. J. P. LaBouff,
    7. N. Isenberg, and
    8. A. Chakroff

    (2018). Survey-based implicit association tests: A methodological and empirical analysis.
34. Catalyst (2019). Pyramid: Women in sp 500 companies. Technical report.
35. 1. Cecchi-Dimeglio, P.

    (2017). How gender bias corrupts performance reviews, and what to do about it. Harvard Business Review.
36. 1. Chakraborty, P.,
    2. D. Serra

    , et al. (2021). Gender and leadership in organizations: Promotions, demotions and angry workers. Working Papers 20210104–001.
37. 1. Charness, G.,
    2. D. Masclet, and
    3. M. C. Villeval

    (2014). The dark side of competition for status. Management Science 60, 38–55.

    OpenUrl
38. 1. Coffman, K. B.

    (2014). Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129(4), 1625–1660.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. 1. Collins, L.,
    2. D. R. Fineman, and
    3. A. Tsuchida

    (2017). People analytics: Recalculating the route. Deloitte Insights.
40. 1. Cook, C.,
    2. R. Diamond,
    3. J. Hall,
    4. J. A. List, and
    5. P. Oyer

    (2018). The gender earnings gap in the gig economy: Evidence from over a million rideshare drivers. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
41. 1. Correll, S. and
    2. C. Simard

    (2016). Vague feedback is holding women back. Harvard Business Review.
42. 1. Deci, E. L.

    (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology 18(1), 105.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
43. 1. DellaVigna, S. and
    2. D. Pope

    (2017). Predicting experimental results: Who knows what? Journal of Political Economy 126(6), 2410–2456.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. DellaVigna, S. and
    2. D. Pope

    (2018). What motivates effort? evidence and expert forecasts. Review of Economic Studies 85(2), 1029–1069.

    OpenUrl
45. 1. Devine, P. G.,
    2. M. J. Monteith,
    3. J. R. Zuwerink, and
    4. A. J. Elliot

    (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60(6), 817.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
46. 1. Doerrenberg, P.,
    2. D. Duncan, and
    3. D. Li

    (2020). The (in) visible hand: do workers discriminate against employers?
47. 1. Eagly, A. H. and
    2. S. Chaiken

    (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
48. 1. Eagly, A. H.,
    2. S. J. Karau, and
    3. M. G. Makhijani

    (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 117(1), 125.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 1. Edelman, B.,
    2. M. Luca, and
    3. D. Svirsky

    (2017). Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: evidence from a field experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9(2), 1–22.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Eriksson, T.,
    2. A. Poulsen, and
    3. M. C. Villeval

    (2009). Feedback and incentives: Experimental evidence. Labour Economics 16(6), 679–688.

    OpenUrl
51. 1. Exley, C. L.,
    2. M. Niederle, and
    3. L. Vesterlund

    (2020). Knowing when to ask: The cost of leaning in. Journal of Political Economy 128(3), 816–854.

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Fryer, R. G. Jr. and
    2. S. D. Levitt

    (2004). The causes and consequences of distinctively black names. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(3), 767–805.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
53. 1. Gaddis, S. M.

    (2019). Signaling class: An experiment examining social class perceptions from names used in correspondence audit studies. Available at SSRN 3350739.
54. 1. Gjedrem, W. G.

    (2018). Relative performance feedback: Effective or dismaying? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 74, 1–16.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Glover, D.,
    2. A. Pallais, and
    3. W. Pariente

    (2019). Discrimination as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Evidence from french grocery stores. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(3), 1219–1260.

    OpenUrl
56. 1. Goldin, C.

    (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review 104(4), 1091–1119.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
57. 1. Grant, A. M.

    (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(1), 48.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. 1. Greenwald, A. G.,
    2. M. R. Banaji, and
    3. B. A. Nosek

    (2015). Statistically small effects of the implicit association test can have societally large effects.
59. 1. Greenwald, A. G.,
    2. B. A. Nosek, and
    3. M. R. Banaji

    (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of personality and social psychology 85(2), 197.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
60. 1. Grossman, P. J.,
    2. C. Eckel,
    3. M. Komai, and
    4. W. Zhan

    (2016). It pays to be a man: Rewards for leaders in a coordination game. Monash Economics Working Papers 38-16, Monash University, Department of Economics.
61. 1. Hannan, R. L.,
    2. G. P. McPhee,
    3. A. H. Newman, and
    4. I. D. Tafkov

    (2012). The effect of relative performance information on performance and effort allocation in a multi-task environment. The Accounting Review 88(2), 553–575.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. Hattie, J. and
    2. H. Timperley

    (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77(1), 81–112.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. 1. Hoffman, M.,
    2. L. B. Kahn, and
    3. D. Li

    (2017). Discretion in hiring. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133(2), 765–800.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Holmstrom, B. and
    2. P. Milgrom

    (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. JL Econ. & Org. 7, 24.

    OpenUrl
65. 1. Horton, J. J.,
    2. D. G. Rand, and
    3. R. J. Zeckhauser

    (2010). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics 14(3), 399–425.

    OpenUrl
66. 1. Hsieh, C.-T.,
    2. E. Hurst,
    3. C. I. Jones, and
    4. P. J. Klenow

    (forthcoming). The allocation of talent and us economic growth. Econometrica.
67. 1. Jamieson, K. H.

    et al. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford University Press on Demand.
68. 1. Judge, T. A.,
    2. C. J. Thoresen,
    3. J. E. Bono, and
    4. G. K. Patton

    (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin 127(3), 376.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
69. 1. Katz, L. F. and
    2. A. B. Krueger

    (2018). Understanding trends in alternative work arrangements in the united states. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.
70. 1. Kling, J. R.,
    2. J. B. Liebman, and
    3. L. F. Katz

    (2007). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica 75(1), 83–119.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
71. 1. Kuhnen, C. M. and
    2. A. Tymula

    (2012). Feedback, self-esteem, and performance in organizations. Management Science 58(1), 94–113.

    OpenUrl
72. 1. Lang, K.

    (1986). A language theory of discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(2), 363–382.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
73. 1. List, J. A. and
    2. F. Momeni

    (2017). When corporate social responsibility backfires: Theory and evidence from a natural field experiment. Working Paper 24169, National Bureau of Economic Research.
74. 1. Loury, G. C.

    (2009). The anatomy of racial inequality. Harvard University Press.
75. 1. Ma, D. S.,
    2. J. Correll,
    3. B. Wittenbrink,
    4. Y. Bar-Anan,
    5. N. Sriram, and
    6. B. A. Nosek

    (2013). When fatigue turns deadly: The association between fatigue and racial bias in the decision to shoot. Basic and applied social psychology 35(6), 515–524.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
76. 1. Macchiavello, R.,
    2. A. Menzel,
    3. A. Rabbani, and
    4. C. Woodruff

    (2020). Challenges of change: An experiment promoting women to managerial roles in the bangladeshi garment sector. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
77. 1. Manian, S. and
    2. K. Sheth

    (2021). Follow my lead: Assertive cheap talk and the gender gap. Management Science.
78. 1. Mueller, G. and
    2. E. Plug

    (2006). Estimating the effect of personality on male and female earnings. ILR Review 60(1), 3–22.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
79. 1. Muse, L. A.,
    2. S. G. Harris, and
    3. H. S. Feild

    (2003). Has the inverted-u theory of stress and job performance had a fair test? Human Performance 16(4), 349–364.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
80. 1. Netchaeva, E.,
    2. M. Kouchaki, and
    3. L. D. Sheppard

    (2015). A man’s (precarious) place: Men’s experienced threat and self-assertive reactions to female superiors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 41(9), 1247–1259.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
81. 1. Neumark, D.

    (2018). Experimental research on labor market discrimination. Journal of Economic Literature 56(3), 799–866.

    OpenUrl
82. 1. Newcombe, M. J. and
    2. N. M. Ashkanasy

    (2002). The role of affect and affective congruence in perceptions of leaders: An experimental study. The Leadership Quarterly 13(5), 601–614.

    OpenUrl
83. 1. Niederle, M. and
    2. L. Vesterlund

    (2007). Do women shy away from competition? do men compete too much? The quarterly journal of economics 122(3), 1067–1101.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
84. 1. Nosek, B. A.,
    2. A. G. Greenwald, and
    3. M. R. Banaji

    (2005). Understanding and using the implicit association test: Ii. method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31(2), 166–180.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
85. 1. Oswald, F. L.,
    2. G. Mitchell,
    3. H. Blanton,
    4. J. Jaccard, and
    5. P. E. Tetlock

    (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of iat criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social psychology 105(2), 171.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
86. 1. Podsakoff, P. M.,
    2. S. B. MacKenzie,
    3. R. H. Moorman, and
    4. R. Fetter

    (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly 1(2), 107–142.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
87. 1. Pope, D. G.,
    2. J. Price, and
    3. J. Wolfers

    (2018). Awareness reduces racial bias. Management Science 64(11), 4988–4995.

    OpenUrl
88. 1. Price, C. R.

    (2012). Gender, competition, and managerial decisions. Management Science 58(1), 114–122.

    OpenUrl