The Lock-in Effects of Information on Part-time Unemployment Benefits

References

1. 1. Alberto Abadie,
   2. Matthew M Chingos, and
   3. Martin R West

   . Endogenous stratification in randomized experiments. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(4):567–580, 2018.

   OpenUrl
2. 1. Jaap H. Abbring and
   2. Gerard J. Van Den Berg

   . The nonparametric identification of treatment effects in duration models. Econometrica, 71(5):1491–1517, 2003.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. 1. Johannes Abeler and
   2. Simon Jäger

   . Complex tax incentives. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(3):1–28, 2015.

   OpenUrl
4. 1. Laila Ait Bihi Ouali,
   2. Olivier Bargain, and
   3. Xavier Joutard

   . Partial unemployment insurance and hour decisions: Evidence from administrative data. Technical report, Aix Marseille University, 2020.
5. 1. Steffen Altmann,
   2. Armin Falk,
   3. Simon Jäger, and
   4. Florian Zimmermann

   . Learning about job search: A field experiment with job seekers in germany. Journal of Public Economics, 164: 33 – 49, 2018. ISSN 0047-2727.

   OpenUrl
6. 1. Steffen Altmann,
   2. Sofie Cairo,
   3. Robert Mahlstedt, and
   4. Alexander Sebald

   . Do Job Seekers Understand the UI Benefit System (and Does It Matter)? Working Papers, University of Copenhagen, 2021.
7. 1. Stéphane Auray and
   2. Nicolas Lepage-Saucier

   . Stepping-stone effect of atypical jobs: Could the least employable reap the most benefits? Labour Economics, 68:101945, 2021.

   OpenUrl
8. 1. Michèle Belot,
   2. Philipp Kircher, and
   3. Paul Muller

   . Providing Advice to Jobseekers at Low Cost: An Experimental Study on Online Advice. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(4): 1411–1447, 10 2018.

   OpenUrl
9. 1. Saurabh Bhargava and
   2. Dayanand Manoli

   . Psychological frictions and the incomplete takeup of social benefits: Evidence from an irs field experiment. American Economic Review, 105(11):3489–3529, November 2015.

   OpenUrl
10. 1. Rebecca M. Blank and
    2. David E. Card

    . Recent trends in insured and uninsured unemployment: Is there an explanation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4):1157–1189, 1991.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. 1. Kay Blaufus,
    2. Malte Chirvi,
    3. Hans-Peter Huber,
    4. Ralf Maiterth, and
    5. Caren Sureth-Sloane

    . Tax misperception and its effects on decision making – literature review and behavioral taxpayer response model. European Accounting Review, pages 1–34, 2020.
12. 1. Erik Bloom,
    2. Indu Bhushan,
    3. David Clingingsmith,
    4. Rathavuth Hong,
    5. Elizabeth King,
    6. Michael Kremer,
    7. Benjamin Loevinsohn, and
    8. J Brad Schwartz

    . Contracting for health: evidence from cambodia. Brookings Institution, 2006.
13. 1. Tito Boeri and
    2. Pierre Cahuc

    . Labor market insurance policies in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Economics, 15(1):forthcoming, 2023.
14. 1. René Böheim and
    2. Andrea Weber

    . The effects of marginal employment on subsequent labour market outcomes. German Economic Review, 12(2):381–408, 2011.

    OpenUrl
15. 1. Marco Caliendo,
    2. Steffen Künn, and
    3. Arne Uhlendorff

    . Earnings exemptions for unemployed workers: The relationship between marginal employment, unemployment duration and job quality. Labour Economics, 42:177–193, 2016.

    OpenUrl
16. 1. Victor Chernozhukov,
    2. Mert Demirer,
    3. Esther Duflo, and
    4. Iván Fernández-Val

    . Generic machine learning inference on heterogenous treatment effects in randomized experiments. Working Paper 24678, National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2018.
17. 1. Raj Chetty and
    2. Emmanuel Saez

    . Teaching the tax code: Earnings responses to an experiment with eitc recipients. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(1):1–31, January 2013.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 1. Bart Cockx,
    2. Christian Goebel, and
    3. Stéphane Robin

    . Can income support for part-time workers serve as a stepping-stone to regular jobs? an application to young long-term unemployed women. Empirical economics, 44(1):189–229, 2013.

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Bruno Crépon,
    2. Esther Duflo,
    3. Marc Gurgand,
    4. Roland Rathelot, and
    5. Philippe Zamora

    . Do Labor Market Policies have Displacement Effects? Evidence from a Clustered Randomized Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(2):531–580, 2013.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. 1. Bruno Crépon,
    2. Marc Ferracci,
    3. Gregory Jolivet, and
    4. Gerard J. van den Berg

    . Information shocks and the empirical evaluation of training programs during unemployment spells. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 33(4):594–616, 2018.

    OpenUrl
21. 1. Janet Marion Currie

    . The take-up of social benefits, pages 80–148. Russell Sage Foundation, 12 2006.
22. 1. Matthew Darling,
    2. Christopher O’Leary,
    3. Irma Perez-Johnson,
    4. Jaclyn Lefkowitz,
    5. Ken Kline,
    6. Ben Damerow, and
    7. Randall Eberts

    . Encouragement emails increase participation in reemployment services. DOL Behavioral Interventions Project Brief, 42:1–5, April 2016.

    OpenUrl
23. 1. Mathias Dolls,
    2. Philipp Doerrenberg,
    3. Andreas Peichl, and
    4. Holger Stichnoth

    . Reprint of: Do retirement savings increase in response to information about retirement and expected pensions? Journal of Public Economics, 171:105–116, 2019.

    OpenUrl
24. 1. Susanne. Ek Spector

    . Should unemployment insurance cover partial unemployment? IZA World of Labor, (199), October 2015.
25. 1. Per Engström,
    2. Eskil Forsell,
    3. Johannes Hagen, and
    4. Arnaldur Stefánsson

    . Increasing the takeup of the housing allowance among swedish pensioners: a field experiment. International Tax and Public Finance, 26(6):1353–1382, 2015.

    OpenUrl
26. 1. Rainer Eppel and
    2. Helmut Mahringer

    . Getting a lot out of a little bit of work? the effects of marginal employment during unemployment. Empirica, 46:381–408, 2019.

    OpenUrl
27. 1. Henry S. Farber,
    2. Dan Silverman, and
    3. Till M. von Wachter

    . Factors determining callbacks to job applications by the unemployed: An audit study. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(3):168–201, 2017.

    OpenUrl
28. 1. Amy Finkelstein and
    2. Matthew J Notowidigdo

    . Take-up and targeting: Experimental evidence from snap. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(3):1505–1556, August 2019.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. 1. Ronald Aylmer Fisher

    . Design of experiments. Br Med J, 1(3923):554–554, 1936.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
30. 1. François Fontaine and
    2. Andreas Ketteman

    . Quasi-experimental evidence on take-up and the value of unemployment insurance. Manuscript, Paris School of Economics, July 2019.
31. 1. Florent Fremigacci and
    2. Antoine Terracol

    . Subsidized temporary jobs: lock-in and stepping stone effects. Applied economics, 45(33):4719–4732, 2013.

    OpenUrl
32. 1. Thomas Fujiwara and
    2. Leonard Wantchekon

    . Can informed public deliberation overcome clientelism? experimental evidence from benin. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4):241–55, 2013.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. 1. Xavier Gabaix

    . Inattention. In Douglas Bernheim, Stefano DellaVigna, and David Laibson, editors, Handbook of Behavioral Economics, volume 2, chapter 4, pages 261–343. Elsevier, 2019.

    OpenUrl
34. 1. Pieter Gautier,
    2. Paul Muller,
    3. Bas van der Klaauw,
    4. Michael Rosholm, and
    5. Michael Svarer

    . Estimating equilibrium effects of job search assistance. Journal of Labor Economics, 36 (4):1073–1125, 2018.

    OpenUrl
35. 1. Michael Gerfin,
    2. Michael Lechner, and
    3. Heidi Steiger

    . Does subsidised temporary employment get the unemployed back to work? aneconometric analysis of two different schemes. Labour economics, 12(6):807–835, 2005.

    OpenUrl
36. 1. Anna Godøy and
    2. Knut Røed

    . Unemployment insurance and underemployment. Labour, 30 (2):158–179, 2016.

    OpenUrl
37. 1. Jens Hainmueller

    . Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political analysis, 20(1):25–46, 2012.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
38. 1. Nahomi Ichino and
    2. Matthias Schündeln

    . Deterring or displacing electoral irregularities? spillover effects of observers in a randomized field experiment in ghana. The Journal of Politics, 74(1):292–307, 2012.

    OpenUrl
39. 1. Sabina Issehnane,
    2. Fabrice Gilles,
    3. Léonard Moulin,
    4. Leila Oumeddour, and
    5. Florent Sari

    . Le recours à l’activité réduite: déterminants et trajectoires des demandeurs d’emploi. 2016.
40. 1. Laura Khoury

    . Unemployment Benefits and the Timing of Redundancies. PSE Working Papers n°2019-14, 2021.
41. 1. Andreas R Kostøl and
    2. Andreas S Myhre

    . Labor supply responses to learning the tax and benefit schedule. American Economic Review, 111(11):3733–66, 2021.

    OpenUrl
42. 1. Tomi Kyyrä

    . Partial unemployment insurance benefits and the transition rate to regular work. European economic review, 54(7):911–930, 2010.

    OpenUrl
43. 1. Tomi Kyyrä,
    2. Pierpaolo Parrotta, and
    3. Michael Rosholm

    . The effect of receiving supplementary ui benefits on unemployment duration. Labour Economics, 21:122–133, 2013.

    OpenUrl
44. 1. Thomas Le Barbanchon

    . Taxes today, benefits tomorrow. Working Paper, 2020.
45. 1. Thomas Le Barbanchon and
    2. Pauline Gonthier

    . Activité réduite: les allocataires sont-ils sensibles aux effets de seuil? Etudes et Recherches, (8), 2016.
46. 1. David S Lee,
    2. Pauline Leung,
    3. Christopher J O’Leary,
    4. Zhuan Pei, and
    5. Simon Quach

    . Are sufficient statistics necessary? nonparametric measurement of deadweight loss from unemployment insurance. Working Paper 25574, National Bureau of Economic Research, February 2019.
47. 1. Ioana Marinescu and
    2. Daphné Skandalis

    . Unemployment insurance and job search behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(2):887–931, May 2021. ISSN 0033-5533. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjaa037.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
48. 1. Brian P. McCall

    . Unemployment insurance rules, joblessness, and part-time work. Econometrica, 64(3):647–682, 1996.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
49. 1. Leonardo Melosi

    . Signalling Effects of Monetary Policy. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(2):853–884, 2016.

    OpenUrl
50. 1. Giuseppe Moscarini

    . Excess Worker Reallocation. The Review of Economic Studies, 68 (3):593–612, 07 2001. ISSN 0034-6527. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00182. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00182.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. 1. Emi Nakamura and
    2. Jón Steinsson

    . High-Frequency Identification of Monetary Non-Neutrality: The Information Effect. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(3):1283–1330, 2018.

    OpenUrl
52. 1. Christopher O’Leary

    . An evaluation of the washington state unemployment insurance earnings deduction experiment. Technical report, Washington State Employment Security Department, 1997.
53. Unédic. Enquête auprès des allocataires de l’assurance chômage en activité réduite [link]. Unédic, 2012.
54. 1. Gerard J. van den Berg and
    2. Bas van der Klaauw

    . Counseling and monitoring of unemployed workers: Theory and evidence from a controlled social experiment. International Economic Review, 47(3):895–936, 2006.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. 1. Jan C Van Ours

    . The locking-in effect of subsidized jobs. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(1):37–55, 2004.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. 1. Alwyn Young

    . Channeling fisher: Randomization tests and the statistical insignificance of seemingly significant experimental results. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2): 557–598, 2019.

    OpenUrl