Reducing Parent-School Information Gaps and Improving Education Outcomes: Evidence from High-Frequency Text Messages

References

1. 1. Andrabi, T.,
   2. Das, J. and
   3. Khwaja, A. I.

   (2017), ‘Report cards: The impact of providing school and child test scores on educational markets’, American Economic Review 107(6), 1535–63.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Angrist, N.,
   2. Bergman, P. and
   3. Matsheng, M.

   (2022), ‘School’s out: Experimental evidence on limiting learning loss using “low-tech” in a pandemic’, Nature Human Behaviour.
3. 1. Angrist, N.,
   2. Evans, D. K.,
   3. Filmer, D.,
   4. Glennerster, R.,
   5. Rogers, F. H. and
   6. Sabarwal, S.

   (2020), ‘How to improve education outcomes most efficiently? a comparison of 150 interventions using the new learning-adjusted years of schooling metric’.
4. 1. Avvisati, F.,
   2. Gurgand, M.,
   3. Guyon, N. and
   4. Maurin, E.

   (2014), ‘Getting parents involved: A field experiment in deprived schools’, Review of Economic Studies 81(1), 57–83.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. 1. Banerjee, A. V.,
   2. Banerji, R.,
   3. Duflo, E.,
   4. Glennerster, R. and
   5. Khemani, S.

   (2010), ‘Pitfalls of participatory programs: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in education in india’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2(1), 1–30.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Barrera-Osorio, F.,
   2. Gonzalez, K.,
   3. Lagos, F. and
   4. Deming, D. J.

   (2020), ‘Providing performance information in education: An experimental evaluation in Colombia’, Journal of Public Economics 186, 104185.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Bassi, M.,
   2. Busso, M. and
   3. Muñoz, J. S.

   (2015), ‘Enrollment, graduation, and dropout rates in Latin America: Is the glass half empty or half full?’, Economía pp. 113–156.
8. 1. Bennett, M. and
   2. Bergman, P.

   (2021), ‘Better together? social networks in truancy and the targeting of treatment’, Journal of Labor Economics 39(1), 1–36.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Bergman, P.

   (2021), ‘Parent-child information frictions and human capital investment: Evidence from a field experiment’, Journal of Political Economy 129(1).
10. 1. Bergman, P. and
    2. Chan, E. W.

    (2021), ‘Leveraging parents through low-cost technology: The impact of high-frequency information on student achievement’, Journal of Human Resources pp. 1118–9837R1.
11. 1. Bergman, P.,
    2. Lasky-Fink, J. and
    3. Rogers, T.

    (2020), ‘Simplification and defaults affect adoption and impact of technology, but decision makers do not realize it’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 158, 66–79.

    OpenUrl
12. 1. Bettinger, E.,
    2. Cunha, N.,
    3. Lichand, G. and
    4. Madeira, R.

    (2021), ‘Are the effects of informational interventions driven by salience?’, University of Zurich, Department of Economics, Working Paper 350.
13. 1. Bursztyn, L. and
    2. Coffman, L. C.

    (2012), ‘The schooling decision: Family preferences, intergenerational conflict, and moral hazard in the Brazilian favelas’, Journal of Political Economy 120(3), 359–397.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. 1. Busso et al.

    (2017a), Learning Better: Public policy for skills development, Inter-American Development Bank. Editors: M. Busso, J. Cristia, D. Hincapie, J. Messina, and L. Ripani.
15. 1. Busso, M.,
    2. Dinkelman, T.,
    3. Martínez, C. and
    4. Romero, D.

    (2017b), ‘The effects of financial aid and returns information in selective and less selective schools: Experimental evidence from chile’, Labour Economics 45.
16. 1. Castleman, B. L. and
    2. Page, L. C.

    (2015), ‘Summer nudging: Can personalized text messages and peer mentor outreach increase college going among low-income high school graduates?’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 115, 144–160.

    OpenUrl
17. 1. Cattaneo, M. D.,
    2. Jansson, M. and
    3. Ma, X.

    (2018), ‘Manipulation testing based on density discontinuity’, The Stata Journal 18(1), 234–261.

    OpenUrl
18. 1. De Walque, D. and
    2. Valente, C.

    (2018), Incentivizing school attendance in the presence of parent-child information frictions, The World Bank.
19. 1. Dinkelman, T. and Martínez
    2. A, C.

    (2014), ‘Investing in schooling in Chile: The role of information about financial aid for higher education’, Review of Economics and Statistics 96(2), 244–257.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Dizon-Ross, R.

    (2019), ‘Parents’ beliefs about their children’s academic ability: Implications for educational investments’, American Economic Review 109(8), 2728–65.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Escueta, M.,
    2. Nickow, A. J.,
    3. Oreopoulos, P. and
    4. Quan, V.

    (2020), ‘Upgrading education with technology: Insights from experimental research’, Journal of Economic Literature 58(4), 897–996.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Gallego, F. A.,
    2. Malamud, O. and
    3. Pop-Eleches, C.

    (2020), ‘Parental monitoring and children’s internet use: The role of information, control, and cues’, Journal of Public Economics 188, 104208.

    OpenUrl
23. JPAL (2020), “Improving learning outcomes through providing information to students and parents”, J-PAL Policy Insights, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (JPAL).
24. 1. Kraft, M. A. and
    2. Dougherty, S. M.

    (2013), ‘The effect of teacher–family communication on student engagement: Evidence from a randomized field experiment’, Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 6(3), 199–222.

    OpenUrl
25. 1. Kraft, M. A. and
    2. Rogers, T.

    (2015), ‘The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment’, Economics of Education Review 47, 49–63.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Lim, M.,
    2. Tormshak, E. A. S. and
    3. Dishion, T. J.

    (2005), ‘A one-session intervention for parents of young adolescents: Videotape modeling and motivational group discussion’, Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 13(4), 194–199.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. 1. Manacorda, M.

    (2012), ‘The cost of grade retention’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 94(2), 596–606.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 1. McEwan, P. J.

    (2015), ‘Improving learning in primary schools of developing countries: A meta-analysis of randomized experiments’, Review of Educational Research 85(3), 353–394.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Mizala, A.,
    2. Romaguera, P. and
    3. Urquiola, M.

    (2007), ‘Socioeconomic status or noise? trade-offs in the generation of school quality information’, Journal of development economics 84(1), 61–75.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 1. Muralidharan, K. and
    2. Sundararaman, V.

    (2010), ‘The impact of diagnostic feedback to teachers on student learning: Experimental evidence from india’, The Economic Journal 120(546), F187–F203.

    OpenUrl
31. OECD (2022), ‘Secondary graduation rates (indicators)’. Accessed: 2022-06-06.
32. 1. Rogers, T. and
    2. Feller, A.

    (2018), ‘Reducing student absences at scale by targeting parents’ misbeliefs’, Nature Human Behaviour 2(5), 335–342.

    OpenUrl
33. 1. Tincani, M. M.

    (2018), Heterogeneous peer effects in the classroom, Technical report, Working Paper.
34. 1. Wedenoja, L.

    (2017), ‘The dynamics of high school dropout’, unpublished.
35. 1. York, B. N.,
    2. Loeb, S. and
    3. Doss, C.

    (2019), ‘One step at a time: The effects of an early literacy text-messaging program for parents of preschoolers’, Journal of Human Resources 54(3), 537–566.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text