Comparative Advantage and Gender Gap in STEM

References

1. 1. Abadie, A.,
   2. S. Athey,
   3. G. W. Imbens, and
   4. J. Wooldridge

   (2017). When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering? Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
2. 1. Artz, B.,
   2. A. H. Goodall, and
   3. A. J. Oswald

   (2018). Do Women Ask? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 57(4), 611–636.

   OpenUrl
3. 1. Arulampalam, W.,
   2. A. L. Booth, and
   3. M. L. Bryan

   (2007). Is There a Glass Ceiling over Europe? Exploring the Gender Pay Gap Across the Wage Distribution. ILR Review 60(2), 163–186.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Beede, D. N.,
   2. T. A. Julian,
   3. D. Langdon,
   4. G. McKittrick,
   5. B. Khan, and
   6. M. E. Doms

   (2011). Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief (04–11).
5. 1. Benbow, C. P.

   (1988). Sex-related differences in precocious mathematical reasoning ability: Not illusory, not easily explained. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11(2), 217–232.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Berenbaum, S. A.,
   2. C. L. Martin,
   3. L. D. Hanish,
   4. P. T. Briggs, and
   5. R. A. Fabes

   (2008). Sex differences in children’s play. Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior, 275–290.
7. 1. Bertoni, M. and
   2. R. Nisticò

   (2019). Ordinal Rank and Peer Composition: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
8. 1. Bertrand, M. and
   2. K. F. Hallock

   (2001). The Gender Gap in Top Corporate Jobs. ILR Review 55(1), 3–21.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. 1. Black, D. A.,
   2. A. M. Haviland,
   3. S. G. Sanders, and
   4. L. J. Taylor

   (2008). Gender Wage Disparities Among the Highly Educated. Journal of Human Resources 43(3), 630–659.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Blau, F. D. and
    2. L. M. Kahn

    (2017). The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations. Journal of Economic Literature 55(3), 789–865.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. 1. Bobba, M. and
    2. V. Frisancho

    (2016). Learning about Oneself: The Effects of Performance Feedback on School Choice.
12. 1. Borjas, G. J.

    (1987a). Immigrants, Minorities, and Labor Market Competition. ILR Review 40(3), 382–392.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. 1. Borjas, G. J.

    (1987b). Self-selection and the Earnings of Immigrants. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
14. 1. Breda, T. and
    2. C. Napp

    (2019). Girls’ Comparative Advantage in Reading Can Largely Explain the Gender Gap in Math-related Fields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201905779.
15. 1. Brown, G. D.,
    2. J. Gardner,
    3. A. J. Oswald, and
    4. J. Qian

    (2008). Does Wage Rank Affect Employees’ Wellbeing? Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 47(3), 355–389.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. 1. Bursztyn, L. and
    2. R. Jensen

    (2015). How Does Peer Pressure Affect Educational Investments? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(3), 1329–1367.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. 1. Cahill, L.

    (2005). His Brain, Her Brain. Scientific American 292(5), 40–47.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
18. 1. Card, D.,
    2. A. Mas,
    3. E. Moretti, and
    4. E. Saez

    (2012). Inequality at Work: The Effect of Peer Salaries on Job Satisfaction. American Economic Review 102(6), 2981–3003.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Card, D. and
    2. A. A. Payne

    (2021). High School Choices and the Gender Gap in STEM. Economic Inquiry 59(1), 9–28.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Carlana, M.

    (2019). Implicit Stereotypes: Evidence from Teachers’ Gender Bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134(3), 1163–1224.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Cech, E. A. and
    2. M. Blair-Loy

    (2014). Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers. Work and Occupations 41(1), 86–110.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Cech, E. A. and
    2. M. Blair-Loy

    (2019). The Changing Career Trajectories of New Parents in STEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(10), 4182–4187.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 1. Ceci, S. J.,
    2. D. K. Ginther,
    3. S. Kahn, and
    4. W. M. Williams

    (2014). Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 15(3), 75–141.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 1. Clayton, J. A. and
    2. F. S. Collins

    (2014). Policy: NIH to Balance Sex in Cell and Animal Studies. Nature News 509(7500), 282.

    OpenUrl
25. Committee on Underrepresented Groups and the Expansion of the Science and Engineering Workforce Pipeline (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads. National Academies Press Washington, DC.
26. 1. Cvencek, D.,
    2. A. N. Meltzoff, and
    3. A. G. Greenwald

    (2011). Math–Gender Stereotypes in Elementary School Children. Child development 82(3), 766–779.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 1. De Bellis, M. D.,
    2. M. S. Keshavan,
    3. S. R. Beers,
    4. J. Hall,
    5. K. Frustaci,
    6. A. Masalehdan,
    7. J. Noll, and
    8. A. M. Boring

    (2001). Sex Differences in Brain Maturation During Childhood and Adolescence. Cerebral cortex 11(6), 552–557.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 1. Delaney, J. M. and
    2. P. J. Devereux

    (2019). Understanding Gender Differences in STEM: Evidence from College Applications. Economics of Education Review 72, 219–238.

    OpenUrl
29. 1. Delaney, J. M. and
    2. P. J. Devereux

    (2021a). Gender Differences in College Applications: Aspiration and Risk Management. Economics of Education Review 80, 102077.

    OpenUrl
30. 1. Delaney, J. M. and
    2. P. J. Devereux

    (2021b). High School Rank in Math and English and the Gender Gap in STEM. Labour Economics 69, 101969.

    OpenUrl
31. 1. Denning, J. T.,
    2. R. Murphy, and
    3. F. Weinhardt

    (2020). Class Rank and Long-run Outcomes. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
32. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture (2019). Education and training monitor 2019 - Greece.
33. 1. Dix-Carneiro, R. and
    2. B. K. Kovak

    (2015). Trade Liberalization and the Skill Premium: A Local Labor Markets Approach. American Economic Review 105(5), 551–57.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Duflo, E.

    (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic literature 50(4), 1051–79.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. 1. Dweck, C. S.,
    2. W. Davidson,
    3. S. Nelson, and
    4. B. Enna

    (1978). Sex Differences in Learned Helplessness: II. The Contingencies of Evaluative Feedback in the Classroom and III. An Experimental Analysis. Developmental Psychology 14(3), 268.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. 1. Eccles, J.

    (1983). Expectancies, Values and Academic Behaviors. Achievement and achievement motives.
37. 1. Eccles, J. S. and
    2. J. E. Jacobs

    (1986). Social Forces Shape Math Attitudes and Performance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 11(2), 367–380.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. 1. Eccles, J. S.,
    2. J. E. Jacobs, and
    3. R. D. Harold

    (1990). Gender Role Stereotypes, Expectancy Effects, and Parents’ Socialization of Gender Differences. Journal of Social Issues 46(2), 183–201.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. 1. Elsner, B. and
    2. I. E. Isphording

    (2017). A Big Fish in a Small Pond: Ability Rank and Human Capital Investment. Journal of Labor Economics 35(3), 787–828.

    OpenUrl
40. 1. Elsner, B.,
    2. I. E. Isphording, and
    3. U. Zöolitz

    (2021, 04). Achievement Rank Affects Performance and Major Choices in College. The Economic Journal 131(640), 3182–3206.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Eriksson, T.

    (1999). Executive Compensation and Tournament Theory: Empirical Tests on Danish Data. Journal of labor Economics 17(2), 262–280.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
42. European Institute for Gender Equity (2017). The Gender Pay Gap in Greece.
43. European Institute for Gender Equity (2019). Gender Equality Index 2019: Greece.
44. 1. Festinger, L.

    (1954). A Theory of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations 7(2), 117–140.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. 1. Friedman, J.,
    2. T. Hastie, and
    3. R. Tibshirani

    (2001). The Elements of Statistical Learning, Volume 1. Springer series in statistics New York.
46. 1. Gallagher, A. M. and
    2. J. C. Kaufman

    (2005). Gender Differences in Mathematics: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Cambridge University Press.
47. 1. Gardner, A.

    (2016). How Important Are GCSE Choices When It Comes to University.
48. 1. Gaulin, S. J.,
    2. H. A. Hoffman, et al.

    (1988). Evolution and Development of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability. Human Reproductive Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective, 129–152.
49. 1. Gneezy, U.,
    2. M. Niederle, and
    3. A. Rustichini

    (2003). Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(3), 1049–1074.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Goldin, C.

    (2015). Gender and the Undergraduate Economics Major: Notes on the Undergraduate Economics Major at a Highly Selective Liberal Arts College. Technical report, Report on the Status of Undergraduate Women in Economics at Adams College.
51. 1. Goulas, S.,
    2. S. Griselda, and
    3. R. Megalokonomou

    (2021). Compulsory Class Attendance Versus Autonomy. IZA Discussion Paper Number 14559.
52. 1. Goulas, S. and
    2. R. Megalokonomou

    (2019). Which Degrees Do Students Prefer during Recessions? Empirical Economics 56(6), 2093–2125.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Goulas, S. and
    2. R. Megalokonomou

    (2020). Marathon, Hurdling, or Sprint? The Effects of Exam Scheduling on Academic Performance. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 20(2).
54. 1. Goulas, S. and
    2. R. Megalokonomou

    (2021). Knowing Who You Actually Are: The Effect of Feedback Information on Short- and Longer-term Outcomes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.
55. 1. Graham, J. W. and
    2. S. A. Smith

    (2005). Gender Differences in Employment and Earnings in Science and Engineering in the US. Economics of Education Review 24(3), 341–354.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. 1. Guiso, L.,
    2. F. Monte,
    3. P. Sapienza, and
    4. L. Zingales

    (2008). Culture, Gender, and Math. Science 320(5880), 1164–1165.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
57. 1. Gur, R. C.,
    2. B. I. Turetsky,
    3. M. Matsui,
    4. M. Yan,
    5. W. Bilker,
    6. P. Hughett, and
    7. R. E. Gur

    (1999). Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: correlations with cognitive performance. Journal of Neuroscience 19(10), 4065–4072.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
58. 1. Hong, L. and
    2. S. E. Page

    (2001). Problem Solving by Heterogeneous Agents. Journal of Economic Theory 97(1), 123–163.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
59. 1. Hyde, J. S.

    (2005). The Gender Similarities Hypothesis. American Psychologist 60(6), 581.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
60. 1. Jonsson, J. O.

    (1999). Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice: An Empirical Assessment of a Rational Choice Model. European sociological review 15(4), 391–404.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
61. 1. Kahn, S. and
    2. D. Ginther

    (2017). Women and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Are Differences in Education and Careers due to Stereotypes, Interests, or Family. The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy, 1–39.
62. 1. Kahn, S. and
    2. D. Ginther

    (2018). Women and Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Are Differences in Education ad Careers due to Stereotypes, Interests, or Family. The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy. Oxford University Press, New York, 767–798.
63. 1. Kübler, D.,
    2. J. Schmid, and
    3. R. Stüuber

    (2018). Gender Discrimination in Hiring Across Occupations: A Nationally Representative Vignette Study. Labour Economics 55, 215–229.

    OpenUrl
64. 1. Landaud, F.,
    2. S. T. Ly, and
    3. É. Maurin

    (2020). Competitive Schools and the Gender Gap in the Choice of Field of Study. Journal of Human Resources 55(1), 278–308.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
65. 1. Lavy, V. and
    2. R. Megalokonomou

    (2019, June). Persistency in Teachers’ Grading Bias and Effects on Longer-Term Outcomes: University Admissions Exams and Choice of Field of Study. NBER Working Paper (26021).
66. 1. Lavy, V. and
    2. E. Sand

    (2015). On the Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
67. 1. Lee, F.

    (2018). How Prepared Do I Have to Be for a Job? Gender Differences in the Desire for Preparedness. Stanford University.
68. 1. Luckenbill-Edds, L.

    (2002). The Educational Pipeline for Women in Biology: No Longer Leaking? BioScience 52(6), 513–521.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
69. 1. Maddux, J. E.

    (2013). Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application. Springer Science & Business Media.
70. 1. Major, B.,
    2. D. B. McFarlin, and
    3. D. Gagnon

    (1984). Overworked and Underpaid: On the Nature of Gender Differences in Personal Entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(6), 1399.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
71. 1. Manning, A. and
    2. J. Swaffield

    (2008). The Gender Gap in Early-career Wage Growth. The Economic Journal 118(530), 983–1024.

    OpenUrl
72. 1. Marsh, H.W. and
    2. K.-T. Hau

    (2004). Explaining Paradoxical Relations Between Academic Self-concepts and Achievements: Cross-cultural Generalizability of the Internal/External Frame of Reference Predictions Across 26 Countries. Journal of Educational Psychology 96(1), 56.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
73. 1. Murphy, R. and
    2. F. Weinhardt

    (2020). Top of the Class: The Importance of Ordinal Rank. The Review of Economic Studies 87(6), 2777–2826.

    OpenUrl
74. National Science Foundation (2016). Science & Engineering Indicators. Technical Report (20161).
75. National Science Foundation (2017). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. Technical Report (17310).
76. 1. Niederle, M. and
    2. L. Vesterlund

    (2007). Do women shy away from competition? do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3), 1067–1101.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
77. 1. Nollenberger, N.,
    2. N. Rodríguez-Planas, and
    3. A. Sevilla

    (2016). The math gender gap: The role of culture. The American Economic Review 106(5), 257–261.

    OpenUrl
78. 1. O’Dea, R.,
    2. M. Lagisz,
    3. M. Jennions, and
    4. S. Nakagawa

    (2018, 12). Gender Differences in Individual Variation in Academic Grades Fail to Fit Expected Patterns for STEM. Nature Communications 9.
79. OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education.
80. OECD (2018). Education for a Bright Future in Greece.
81. 1. O’Neill, J.

    (2003). The Gender Gap in Wages, Circa 2000. American Economic Review 93(2), 309–314.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
82. 1. Orrenius, P. M. and
    2. M. Zavodny

    (2015). Does Immigration Affect Whether US Natives Major in Science and Engineering? Journal of Labor Economics 33(S1), S79–S108.

    OpenUrl
83. 1. Ors, E.,
    2. F. Palomino, and
    3. E. Peyrache

    (2013). Performance Gender Gap: Does Competition Matter? Journal of Labor Economics 31(3), 443–499.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
84. 1. Owen, A. L.

    (2010). Grades, Gender, and Encouragement: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis. The Journal of Economic Education 41(3), 217–234.

    OpenUrl
85. 1. Perfect, D.

    (2011). Gender Pay Gaps. Equality and Human Rights Commission Manchester.
86. 1. Piyapromdee, S.

    (2021). The Impact of Immigration on Wages, Internal Migration, and Welfare. The Review of Economic Studies 88(1), 406–453.

    OpenUrl
87. 1. Porter, C. and
    2. D. Serra

    (2020, July). Gender Differences in the Choice of Major: The Importance of Female Role Models. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12(3), 226–54.

    OpenUrl
88. 1. Rask, K. and
    2. J. Tiefenthaler

    (2008). The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics. Economics of Education Review 27(6), 676–687.

    OpenUrl
89. 1. Rose, A. S.

    (2010). STEM Major Choice and the Gender Pay Gap. On Campus with Women 39(1).
90. 1. Roy, A. D.

    (1951). Some Thoughts on the Distribution of Earnings. Oxford economic papers 3(2), 135–146.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
91. 1. Sandberg, S.

    (2015). Lean in-Women, Work and the Will to Lead.
92. 1. Sassler, S.,
    2. J. Glass,
    3. Y. Levitte, and
    4. K. M. Michelmore

    (2017). The Missing Women in STEM? Assessing Gender Differentials in the Factors Associated with Transition to First Jobs. Social Science Research 63, 192–208.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
93. 1. Säve-Söderbergh, J.

    (2019). Gender Gaps in Salary Negotiations: Salary Requests and Starting Salaries in the Field. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 161, 35–51.

    OpenUrl
94. 1. Shauman, K. A.

    (2017). Gender Differences in the Early Employment Outcomes of STEM Doctorates. Social Sciences 6(1), 24.

    OpenUrl
95. 1. Sloane, C.,
    2. E. Hurst, and
    3. D. Black

    (2019). A Cross-Cohort Analysis of Human Capital Specialization and the College Gender Wage Gap. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.
96. 1. Steele, C. M.

    (1997). A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance. American Psychologist 52(6), 613.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
97. 1. Stoet, G. and
    2. D. C. Geary

    (2018). The Gender-equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science 29(4), 581–593.

    OpenUrl
98. 1. Su, R.,
    2. J. Rounds, and
    3. P. I. Armstrong

    (2009). Men and Things, Women and People: A Meta-analysis of Sex Differences in Interests. Psychological Bulletin 135(6), 859.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
99. 1. Suls, J. and
    2. L. Wheeler

    (2013). Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. Springer Science & Business Media.
100. 1. Tincani, M.

     (2017). Heterogeneous Peer Effects and Rank Concerns: Theory and Evidence.
101. 1. Tversky, A. and
     2. D. Kahneman

     (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185(4157), 1124–1131.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
102. 1. Waber, D.

     (1976). Sex Differences in Cognition: a Function of Maturation Rate? Science 192, 572–574.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
103. 1. Wang, M.-T. and
     2. J. Degol

     (2013). Motivational Pathways to STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy– value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields. Developmental Review 33(4), 304–340.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
104. 1. Wang, M.-T.,
     2. J. S. Eccles, and
     3. S. Kenny

     (2013). Not Lack of Ability but More Choice: Individual and Gender Differences in Choice of Careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Psychological Science 24(5), 770–775.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
105. 1. Weichselbaumer, D. and
     2. R. Winter

     -Ebmer (2005). A Meta-analysis of the International Gender Wage Gap. Journal of Economic Surveys 19(3), 479–511.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
106. 1. Xie, Y.,
     2. K. A. Shauman, and
     3. K. A. Shauman

     (2003). Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes, Volume 26. Harvard university press Cambridge, MA.
107. 1. Yu, L.

     (2020). Female Bosses and Female Employees’ Careers: Evidence from Lawyers in Shanghai.
108. 1. Zafar, B.

     (2011). How Do College Students Form Expectations? Journal of Labor Economics 29(2), 301–348.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science