Publish or Perish: Selective Attrition as a Unifying Explanation for Patterns in Innovation over the Career

References

1. 1. Acemoglu, Daron,
   2. Ufuk Akcigit, and
   3. Murat Celik

   . 2015. “Young, Restless, and Creative: Openness to Disruption and Creative Innovations.” NBER Working Paper No. 19894.
2. 1. Althouse, Benjamin M.,
   2. Jevin D. West,
   3. Carl T. Bergstrom, and
   4. Theodore Bergstrom

   . 2009. “Differences in impact factor across fields and over time.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(1): 27–34.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Aquiar, Mark, and
   2. Erik Hurst

   . 2013. “Deconstructing Life Cycle Expenditure.” Journal of Political Economy 121(3): 437–492.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. 1. Azoulay, Pierre,
   2. Joshua S. Graff Zivin, and
   3. Jialan Wang

   . 2010. “Superstar Extinction.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(2): 549–589.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. 1. Baerlocher, Mark Otto,
   2. Marshall Newton,
   3. Tina Gautam,
   4. George Tomlinson, and
   5. Allan S. Detsky

   . 2007. “The Meaning of Author Order in Medical Research.” Journal of Investigative Medicine 55(4):175–180.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Beard, George Miller.

   1874. Legal Responsibility in Old Age: Based on Researches into the Relation of Age to Work. New York: Russells’ American Steam Printing House.
7. 1. Becker, Gary S.

   1975. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, Second Edition. National Bureau of Economic Research.
8. 1. Bhandari, Mohit,
   2. Jason W. Busse,
   3. Aabhaya V. Kulkarni,
   4. P.J. Devereaux,
   5. Pamela Leece, and
   6. Gordon H. Guyatt

   . 2004. “Interpreting Authorship Order and Corresponding Authorship.” Epidemiology 15(1): 125–126.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 1. Blau, David M., and
   2. Bruce A Weinberg

   . 2017. “Why the US science and engineering workforce is aging rapidly” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114(15): 3879–3884.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 1. Bollen, Johan,
    2. Herbert Van de Sompel,
    3. Aric Hagberg, and
    4. Ryan Chute

    . 2009. “A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures.” PLoS One 4(6): e6022.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 1. Brogaard, Jonathan,
    2. Joseph Engelberg, and
    3. Edward Van Wesep

    . 2018. “Do Economists Swing for the Fences after Tenure?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 32(1): 179–194.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Charette, Marc F,
    2. Young S. Oh,
    3. Christine Maric-Bilkan,
    4. Lindsey L. Scott,
    5. Charles C. Wu,
    6. Matthew Eblen,
    7. Katrina Pearson,
    8. H. Eser Tolunay, and
    9. Zorina S. Galis

    . 2016. “Shifting Demographics among Research Project Grant Awardees at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).” PLoS One 11(12): e0168511.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Cole, Stephen.

    1979. “Age and scientific performance.” American Journal of Sociology 84(4): 958–977.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. 1. Costas, Rodrigo, and
    2. Maria Bordons

    . 2011. “Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective.” Scientometrics 88(1): 145–161.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. 1. Costas, Rodrigo,
    2. Thed N. van Leeuwen, and
    3. María Bordons

    . 2010. “A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(8): 1564–1581.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Cronin, Blaise, and
    2. Cassidy R. Sugimoto

    . (Eds.) 2014. Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. 1. Cronin, Blaise, and
    2. Cassidy R. Sugimoto

    (Eds.) 2015. Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc./ASIST.
18. 1. Davis, Robert A.

    1954. “Note on age and productive scholarship of a university faculty.” Journal of Applied Psychology 38 (5): 318–319.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. Deaton, Angus S., and
    2. Christine H Paxson

    . 1994. “Saving, Growth, and Aging in Taiwan.” Studies in the Economics of Aging, edited by David A. Wise. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research and University of Chicago Press.
20. 1. Deming, David J., and
    2. Kadeem L. Noray

    . 2018. “STEM Careers and Technological Change.” NBER Working Paper No. 25065.
21. 1. Diamond, A.M.

    1984. “An economic model of the life-cycle research productivity of scientists.” Scientometrics 6(3): 189–196.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. 1. Falagas, Matthew E.,
    2. Vrettos Ierodiakonou, and
    3. Vangelis G. Alexiou

    . 2008. “At what age do biomedical scientists do their best work?” The FASEB Journal 22(12): 4067–4070.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 1. Feist, Gregory J.

    2006. “The development of scientific talent in Westinghouse finalists and members of the National Academy of Sciences.” Journal of Adult Development 13(1): 23–35.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. 1. Foster, Jacob G.,
    2. Feng Shi, and
    3. James Evans

    . 2021. “Surprise! Measuring Novelty as Expectation Violation.” SocArXiv. April 13. doi:10.31235/osf.io/2t46f.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. 1. Franzoni, Chiara, and
    2. Cristina Rossi-Lamastra

    . 2017. “Academic tenure, risk-taking and the diversification of scientific research.” Industry and Innovation 24(7): 691–712.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Funk, Russel J., and
    2. Jason Owen-Smith

    . 2016. “A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change.” Management Science 63(3):791–817.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Gingras, Yves,
    2. Vincent Larivière,
    3. Benoî Macaluso, and
    4. Jean-Pierre Robitaille

    . 2008. “The effects of aging on researchers’ publication and citation patterns.” PloS One 3(12): e4048.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. 1. Haefele, John W.

    1962. Creativity and Innovation. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.
29. 1. Hall, Bronwyn H.,
    2. Jacques Mairesse, and
    3. Laure Turner

    . 2007. “Identifying age, cohort and period effects in scientific research productivity: discussion and illustration using simulated and actual data on french physicists.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16(2): 159–177.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. 1. Horner, Karen L.,
    2. J. Philippe Rushton, and
    3. Philip A. Vernon

    . 1986. “Relation between aging and research productivity of academic psychologists.” Psychology and Aging 1(4): 319–324.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
31. 1. Hutchins, B. Ian,
    2. Xin Yuan,
    3. James M. Anderson, and
    4. George M. Santangelo

    . 2016. “Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric that Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influences at the Article Level.” PLoS Biology 14(9): e1002541.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
32. 1. Jaffe, Adam B.,
    2. Manuel Trajtenberg, and
    3. Rebecca Henderson

    . 1993. “Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3): 577–598.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Kaiser, Jocelyn.

    2008a. “Zerhouni’s Parting Message: Make Room for Young Scientists.” Science 322(5903): 834–835.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
34. 1. Kaiser, Jocelyn.

    2008b. “The graying of NIH research.” Science 322(5903): 848–849.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. 1. Kaltenberg, Mary,
    2. Adam B. Jaffe, and
    3. Margie F. Lachman

    . 2021. “Invention and the Life Course: Age Differences in Patening.” NBER Working Paper No. 28769.
36. 1. Kyvik, Svein.

    1990. “Age and scientific productivity. Differences between fields of learning.” Higher Education 19(1): 37–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. 1. Kyvik, Sevin, and
    2. Terje Olsen

    . 2008. “Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities?” Scientometrics 76(3): 439–455.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. 1. Lehman, Harvey C.

    1953. Age and Achievement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39. 1. Levin, Sharon G. and
    2. Paula E. Stephan

    . 1989. “Age and research productivity of academic scientists.” Research in Higher Education 30(5): 531–549.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. 1. Levin, Sharon G., and
    2. Paula E. Stephan

    . 1991. “Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists.” The American Economic Review 81(1): 114–132.

    OpenUrl
41. 1. Marschke, Gerald,
    2. Allison Nunez,
    3. Bruce A. Weinberg, and
    4. Huifeng Yu

    . 2018. “Last Place? The Intersection of Ethnicity, Gender, and Race in Biomedical Authorship” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 108 (No. 5, May): 222–227.

    OpenUrl
42. National Science Board, Science & Engineering Indicators, NSB-2020-6, 2020.
43. 1. Over, Ray.

    1982. “Does research productivity decline with age?” Higher Education 11(5): 511–520.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Packalen, Mikko, and
    2. Jay Bhattacharya

    . 2019. “Age and the Trying Out of New Ideas.” Journal of Human Capital 13(2): 341–373.

    OpenUrl
45. 1. Planck, Max.

    1949. Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers. Philosphical Library, New York, NY.
46. 1. Rafols, Ismael, and
    2. Martin Meyer

    . 2010. “Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience.” Scientometrics 82(2): 263–287.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
47. 1. Ross, Matthew B.,
    2. Gerald Marschke,
    3. Huifeng Yu,
    4. Joseph Staudt, and
    5. Bruce A. Weinberg

    . 2018. “The Effects of Own and Field Career Age on Research Productivity in Biomedical Science.” Working paper.
48. 1. Seglen, Per O.

    1997. “Why the Impact Factor of Journals Should Not Be Used for Evaluating Research.” British Medical Journal 314(7079): 498–502.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
49. 1. Simonton, Dean K.

    1997. “Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks.” Psychological Review 104(1): 66–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. 1. Sinatra, Roberta,
    2. Dashun Wang,
    3. Pierre Deville,
    4. Chaoming Song, and
    5. Albert-László Barabási

    . 2016. “Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact.” Science 35(6312): aaf5239-1-aaf5239-8
51. 1. Singh, Jasjit.

    2005. “Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns.” Management Science 51(5): 756–770

    OpenUrlCrossRef
52. 1. Sorenson, Olav,
    2. Jan W. Rivkin, and
    3. Lee Fleming

    . 2006. “Complexity, networks and knowledge flow.” Research Policy 35(7): 994–1017.

    OpenUrl
53. 1. Staudt, Joseph,
    2. Huifeng Yu,
    3. Robert P. Light,
    4. Katy Borner,
    5. Gerald Marschke, and
    6. Bruce A. Weinberg

    . 2018. “High-impact and transformative science (HITS) metrics: definition, exemplification, and comparison.” PLoS One 13(7): e0200597

    OpenUrl
54. 1. Stephan, Paula.

    2010. “The Economics of Science.” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Elsevier Vol. 1: 217–273.

    OpenUrl
55. 1. Torvik, Vetle I., and
    2. Neil R. Smalheiser

    . 2009. “Author name disambiguation in MEDLINE.” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 3(3): 11.

    OpenUrl
56. 1. Torvik, Vetle I.,
    2. Marc Weeber,
    3. Don R. Swanson, and
    4. Neil R. Smalheiser

    . 2005. “A Probablistic Similarity Metric for Medline Records: A Model for Author Name Disambiguation.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56(2): 140–158.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. 1. Trajtenberg, Manuel,
    2. Rebecca Henderson, and
    3. Adam Jaffe

    . 1997. “University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention.” Economics of Innovation and new technology 5(1): 19–50.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. 1. Verhaeghen, Paul, and
    2. Timothy A. Salthouse

    . 1997. “Meta-Analyses of Age-Cognition Relationships in Adulthood: Estimates of Linear and Nonlinear Age Effects and Structural Models.” Psychological Bulletin 122(3): 231–249.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
59. 1. Wang, Dashun,
    2. Chaoming Song, and
    3. Albert-Laslo Barabasi

    . 2013. “Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact.” Science 342(6154): 127–132.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
60. 1. Wang, Jian,
    2. Reinhilde Veugelers, and
    3. Paula Stephan

    . 2017. “Bias Against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators.” Research Policy 46(8): 1416–1436.

    OpenUrl
61. 1. Weinberg, Bruce and
    2. David Galenson

    . 2019. “Creative Careers: The Life Cycles of Nobel Laureates in Economics.” De Economist 167: 221–239.

    OpenUrl
62. 1. White, J. Chris,
    2. Margaret Rush, and
    3. Walter T. Schaffer

    . 2009. “Workforce Modeling for the National Institutes of Health (NIH).” Report. URL: https://report.nih.gov/sites/report/files/docs/Workforce%20Modeling.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2021.
63. 1. Wuchty, Stephan,
    2. Benjamin F. Jones, and
    3. Brian Uzzi

    . 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in the Production of Knowledge.” Science 316 (5827): 1036–1039.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
64. 1. Zucker, Lynne G.,
    2. Michael R. Darby, and
    3. Marilynn B. Brewer

    . 1998. “Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises.” The American Economic Review 88 (1): 290–306.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
65. 1. Zuckerman, Harriet A. and
    2. Robert K. Merton

    . 1973. “Age, Aging and Age Structure in Science.” The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by Norman Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.